PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H J Schindler

Publications and source records attributed to H J Schindler.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

[Therapy of masticatory muscle pain: recommendations for clinical management].

Myalgias of the masticatory muscles are the most frequent noninfectious complaints in the orofacial region. After summarizing the current knowledge on the physiology, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of masticatory muscle pain, we specifically focus on management recommendations. Results of an extensive literature search show that for the majority of patients pain reduction or pain relief can be achieved with noninvasive reversible methods. Longitudinal short- and long-term studies have revealed that different therapeutic measures are similarly effective. In patients with chronic masticatory myalgias associated with psychosocial impairment, however, additional involvement of a psychotherapist is crucial.

Analgesics↗

[Recommendations for the standardized evaluation and classification of painful temporomandibular disorders: an update].

BACKGROUND: In 2000, the interdisciplinary Working Group of Orofacial Pain within the German Chapter of the IASP (German Association for the Study of Pain) published recommendations for the standardized evaluation and diagnostic classification of patients with painful masticatory muscles and/or temporomandibular joints. The purpose of the present study was to critically review and update these recommendations. RESULTS: Appraisal of the relevant literature published after the release of the recommendations (up to December 2005) shows that the two-axis approach for the assessment of the somatic and psychosocial parameters of the orofacial pain experience has found wide support. Single aspects of the recommendations have been substantiated by additional scientific evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations reflect the current state of pain medicine. Therefore, they should be considered among practitioners who diagnose and manage patients suffering from temporomandibular disorders.

Germany↗

[Pain drawings of patients with orofacial pain. Comparison of acceptance and gain of information].

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this prospective multicentric study was to compare two different types of pain drawings in terms of acceptance and gain of information in patients with orofacial pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 204 patients from 9 centers, who visited their dentist or physician for orofacial pain, received two different diagrams for pain drawings in random order. One was the original pain diagram of the Deutsche Schmerzfragebogen (German Pain Questionnaire, diagram A), and the other diagram had been developed to achieve a symmetrical representation of the body and to allow computer-assisted analysis (diagram B). This diagram was larger and contained a drawing of the head. The patients' answers were analyzed for the preference between diagrams, the number and distribution of pain areas, and the concordance between the diagrams. The results were correlated with the patients' data. RESULTS: Data from 183 patients could be analyzed: 100 of 183 patients preferred diagram B and 57 of 183 preferred diagram A, independent of gender, age, or duration of disease. Most patients reported pain in more than one area; in only 43 of 183 patients was the pain limited to the face and head. The number and distribution of pain areas were not different between the two pain diagrams. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed head and body diagrams can be used in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with orofacial pain without fear of placing excessive demands on the patients and are useful for detecting comorbidities.

Art↗

Differential activity patterns in the masseter muscle under simulated clenching and grinding forces.

The aim of this study was to investigate (i) whether the masseter muscle shows differential activation under experimental conditions which simulate force generation during clenching and grinding activities; and (ii) whether there are (a) preferentially active muscle regions or (b) force directions which show enhanced muscle activation. To answer these questions, the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the right masseter muscle was recorded with five intramuscular electrodes placed in two deep muscle areas and in three surface regions. Intraoral force transfer and force measurement were achieved by a central bearing pin device equipped with three strain gauges (SG). The activity distribution in the muscle was recorded in four different mandibular positions (central, left, right, anterior). In each position, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was exerted in vertical, posterior, anterior, medial and lateral directions. The investigated muscle regions showed different amount of EMG activity. The relative intensity of the activation, with respect to other regions, changed depending on the task. In other words, the muscle regions demonstrated heterogeneous changes of the EMG pattern for the various motor tasks. The resultant force vectors demonstrated similar amounts in all horizontal bite directions. Protrusive force directions revealed the highest relative activation of the masseter muscle. The posterior deep muscle region seemed to be the most active compartment during the different motor tasks. The results indicate a heterogeneous activation of the masseter muscle under test conditions simulating force generation during clenching and grinding. Protrusively directed bite forces were accompanied by the highest activation in the muscle, with the posterior deep region as the most active area.

Adult↗

[Chronic temporomandibular disorders].

According to the 3rd German Oral Health Study (1999), the prevalence of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is about 5%. Although limited information about the magnitude of utilization of health care services and expenses for health care in temporomandibular pain patients is available, the financial burden of affected individuals may be considerable. The etiology and pathophysiology of chronic TMDs is still obscure. However, certain (patho)physiological mechanisms may be associated with the genesis and perpetuation of these musculoskeletal facial pains (e. g. disturbances in central nervous system processing; psychosocial factors; hormonal influences). Strong scientific evidence from the dental/medical literature is currently available for the following forms of TMD treatment and management: occlusal appliances (stabilization appliance), clonazepam, diazepam, meprobamate, EMG biofeedback, multimodal approaches (somatic and psychological pain management).

Chronic Disease↗

[Jaw muscle pain--its neurobiological basis].

The masticatory muscles show morphologic, histochemical, electrophysical, and functional features that differ from the other muscles of the body. At least two kinds of masticatory muscle pain should be distinguished: A local pain associated with peripheral mechanical overuse, and a pain associated with changes in the central nociceptive system. Biomechanical factors appear to be important for the first type of muscle pain. Since the typical reaction of a painful muscle consists of inhibition of its activity, traditional concepts that postulate the maintenance of the pain by chronic overuse of the whole muscle are not supported by the current literature. Instead, differential overuse of discrete intramuscular regions appear to provide a more plausible explanation. On the other hand, the possible relationships between functional and structural neuroplastic changes and the second form of chronic muscle pain (e.g., fibromyalgia) still remain speculative.

Facial Pain↗

FE-simulation of bone modeling around an implant in the mandible in two-stage versus one-stage implantation.

On the basis of a FE-model for bone modeling which takes into account bone apposition and resorption as well as revascularization, the ossification process of the repair zone around a dental implant in the mandible is studied for two alternatives. The conventional two-stage implantation method consists of a healing phase (no direct loading of the implant) and a functional phase (direct loading). In the recently applied one-stage method the healing phase is omitted (early loading). The presented simulations show that both processes finally lead to the same degree of ossification of the repair zone. However, the relative displacements and rotations of the implant are considerably larger in the one-stage process and might therefore possibly lead to a violation of the bond between implant and bone.

Bone Remodeling↗

Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures--a clinical-experimental study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: On the basis of animal experiments, it has been hypothesized that the dynamics of food reduction are controlled by peripheral receptors. Studies on this subject in human beings are rare. PURPOSE: This study investigated the influence of periodontal and joint proprioceptors on mastication in human beings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Both jaw joints and the chewing-side teeth were consecutively anesthetized in a 6-person panel by chewing wine gum. The effects on the kinematics, chewing force, and electromyographic activity were measured. RESULTS: The results substantiate a positive feedback of periodontal receptors for chewing force control. A substantial influence of joint receptors on movement control could not be found. CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of proprioception in both jaw joints and the periodontal receptors in the chewing side, the characteristics of the measured kinematic and dynamic values remained essentially unchanged.

Adult↗