PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Holdaas

Publications and source records attributed to H Holdaas.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The impact of early-diagnosed new-onset post-transplantation diabetes mellitus on survival and major cardiac events.

The impact of early-diagnosed new-onset post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) on cardiovascular (CV) disease is not well described. The objectives of the present prospective single-center observational study were to assess the long-term effects of early-diagnosed new-onset PTDM on major cardiac events (MCE; cardiac death or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction) and patient survival. Diabetic status and CV risk factors were assessed in 201 consecutive renal allograft recipients 3 months after transplantation (baseline) during a period of 16 months (1995-96). Follow-up data until January 1, 2004 were obtained from the Norwegian Renal Registry. The 8-year (range 7-9 years) cumulative incidence of MCEs was 7% (nine out of 138) in recipients without diabetes, 20% (seven out of 35) in patients with new-onset PTDM and 21% (six out of 28) in patients with diabetes mellitus before transplantation (DM). Proportional hazards regression analyses (forward stepwise regression) revealed that patients with PTDM had an approximately three-fold increased risk of MCEs as compared with nondiabetic patients (hazard ratio (HR)=3.27, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.22-8.80, P=0.019). A total of 61 patients (30%) died. Eight-year patient survival was 80% in the nondiabetic group, 63% in the PTDM group and 29% in the DM group, respectively. Pretransplant diabetes (HR=5.09, 95% CI=2.60-9.96, P<0.001), age (HR=1.03, 95% CI=1.01-1.05, P=0.016), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (HR=2.66, 95% CI=1.27-5.53, P=0.009), and creatinine clearance (HR=0.98, 95% CI=0.96-1.00, P=0.046), but not PTDM (HR=1.20, 95% CI=0.58-2.49, P=0.621), were independent predictors of death in the multiple Cox regression model. Early-diagnosed PTDM is a predictor of MCEs, but not of all-cause mortality, the first 8 years after renal transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvastatin XL and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and extended-release fluvastatin (fluvastatin XL), 80 mg for 7 days, in stable renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label study. 17 renal transplant recipients received their standard cyclosporine therapy (Days 1 - 9) plus a once-daily single oral dose of fluvastatin XL, 80 mg (Days 2 - 8). Blood samples were collected and cyclosporine (whole blood) and fluvastatin (plasma) concentrations determined by radioimmunoassay and HPLC fluorescence detection, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartment analysis and fluvastatin results were compared with historical controls. RESULTS: Treatment with fluvastatin XL, 80 mg for 7 days, had no significant effect on either the AUC0-12 (3,644 ng x h/ml in the absence of fluvastatin vs. 3,534 ng x h/ml in the presence of fluvastatin) or the Cmax of cyclosporine (983 ng/ml in the absence of fluvastatin vs. 945 ng/ml in the presence of fluvastatin). Co-administration of fluvastatin XL also had no effect on the tmax, t1/2 or apparent clearance (CL/F) of cyclosporine in renal transplant patients. The AUC and Cmax for fluvastatin XL in the presence of cyclosporine (AUC0-24 1,192 ng. x h/ml, Cmax 271 ng/ml) were approximately 2-fold higher compared with historical data for fluvastatin XL alone in healthy volunteers (AUC0-24 630 ng x h/ml, Cmax 102 ng/ml) but lower than the historical data for fluvastatin IR, 40 mg b.i.d. alone in healthy volunteers (AUC0-24 1,340 ng x h/ml, Cmax 443 ng/ml). Tmax, t1/2 and trough levels of fluvastatin in the presence of cyclosporine were also similar to the historical controls. Concomitant administration of cyclosporine and fluvastatin XL was well tolerated by renal transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin XL, 80 mg, and cyclosporine do not show clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Renal dysfunction is a strong and independent risk factor for mortality and cardiovascular complications in renal transplantation.

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have shortened life expectancy, primarily due to premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). Traditional CVD risk factors are highly prevalent. In addition, several non-traditional risk factors may contribute to the high risk. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of renal dysfunction on mortality and cardiovascular complications in 1052 placebo-treated patients of the Assessment of LEscol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) trial. Follow-up was 5-6 years and endpoints included cardiac death, non-cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The effects of serum creatinine at baseline on these endpoints were evaluated. Elevated serum creatinine in RTR was a strong and independent risk factor for MACE, cardiac, non-cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality, but not for stroke or non-fatal MI alone. Serum creatinine was associated with increased mortality and MACE, independent of established CVD risk factors. Graft loss resulted in increased incidences of non-cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, MACE and non-fatal MI. In conclusion, elevated serum creatinine is a strong risk factor for all-cause, non-cardiovascular and cardiac mortality, and MACE, independent of traditional risk factors, but not for stroke or non-fatal MI alone.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2005

Combined therapy with atorvastatin and calcineurin inhibitors: no interactions with tacrolimus.

Increased systemic exposure to statins and consequent risk for complications has been reported in patients concomitantly treated with cyclosporin A (CsA). This has been ascribed to inhibition of drug catabolism by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or drug transport by P-glycoprotein (PGP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1B1). It is not known whether the combination of statins and tacrolimus (Tac) also suffers from this drawback. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic study of atorvastatin and its metabolites was performed in 13 healthy volunteers after 4 days' treatment, and after short (12 h) concomitant exposure to CsA and Tac. A complementary assessment of overall CYP, and hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4+PGP activity was performed after each treatment episode and compared to baseline (no drugs). Systemic exposure to atorvastatin acid and its metabolites was significantly increased when administered with CsA. In contrast, intake of Tac did not have any impact on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics. Concomitantly, a profound decrease of hepatic and intestinal PGP and an increase of intestinal CYP3A4 were noted with CsA, whereas no effect was seen after atorvastatin therapy with or without Tac. Based on these findings treatment with Tac appears a safer option for patients needing a combination of statins and calcineurin inhibitors.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2005

Long-term cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients receiving fluvastatin: the ALERT extension study.

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have an increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The ALERT study is the first trial to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on cardiac outcomes following renal transplantation. Patients initially randomized to fluvastatin or placebo in the 5-6 year ALERT study were offered open-label fluvastatin XL 80 mg/day in a 2-year extension to the original study. The primary endpoint was time to first major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Of 1787 patients who completed ALERT, 1652 (92%) were followed in the extension. Mean total follow-up was 6.7 years. Mean LDL-cholesterol was 98 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) at last follow-up compared to a pre-study level of 159 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L). Patients randomized to fluvastatin had a reduced risk of MACE (hazards ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.036), and a 29% reduction in cardiac death or definite non-fatal MI (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.93, p = 0.014). Total mortality and graft loss did not differ significantly between groups. Fluvastatin produces a safe and effective reduction in LDL-cholesterol associated with reduced risk of MACE in RTR. The lipid-lowering and cardiovascular benefits of fluvastatin are comparable to those of statins in other patient groups, and support use of fluvastatin in RTR.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Acute renal allograft rejections, a role for statins?

Acute rejection of kidney allografts during the first months following transplantation is one of the most important risk factor for long-term graft failure. Some small open studies have indicated that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-Co-A), statins, might act as immunosuppressive agents, and reduce acute rejection rates. Moreover, the use of statin in transplant recipients is quite common, despite no data from prospective large multi-centre studies are available to demonstrate any beneficial effect for acute rejections or long-term cardiovascular protection in this population. In this overview, recent clinical and experimental data will be provided for assessing statins as immunosuppressive agents. Although in vitro studies have provided a theoretical basis for the use of statins as immunosuppressive agents, more recent clinical placebo controlled studies have failed to confirm the initial optimism of this effect of statins.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Sustained improvement of renal graft function for two years in hypertensive renal transplant recipients treated with nifedipine as compared to lisinopril.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of posttransplant hypertension is still a matter of debate. Calcium antagonists may ameliorate renal side effects of cyclosporin. Angiotensin converting enzyme- (ACE) inhibitors may be more effective in sustaining renal function in native chronic renal disease. We prospectively compared the effect of controlled release nifedipine and lisinopril on long-term renal function in hypertensive kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporin. METHODS: A total of 154 renal transplant patients presenting with hypertension (diastolic blood pressure >or=95 mmHg) during the first 3 weeks after transplantation were randomised to receive double-blind nifedipine 30 mg or lisinopril 10 mg once daily. A total of 123 patients completed 1 year of treatment (69 nifedipine, 54 lisinopril) and 64 patients completed 2 years of double-blind treatment (39 nifedipine, 25 lisinopril). Baseline glomerular filtration rate was measured as 99 mTc-diethylene-triaminepentaacetate clearance in a stable phase 2 to 5 weeks after inclusion and repeated at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Baseline glomerular filtration rates were similar (46+/-16 ml/min with nifedipine, 43+/-14 ml/min with lisinopril). The changes in glomerular filtration rates from baseline were statistically significant between the groups after 1 year (9.6 ml/min mean treatment difference (95% confidence interval [CI]s 5.5-13.7 ml/min, P=0.0001) and remained statistically significant also after 2 years (10.3 ml/min mean difference (95% CIs 4.0-16.6], P=0.0017). After 1 year glomerular filtration rates averaged 56+/-19 ml/min in the nifedipine group and 44+/-14 ml/min in the lisinopril group. CONCLUSIONS: Both nifedipine and lisinopril were safe and effective in treatment of hypertension in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporin. Patients receiving nifedipine but not lisinopril improved kidney transplant function over a period of 2 years.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Reduction of left ventricular mass by lisinopril and nifedipine in hypertensive renal transplant recipients: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the dominant cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a known risk factor. After renal transplantation, persistent hypertension is an important determinant for the further evolution of LVH. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) (controlled release nifedipine) in treatment of posttransplant hypertension focusing on changes in LVH. METHODS: One hundred fifty-four renal transplant recipients presenting with hypertension (diastolic BP> or =95 mmHg) during the first 3 weeks after transplantation were randomized to receive double-blind 30 mg nifedipine or 10 mg lisinopril once daily. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients completed 1 year of treatment. Good quality echocardiographic data were available in 116 recipients (62 nifedipine/54 lisinopril) 2 and 12 months posttransplant. Blood pressure was equally well controlled in the two groups throughout the study (mean systolic/diastolic+/-SD after 1 year: 140+/-16/87+/-8 mmHg with nifedipine and 136+/-17/85+/-8 mmHg with lisinopril). Left ventricular mass index was reduced by 15% (P<0.001) in both groups (from 153+/-43 to 131+/-38 g/m2 with nifedipine and from 142+/-35 to 121+/-34 g/m2 with lisinopril). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups at baseline or at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive renal transplant recipients with well-controlled blood pressure, there is a regression of left ventricular mass after renal transplantation. The regression of left ventricular mass index is observed to a similar extent in patients treated with lisinopril or nifedipine.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The use of pretransplant erythropoietin to normalize hemoglobin levels has no deleterious effects on renal transplantation outcome.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish the outcome of renal transplantation in patients given pretransplant erythropoietin (EPO) treatment targeted at reaching a normal hemoglobin concentration (Hb), compared to those given EPO-treatment aimed at maintaining subnormal Hb. METHODS: A total of 416 patients from Scandinavian countries and with renal anaemia were enrolled to examine the effects of increasing Hb from a subnormal level (90-120 g/liter) to a normal level (135-160 g/liter) by EPO treatment. Half of the patients were randomized to have their Hb increased, with the other half randomized to maintain a subnormal Hb. Thirty-two patients from the normal Hb group and 24 patients from the subnormal group received a renal graft during the study period. The outcomes of these transplantations were examined prospectively for 6 months. RESULTS: Preoperative Hb levels were 143+/-17 and 121+/-14 g/liter in the two groups, respectively (P<0.0001). The Hb remained higher in the normal Hb group during the first 2 weeks after transplantation. The percentage of patients requiring postoperative blood transfusions in the normal Hb group was 16%, compared with 50% in the subnormal group (P<0.01). No statistically significant difference in the proportion of functioning grafts or in the serum creatinine levels could be detected. No correlation between EPO treatment and creatinine levels after transplantation was found. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EPO treatment aimed at reaching a normal Hb in renal transplant recipients reduces the postoperative requirement for blood transfusions and has no deleterious effects on kidney graft function.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy of nifedipine or lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation: a double-blind randomised comparative trial.

Calcium channel blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors are commonly used in the treatment of hypertensive renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the response rate to treatment differs with these drugs in this setting. A single centre, prospective, randomised, double-blinded, comparative study to address the efficacy of controlled release nifedipine or lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension (diastolic blood pressure > or =95 mmHg) in cyclosporin (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients was performed. Recipients were randomised to receive either lisinopril (10 mg once daily) or controlled release nifedipine (30 mg once daily). The dose was doubled on indication. The number of responders (diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg on monotherapy) were addressed during the early post-transplant phase (first 3 months) and during a late post-transplant phase (from 3 to 12 months after renal transplantation) in the same patient population. One hundred and fifty-four patients (nifedipine=78, lisinopril=76) with untreated hypertension (diastolic blood pressure> or =95 mmHg) were randomised within 3 wk after renal transplantation. One hundred and twenty-three patients (nifedipine=69, lisinopril=54) completed the study. Fourteen (20%) nifedipine-treated recipients responded during the early, and 26 (38%) during the late post-operative phase (months 4-12 after renal transplantation). Eleven (20%) lisinopril-treated recipients responded during the early, and 18 (33%) during the late post-transplant phase. Non-responders were, on average, 8.5+/-1.5 kg heavier both in the early phase and after 1 yr of treatment (p<0.01), and 6.1+/-0.9 yr older than responders (p<0.05). In conclusion, these results indicate that both controlled release nifedipine and lisinopril are equally efficient in the treatment of post-transplant hypertension. As monotherapy, both drugs show a "response rate" of 20-38%, depending on time interval after transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine A and atorvastatin in renal transplant recipients.

Atorvastatin is increasingly used as a cholesterol-lowering agent in solid organ transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine A (CsA). However, the potential bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and CsA in renal transplant recipients has not previously been examined. Baseline 12-h CsA pharmacokinetic investigation was performed in 21 renal transplant recipients and repeated after 4 weeks of atorvastatin treatment (10 mg/ d). At week 4, 24-h pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin was also performed. All patients received basiliximab induction followed by CsA and prednisolone immunosuppression. Compared with historic controls, CsA-treated patients showed, on average, sixfold higher plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity after 4 weeks of atorvastatin treatment (p < 0.05). Atorvastatin had a moderate effect on the pharmacokinetics of CsA and reduced the AUC0-12 (area under curve, 0-12h) by 9.5 +/- 18% (p = 0.013) and Cmax (maximal concentration) by 13.5 +/- 24% (p =0.009), while C12 (trough level) was unchanged (p =0.42). Total and LDL cholesterol decreased by 26.8 +/- 8.4% (p < 0.0001) and 41.5 +/- 11.0% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and CsA resulted in sixfold higher plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity, but only a moderate decrease in systemic exposure of CsA.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Effect of fluvastatin on acute renal allograft rejection: a randomized multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Statin therapy has been reported to reduce the acute rejection rate following renal transplantation in a pilot study. The present study is the first randomized, double-blind and adequately powered study to examine the effect of statins on acute rejection of renal allografts. METHODS: A total of 364 patients were randomly assigned to receive either fluvastatin 40 mg or placebo in combination with conventional cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. The primary end point was treated first acute rejection. Secondary end points included biopsy-proven rejection, histological severity of rejection, occurrence of steroid-resistant rejection, and serum creatinine at three months following transplantation. RESULTS: Fluvastatin was well tolerated; no patients developed myositis or rhabdomyolysis. There was no difference in the acute rejection rate [86 (47.3%) fluvastatin vs. 87 (47.8%) placebo] and no significant difference in the severity of rejection, steroid resistant rejection or mean serum creatinine at three months (160 micromol/L vs. 160 micromol/L). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased following renal transplantation. With the exception of the increase in HDL-C, which was augmented, the increases in lipid parameters were significantly reduced by fluvastatin (total cholesterol +17.5% vs. 35.7%; LDL-C +6.3% vs. 46.7%; HDL-C +43.3% vs. 38.1%; triglyceride +52.2% vs 77.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the reported effects of statins, fluvastatin had no effect on the incidence or severity of acute rejection following renal transplantation. There were no increases in adverse events. A significant and potentially beneficial alteration in the lipid profile was observed in the early post transplant period. We conclude that fluvastatin may be used safely to correct dyslipidemia in patients with end-stage renal failure through the peri-transplant period.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Atorvastatin improves endothelial function in renal-transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidaemia and endothelial dysfunction are common features in cyclosporin A (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients. Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the risk of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular death in these patients. A beneficial effect of statin therapy beyond cholesterol lowering may be an improvement of endothelial function. The present study was designed to assess the effect of atorvastatin on serum lipids and endothelial function in CsA treated renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This pilot study was an open trial of 4 weeks atorvastatin (10 mg per day) treatment in renal transplant recipients (n=22). All patients received a CsA- and prednisolone-based immunosuppressive regimen. Endothelial function was assessed in the forearm skin microvasculature by acetylcholine stimulation and laser Doppler flowmetry, before and after atorvastatin treatment. Serum lipids, plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1), nitric oxide (NO), and von Willebrand factor (vWF) were also measured. RESULTS: Both total and LDL cholesterol were significantly reduced by 26.8 +/- 8.4 and 41.5 +/- 11.0% respectively, after 4 weeks of treatment. Endothelial function was significantly improved during atorvastatin treatment, area under the flux versus time curve (AUC)(ACh) was 538 +/- 362 AU x min before and 682 +/- 276 AU x min after treatment (P=0.042). Plasma NO levels also showed a borderline significant increase from 49 +/- 30 to 57 +/- 37 micromol/l during the treatment period (P=0.051), though plasma ET-1 (0.37+/-0.08 vs 0.37+/-0.12 fmol/ml) and vW (196+/-57 vs 197+/-37%) were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin lowered serum cholesterol significantly and improved endothelial function in renal transplant recipients after 4 weeks of treatment. Plasma NO levels were increased during atorvastatin treatment, indicating a possible endothelial protective effect through an "endothelial-NO pathway".

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Effects of fluvastatin on cardiac events in renal transplant patients: ALERT (Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation) study design and baseline data.

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials of primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease have demonstrated that lowering plasma cholesterol with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors ('statins') reduces morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease in diverse patient populations. STUDY AIMS: The aim of the present ALERT (Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation) study is to determine whether renal transplant recipients would also benefit from statin therapy. ALERT is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of fluvastatin in renal transplant recipients with mild-to-moderate hypercholesterolaemia. The primary objective is to investigate the effects of fluvastatin on major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In addition, the effects on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, as well as renal function, will be addressed. STUDY POPULATION: The study population contains patients with functioning renal allografts of more than 6 months' duration, recruited from 75 centres in Northern Europe and Canada. Patients of both sexes, aged 30-75 years, with a total cholesterol level of 4.0-9.0 mmol/l (155-348 mg/dl) were included, except for those with a history of myocardial infarction, where the upper limit for inclusion was 7.0 mmol/l (270 mg/dl). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 2100 patients were recruited by the end of October 1997 and will be followed for up to 6 years. This report presents the design features of the study (recruitment, follow-up, sample size, data analysis and study organization), along with baseline results. ALERT is the first large-scale prospective, randomized, double-blind study to address the prevention of cardiovascular mortality in renal transplant patients receiving an HMGCoA reductase inhibitor.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Fluvastatin in combination with cyclosporin in renal transplant recipients: a review of clinical and safety experience.

Cardiovascular disease remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have undergone renal transplantation, with one of the main risk factors being post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. To date, however, optimal management of elevated lipid levels in such patients has been hindered by the lack of both effective and safe treatments, coupled with concerns over probable interactions with immunosuppressive therapy, particularly cyclosporin. Numerous studies confirm that the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, such as fluvastatin, are effective lipid-lowering agents in renal transplant recipients, supporting findings in other patients' groups. Moreover, based on investigations of metabolic profile and clinical observation, fluvastatin (at dosages of up to 80 mg/day) is well tolerated in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin. In clinical trials to date, no instances of rhabdomyolysis have been observed during co-administration of fluvastatin and cyclosporin. The potential of fluvastatin for improving survival in renal transplant recipients, in terms of both cardiovascular mortality and graft rejection, is currently being investigated in two ongoing studies: ALERT (Assessment of Lescol [fluvastatin] in Renal Transplantation) and SOLAR (Study of Lescol [fluvastatin] in Acute Rejection). The results of these landmark studies should confirm the safe utility of fluvastatin in the renal transplantation setting.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗