Biomedical subjects

H J Löppönen

Publications and source records attributed to H J Löppönen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Post-tonsillectomy pain: a prospective, randomised and double-blinded study to compare an ultrasonically activated scalpel technique with the blunt dissection technique.

Thirty-two patients participated in a study to compare the use of an ultrasonically activated scalpel (Harmonic scalpel) for tonsillectomy on one side and a blunt dissection tonsillectomy on the other. Pain scores at rest and on swallowing expressed as the area under curves (AUC) during the 10 h after surgery, intra-operative blood loss and the need for electrocoagulation for haemostasis were significantly higher on the blunt dissection side than on the Harmonic scalpel side (p < 0.05). However, pain scores expressed as AUC at rest, on swallowing, the day's least, average and worst levels of pain, and the day's worst otalgia during the second week after surgery were significantly higher on the Harmonic scalpel side than on the blunt dissection side. In conclusion, we found that Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy was associated with decreased severity in pharyngeal pain on the day of the operation but increased pharyngeal pain and otalgia during the second postoperative week.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Speech perception and functional benefit after multichannel cochlear implantation.

This study was done to investigate the effect of a multichannel cochlear implant on speech perception and the functional benefit of cochlear implantation in Finnish-speaking postlingually deafened adults. Fourteen subjects were enrolled. Sentence and word recognition were studied with open-set tests auditorily only. One year after implantation, the listening performance was assessed by case histories and interviews. Before implantation for subjects with a hearing aid, the mean recognition score was 38% for sentences and 17% for words. One year after switching on the implant, the mean recognition score was 84% for sentences and 70% for words. Before implantation, the majority of the subjects were not aware of environmental sounds and only a few were able to recognize some environmental sounds. One year after switching on the implant, the majority of the subjects were able to use the telephone with a familiar speaker. All the subjects were able to recognize speech auditorily only and had thus gained good functional benefit from the implant.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2001

Cochlear implant patients and quality of life.

During the last two decades, cochlear implants have been available for profoundly hearing-impaired patients who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids. The quality of life of these implantees has not been extensively studied, and has not been studied at all in Finland. To assess their quality of life, the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire was sent to all adult implanted patients in Finland. Implantees tended to have more favourable average pain, emotional reaction and mobility indexes in each age group studied than the average population. Social-isolation seemed to be more common in the youngest and oldest age groups of implantees. Apparently, implantees are physically healthier than the average population. However, a bias caused by the strict selection of implant candidates cannot be excluded.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

The effect of a multichannel cochlear implant on phoneme perception.

This study was done to investigate the effects of a multichannel cochlear implant on phoneme perception in Finnish-speaking postlingually deafened adults. Phoneme recognition was studied with 100 prerecorded nonsense syllables (open-set) presented at 70 dB SPL, auditorily only, in a free-field situation. Ten subjects were tested before implantation both with and without a hearing aid (HA), and 3, 6 and 12 months after switching on the implant. Before implantation without a HA, the subjects did not recognize vowels, consonants or syllables. Four of the subjects used a HA before implantation, and the mean recognition scores of these subjects were 34% for vowels, 28% for consonants and 13% for syllables. One year after switching on the implant, the mean recognition scores were 77% for vowels, 66% for consonants and 46% for syllables. According to phonological analysis vowels appear to be easier to perceive than consonants during the first stage after multichannel cochlear implantation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2001

Cochllear implants and GSM phone.

Use of a telephone and GSM phones, in particular, was assessed by means of a postal interview sent to all adult Finnish implantees. The response rate was very high (87%). Fifty-one of the 61 respondents used a telephone and 27/61 also used a mobile phone, usually a digital phone. Two GSM phone models from Nokia (3110 and 6110) were tested with three different cochlear implant systems used by nine patients. Definite differences between the processors were found. Nucleus Spectra (two implantees) could not be used with any of the GSM phones under any test condition. Nucleus SPrint was incompatible with both GSM phone models in a poor field, while GSM phone model 6110 could be used in a good field. The Med-El Combi 40+ processor was compatible with both GSM models tested under any condition.

Acoustic Stimulation↗