PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H J Hutt

Publications and source records attributed to H J Hutt.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

[Bioavailability of two verapamil formulations following repeated administration in steady-state conditions. An open, two-period, crossover study].

The relative bioavailability of a new formulation of verapamil (CAS 52-53-9, Veramex 40) in comparison to a standard formulation was investigated in an open two-period cross-over study in 16 healthy volunteers under steady state conditions of 7 days duration each. For the estimation of verapamil a selective HPLC-method was used with fluorescence detection after direct injection and enrichment by column switching enabling a simultaneous separation and analysis of verapamil and N-norverapamil. The bioavailability was estimated using areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC), maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF). Bioequivalence was tested calculating the 90% confidence intervals (ANOVAlog). The mean verapamil plasma profile after the test substance was up to 1.5 h slightly lower than the corresponding curve after the reference substance, thereafter slightly higher plasma levels up to 7 h were observed after the test substance. The individual plasma profiles had a similar variance, and hardly any difference was discernible between the two drugs. A similar behaviour was also seen for N-norverapamil. A mean relative bioavailability of 101% was observed after the test substance both for verapamil and N-norverapamil. The mean maximum plasma concentrations for verapamil and N-norverapamil were 50.0 and 49.7 ng/ml, respectively. After the standard formulation the corresponding values were 50.4 and 50.3 ng/ml. The mean PTF-values for verapamil and N-norverapamil were 178 and 76.6% after the test substance and 182 and 79.6% after the standard formulation, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC, Cmax and PTF for verapamil and N-norverapamil are completely within the accepted range of 80 to 125% for AUC, Cmax and PTF. Therefore bioequivalence between both formulations can be stated.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Gaviscon in reflux symptoms. Results of a drug monitoring study].

335 general practitioners participated in an observational study of the alginic acid-containing antacid preparation Gaviscon over a period of eight months. In this period, 2927 patients with reflux disease were treated. Some 62.3% of the patients were treated for six to eight days. Both the tablet and suspension forms of the drug were considered to be effective by both physician and patient in more than 94% of the cases. Drug toleration was also considered good in more than 95% of the cases. The taste of Gaviscon was described as good by 54.7% of the patients, and acceptable by 33.5%. Pregnant women with reflux symptoms were observed in a separate group (n = 52).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Pharmacodynamic action and pharmacokinetics of moxonidine after single oral administration in hypertension patients.

Moxonidine is a new centrally acting alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist that differs from others by a lower incidence of side effects in hypertensive patients. The effects of moxonidine and placebo on blood pressure, pulse rate, plasma catecholamines, plasma renin activity, sedation, and salivary flow were evaluated in eight hypertensive patients by an intraindividual comparison. Moxonidine induced a significant decrease in blood pressure that corresponded with its plasma concentrations. The maximum antihypertensive effect appears to be delayed when compared with the peak plasma level. Plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, and plasma renin activity were significantly reduced by moxonidine, and blood pressure reduction corresponded with decrease of plasma norepinephrine. Heart rate, sedation, and salivary flow were not different using moxonidine compared with placebo. Only one patient mentioned dry mouth. No further relevant adverse effects were seen in the patients. This study demonstrates a significant decrease of blood pressure, plasma renin activity, norepinephrine, and epinephrine with a single dose of 0.25 mg moxonidine, but no significant effect on pulse rate, salivation, and sedation.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Improved orthostatic dysregulation record after administration of a sustained-release form of urapidil.

The efficacy and safety of urapidil has been demonstrated in a long-term treatment. However, a relatively good record of side effects has been marred by reports of orthostatic dysregulation. This study was designed to examine the blood pressure lowering effect, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a sustained-release formulation of urapidil. Twelve patients received either 60 mg of sustained-release urapidil (Ebrantil 60) or 50 mg urapidil for experimental reference as a fast-release tablet in single or multiple doses in a randomized, double-blind fashion. To ensure the double blind-character of the study, the tablets were encapsulated. Blood samples for the determination of urapidil (HPLC) were drawn before and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h post application. Blood pressure was measured at 0.5, 1.5, 3, 8, 10 and 12 h post application. An orthostatic test was performed before and at 1, 2, 4 and 6 h post application. Twelve h after the first application, patients received a second capsule or encapsulated tablet and continued medication for two days. On day four, the same procedure as on day one was repeated, except that patients received no evening medication and blood samples and blood pressure were measured at 24, 28 and 32 h post application on the fifth day. The Cmax of sustained-release urapidil was 44% lower than for the single tablet dose and 37% lower after multiple dosing. The peak-trough fluctuation of the steady-state serum concentrations was 29% lower for the sustained-release capsule (138 +/- 45%) compared to the tablet (195 +/- 83%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1988

The influence of renal function on clinical pharmacokinetics of moxonidine.

Investigations were carried out on 24 hypertensive or borderline hypertensive patients with different degrees of renal function. Eight had normal renal function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) greater than 90 ml/min], 8 moderate (GFR 30 to 60 ml/min) and 8 severe renal impairment (GFR less than 30 ml/min). All patients were given moxonidine 0.3mg once daily for 7 days and both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were determined. During moxonidine treatment plasma elimination half-life, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and apparent total clearance (CLT) showed statistically significant differences among patients in the 3 groups. Elimination half-life was 2.6 +/- 0.9 hours in patients with a GFR greater than 90 ml/min and increased to 6.9 +/- 3.7 hours in those with a GFR less than 30 ml/min (mean +/- SD; p = 0.012). Correspondingly, AUC0-24 h rose from 5.4 +/- 2.7 to 17.2 +/- 7.9 micrograms/L . h (p = 0.001), and CLT decreased from 1150 +/- 602.l ml/min to 369 +/- 227.6 ml/min (p = 0.001). These data suggest that once-daily administration of 0.3mg moxonidine may be appropriate in patients with impaired renal function. Independent of renal function, moxonidine was well tolerated in 22 of 24 patients. No deterioration in renal function as a consequence of the use of moxonidine was found. Thus, in patients with renal failure, dosage of moxonidine should be individually titrated according to the desired clinical response, as is recommended for hypertensive patients without renal impairment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1987

Bioavailability and elimination of nitrendipine in liver disease.

Twenty one patients with liver disease (cirrhosis 11, chronic hepatitis 5 and acute hepatitis 5) and 6 healthy volunteers were given a single i.v. dose of nitrendipine 5 mg. Afterwards nitrendipine 20 mg once daily were administered orally for seven days. With the intravenous injection a significant increase in the AUC and elimination half-life of nitrendipine was found in patients with cirrhosis as compared to the normal volunteers. After chronic oral dosing, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC (0-24), was 94.5 ng ml-1 h and the plasma clearance CL was 1380.6 ml/min in the healthy controls; in patients with cirrhosis the AUC (0-24) h was significantly greater at 309.4 ng ml-1 h and CL had fallen to 686.6 ml/min. Considerable accumulation of nitrendipine was also found in the patients with chronic hepatitis. Nitrendipine could not be detected in urine from any of the subjects. Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly influenced by the treatment in the various groups investigated. Antipyrine clearance in the patients with cirrhosis was correlated with the nitrendipine plasma clearance. Thus, accumulation of nitrendipine has been demonstrated in the patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1986

Dose-dependence of the nifedipine/digoxin interaction?

The dose-dependence of the nifedipine/digoxin interaction was investigated in seven healthy volunteers. After an adequate loading dose of digoxin for two weeks, 0.25 mg digoxin was given alone orally twice daily. Afterwards, 0.25 mg digoxin was administered twice daily for three one week periods combined with capsules of nifedipine 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg (ADA-LAT) respectively on a three times daily basis. Subsequently the study was completed with a digoxin monotherapy phase lasting seven days. All three doses of nifedipine administered led to a significant increase of the digoxin plasma concentrations and of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with digoxin monotherapy. In conclusion, nifedipine causes a slight but significant increase of digoxin plasma concentrations and of its AUC (15%). This effect was not dependent on the nifedipine dose administered.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Dose-dependence of the nifedipine-digoxin interaction?

The dose-dependence of the nifedipine-digoxin interaction was investigated in seven healthy subjects. After an adequate loading dose of digoxin for 2 weeks, 0.25 mg digoxin b.i.d. was given by mouth by itself. Afterwards, 0.25 mg digoxin was given twice a day for three 1-week periods in combination with capsules of nifedipine, 5, 10, or 20 mg, respectively, given on a thrice-daily basis. The study ended with a digoxin monotherapy phase lasting 7 days. All three doses of nifedipine significantly increased digoxin plasma concentrations and AUC compared with digoxin monotherapy. Thus, for example, the AUC was 10.16 +/- 0.88 ng/ml . hr (mean +/- SE) when digoxin was given alone and 12.33 +/- 1.59 ng/ml . hr with concurrent nifedipine, 5 mg t.i.d. (P less than 0.05). Nifedipine causes a slight but significant increase (15%) in digoxin plasma concentrations and AUC. This effect did not depend on the nifedipine dose given in the range studied.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1986

Influence of nisoldipine on haemodynamic effects and plasma levels of digoxin.

In a placebo controlled double-blind study including 10 patients with heart failure the nisoldipine/digoxin interaction was studied. Nisoldipine was shown to elevate digoxin plasma concentrations significantly by about 15% (trough levels). During chronic combination therapy with nisoldipine trough levels and plasma concentrations 4 h after the morning dose of digoxin were 1.35 +/- 0.14 and 1.92 +/- 0.16 ng ml-1 respectively, whereas they averaged to 1.16 +/- 0.14 and 1.52 +/- 0.16 ng ml-1 with digoxin and placebo (P less than 0.05; mean +/- s.e. mean). Systolic time intervals were significantly altered by nisoldipine co-administration compared with digoxin plus placebo. In certain patients the elevation of digoxin plasma levels due to nisoldipine co-administration could be of clinical relevance.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Interaction between the beta-adrenoceptor blockers metoprolol and atenolol with amitriptyline and their effects on oxidative liver metabolism.

Neither the kinetics of the hydrophilic beta-adrenoceptor blocker atenolol nor those of the lipophilic metoprolol were influenced by the concurrent administration of amitriptyline. Compared with placebo, chronic administration (14 days) of atenolol and metoprolol (each as monotherapy) did not significantly reduce oxidative liver metabolism as measured by antipyrine half-life and by 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion. Compared with atenolol and metoprolol monotherapy, chronic administration of amitriptyline concurrently with each of the beta-adrenoceptor blockers produced an insignificant decrease (circa 10-20%) in antipyrine half-life and 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion. Amitriptyline appears therefore to have little enzyme-inducing activity.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Drug interactions with nitrendipine.

Interactions between calcium channel blockers like nifedipine and concurrently administered drugs like digoxin or cimetidine have been described in the literature. Therefore, possible interactions of the new calcium channel blocker nitrendipine (20 mg daily) with digoxin (0.5 mg daily), digitoxin (0.1 mg daily), cimetidine (1,000 mg daily), ranitidine (300 mg daily), atenolol (100 mg daily), metoprolol (200 mg daily), and acebutolol (400 mg daily) were studied following 1 week of combined treatment of nitrendipine with each of these drugs. Six healthy volunteers were investigated (mean age, 30.2 +/- 2.1 years; mean body weight, 69.7 +/- 4.7 kg; means +/- SEM). Under nitrendipine monotherapy, maximum plasma levels (Cmax) averaged 41.6 +/- 12.8 ng/ml, and they were reached after 2 h. Mean area under the curve was 131.5 +/- 40 ng ml-1 h, and "oral" plasma clearance (Clpl) amounted to 80.8 +/- 27.5 L/h. The H2 receptor antagonists cimetidine and ranitidine and the digitalis glycosides like digoxin or digitoxin did not alter nitrendipine kinetics significantly. Also simultaneous treatment with beta-blockers did not significantly influence kinetic values of the calcium channel blocker, but atenolol showed a tendency to increase Cmax of nitrendipine to 54.2 +/- 19.7 ng/ml, when its Clpl was distinctly lowered to 42.7 +/- 10.4 L/h (p greater than 0.05 compared with 80.8 +/- 27.5 L/h under nitrendipine monotherapy). Increased digoxin plasma levels and digoxin-induced side-effects were seen under nitrendipine co-administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗