PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H J van den Hoogen

Publications and source records attributed to H J van den Hoogen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Microalbuminuria in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus from general practice: course and predictive value.

AIMS: To assess the course of microalbuminuria in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in general practice and the predictive value of urinary albumin concentration on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. METHODS: Cohort study in Type 2 diabetic patients tested for microalbuminuria in 1992, and re-tested in 1998. During follow-up all cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: Of the original sample of 317 patients, 163 patients were re-tested. The mean change in urinary albumin concentration was +16.2 mg/l (range -122.0 to +602 mg/l). Seventy-five per cent of the patients without microalbuminuria in 1992 still had no microalbuminuria in 1998 and 40% of those with microalbuminuria in 1992 reverted to normoalbuminuria in 1998. Cox survival analysis, stratified for age, showed that microalbuminuria at baseline resulted in a risk ratio of all-cause mortality of 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.8-2.7), of cardiovascular mortality of 1.2 (0.5-2.8) and of new cardiovascular events (including cardiovascular mortality) of 1.4 (0.8-2.3). CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of patients the change of urinary albumin excretion was small, but the range was wide. A weak non-significant relationship between microalbuminuria and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity was observed.

Aged↗

Insulin therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients: does it affect quality of life?

BACKGROUND: Strict glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients is recommended in a number of treatment protocols. However, although better glycaemic control prevents or postpones chronic diabetic complications, it remains uncertain how this affects quality of life in the short and long term. AIM: To study the impact of insulin therapy on glycaemic control and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients, with secondary failure on maximal oral medication. DESIGN OF STUDY: Two separate sets of analyses were performed: a longitudinal analysis of those patients converted to insulin therapy and a comparison of 12-week outcomes between the two randomisation groups. SETTING: Ten general practices, participating in the Nijmegen Monitoring Project. METHOD: Patients, poorly controlled on maximal oral therapy, were stratified with respect to age and sex, and randomly allocated to insulin therapy in two different schedules: (a) after a 12-week period with enhanced compliance to diet and oral therapy: or (b) as soon as secondary failure was established. Patients were referred to a diabetologist to start insulin therapy and were referred back to their general practitioner (GP) as soon as glycaemic control was stable. We assessed fasting blood glucose, HbA1c functional health, and quality of life (Sickness Impact Profile, COOP/WONCA charts, Diabetes Symptom Checklist) at baseline, after the patient was referred back to the GP, and nine months later. RESULTS: Of the 38 included patients, three patients dropped out and seven patients were not switched over to insulin therapy. In patients starting insulin therapy, mean HbA1c and fasting blood glucose level decreased from 9.5% to 7.6%, and from 12.0 mmol to 8.4 mmol, respectively (P < 0.001). The better control was accompanied by a decrease in hyperglycaemic complaints (P = 0.01). No increase in hypoglycaemic complaints was found. There were no statistically significant changes in quality-of-life parameters. After 12 weeks, patients directly referred to insulin therapy showed a statistically significant improvement in HbA1c and fasting glucose level, in contrast to patients with enhanced compliance. Quality-of-life scores did not significantly differ statistically. CONCLUSION: Insulin therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients from general practice resulted in a significant clinical improvement of glycaemic control, accompanied by a reduction of hyperglycaemic complaints, without an increase in hypoglycaemic complaints or an adverse influence on quality of life.

Aged↗

Changes in serum total cholesterol levels over 18 years in a cohort of men and women: The Nijmegen Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate to what extent cholesterol levels change in individuals in different age groups over an 18-year period. Factors that contribute to the changes, with respect to prevention of cardiovascular disease, were taken into account. METHODS: In 1977 serum cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass index, and smoking habits were measured in a cohort of 7,092 patients (men and women from 20 to 50 years of age) from six general practices in The Netherlands. In 1995, a sample of 2,600 of these same patients were invited to take part in a similar screening program; 2,335 patients, consisting of 1,171 men and 1,164 women, agreed to participate. Patients were derived from both high-risk and low- to normal-risk category in 1977. The differences in cholesterol between 1977 and 1995 were calculated and cholesterol levels were tracked over the study period by determining Pearson correlation coefficients. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the determinants influencing the changes in cholesterol level. RESULTS: The mean cholesterol levels rose during the study period in all age groups. The highest mean increase in men was 1.23 mmol/L, or 20%, in the youngest age group (20-24 years), and in women the maximum mean increase was 1.12 mmol/L, or 17%, in the age group 40-44 years. Correlation coefficients between the 1977 and 1995 readings varied from 0.63 in the youngest age group to 0.41 in the oldest. Body weight change during the study period, more than initial body weight, was found to have influenced the rise in serum cholesterol. At basic screening, 19.2% of the men and 12.4% of the women had cholesterol levels of 6. 5 mmol/L or higher, as against 35.8 and 36.8%, respectively, in 1995. CONCLUSIONS: Over an 18-year period cholesterol level increased in most subjects, at a younger age in men than in women. The highest increase in women took place during the menopausal period. Weight gain, more than baseline weight, had a positive influence on the increase in cholesterol.

Adult↗

Treatment of depression related to recurrence: 10-year follow-up in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: To study outcomes related to long-term treatment of depression and differences in treatments for first episodes of depression in patients with and without recurrences. METHODS: A historic cohort design study with 222 general practice patients who had been followed up for 10 years after being diagnosed of depression. Prescriptions for antidepressants, psychotropics and referrals over the period of 10 years following the first diagnosis of depression were studied. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, the length of treatment with antidepressants and the doses prescribed were low compared to what is known to be efficacious in depression. This was also true for treatment during the first episode. Patients with a recurrent type of illness were more often treated with antidepressants and other psychotropics during their first episode than patients with only one episode of depression, but they were not referred any more often. CONCLUSION: Even though treatment was not as recommended for depression, the majority of the patients did not have recurrences. Future prospective research is needed to study causal relationships between treatment of depression and long-term outcome.

Adult↗

The validity of the diagnosis of depression in general practice: is using criteria for diagnosis as a routine the answer?

BACKGROUND: In general practice, making a diagnosis does not follow the same lines as in secondary care because every new diagnosis is made against 'foreknowledge' and could be coloured by it. This could explain low accordance and differences in diagnoses between primary and secondary care, in particular when mental illness such as depression is concerned. When criteria are used for diagnosis there should be no differences. AIM: To establish the accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria of major depressive disorder when the diagnosis of depression has been made by general practitioners (GPs) for whom coding and using criteria for diagnosis is a daily routine (ICHPPC-2 criteria). METHOD: Ninety-nine general practice patients from four general practices belonging to the Continuous Morbidity Registry (CMR) of the University of Nijmegen in The Netherlands were interviewed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (auto) 12-month version (DSM-IV criteria). Thirty-three patients had a code for depression; 33 patients a code for chronic nervous functional complaints (CNFC); and 33 had no code for mental illness (the depression and CNFC codes were given in the 12 months prior to the interview). Specificity and accordance with the DSM-IV criteria of major depressive disorder (MDD) were calculated with the results from the interviews. RESULTS: Of the 33 general practice depression cases (all matching ICHPPC-2 criteria), 28 matched DSM-IV criteria: 26 for MDD and 2 for dysthymia. No cases of DSM-IV MDD were found in the control group without a code for a mental disorder, and seven out of 33 were found in the control group with the code for CNFC. CONCLUSION: The specificity of diagnosis of depression made by GPs in a continuous morbidity registry and the accordance with DSM-IV criteria are high. Using criteria for diagnosis, which is a trend, could be one of the solutions towards a better diagnosis. As far as the sensitivity is concerned, GPs should not be distracted from using criteria for the diagnosis of depression when a large variety of complaints is presented.

Adult↗

Long-term follow-up of depression among patients in the community and in family practice settings. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge about the long-term outcome of depression is largely based on the results of studies performed with the small selection of patients who are referred to psychiatric professionals. However, because of the high prevalence of depression in the community and in primary care, information about the longterm outcome in these populations is indispensable if physicians are to offer the best possible care in these settings. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify relevant papers published between 1970 and 1999 on original long-term follow-up studies of depression in community and primary care populations. The included studies were of adult populations with depression based on diagnostic criteria and a follow-up of at least 5 years. Data about recurrences, relapses, psychopathology, disability, or quality of life at follow-up were examined. RESULTS: We found 8 studies that fulfilled our criteria. The reported rates of recurrence or depression at follow-up were between 30% and 40%. Higher rates were found in the younger and older age groups. Data about other predictors of outcome, health status, and the relation between treatment and outcome did not justify any hard conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of depression in the community and in primary care is rarely studied. The results of available studies are difficult to compare because of the large differences in populations and methods. Nevertheless, these studies suggest that the longterm prognosis of depression in the community and in primary care is not as poor as in psychiatry.

Adolescent↗

Development of blood pressure and the incidence of hypertension in men and women over an 18-year period: results of the Nijmegen Cohort Study.

The objective of this study was to determine the factors that influence diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the incidence of hypertension. In 1977, DBP and cardiovascular risk factors were measured in 7092 men and women. In 1995, 2335 subjects participated at a second screening. Those patients already under hypertension treatment in 1977 were excluded. The DBP tracking was studied in subjects not under hypertension treatment during the study. Hypertension was defined on two ways in the analysis: under current hypertension treatment or a DBP > 95 mmHg measured at rescreening in 1995. Forty-seven percent of the subjects with a DBP < 75 mmHg in 1977 remained in the same category of DBP in 1995, and 7% had become hypertensive. Of the 75-84 mmHg group in 1977, 40% stayed in the same category in 1995 and 15% became hypertensive. Of the 85-94 mmHg category, 30% stayed in the same category and 30% became hypertensive in 1995. Of the highest category in 1977 (> 95 mmHg), 64% were still in that category in 1995. Baseline DBP in 1977 had the highest predictive value for future DBP. Weight gain over the years increased the risk for future hypertension: in contrast, there was no risk at a low DBP without weight gain. There is no need for regular check-ups for those patients with a low DBP who experience no weight gain. Borderline DBP (85-95 mmHg), together with weight gain, increases the risk of development of hypertension. The risk was especially high for men in the lower socioeconomic class.

Adult↗

The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on daily functioning.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, health and the outcomes of medical treatment have been measured in terms of morbidity, incidence or prevalence of disease, or even mortality. This disease model provides an adequate framework for acute illnesses, but for chronic diseases, severity and their effect on everyday functioning are paramount. For chronic diseases, functional health status, as a vital part of quality of life, is now recognized as an important outcome measure of the GP's care. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on functional health status in Dutch general practice. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the functional health status of all patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under 85 in two general practices, using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the COOP/WONCA charts. A control group of non-diabetic patients was selected, matched for practice, sex and age. RESULTS: In total, 127 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and 127 controls participated in the study, the responses being 78 and 70%, respectively. Between these groups the following were significantly different: the SIP subscore Physical, the SIP sum score and the COOP/WONCA scores for physical fitness and overall health. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were 2.46 (95% CI 1.5-4.1) times more likely to experience functional impairment. Cardiovascular morbidity (odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.7), locomotory morbidity (odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-5.1) and diabetes itself (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9) were significantly associated with the presence of functional impairment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on functional status, particularly in relation to cardiovascular morbidity.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of an intensive small group education and peer review programme aimed at implementing national guidelines on asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and on patient outcomes. DESIGN: A randomised experimental study with pre-measurement and post-measurement (after one year) in an experimental group and a control group in Dutch general practice. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTION: Two groups of GPs were formed and randomised. The education and peer review group (17 GPs with 210 patients) had an intervention consisting of an interactive group education and peer review programme (four sessions each lasting two hours). The control group consisted of 17 GPs with 223 patients (no intervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, skills, opinion about asthma and COPD care, presence of equipment in practice; actual performance about peakflow measurement, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment; asthma symptoms (Dutch Medical Research Council), smoking habits, exacerbation ratio, and disease specific quality of life (QOL-RIQ). Data were collected by a written questionnaire for GPs, by self recording of consultations by GPs, and by a written self administered questionnaire for adult patients with asthma/COPD. RESULTS: Data from 34 GP questionnaires, 433 patient questionnaires, and recordings from 934 consultations/visits and 350 repeat prescriptions were available. Compared with the control group there were only significant changes for self estimated skills (+16%, 95% confidence interval 4% to 26%) and presence of peakflow meters in practice (+18%, p < 0.05). No significant changes were found for provided care and patient outcomes compared with the control group. In the subgroup of more severe patients, the group of older patients, and in the group of patients not using anti-inflammatory medication at baseline, no significant changes compared with the control group were seen in patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Except for two aspects, intensive small group education and peer review in asthma and COPD care do not seem to be effective in changing relevant aspects of the provided care by GPs in accordance with guidelines, nor in changing patients' health status.

Adult↗

Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effects of two programmes of assessment of practice management in a practice visit: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised intervention study, with follow up after one year. SETTING: General practices in the Netherlands in 1993 and 1994. SUBJECTS: A total of 90 general practitioners (GPs) in 68 practices; follow up after one year comprised 81 GPs in 62 practices. MAIN MEASURES: Scores on indicators and dimensions of practice management in the visit instrument to assess practice management and organisation (a validated Dutch method to assess practice management in a practice visit). Change was defined as the difference in score between the first visit and the visit after one year on 208 indicators and on 33 dimensions of practice management. RESULTS: Data of 44 mutual visits by peers were compared with data of 46 visits by non-physician observers. After a year both programmes showed improvements on many aspects of practice management, but different aspects changed in each of the two programmes. After mutual practice visits, GPs scored significantly higher on content of the doctor's bag, on collaboration with colleagues, on collaboration with other care providers, and on accessibility of patient information than after a visit by a non-physician observer. The visits by non-physician observers resulted in a higher score on extent of use of records and on assessment on outcome and year report. CONCLUSION: Change after mutual practice visits and feedback by peers is more marked than after a visit and feedback by a non-physician observer.

Family Practice↗

Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of (a) two programmes of assessment of practice management in a practice visit: mutual practice visits and feedback by peers versus visits and feedback by non-physician observers and (2) the practice visit method used in these programmes (the visit instrument to assess practice management and organisation (VIP)--a validated Dutch tool). DESIGN: Prospective, randomised intervention study with the two programmes, follow up after one year. General practitioners (GPs) were visited after each programme and after the revisits by non-physician observers a year later. SETTING: General practices in the Netherlands in 1993 and 1994. SUBJECTS: A total of 90 GPs in 68 practices. At follow up after 1 year there were 81 GPs in 62 practices. MAIN MEASURES: Scores (mainly five point scales) for questions on appreciation and acceptance; after the follow up visit a year later, scores for questions on feasibility and practicality of the improved procedure and feedback report. RESULTS: Data of 44 mutual visits by peers were compared with data of 46 visits by non-physician observers. A visit by a non-physician observer was appreciated significantly more. After the practice visit at one year follow up, the participants reported to have appreciated the visit and the feedback report and to prefer feedback of a non-physician observer to that of a peer. Participants' reports on the procedure and the presentation of the feedback provided clues for the improvement of visit procedures. CONCLUSIONS: A practice visit and feedback by a non-physician observer is more appreciated than a visit and feedback by a colleague. A practice visit with the VIP by a non-physician observer is a simple, easy, and well accepted method for assessing practice management.

Family Practice↗

On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge on the clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice is poor. Preceding studies offer a fragmentary view only, whereas further knowledge is important to enable the assessment of the prognosis. The object of this study is to investigate the course of low back pain presented in general practice to enable the assessment of the prognosis. METHODS: A one year follow up study on the clinical course of low back pain in consecutive cases receiving usual care in general practice. During a period of two years 15 general practitioners from Amsterdam and surrounding areas included consecutive patients with both chronic and recent onset low back pain. After the initial visit, each patient was monitored for a period of 12 months. The follow up consisted of monthly postal questionnaires on the course of the low back pain and the related disability. RESULTS: A total of 443 of 605 patients identified were included in the follow up, which was fully completed by 269 patients. In general, patients with less serious low back pain participated less often or did not complete the follow up. At 12 weeks 35% and at the end of the follow up 10% of the population, respectively, still suffered from low back pain. Both the pain and the disability seemed to diminish quickly after the initial visit, and both seemed to stabilise at a lower level if the low back pain did not disappear completely. About three of four patients, whose pain disappeared before the end of the follow up, endured one or more relapses within a year. The median time to a relapse was about seven weeks, and its median duration about six weeks. Both the pain and the disability turned out to be less severe during relapses. The median time to recovery for patients whose low back pain developed more than seven weeks before the initial visit, was four weeks longer than for patients with more recently developed low back pain at the initial visit. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice, for the most patients, clearly is less favourable than expected. It takes more than just a few weeks to recover, and relapses occur within a year in most cases. Fortunately, both the pain and the disability quickly diminish, even if the low back pain does not resolve within a few weeks.

Acute Disease↗

The role of "fear of corticosteroids" in nonparticipation in early intervention with inhaled corticosteroids in asthma and COPD in general practice.

Treatment of chronic airflow obstruction with inhaled corticosteroids at an early stage has been shown to preserve the lung function. We tested the hypothesis that "fear of corticosteroids" may be an important reason for nonparticipation in the Detection, early Intervention and Monitoring programme on Chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD) and Asthma ("DIMCA") project. One thousand seven hundred and forty nine adult subjects from 10 general practices were invited to participate in the several parts of the "DIMCA" programme. Refusers were questioned about the reason(s) for nonparticipation. Together the screening, monitoring and three drug interventions of the study showed on average 25-35% refusers. The most frequent reasons for nonparticipation were absence of pulmonary symptoms and lack of time. For those invited to take part in one of the three drug interventions, "dislike of medication" was the most important reason for nonparticipation (33, 45 and 67% of the refusers). "Fear of corticosteroids" specifically was the reason for nonparticipation in 8% of the refusers on the basis of "dislike of medication". We concluded that a specific fear of corticosteroids was not a major obstacle for early intervention with inhaled corticosteroids.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method.

BACKGROUND: Practice management (PM) in general practice is as yet ill-defined; a systematic description of its domain, as well as a valid method to assess it, are necessary for research and assessment. AIM: To develop and validate a method to assess PM of general practitioners (GPs) and practices. METHOD: Relevant and potentially discriminating indicators were selected from a systematic framework of 2410 elements of PM to be used in an assessment method (VIP = visit instrument PM). The method was first tested in a pilot study and, after revision, was evaluated in order to select discriminating indicators and to determine validity of dimensions (factor and reliability analysis, linear regression). RESULTS: One hundred and ten GPs were assessed with the practice visit method using 249 indicators; 208 of these discriminated sufficiently at practice level or at GP level. Factor analysis resulted in 34 dimensions and in a taxonomy of PM. Dimensions and indicators showed marked variation between GPs and practices. Training practices scored higher on five dimensions; single-handed and dispensing practices scored lower on delegated tasks, but higher on accessibility and availability. CONCLUSION: A visit method to assess PM has been developed and its validity studied systematically. The taxonomy and dimensions of PM were in line with other classifications. Selection of a balanced number of useful and relevant indicators was nevertheless difficult. The dimensions could discriminate between groups of GPs and practices, establishing the value of the method for assessment. The VIP method could be an important contribution to the introduction of continuous quality improvement in the profession.

Family Practice↗

Control group characteristics and study outcomes: empirical data from a study on mortality of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Dutch general practice.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Control group characteristics as comorbidity and chronic psychosocial problems may play an important part in study outcomes. A primary care data base was used to quantify the effects of varying the case mix of participants. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Data were collected from 1967-1996 in four Dutch general practices performing the Continuous Morbidity Registration Nijmegen. PATIENTS AND CONTROLS: All newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients in the period 1967-1989 fulfilling the WHO criteria (n = 265); for each type 2 diabetic patient a control was matched for practice, sex, age, and social class; from these controls subgroups were selected based on the absence of different types of morbidity; these subgroups were also matched for practice, sex, age, and social class. MAIN RESULTS: The relative risk of mortality in type 2 diabetic patients in comparison with various subsets of controls ranged from 1.33 (95% CI 0.97, 1.81) to 2.16 (95% CI 1.46, 3.20). CONCLUSION: Control group characteristics as comorbidity and chronic psychosocial problems turned out to influence the risk estimation in a cohort study. General practice data enhance the study of these aspects.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

The prognosis of low back pain in general practice.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study on low back pain in consecutive patients in general practice, in which potential prognostic indicators at baseline and at the 1-year follow-up examination were assessed by means of four weekly questionnaires. OBJECTIVES: To identify prognostic indicators of the duration of low back pain in general practice and the occurrence of a relapse. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prognosis of low back pain in general practice. Different designs and different results of preceding studies make drawing conclusions about the prognostic indicators, in any, of the course of low back pain in general practice difficult. METHODS: For a period of 2 years, 15 general practitioners from Amsterdam and surrounding areas studied consecutive patients with chronic low back pain and those with a recent onset of low back pain. A large number of potential prognostic indicators were assessed at the initial visit. After the initial visit, each patient was monitored for a period of 12 months. The follow-up assessment was conducted with four weekly postal questionnaires. The associations among the potential prognostic indicators, the duration of the index episode, and the occurrence of a relapse were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 605 patients identified, 443 were included in the follow-up period of assessment; the questionnaires were completed by 269 patients. In general, patients with less severe low back pain participated less often or did not complete the follow-up study. Thirty-five percent of the population still experienced low back pain after 12 weeks, and 10% still experienced it after 1 year. Approximately three of every four patients whose index episode ended before the end of the follow-up period had one or more relapses within a year. The analysis resulted in a model with four variables predicting the duration of the low back pain, including "the duration of the low back pain preceding the initial visit," "receiving physical therapy," "pain intensity", and "history of back surgery." Daily functioning appeared to be the only variable that was significantly associated with the occurrence of a relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Only a few variables appear to be related to the clinical course of low back pain seen in general practice. In particular, the duration preceding the initial visit and, unexpectedly, receiving physical therapy were both associated with a longer duration of low back pain.

Adult↗

Long-term effect of nutritional counseling: a study in family medicine.

This paper reports research using data in the Nijmegen Family Practice Monitoring Project. One part of the research is follow-up, after 17 y, of a 1977 trial of dietary advice for patients with hypertension or a family history of premature cardiovascular disease. In the intervention group, 840 patients were given health education every 2 mo by trained practice nurses for 1 y. There were 497 patients with similar coronary risk factors in the control group, who received usual care. One year after the intervention a significant decrease was found (and published) in serum cholesterol concentrations and blood pressure in the intervention group. By the time of the 1995 reexaminations, however, there were no differences in coronary risk factors between the two groups. Blood pressures had come down, more so in the control group, and the percentage of smokers had decreased equally in both groups. There were no significant differences in intake of dietary fat or in type of fat. The lack of difference was still found when the groups were divided into those with serum cholesterol concentrations > and < 6.5 mmol/L. A second part of the research was to investigate in 1995 the relation between patients' stage of change of fat intake and their dietary intake. It was found that those in stage 5 (sustaining desired changes in behavior) had the lowest saturated fat intake. Since 1977 both groups have been treated equally if hypertension was diagnosed. The two groups were not managed differently with regard to dietary advice after 1977.

Adult↗

Asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness in adolescents and young adults.

The clinical significance of asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is not well-known. The aim of this study was to explore, in a cross-sectional analysis, the characteristics of adolescent subjects with asymptomatic BHR, as compared to nonhyperresponsive subjects and those with symptomatic BHR. The subjects were selected by date of birth from the register of general practitioners. The hypothesis that both asymptomatic and symptomatic BHR are related to early childhood lower respiratory tract infections was also tested, in a historical cohort analysis. Respiratory morbidity was studied in early childhood and BHR in adolescence and young adulthood, in a population of 551 subjects aged 10-23 yrs. Morbidity had been recorded prospectively since birth in the general practice. Data on chronic respiratory symptoms, smoking behaviour, airways obstruction, BHR and allergy were collected during this investigation. BHR was present in 42% of the subjects, of which 70% were asymptomatic. The occurrence of symptomatic BHR was related to acute bronchitis in early childhood, allergy, airways obstruction and recent asthma, acute bronchitis and hay fever; whereas, asymptomatic BHR was not. Characteristics of subjects with asymptomatic BHR did not differ significantly from those without BHR, with respect to these factors. We conclude that asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness in adolescence and young adulthood is not related to lower respiratory infections in early childhood. Furthermore, subjects with asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness have similar characteristics to those without bronchial hyperresponsiveness, but differ strongly from subjects with symptomatic hyperresponsiveness. Asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness may not be the link between early childhood lower respiratory morbidity and asthma in later life, nor a risk factor for later asthma.

Acute Disease↗