The effect of losartan compared with atenolol on the incidence of revascularization in patients with hypertension and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. The LIFE study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to H Ibsen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cardiac fibrosis and high levels of circulating collagen markers has been associated with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. However, the relationship to vascular hypertrophy and blood pressure (BP) load is unclear. In 204 patients with essential hypertension and electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, we measured sitting BP, serum collagen type I carboxy-terminal telopeptide (ICTP) reflecting degradation, procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP) reflecting synthesis and LV mass by echocardiography after 2 weeks of placebo treatment and after 1 year of antihypertensive treatment with a losartan- or an atenolol-based regimen. Furthermore, we measured intima-media thickness of the common carotid arteries (IMT), minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography and ambulatory 24-h BP in around half of the patients. At baseline, PICP/ICTP was positively related to IMT (r=0.24, P<0.05), MFVR(men) (r=0.35, P<0.01), 24-h systolic BP (r=0.24, P<0.05) and 24-h diastolic BP (r=0.22, P<0.05), but not to LV mass. After 1 year of treatment with reduction in systolic BP (175+/-15 vs 151+/-17 mmHg, P<0.001) and diastolic BP (99+/-8 vs 88+/-9 mmHg, P<0.001), ICTP was unchanged (3.7+/-1.4 vs 3.8+/-1.4 microg/l, NS) while PICP (121+/-39 vs 102+/-29 microg/l, P<0.001) decreased. The reduction in PICP/ICTP was related to the reduction in sitting diastolic BP (r=0.31, P<0.01) and regression of IMT (r=0.37, P<0.05) in patients receiving atenolol and to reduction in heart rate in patients receiving losartan (r=0.30, P<0.01). In conclusion, collagen markers reflecting net synthesis of type I collagen were positively related to vascular hypertrophy and BP load, suggesting that collagen synthesis in the vascular wall is increased in relation to high haemodynamic load in a reversible manner.
Recent studies have suggested that a high pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of aortic stiffness, may be a stronger risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than a high blood pressure (BP). The relation between insulin, believed to play an important role in the development and clinical course of high BP, and PWV is not yet clear. Therefore, we decided to examine the relationship between insulin and PWV in a large population-based study. The study population consisted of a random sample of 1213 women and 1207 men (age range, 41-72 years) without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Fasting insulin was determined together with conventional risk factors for CVD. PWV was recorded transcutaneously by a mechanical electrical principle with one transducer positioned over the left common carotid artery, and another over the left femoral artery. In univariate analysis, insulin was highly significantly related to PWV (standardized regression coefficient: 0.0669+/-0.0051; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, controlling for all well-established predictors of PWV, such as age, systolic BP or mean BP and pulse pressure, sex, and heart rate, as well as controlling for conventional risk factors for CVD and use of BP-lowering drugs, the level of insulin remained a significant predictor of PWV (standardized regression coefficient: 0.0122+/-0.0048; P=0.012). In conclusion, the present study found that a higher insulin level was related to a higher PWV. This indicates that hyperinsulinaemia may affect BP and risk of CVD by increasing aortic stiffness.
We wanted to investigate whether urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) and left ventricular (LV) mass, both being associated with diabetes and increased blood pressure, predicted cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension independently. After 2 weeks of placebo treatment, clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic variables were assessed in 960 hypertensive patients from the LIFE Echo substudy with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy. Morning urine albumin and creatinine were measured to calculate UACR. The patients were followed for 60+/-4 months and the composite end point (CEP) of cardiovascular (CV) death, nonfatal stroke or nonfatal myocardial infarction was recorded. The incidence of CEP increased with increasing LV mass (below the lower quartile of 194 g to above the upper quartile of 263 g) in patients with UACR below (6.7, 5.0, 9.1%) and above the median value of 1.406 mg/mmol (9.7, 17.0, 19.0%(***)). Also the incidence of CV death increased with LV mass in patients with UACR below (0, 1.4, 1.3%) and above 1.406 mg/mmol (2.2, 6.4, 8.0%(**)). The incidence of CEP was predicted by logUACR (hazard ratio (HR)=1.44(**) for every 10-fold increase in UACR) after adjustment for Framingham risk score (HR=1.05(***)), history of peripheral vascular disease (HR=2.3(*)) and cerebrovascular disease (HR=2.1(*)). LV mass did not enter the model. LogUACR predicted CV death (HR=2.4(**)) independently of LV mass (HR=1.01(*) per gram) after adjustment for Framingham risk score (HR=1.05(*)), history of diabetes mellitus (HR=2.4(*)) and cerebrovascular disease (HR=3.2(*)). (*)P<0.05, (**)P<0.01, (***)P<0.001. In conclusion, UACR predicted CEP and CV death independently of LV mass. CV death was predicted by UACR and LV mass in an additive manner after adjustment for Framingham risk score and history of CV disease.
Hypertension is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Plasma catecholamines are linked to the pathogenesis of hypertension. Pharmacological intervention, including treatment with beta-blockers, reduces cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study, the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan significantly reduced cardiovascular end points compared to the beta-blocker atenolol. Thus, for the first time, one drug was shown to be superior to another in hypertension. The present substudy examined the effects of atenolol vs losartan treatment on plasma catecholamines at rest and during hyperinsulinaemia in a cohort of 86 LIFE patients. Plasma adrenaline increased significantly from placebo treatment at baseline to year 1 of treatment (P<0.0001), and also during hyperinsulinaemia (P<0.0001). Plasma noradrenaline did not change significantly from placebo treatment at baseline to year 1, but increased significantly during hyperinsulinaemia both at baseline and at year 1 (P<0.0001 for both). There were no differences in plasma catecholamines or the relative changes between the two treatment arms at any stage. In a subset of 42 patients examined also at years 2 and 3, these findings were confirmed during long-term treatment. Thus, losartan had an effect on plasma catecholamines comparable to that with the beta-blocker atenolol in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy at rest and during hyperinsulinaemia. We find it unlikely that a difference in sympathetic activity explains the outcome benefits of losartan over atenolol in the LIFE study.
Impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) has been demonstrated in hypertension, and has been associated with peripheral vascular changes. We investigated whether MFR was impaired and associated with structural and/or functional vascular changes in hypertensive patients without evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). We measured left ventricular (LV) mass index by echocardiography and MFR by positron emission tomography in 33 unmedicated, hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy without CAD, and 15 age- and gender-matched normotensive subjects. We also measured 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography, media:lumen ratio in isolated, subcutaneous resistance arteries by myography, intima-media cross-sectional area of the common carotid artery, and flow-mediated (FMD) and nitroglycerin-induced dilatation (NID) of the brachial artery by ultrasound. Compared to the controls, the patients had impaired MFR (2.4 (95% CI 1.95-2.8) vs 3.4 (2.7-4.2), P<0.01) due to increased resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) (0.82 (0.73-0.91) vs 0.65 (0.56-0.75) ml/g min), and decreased dipyridamole-stimulated MBF (1.80 (1.55-2.1) vs 2.3 (1.80-2.8) ml/g min, both P<0.05). The difference in resting MBF disappeared (80 (74-87) vs 86 (74-97) microl/kg mmHg, NS) when normalized for blood pressure and heart rate. MFR correlated negatively to median 24-h systolic blood pressure (r=-0.50, P<0.01) as well as to LV mass index (r=-0.45, P<0.05) and MFVR in men (r=-0.47, P<0.05), and positively to FMD (r=0.44, P<0.05) and NID (r=0.40, P<0.05). Hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy without CAD had impaired MFR associated with cardiovascular hypertrophy and vasodilatory dysfunction. This suggests that MFR is impaired by LV hypertrophy and structural/functional vascular damage in the coronary and noncoronary circulation.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the relationships among left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns and urinary albumin excretion in patients with hypertension and electrocardiographic (ECG) LV hypertrophy. In 143 patients with stage II-III hypertension, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, single urine albumin determination, and echocardiography were performed after 14 days of placebo treatment. Mean age was 68+/-7 years, 35% were women, body mass index was 28+/-5 kg/m(2), LV mass index (LVMI) was 125+/-26 g/m(2), and 24% had microalbuminuria. The mean office BP was 176+/-15/99+/-8 mmHg and the mean daytime ambulatory BP was 161+/-18/92+/-12 mmHg. Ambulatory BP, but not office BP, was higher among albuminuric compared to normoalbuminuric patients. In patients with established hypertension, daytime pulse pressure and office BP were different in the four patterns of LV geometry, with the highest pressure in those with abnormal geometry. Furthermore, microalbuminuria was more frequent in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy than in those with either normal geometry or concentric remodelling. White coat hypertensives (10%) showed lower LVMI and no microalbuminuria compared to patients with established hypertension. There were no differences in the prevalence of nondippers (26%) among the four LV geometric patterns or in microalbuminuria. In conclusion, increased daytime pulse pressure and office BP were associated with increased prevalence of abnormal LV geometry. Microalbuminuria was more frequent in groups with concentric and eccentric LV hypertrophy. Ambulatory BP, but not office BP, was higher in albuminuric than normoalbuminuric patients. With regard to the relationship among BP, LV geometric patterns, and urine albumin excretion in this population, 24-h ambulatory BP did not provide additional information beyond the office BP.
We investigated whether inappropriately high left ventricular (LV) mass, defined as observed LV mass exceeding the level of individual LV mass predicted from gender, height, and stroke work, may be associated with an imbalance between growth-promoting and growth-inhibitory factors and/or structural vascular changes. In 53 patients with hypertension and electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP); echocardiographic LV mass, stroke volume and stroke work; minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR); and intima-media cross-sectional area in common carotid arteries (IMA) were evaluated after 2 weeks of placebo treatment. Serum insulin, plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, endothelin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were also measured. High observed LV mass was related to high IMA (r=0.46, P<0.001), MFVR (in men: r=0.36, P<0.05), 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (r=0.30, P=0.06), and lower plasma angiotensin II (r=-0.33, P<0.05), but not to other circulating growth factors. Stroke work was similarly related to IMA (r=0.42, P<0.01), MFVR (in men: r=0.41, P<0.05), and plasma angiotensin II (r=-0.32, P<0.05). Inappropriate LV mass, identified by the ratio between observed LV mass and the value predicted for gender, height, and stroke work, was not significantly related to any of the arterial or neurohormonal variables. In this small series of older hypertensive patients, inappropriate LV mass was not significantly related to arterial changes or to measured circulating growth factors, although weak relations cannot be excluded. Alternatively, inappropriately high LV mass might be related to unmeasured factors such as local myocardial alterations in growth factors and/or genetic predisposition to develop excessive LV hypertrophy.
The Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study showed superiority of losartan over atenolol for reduction of composite risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction in hypertensives with left ventricular hypertrophy. We compared hazard ratios (HR) in 4287 and 685 participants who reported intakes of 1-7 and >8 drinks/week at baseline, respectively, with those in 4216 abstainers, adjusting for gender, age, smoking, exercise, and race. Within categories, clinical baseline characteristics, numbers randomized to losartan and atenolol, and blood pressure (BP) lowering were similar on the drug regimens. Overall BP control (<140/90 mmHg) at end of follow-up was similar in the categories. Composite end point rate was lower with 1-7 (24/1000 years; HR 0.87, P<0.05) and >8 drinks/week (26/1000 years; HR 0.80, NS) than in abstainers (27/1000 years). Myocardial infarction risk was reduced in both drinking categories (HR 0.76, P<0.05 and HR 0.29, P<0.001, respectively), while stroke risk tended to increase with >8 drinks/week (HR 1.21, NS). Composite risk was significantly reduced with losartan compared to atenolol only in abstainers (HR 0.81 95% confidence interval, CI (0.68, 0.96), P<0.05), while benefits for stroke risk reduction were similar among participants consuming 1-7 drinks/week (HR 0.73, P<0.05) and abstainers (HR 0.72, P<0.01). Despite different treatment benefits, alcohol-treatment interactions were nonsignificant. In conclusion, moderate alcohol consumption does not change the marked stroke risk reduction with losartan compared to atenolol in high-risk hypertensives. Alcohol reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, while the risk of stroke tends to increase with high intake.
Vascular hypertrophy and insulin resistance have been associated with abnormal left ventricular (LV) geometry in population studies. We wanted to investigate the influence of vascular hypertrophy and insulin resistance on LV hypertrophy and its function in patients with hypertension. In 89 patients with essential hypertension and electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, we measured blood pressure; insulin sensitivity by hyperinsulinaemic euglucaemic clamp; minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography; intima-media cross-sectional area of the common carotid arteries (IMA) by ultrasound; and LV mass, relative wall thickness (RWT), systolic function and diastolic filling by echocardiography after two weeks of placebo treatment. LV mass index correlated to IMA/height (r=0.36, P=0.001), serum insulin (r=-0.25, P<0.05), plasma glucose (r=-0.34, P<0.01), and showed a tendency towards a correlation to insulin sensitivity (r=0.21, P=0.051), but was unrelated to MFVR. Deceleration time of early diastolic transmitral flow positively correlated to IMA/height (r=0.30, P<0.01). The ratio between early and atrial LV filling peak flow velocity negatively correlated to MFVR(men) (r=-0.30, P<0.05). Endocardial and midwall systolic LV function were not related to vascular hypertrophy, plasma glucose, serum insulin or insulin sensitivity. In conclusion, insulin resistance was not related to LV hypertrophy or reduced LV function. However, high thickness of the common carotid arteries was associated with LV hypertrophy and high deceleration time of early diastolic transmitral flow. High MFVR was associated with low ratio between early and atrial LV filling peak flow velocity. This may suggest that systemic vascular hypertrophy contributes to abnormal diastolic LV relaxation in patients with hypertension and electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy.
The clinical value of renal vein renin sampling (RVRS) as a prognostic tool in the treatment of renovascular hypertension was evaluated. One hundred consecutive patients were included over a 4-year period of time. About half of the patients (49%) were treated interventionally by PTRA (21%), nephrectomy (20%), or vascular surgery (8%). Seven patients (15%) were cured and 15 (32%) had improved (reduction in antihypertensive medicine) after 6 months follow-up, whereas three patients (6%) were cured and 12 (26%) improved after 3-4 years follow-up. Thus, the number of patients cured or improved is comparable with the results from our department reported 20 years ago. However, in the present report, more than twice as many patients were enrolled, leading to double costs. Different indices of lateralisation of the renin generation were calculated for the use in cases of a shrunken kidney (functional share < or =15%). None of the indices clearly discriminated between the patients who did benefit from intervention, and those who did not. The only positive finding was that a peripheral renin concentration lower than 8 mlU/l predicted no effect of intervention, which might lead to the exclusion of 11% of the patients before entering the diagnostic programme. We conclude that the RVRS demands a very restrictive referral pattern if it should be of prognostic value for the blood pressure outcome after intervention. No indices of lateralised renin concentrations proved high predictive value. However, a peripheral renin concentration low in the normal range seems useful as an indicator of no benefit from intervention.
In the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) study left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy was associated with increased urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) at baseline. To evaluate whether this association was due only to parallel blood pressure (BP)-induced changes we re-examined the patients after 1 year of antihypertensive treatment to investigate whether changes in LV hypertrophy and UACR were related independently of changes in BP. In 7,142 hypertensive patients included in the LIFE study, we measured UACR, LV hypertrophy by electrocardiography, plasma glucose and BP after 2 weeks of placebo treatment and again after 1 year of antihypertensive treatment with either an atenolol or a losartan based regime. At baseline and still after 1 year of treatment logUACR (R = 0.28, P < 0.001) was still correlated to LV hypertrophy (beta = 0.05) assessed by ECG independently of systolic BP (beta = 0.16), plasma glucose (beta = 0.19) and age (beta = 0.08). Change in logUACR (R = 0.19, P < 0.001) during treatment was correlated to change in LV hypertrophy (beta = 0.10) independently of reduction in systolic BP (beta = 0.13) and change in plasma glucose (beta = 0.06). After 1 year of antihypertensive treatment UACR was still related to LV hypertrophy independently of systolic BP, and the reduction in UACR during that first year of treatment was related to regression of LV hypertrophy independently of reduction in systolic BP. This suggests that the relationship between LV hypertrophy and glomerular albumin leakage is not just due to parallel BP-induced changes. As glomerular albumin leakage may represent generalised vascular damage we hypothesise a vascular relationship between cardiac and glomerular damage.
Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is normal in most patients with uncomplicated hypertension, but the prevalence and correlates of decreased LV systolic chamber and myocardial function, as assessed by midwall mechanics, in hypertensive patients identified as being at high risk by the presence of LV hypertrophy on the electrocardiogram has not been established. Therefore echocardiograms were obtained in 913 patients with stage I to III hypertension and LV hypertrophy determined by electrocardiographic (Cornell voltage duration or Sokolow-Lyon voltage) criteria after 14 days' placebo treatment. The 913 patients' mean age was 66 years, and 42% were women. Fourteen percent had subnormal LV endocardial shortening, 24% had subnormal midwall shortening, and 13% had reduced stress-corrected midwall shortening. Nineteen percent had normal LV geometry, 11% had concentric remodeling, 47% had eccentric hypertrophy, and 23% had concentric hypertrophy. LV systolic performance evaluated by LV endocardial shortening and midwall shortening was impaired in 10% of patients with normal geometry, 20% with concentric remodeling, 27% with eccentric hypertrophy, and 42% with concentric hypertrophy. Relative wall thickness, an important independent correlate of LV chamber function, was related directly to endocardial shortening and negatively to midwall shortening and stress-corrected midwall shortening. LV mass was the strongest independent correlate of impaired endocardial shortening, midwall shortening, or both. In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, indexes of systolic performance are subnormal in 10% to 42% with different LV geometric patterns. Depressed endocardial shortening is most common in patients with eccentric LV hypertrophy, whereas impaired midwall shortening is most prevalent in patients with concentric remodeling or hypertrophy. Thus, in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, impaired LV performance occurs most often, and is associated with greater LV mass and relative wall thickness and may contribute to the high rate of cardiovascular events.
BACKGROUND: There is a considerable gap between recommended and actually conducted preventive cardiology in general practice. The effect of guidelines is not fully evaluated. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 10 questions on preventive cardiology, including the use of clinical guidelines, together with four case stories for cardiovascular risk estimation was mailed to 205 general practitioners (GPs). RESULTS: Response rate was 81%. Twenty-five percent of the GPs had consultations in preventive cardiology at least once a day and 60% of the GPs thought lifestyle intervention had significant effect on cardiovascular risk. Approximately two-thirds of the GPs were regular users of national guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease. While the majority of GPs correctly assigned a patient with multiple risk factors to the high-risk category there was a much larger variation in risk estimations if fewer risk factors were present. GPs who reported use of guidelines overestimated coronary risk twice as frequently as nonusers of guidelines. CONCLUSION: Preventive cardiology in general practice is common and the effect of lifestyle intervention is well accepted. Poor discrimination between high- and low-risk patients may, however, lead to suboptimal preventive care. The use of guidelines does not seem to improve risk estimation and further dissemination of better tools for risk estimation is needed.
BACKGROUND: Peripheral endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated in hypertension. However, its relationship to blood pressure (BP) load, vascular structure, and metabolic disturbances in patients with long-standing, previously treated hypertension is unclear. METHODS: A total of 41 patients with stage I to III essential hypertension and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy were studied. After 2 to 3 weeks of placebo treatment we measured nitroprusside-induced relaxation (NIR), acetylcholine-induced relaxation (AIR), and media:lumen ratio in isolated, subcutaneous resistance arteries by myography, as well as 24-h ambulatory BP, and serum lipids. RESULTS: Maximal AIR correlated negatively with median 24-h diastolic BP (r=-0.42, P=.01), and sensitivity to AIR correlated negatively with serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) (r =-0.36, P < .05). In multiple regression analyses, sensitivity to AIR correlated negatively with serum LDL (beta=-0.33) independently of maximal NIR (beta=0.41) (adjusted R2 =0.26, P < .01). Maximal acetylcholine-induced relaxation correlated negatively with median 24-h diastolic BP (beta=-0.38) independently of maximal NIR (beta=0.45) (adjusted R2= 0.32, P < .001). Acetylcholine-induced relaxation was not significantly related to diabetes or to media:lumen ratio (r = -0.26, NS). CONCLUSIONS: High diastolic BP and high serum LDL were associated with impaired maximal AIR and reduced sensitivity to AIR, respectively, independently of smooth muscle cell responsiveness to nitroprusside. This indicated decreasing endothelial function in small resistance arteries with increasing BP and increasing LDL in hypertension. Endothelial function was not significantly related to vascular structure of the resistance arteries or to diabetes in these patients with long-standing hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular hypertrophy and remodeling in patients with never-treated hypertension has been associated with impaired exercise capacity, but whether this relationship remains in patients with longstanding hypertension and target organ damage is less elucidated. METHODS: In 43 unmedicated patients with essential hypertension and electrocardiographic left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, we measured maximal workload and oxygen reserve by bicycle test, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP), LV mass index by magnetic resonance imaging (LVMI(MRI), n = 31), LVMI(echo) and systemic vascular compliance by echocardiography, minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography, and intima media thickness and distensibility in the common carotid arteries by ultrasound. RESULTS: The patients did not achieve the maximal workload as predicted by age, gender and body composition (146[129-163] v 162[146-179] Watt, P = .01). This impaired exercise capacity, calculated as the ratio between achieved and predicted maximal workload, was in simple regression analyses related to lower distensibility of the common carotid artery (r = 0.38, P = .01) and lower oxygen reserve (r = 0.68, P < .001). In multiple regression analyses, lower oxygen reserve was related to higher LVMI(MRI) (beta = -0.44), lower systemic vascular compliance (beta = -0.36), and higher MFVR (beta = -0.52) (adjusted R2 = 0.53, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with longstanding hypertension and target organ damage cannot achieve the predicted maximal workload. This impaired exercise capacity was associated with lower common carotid distensibility and lower oxygen reserve. The latter was independently related to LV hypertrophy, low systemic vascular compliance and peripheral vascular remodeling, suggesting that cardiovascular hypertrophy and remodeling may reduce exercise capacity by itself.
AIMS: The age-specific prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was estimated in 60-year-old individuals in 1996/97 and compared to the prevalence in 1974/75. The study also examined whether or not the change in prevalence of diabetes and IGT could be explained by changes in body mass index (BMI) and physical activity. METHODS: Diabetes and IGT were diagnosed by a standardized oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in two Danish population-based, age-specific, birth cohorts. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes in 1996/97 was 12.3% among 60-year-old men and 6.8% among women, representing an increase in diabetes of 58% in men and 21% in women compared to 1974/75. The prevalence of IGT was 15.9% among men and 13.1% among women, representing increases of 109 and 16%, respectively. A concurrent increase in BMI in the 22-year period between the two studies explained the increase found in the prevalence of diabetes and IGT. CONCLUSIONS: A marked increase in the prevalence of diabetes and IGT among 60-year-old individuals over a 22-year period was observed - especially in men. The increase was fully explained by a concurrent increase in BMI.
PURPOSE: To examine the influence of (i) strong predisposition to essential hypertension and (ii) insulin sensitivity and plasma levels of cardiomyotrophic hormones on echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular structure and function. METHODS: 26 normotensive subjects (age 18-35) with bi-parental hypertension and 26 matched controls with normotensive parents. Families with non-insulin-dependent diabetes or morbid obesity were excluded. (i) Echocardiography; (ii) plasma concentrations of renin, angiotensin-II, aldosterone, epinephrine and norepinephrine; (iii) euglycaemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp study. RESULTS (means +/- SD): Hypertension-prone subjects vs controls had (i) higher resting systolic (117.0 +/- 14.0 vs 107.1 +/- 11.9 mmHg), and 24-h diastolic blood pressure (77.9 +/- 7.1 vs 72.9 +/- 7.2 mmHg), (ii) higher relative wall thickness (RWT) (0.39 +/- 0.09 vs 0.34 +/- 0.06). They had similar left vetricular mass index, diastolic function parameters, insulin sensitivity and plasma concentrations of cardiomyotrophic hormones. The increased RWT was not attributable to any other factor than the systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: In a carefully selected group of subjects with two hypertensive parents compared to a control group, the only echocardiographic change demonstrated was an increased RWT. This remodelling was attributable to a higher systolic blood pressure in the hypertension-prone subjects, but not to insulin sensitivity or a selection of cardiomyotrophic hormones.