PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H J Malling

Publications and source records attributed to H J Malling.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

CXCR3 expression on CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitors induced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: II. Signaling pathways involved.

CXCR3, known to have four ligands (IFN-gamma inducible protein 10 (gamma IP-10), monokine induced by IFN-gamma (Mig), I-TAC, and 6Ckine), is predominantly expressed on memory/activated T lymphocytes. We recently reported that GM-CSF induces CXCR3 expression on CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitors, in which gamma IP-10 and Mig induce chemotaxis and adhesion. Here we further report that stimulation with GM-CSF causes phosphorylation of Syk protein kinase, but neither Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (Cbl) nor Cbl-b in CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitors can be blocked by anti-CD116 mAb. Specific Syk blocking generated by PNA antisense completely inhibits GM-CSF-induced CXCR3 expression in CD34(+) progenitors at both mRNA and protein as well as at functional levels (chemotaxis and adhesion). Cbl and Cbl-b blocking have no such effects. Thus, GM-CSF binds to its receptor CD116, and consequently activates Syk phosphorylation, which leads to induce CXCR3 expression. gamma IP-10 and Mig can induce Syk, Cbl, and Cbl-b phosphorylation in CD34(+) progenitors by means of CXCR3. gamma IP-10 or Mig has induced neither chemotaxis nor adhesion in GM-CSF-stimulated Cbl-b-blocked CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitors, whereas SDF-1alpha induces both chemotaxis and adhesion in these cells. Interestingly, gamma IP-10 and Mig can induce chemotaxis and adhesion in GM-CSF-stimulated Syk- or Cbl-blocked CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitors. Thus, Cbl-b, but not Syk and Cbl phosphorylation, is essential for gamma IP-10- and Mig-induced chemotaxis and adhesion in CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitors. This study provides a useful insight into novel signaling transduction pathways of the functions of CXCR3/gamma IP-10 and Mig, which may be especially important in the cytokine/chemokine environment for mobilization, homing, and recruitment during proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of hemopoietic progenitor cells.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2001

Standardization of food allergen extracts for skin prick test.

The aim of the study was to standardize and evaluate technically optimized food allergen extracts for use in skin prick test (SPT). The standardization procedure comprised 36 allergic histories in 32 food allergic patients with 21 healthy, non-atopic individuals serving as controls. The patients had a history of allergic symptoms upon ingestion of either cow's milk (n=3), hen's egg (n=9), wheat (n=4), hazelnut (n=14) or cod (n=6). They also had specific IgE in serum to the food in question and a positive SPT with a fresh preparation of the food. The diagnosis had been confirmed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, except for the hazelnut-allergic patients. The controls were subjected to an open food challenge with all the foods to ensure tolerance. The standardization was performed by means of titrated SPT in accordance with the guidelines on biological standardization from the Nordic Council on Medicine. Regression analysis of the skin wheal areas was performed for each patient and the median protein concentration of allergen preparation (median Ch10) eliciting a wheal area of the same size as histamine 10 mg/ml was calculated. The median Ch10 was 0.56 mg/ml for milk, 0.88 mg/ml for egg, 5.4 mg/ml for wheat, 2.1 mg/ml for hazelnut and 0.017 mg/ml for the cod extract. The sensitivity of the median Ch10 estimated from the SPT data was 1 for milk, 0.98 for egg, 1 for wheat, 1 for hazelnut and 0.87 for the cod extract. The allergenic activity of the hazelnut extract was further investigated by leukocyte histamine release (HR) and immunoblotting experiments using sera from 27 hazelnut allergic patients. The clinical sensitivity of the optimized hazelnut extract evaluated by HR was 0.78 compared to 0.30 for a commercially available hazelnut extract (Soluprick). Immunoblotting results showed a stronger IgE binding capacity and additional IgE-binding bands of the optimized hazelnut extract compared with the Soluprick extract.

Allergens↗
PubMed2001

Allergen-specific immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis.

The scope of this review is to highlight important and interesting articles in the field of allergen-specific immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis published within the past year. The review is not intended to give a full overview of published literature but rather to focus on some subjects that I find significant in relation to the understanding of the specific treatment of allergies and to the selection of different treatment modalities. The most important aspects are how to define the most suitable candidates for the specific treatment, the mechanisms of action of immunotherapy and how to optimize treatment, and finally I include some reflections on the optimal presentation of the allergen to the immune system.

Allergens↗
PubMed2000

CXC chemokine receptor 3 expression on CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors from human cord blood induced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: chemotaxis and adhesion induced by its ligands, interferon gamma-inducible protein 10 and monokine induced by interferon gamma.

CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3), which is known to be expressed predominately on memory and activated T lymphocytes, is a receptor for both interferon gamma (IFN-gamma)-inducible protein 10 (gamma IP-10) and monokine induced by IFN-gamma (Mig). We report the novel finding that CXCR3 is also expressed on CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors from human cord blood stimulated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) but not on freshly isolated CD34(+) progenitors. Freshly isolated CD34(+) progenitors expressed low levels of CXCR3 messenger RNA, but this expression was highly up-regulated by GM-CSF, as indicated by a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction technique. gamma IP-10 and Mig induced chemotaxis of GM-CSF-stimulated CD34(+) progenitors by means of CXCR3, since an anti-CXCR3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was found to block gamma IP-10-induced and Mig-induced CD34(+) progenitor chemotaxis. These chemotactic attracted CD34(+) progenitors are colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage. gamma IP-10 and Mig also induced GM-CSF-stimulated CD34(+) progenitor adhesion and aggregation by means of CXCR3, a finding confirmed by the observation that anti-CXCR3 mAb blocked these functions of gammaIP-10 and Mig but not of chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha. gamma IP-10-induced and Mig-induced up-regulation of integrins (CD49a and CD49b) was found to play a crucial role in adhesion of GM-CSF-stimulated CD34(+) progenitors. Moreover, gamma IP-10 and Mig stimulated CXCR3 redistribution and cellular polarization in GM-CSF-stimulated CD34(+) progenitors. These results indicate that CXCR3-gamma IP-10 and CXCR3-Mig receptor-ligand pairs, as well as the effects of GM-CSF on them, may be especially important in the cytokine/chemokine environment for the physiologic and pathophysiologic events of differentiation of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors into lymphoid and myeloid stem cells, subsequently immune and inflammatory cells. These processes include transmigration, relocation, differentiation, and maturation of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors. (Blood. 2000;96:1230-1238)

Antigens, CD34↗
PubMed2000

CXCR3 expression and activation of eosinophils: role of IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10 and monokine induced by IFN-gamma.

CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3), predominately expressed on memory/activated T lymphocytes, is a receptor for both IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10 (gamma IP-10) and monokine induced by IFN-gamma (Mig). We report a novel finding that CXCR3 is also expressed on eosinophils. gamma IP-10 and Mig induce eosinophil chemotaxis via CXCR3, as documented by the fact that anti-CXCR3 mAb blocks gamma IP-10- and Mig-induced eosinophil chemotaxis. gamma IP-10- and Mig-induced eosinophil chemotaxis are up- and down-regulated by IL-2 and IL-10, respectively. Correspondingly, CXCR3 protein and mRNA expressions in eosinophils are up- and down-regulated by IL-2 and IL-10, respectively, as detected using flow cytometry, immunocytochemical assay, and a real-time quantitative RT-PCR technique. gamma IP-10 and Mig act eosinophils to induce chemotaxis via the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A signaling pathways. The fact that gamma IP-10 and Mig induce an increase in intracellular calcium in eosinophils confirms that CXCR3 exists on eosinophils. Besides induction to chemotaxis, gamma IP-10 and Mig also activate eosinophils to eosinophil cationic protein release. These results indicate that CXCR3-gamma IP-10 and -Mig receptor-ligand pairs as well as the effects of IL-2 and IL-10 on them may be especially important in the cytokine/chemokine environment for the pathophysiologic events of allergic inflammation, including initiation, progression, and termination in the processes.

Blood Proteins↗
PubMed2000

[Allergen-specific immune therapy in the treatment of asthma].

OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify all published randomised controlled trials of allergen specific immunotherapy in asthma. 2. To estimate the overall efficacy of allergen specific immunotherapy upon asthmatic symptoms, medication requirements, lung function, nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and allergen specific BHR. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search of the asthma database by the Cochrane Airways Group at St. Georges Hospital Medical School, London identified 660 nonunique citations with the keywords Immunotherapy* or Hyposensitive or Desensiti*. This database included all studies published up to 1997 with the keywords Asthma or Wheez* from the Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases, together with other studies identified by handsearching. SELECTION CRITERIA: The review was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCT). Only studies which focussed upon asthma were included. Allergen specific immunotherapy was defined as the subcutaneous administration of extracts of house dust mites, pollens, animal danders or moulds, chemically modified allergoids or antigen-antibody complexes. Although placebo controlled trials were methodologically stronger, studies which administered house dust or other relatively antigenically inactive preparations to the control group were also considered. Double blinded trials were preferred, but single blind and open studies were also reviewed for possible inclusion. At least one of the following clinical outcomes had to be reported: asthmatic symptoms, asthma medication requirements, lung function, nonspecific BHR or allergen specific BHR. Inclusion of studies in the review was decided by a simple majority of all three reviewers, who independently read the methods sections of papers identified by the search strategy and applied the stated criteria. Quality assessment was performed by 2 reviewers, who independently assessed the concealment of allocation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The comparisons were: Allergen immunotherapy v placebo, Allergen immunotherapy v antigenically inactive control, House dust v placebo and Allergen immunotherapy v untreated control. These comparisons were performed separately for each outcome, whenever these results were reported. Outcome data were extracted and entered into RevMan 3.0.1 for statistical analysis. Categorical outcomes were analysed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by Peto's method. Continuous outcomes were analysed as standardised mean differences (SMD). Fixed effects models were used to obtain summary statistics for the overall efficacy of allergen immunotherapy and x2 tests were performed to assess heterogeneity between studies. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty four randomised controlled trials published between 1954 and 1997 satisfied the inclusion criteria. There were 25 studies reporting immunotherapy for mite allergy, 13 studies of pollen allergy, eight studies of animal dander allergy, two studies of allergy to the mould Cladosporium and six studies which attempted simultaneous immunotherapy for multiple aeroallergens. Concealment of allocation was assessed as clearly adequate in only 11 studies. The adequacy or otherwise of 40 studies could not be determined from the details published in the papers. Only three studies used a clearly inadequate method for concealment of allocation. There was a significant overall improvement in asthma symptom scores following immunotherapy (combined SMD -0.52; 95% -0.70 to -0.35). Patients randomised to immunotherapy were also significantly less likely to report a deterioration in asthma symptoms than those randomised to placebo (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.35). Asthma medication requirements were significantly reduced (SMD -0.51; 95% CI -0.74 to -0.28). Patients randomized to immunotherapy were also significantly less likely to require medication than those randomised to placebo (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.42). There was no overall improvement in lung function following immunotherapy and marked hete

Asthma↗
PubMed2000

Allergen-specific immunotherapy in birch- and grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis. I. Efficacy estimated by a model reducing the bias of annual differences in pollen counts.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) with pollen extracts is complicated by annual variation in pollen intensity. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of birch and grass IT, taking into consideration these variations. METHODS: After 1 year of observation, 52 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and allergy to birch as well as grass pollen were allocated to double-blinded clustered IT with aluminum-adsorbed extract produced from either birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen or grass (PIleum pratense) pollen. After 1 year of treatment, the patients continued IT with their original extract and also received the other extract. During the three consecutive pollen seasons, the rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score and the use of antihistamines, eye-drops, and oral prednisolone were recorded. Longitudinal data analysis was used to investigate the relation between different pollen counts and the magnitude of clinical efficacy. RESULTS: An effect of IT was found on symptom score, antihistamine intake, and eye-drop use for both birch and grass (P values <0.05). The mean reduction in symptom score/medication by IT ranged from 24% to 95%, depending on mean seasonal pollen counts. A minimum mean seasonal grass-pollen count of 20-30 pollen grains m3 was required for the efficacy of grass IT to emerge. CONCLUSIONS: A model was developed for evaluation of efficacy in longitudinal IT studies, taking the differences in annual pollen counts into consideration. The model showed a significant beneficial role of pollen IT in rhinoconjunctivitis patients allergic to birch and grass pollen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Allergen-specific immunotherapy in birch- and grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis. II. Side-effects.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) involves the risk of side-effects. Different side-effect profiles have been reported for different allergens, and it would be of great benefit to be able more precisely to predict patient- and allergen-related risk factors. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and allergy to birch as well as grass pollen participated in a 3-year IT study, with a baseline year followed by 2 years of treatment. During the first treatment year, the patients received double-blinded IT with either birch (Betula verrucosa) or grass (Phleum pratense) pollen extracts adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide. The following year, the other allergen extract was added. Assessment of systemic reactions (SRs) was performed, and related to patient pretreatment parameters such as seasonal symptoms and medication requirement, skin prick test (SPT), conjunctival provocation test (CPT), nasal provocation test (NPT), total and specific IgE, basophil histamine release (HR), eosinophil count (EOS), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and eosinophil protein X (EPX). RESULTS: In total, 44 and 47 patients started IT with birch- and grass-pollen extracts, respectively. All SRs occurred during the dose-increase phase. No life-threatening SRs were observed. There were a higher number of patients with SRs during IT with grass pollen than IT with birch pollen, 21 vs five patients (P<0.001), with SRs to 3.3% of grass-pollen injections compared to 0.7% of birch-pollen injections (P<0.0001). The SRs of birch-pollen IT were mild, consisting of rhinoconjunctivitis and oral-pharyngeal itching, whereas asthma and urticaria episodes were observed in the grass-pollen IT. No difference was found in sensitivity to birch and grass, when measured by SPT, CPT, NPT, specific IgE, or HR, and no difference was found in age, duration of allergic symptoms, prevalence of asthma, mean seasonal birch/grass symptom score, eye-drop use, or antihistamine or prednisolone intake between the group with and without subsequent SRs to IT. No difference was found in EOS, serum ECP, or EPX, between the group with and without subsequent SRs to IT. CONCLUSIONS: IT with grass-pollen extract seems to be associated with a higher number and more severe SRs than birch-pollen IT. Neither demographic data nor diagnostic tests of allergy such as specific IgE, HR, SPT, CPT, and NPT could identify the patients with subsequent SRs.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

CXC chemokine receptor 4 expression and stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha-induced chemotaxis in CD4+ T lymphocytes are regulated by interleukin-4 and interleukin-10.

We report that interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-10 can significantly up- or down-regulate CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) expression on CD4+ T lymphocytes, respectively. Stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha)-induced CD4+ T-lymphocyte chemotaxis was also correspondingly regulated by IL-4 and IL-10. IL-4 and IL-10 up- or down-regulated CXCR4 mRNA expression in CD4+ T lymphocytes, respectively, as detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Scatchard analysis revealed a type of CXCR4 with affinity (Kd approximately 6.3 nM), and approximately 70,000 SDF-1alpha-binding sites per cell, among freshly isolated CD4+ T lymphocytes, and two types of CXCR4 with different affinities (Kd1 approximately 4.4 nM and Kd2 approximately 14.6 nM), and a total of approximately 130,000 SDF-1alpha-binding sites per cell, among IL-4-stimulated CD4+ T lymphocytes. The regulation of CXCR4 expression in CD4+ T lymphocytes by IL-4 and IL-10 could be blocked by a selective inhibitor of protein kinase (staurosporine) or by a selective inhibitor of cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinase (H-8), indicating that these cytokines regulate CXCR4 on CD4+ T lymphocytes via both cAMP and cGMP signalling pathways. The fact that cyclosporin A or ionomycin were able to independently change the CXCR4 expression and block the effects of IL-4 and IL-10 on CXCR4 expression implied that the capacity of IL-4 and IL-10 to regulate CXCR4 on CD4+ T lymphocytes is not linked to calcium-mobilization stimulation. These results indicate that the effects of IL-4 and IL-10 on the CXCR4-SDF-1 receptor-ligand pair may be of particular importance in the cytokine/chemokine environment concerning the inflammatory processes and in the progression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed2000

Minimising the risks of allergen-specific injection immunotherapy.

The clinical advantages of allergen-specific immunotherapy are counterbalanced by the risk of inducing systemic adverse effects. Although the frequency of life-threatening systemic reactions is low, the treatment carries a risk of inducing anaphylactic reactions. A fundamental point in risk assessment is to use a clinically meaningful and internationally accepted grading system for reactions. Of importance in minimising the risk of systemic adverse effects is the identification of at-risk patients and factors, the institution of procedures for monitoring patients before injections, and the adjustment of dosages in accordance with defined rules. Asthma, especially uncontrolled asthma, is a significant risk factor for the induction of systemic reactions. Likewise, dose escalation during allergen exposure, i.e. during pollen seasons, increases the risk of adverse effects. It is recommended that standardised extracts with a documented potency and consistency between production batches are used in order to prevent overdose when changing to a new vial. The intensity of the induction regimen is a balance between the risk of inducing systemic reactions and the time required to administer the regimen. Single injections once a week are generally well tolerated, in contrast to rush immunotherapy which may carry an increased frequency of adverse effects. A clustered induction regimen (2 to 4 injections per visit) represents a compromise of a patient-friendly fast regimen without an unacceptably high frequency of systemic reactions. A major issue in improving the safety of allergen injections is minimising the human factor, e.g. mistakes of patient identification, allergen extracts and dosages. Meticulous care in monitoring every patient before the injection, which requires education and training of the staff in the dosage decision process, is the cornerstone in reducing adverse effects. Involving the patient actively in the safety monitoring process might be helpful and improves patient compliance by allowing the patient to be an active partner in the treatment. Finally, if anaphylactic reactions are induced, a successful outcome is related to the staff being able to identify the early signs and to institute immediate rescue treatment. A quality assurance programme is the optimal way to minimise the risk of immunotherapy-associated systemic reactions.

Allergens↗
PubMed1999

Cutting edge: expression of the NF of activated T cells in eosinophils: regulation by IL-4 and IL-5.

We report that NF-AT1 and NF-AT4 are expressed cytoplasmically in resting eosinophils, whereas NF-AT2 and NF-AT3 have not been seen. Likewise, NF-AT1 mRNA and NF-AT4 mRNA have been detected in resting eosinophils, and their levels can be significantly up-regulated by the Th2-associated cytokines IL-4 and IL-5. There is no detectable NF-AT protein expression in the nuclei of resting eosinophils. However NF-ATs appear in the nuclei of IL-4-, IL-5-, or ionomycin-stimulated eosinophils. Only NF-AT1 and NF-AT4, but not NF-AT2 and NF-AT3, have translocated into the nuclei in IL-4- or IL-5-stimulated eosinophils. These findings delineate a novel pathway in the cytokine network in which Th2 lymphocytes "control" eosinophils via the release of IL-4 and IL-5, and activation of NF-AT in eosinophils. The findings also suggest that a later feedback "talking" may exist between eosinophils and Th2 lymphocytes.

DNA-Binding Proteins↗
PubMed1999

[Specific immunotherapy (hyposensitization) in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects].

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) of allergic disorders as introduced by Freeman and Noon involves the application of gradually increasing doses of extracts of the material to which the individual is sensitive. SIT represents the only specific treatment that can be offered to allergic patients besides allergen avoidance. SIT has been widely used in patients with pollen allergic rhinitis and its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in several controlled clinical trials. The underlying mechanism of this treatment is still not understood. Previous studies have focused on changes in serum antibodies, including blunting of seasonal rises in specific IgE and increases in specific IgG antibodies, especially of the IgG4 isotype. Recent studies have suggested an effect on T-lymphocytes, leading to a switch from a predominant Th2 response--that is, interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5--to a Th1 response involving interferon (IFN)-gamma. The switch of a cytokine profile to a predominant IFN-gamma response results in inhibition of IL-4 dependent IgE production, which is reinforced by a decrease in the production of IL-4 by Th2 cells. METHODS: In the present study a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate all double-blind placebo-controlled studies investigating the effect of SIT on clinical and immunological treatment used in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. RESULTS: SIT was shown to be an effective treatment modality in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, decreasing symptoms, the need for medication and reactivity in specific nasal and conjunctival provocation tests, as well as inflammatory markers. Histologically, a switch might be induced from a predominant Th2 cell profile to that of a Th1. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the efficacy of SIT is dependent on the allergen the individual patient is sensitive to, the quality and total amount of the allergen applied and the SIT schedule.

Conjunctivitis, Allergic↗
PubMed1999

Histamine and tryptase in nasal lavage fluid after allergen challenge: effect of 1 week of pretreatment with intranasal azelastine or systemic cetirizine.

BACKGROUND: Antihistamines (H1-receptor antagonists) act by competitive antagonism of histamine at H1-receptors. In addition, high concentrations of some antihistamines inhibit allergen-induced histamine release from mast cells in vitro. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of intranasal azelastine or systemic cetirizine (both potent antihistamines) on the allergen-induced release of mast-cell mediators from the human nasal mucosa in vivo. METHODS: Patients allergic to birch pollen (n = 11) and control subjects not allergic to birch pollen (n = 5) were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover study outside the pollen season. Each subject was treated with azelastine nasal spray 0.14 mg per nostril twice daily, cetirizine tablets 10 mg every day, or placebo for 1 week using a double-dummy design. At the end of each treatment period, nasal allergen challenges were performed, and the number of sneezes were counted. In addition, nasal lavage fluid was collected, and the levels of mast-cell mediators (histamine and tryptase) were measured. RESULTS: The allergen challenge of patients allergic to pollen produced sneezing and a significant increase in the levels of histamine and tryptase. The challenge of subjects not allergic to pollen produced no such response. Azelastine and cetirizine significantly reduced allergen-induced sneezing and the associated increase in histamine and tryptase levels. No significant differences were found between the azelastine and cetirizine treatments. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with azelastine or cetirizine inhibits the allergen-induced release of mast-cell mediators from the human nasal mucosa. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that both antihistamines reduce mediator release from nasal mucosa mast cells in vivo. However, further studies are necessary to test this hypothesis.

Administration, Intranasal↗