PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H L Elliott

Publications and source records attributed to H L Elliott.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Circulating endothelial cells in renal transplant recipients.

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are a marker of endothelial injury and endothelial dysfunction. We measured CECs in 95 patients with functioning renal transplants at risk of premature cardiovascular (CV) disease and in normal control subjects. We were unable to demonstrate consistent relationships between CEC levels and conventional CV risk factors in transplant recipients. However, CEC levels were increased in patients with a history of rejection. We conclude that CECs are of little use as a marker of CV risk in this population but may be a useful marker to monitor allograft rejection.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

24-hour blood pressure control: its relevance to cardiovascular outcomes and the importance of long-acting antihypertensive drugs.

This review article outlines the evidence that 24 h blood pressure (BP) measurements are particularly important predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcome. In turn, there is supportive evidence from a range of studies that 24 h BP control should be an integral part of the antihypertensive drug treatment strategy. Furthermore, since not all once daily antihypertensive agents can provide such 24 h control, there is a requirement for careful drug (and/or dosage) selection. Although the clinic (office) BP continues to be the standard measurement by which hypertension is diagnosed and treatment monitored, there is now clear evidence of the superiority of 24 h BP assessments. Although there are not yet prospective, outcome clinical trails which have relied upon 24 h BP values there is clear evidence that 24 h BP values correlate much more closely than conventional clinic BP values with measurements such as left ventricular hypertrophy, cerebral vascular damage (lacunar infarcts), renal damage (microalbuminuria) and vascular damage (carotid artery intima media thickness). In turn, there is evidence that during drug treatment, when achieved clinic blood pressures appear to be comparable, there is improved outcome in those patients whose 24 h BP values are significantly lower. Not all antihypertensive drugs are equivalent, however, in their abilities to reduce 24 h BP and the clinician needs to be aware of possible shortcomings when considering the choice of drug. In this respect, intrinsically long-acting agents are best equipped to provide sustained and consistent BP control throughout 24 h.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2000

The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of controlled-release formulations of felodipine and metoprolol in free and fixed combinations in elderly hypertensive patients.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to study the efficacy and tolerability of felodipine extended release (ER) 5 mg and metoprolol controlled release (CR/ZOC) 50 mg given as a fixed combination (Logimax) or as a free combination in elderly (age greater than 60 years) hypertensive patients, using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. A secondary aim was to relate the efficacy of the free and fixed combinations with pharmacokinetic profiles. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised three-way crossover multi-centre study. BP was measured for 26 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), which was performed on the last day of the three treatment phases. RESULTS: Mean sitting BPs, measured during the trough period with ABPM, were significantly lower with both the free and fixed combinations of metoprolol and felodipine than placebo (141/83 mmHg free, 140/83 mmHg fixed, 156/93 mmHg placebo). The mean BPs measured over 24 h using ABPM were 143/82 mmHg, 140/82 mmHg and 158/93 mmHg for the free, fixed and placebo treatment arms, respectively. The trough-to-peak ratios (T:P) were 75% and 79% for the systolic BP and 70% and 70% for the diastolic BP for the free and fixed combinations, respectively. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed identical plasma concentration-time curves for felodipine given as the free or fixed combination. Comparison of the plasma concentration-time curves for metoprolol revealed a delay in the release rate from the fixed combination formulation. No significant differences in BP control between the active treatments were noted during this period. Of 26 patients entered into the study, 3 withdrew during active phase for non-drug-related reasons. No patient withdrew from active treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. The frequency of adverse event reporting for the fixed combination of felodipine and metoprolol was similar to that for placebo (60% and 58%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that once-daily dosing with either the free or fixed combination of felodipine 5 mg and metoprolol 50 mg produces a significant sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic BP with similar plasma concentration profiles over a 24-h period.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Insulin action is associated with endothelial function in hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

A primary defect in the vascular action of insulin may be a key intermediate mechanism that links endothelial dysfunction with reduced insulin-mediated cellular glucose uptake in metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. The present study was designed to characterize more fully the relations between insulin action and endothelial function in male patients with essential hypertension (H, n=9) or type 2 diabetes (D, n=9) along with healthy control subjects (C) matched for age, body mass index, and lipid profile. They attended for measurement of whole-body insulin sensitivity (MCR) by the hyperinsulinemic clamp technique (day 1) and forearm vasoreactivity in response to intra-arterial infusions of insulin/glucose (day 2) and N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) and norepinephrine (day 3) by bilateral venous-occlusion plethysmography. Results expressed as mean+/-SE MCR (mL/kg per minute) were 7.22+/-0. 99 (C), 6.32+/-0.78 (H), and 5.06+/-0.53 (D). Insulin/glucose-mediated vasodilation (IGMV) was 17.1+/-5.6% (C), 17. 2+/-5.5% (H), and 12.3+/-6.4% (D). L-NMMA vasoconstriction (LNV) was 37.9+/-5.1% (C), 37.5+/-2.3% (H), and 33.6+/-2.8% (D). There were no significant differences among groups for these parameters. Pooled correlation analyses revealed associations between MCR and IGMV (r=0. 46, P<0.05), MCR and LNV (r=0.44, P<0.05), and IGMV and LNV (r=0.52, P<0.01). This study supports functional coupling between insulin action (both metabolic and vascular) and basal endothelial nitric oxide production in humans.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Trandolapril does not improve insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are increasingly used as first-line therapy for hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus and are widely believed to improve insulin sensitivity (M). However, the evidence for the latter effect does not stand close scrutiny. We have assessed the effect of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril on M in 16 patients (mean +/- SD age, 58 +/- 10.6 yr) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (initial blood pressure, 173 +/- 14.5/93 +/- 8.0 mm Hg), obesity (body mass index, 30 +/- 5.4 kg/m2), and impaired glucose intolerance (n = 4) or type 2 diabetes (n = 12) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. All patients underwent three 3-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp studies (soluble insulin, 1.5 mU/kg x min) after a 2-week placebo run-in and at the end of two 4-week periods of treatment with 2 mg trandolapril or placebo (2-week washout). M (mean +/- SD) did not change with trandolapril: placebo (run-in), 5.2 +/- 1.98 mg/kg x min; placebo, 5.3 +/- 1.70 mg/kg x min; trandolapril, 5.1 +/- 1.65 mg/kg x min; P = 0.58; 95% confidence intervals, -0.74, 0.43 (trandolapril vs. placebo); 95% power to exclude an 8% increase in M. In conclusion, trandolapril had no clinically relevant effect on M in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Previous reports of improved M during ACE inhibitor treatment may be attributable to suboptimal study design and/or use of surrogate measures of M.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Endothelial dysfunction as a possible link between C-reactive protein levels and cardiovascular disease.

Low-grade chronic inflammation, characterized by elevated plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Endothelial cell activation is an early event in atherogenesis, and previous studies have reported correlations between indirect markers of endothelial cell activation and CRP concentration. Therefore, in the present study, we measured CRP concentration (and leptin concentration as an index of fat mass) in nine healthy subjects (mean age 53+/-8.1 years; body mass index 27+/-3.2 kg/m(2); mean arterial blood pressure 101+/-9.0 mmHg) undergoing measurement of basal endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthesis using intra-brachial infusions of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; a substrate inhibitor of endothelial NO synthase) and noradrenaline (a non-specific control vasoconstrictor). In univariate analysis, CRP concentration was correlated with (i) the percentage decrease in forearm blood flow (FBF) during L-NMMA infusion (r=0.85, P=0.004); and (ii) the serum leptin concentration (r=0.65, P=0.05). In multivariate analysis, the relationship between CRP concentration and the FBF response to L-NMMA remained significant when age and leptin (t=2.65, P=0.045), age and BMI (t=3.69, P=0.014), or age and low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol plus high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (t=3.37, P=0.044), were included in regression models. In contrast, the response of FBF to noradrenaline was not significantly related to CRP concentration. These data demonstrate for the first time a relationship between low-grade chronic inflammation and basal endothelial NO synthesis (measured using an invasive method), and support the notion that endothelial dysfunction is a critical intermediate phenotype in the relationship between inflammation and cardiovascular disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Platelet-derived growth factor stimulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression is mediated by transient activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase signal transduction pathway.

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) stimulates transcription of an immediate-early gene set in Balb/c 3T3 cells. One cohort of these genes, typified by c-fos, is induced within minutes following activation of PDGF receptors. A second cohort responds to PDGF only after a significant time delay, although induction is still a primary response to receptor activation as shown by "superinduction" in the presence of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. PDGF-receptor activated signaling pathways for the "slow" immediate-early genes are poorly resolved. Using gain-of-function mutations together with small molecule inhibitors of kinase activity, we show that activation of PI 3-kinase is both necessary and sufficient for the induction of the prototype slow immediate-early gene, monocyte chemoattractant-1 (MCP-1). Following activation of PDGF receptors, MCP-1 mRNA does not begin to accumulate for at least 90 min. However, only a brief (10 min) interval of PI 3-kinase activity is required to trigger this delayed response. The serine/threonine protein kinase, Akt/PKB, likely functions as a downstream affector of PI 3-kinase for this induction.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1999

Renal effects of amlodipine in normotensive renal transplant recipients.

Renal effects of amlodipine in normotensive renal transplant recipients. The use of cyclosporin A (CsA) has improved the success of renal transplantation, but is associated with hypertension and significant renal toxicity. Previous reports suggest that calcium channel blockers may be useful in opposing the adverse effects of CsA. We have evaluated the effects of amlodipine (5 mg, once daily for 8 weeks) on renal function in 27 normotensive renal transplant recipients with stable renal function, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, cross over study. Amlodipine significantly reduced serum creatinine concentration relative to placebo (mean+/-SD: 168+/-65 vs 177+/-66 micromol/l; P=0.002) and there was a strong trend towards an increase in effective renal plasma flow on amlodipine relative to placebo (238+/-92 vs 217+/-87 ml/min; P=0.055). Glomerular filtration rate and lithium clearance were unaffected. Trough CsA blood concentration was unaffected. Amlodipine was well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events, and did not affect blood pressure or heart rate. In conclusion, amlodipine reduced serum creatinine in normotensive renal transplant recipients after only 8 weeks treatment, and was well tolerated in concomitant administration with CsA.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

ACE inhibition in chronic renal failure and in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy: focus on spirapril.

The management of hypertension and nephropathy, in both diabetes and other forms of renal disease, is usually based on blood pressure reduction through an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-based treatment regimen. With particular respect to the choice of ACE inhibitor drug, there are no definitive direct comparisons in the treatment of renal disease. In terms of blood pressure reduction, however, there is evidence that spirapril is at least as effective as the reference ACE inhibitor, enalapril. However, patients with diabetic nephropathy and/or chronic renal failure are at potential risk from drug accumulation if the preferred agent relies predominantly on glomerular filtration for its elimination. In this respect spirapril may have an advantage because it has been shown that there are no clinically relevant increases in the spirapril(at) concentrations (24 h post-dose) even in the setting of advanced renal failure (creatinine clearance <20 ml/min). Thus, there is no requirement to modify the dose and no concerns about drug accumulation or the potential for exaggerated therapeutic or adverse effects. In summary, an ACE inhibitor drug is seen as an integral component of the drug treatment regimen for patients with nephropathy. Where there is renal failure it may be prudent to administer a drug, such as spirapril, which also has alternative elimination mechanisms.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1999

Insulin-mediated vasodilation and glucose uptake are functionally linked in humans.

Intra-arterial infusion of insulin in physiological doses causes forearm vasodilation which is augmented by co-infusion of D-glucose, leading us to speculate that local insulin-mediated vasodilation may depend on insulin-mediated glucose uptake. We have examined the relationship between whole-body insulin sensitivity and forearm vasodilation in response to local infusion of insulin/glucose, thus avoiding any confounding effects of sympathetic stimulation on peripheral blood flow. Eighteen healthy, normotensive male volunteers (age, 26+/-5.4 years) attended on two separate occasions for measurement of: (1) whole-body insulin sensitivity with use of the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp; (2) forearm vasodilation in response to an intra-arterial infusion of insulin/glucose with use of bilateral venous occlusion plethysmography. Insulin-mediated glucose uptake (M) for the group (mean+/-SD) was 10.0+/-2.2 mg. kg-1. min-1, and the percentage change in forearm blood flow ratio (%FBFR) for the group (median, interquartile range) was 28.2% (13.6, 48.6). In univariate analysis, M was significantly correlated with %FBFR (rs=0.60, P<0.05), but not with body mass index (BMI) (rs=-0. 42), age (r=-0.39) or mean arterial pressure (r=0.13). In multiple regression analysis, %FBFR remained a significant independent predictor of M (R2 (adj)=0.48, t=3.23, P<0.01) in a model involving BMI, age, and blood pressure. These data support the concept of a significant functional relationship between insulin's metabolic and vascular actions, possibly at an endothelial level.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

ACE (I/D) genotype as a predictor of the magnitude and duration of the response to an ACE inhibitor drug (enalaprilat) in humans.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the possible effects of contrasting ACE (I/D) genotypes on the responses to the ACE inhibitor enalaprilat in normotensive men. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects with DD (n=12) and II (n=11) ACE genotypes received an intravenous infusion of enalaprilat or placebo. Pressor responses to stepwise, incremental doses of angiotensin I were measured at 1 and 10 hours after dosing. The dose required to raise mean blood pressure by 20 mm Hg (PD20) was calculated individually, and the ratio of PD20 during enalaprilat to that during placebo (dose ratio, DR) was used for assessment of the extent of ACE inhibition. The pressor response was significantly attenuated at 1 hour after enalaprilat in both groups, but significant attenuation was evident at 10 hours after dose only in the II subjects. The DRs at both 1 hour (median, 5.43 versus 2.82, P=0.0035) and 10 hours (2.06 versus 0.84, P=0.0008) after enalaprilat were significantly higher in II subjects than in DD subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of enalaprilat was significantly greater and lasted longer in normotensive men homozygous for the II ACE genotype. By multivariate analysis, ACE (I/D) genotype and plasma angiotensin II levels were predictive of >50% of the variation in response to ACE inhibition.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Angiotensin II antagonists: efficacy, duration of action, comparison with other drugs.

The benefits of anti-hypertensive drug treatment have been established by clinical trials demonstrating significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thiazide diuretics predominated in these trials but it is reasonable to conclude that the benefits were attributable to the blood pressure (BP) reduction per se and not to specific pharmacological characteristics. Furthermore, it can be calculated that even greater benefits would probably have accrued if the magnitude of the BP reduction had been greater. On first principles, therefore, the basic requirement for any anti-hypertensive drug is confirmation of its ability to reduce BP. The angiotensin II antagonists constitute an important new class of drug, with a low incidence of adverse effects, but early studies with the prototype, losartan, have raised some doubts about its anti-hypertensive 'potency' in the clinical setting. For example, in several different comparative studies there were consistently lesser BP reductions with losartan compared to enalapril. This applied to both the trough and peak BP reductions. Furthermore, dose-response relationships have not always been clearly defined: for example, in one study diastolic BP reductions (trough) fell in the range 4.1 to 4.8 mm Hg with 50, 100 and 150 mg losartan. Although the preliminary results with newer angiotensin II antagonists suggest that they may have greater efficacy, there is only limited information about the definitive identification of the clinically relevant dose ranges for many of these drugs.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗