Biomedical subjects

H Hoijtink

Publications and source records attributed to H Hoijtink.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Examining the psychometric characteristics of the Dutch childhood health assessment questionnaire: room for improvement?

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric characteristics of the childhood health assessment questionnaire-disability index (CHAQ-DI). Seventy-six patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), age range 4.8-15.8 years, completed a CHAQ questionnaire one or more times. In total, 321 CHAQ questionnaires were available for analysis. Factor analysis and correlation were used to analyse the data. The analysis indicated that 12 items could be removed from the original 30 items of the CHAQ-DI. Also the addition of "aids and assistance" to the overall scoring method of the CHAQ-DI did not contribute to the overall measuring concept of the CHAQ-DI. The psychometric characteristics of the CHAQ-DI could be improved by removing 12 items from the original 30 items. Moreover, a simple scoring method, without the addition of aids and assistance to the total CHAQ-DI improves sensitivity to change of the CHAQ-DI.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

[Construction of a scale to signal personality disorders in the elderly].

Till now, no specific diagnostic instruments to detect personality disorders in the elderly are available. The aim of our study was to contribute to the construction of a reliable en valid instrument for the detection of personality disorders in older adults. Therefore, a draft version of the instrument was constructed both for the patient and the informant. Both the patient and the informant version of the instrument included 52 items with the same content. These items concerned Habitual behaviour (HAB), Biographical information (BIO) and Observation of actual behaviour (OBS). 159 clients of 60 years and older of a Dutch ambulatory mental health care organisation were assessed with the screening instrument. In 96 of the 159 outpatients one or more informants were included. The results indicate that the internal consistency of seven HAB items, nine BIO items and five OBS items was moderate to good with regard to both the patient and informant instrument. Test-retest reliability of the 21 items of the patient instrument was moderate with regard to HAB, excellent with regard to BIO and moderate with regard to OBS. Interrater reliability of OBS was also moderate. The criterion validity (criterion: DSM-IV TR Axis II classification) of HAB, BIO and OBS based on the 21 items of the patient instrument was fair and with regard to the same 21 items of the informant instrument insufficient. In conclusion, sixteen out of 52 potential items of the patient's draft version of the screening instrument can be used to detect a possible personality disorder. These sixteen items from the HAB and BIO scale are named the Gerontological Personality disorder Scale (GPS). Medical doctors, psychologists and nurses working in ambulatory mental health organisation can use the GPS as a resource during the diagnostic process. Whether the GPS can be used beyond mental health organisations, for example by general practitioners is a subject for future studies.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Cultural differences in functional status measurement: analyses of person fit according to the Rasch model.

For many reasons it is preferable to use established health related outcome instruments. The validity of an instrument, however, can be affected when used in another culture or language other than what it was originally developed. In this paper, the outcome on functional status measurement using a preliminary version of the Dutch translated 'Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory' (PEDI) was studied involving a sample of 20 non-disabled Dutch children and American peers, to see if a cross-cultural validation procedure is needed before using the instrument in the Netherlands. The Rasch model was used to analyse the Dutch data. Score profiles were not found to be compatible with the score profiles of American children. In particular, ten items were scored differently with strong indications that these were based on inter-cultural differences. Based on our study, it is argued that cross-cultural validation of the PEDI is necessary before using the instrument in the Netherlands.

Child↗

PubMed2000

The multidimensionality of self-report schizotypy in a psychiatric population: an analysis using multidimensional Rasch models.

There is increasing empirical evidence from factor analytical studies that schizotypy is composed of three dimensions. All studies into the multidimensionality of schizotypy used common factor analysis of scales, either exploratory or confirmatory. We argue that for research into the multidimensionality of schizotypy with dichotomous item responses on questionnaires (as with the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire [SPQ], Raine 1991) much can be learned using generalized multidimensional Rasch models (GMRMs). GMRMs require a priori postulated models of schizotypy, which can be tested in confirmatory analyses. We hypothesized four competing models of schizotypy, based on the literature and clinical impressions-two two-dimensional models and two three-dimensional models. We also hypothesized that items differ in the degree they are indicative of a particular dimension of schizotypy. The sample was 418 psychiatric inpatients and outpatients, with moderate levels of psychopathology, who filled in the SPQ. Both three-dimensional models yielded a much better fit to the data than both two-dimensional models. Our revised three-dimensional model, a revision of that by Raine et al. (1994) and Gruzelier (1996), yielded the best fit. It consisted of positive schizotypy, disorganization, and negative schizotypy. The results strongly suggest that schizotypy, as measured with the SPQ, is a three-dimensional construct.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Intraindividual variability in infant behavior.

Longitudinal observational data of infant crying, fretting/fussing, and smiling and the time spent in physical contact with the mother were used in a study on behavioral variability. The infants were followed weekly for a 15-month period. Evidence was found of an important intraindividual variability in the studied behaviors, specifically between the ages of 0 and 5 months, 5 and 10 months, but not between 10 and 15 months. Results are discussed and analyzed in the light of earlier literature. The possible functions and the factors underlying variability in development as well as its methodological implications are discussed.

Crying↗

PubMed1996

Psychometric analysis of an advance directive.

OBJECTIVES: Reliability and validity are as necessary for predrafted advance directive forms as they are for all clinical assessment instruments. Performance of predrafted advance directive forms with both lay persons and clinicians is relevant. Evidence relating to test- retest reliability, content validity, and criterion-related validity of one form, the Medical Directive, has been documented for outpatients. The authors investigated construct validity and external validity among outpatients, physicians, and the general public. METHODS: Four hundred ninety-five outpatients, 513 physicians, and 102 members of the general public were surveyed with the Medical Directive. Preference for 11 specific treatments in four to six illness scenarios were recorded. Mokken modeling of responses was used to produce a psychometric scale of receptiveness-to-treatment and desirability of treatments. The Kuder Richardson-20 statistic, Friedman's procedure for analysis of variance, and the Kruskall-Wallis test were used, respectively, to measure inter-item reliability, the relation with scenarios, and the relation between physicians' general goals for care and their scaled preferences. RESULTS: All model diagnostic tests indicated a close-fitting scale for all three respondent groups. Kuder Richardson-20 for outpatients (.98), physicians (.97), and the public (.93) demonstrated high inter-item reliability. Treatment desirabilities were related to invasiveness. Receptiveness-to-treatment was related to prognoses and disabilities of described illness scenarios among each group and to physicians' goals for care. CONCLUSIONS: The Medical Directive has construct validity in relations among specific treatment preferences and between treatment preferences, illness scenarios, and goals for care. External validity is supported by study of separate outpatient, physician, and general public populations. The treatment items constitute a highly reliable scale that can be used in further empirical research regarding life-sustaining treatment.

Adult↗