PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H L Elliott

Publications and source records attributed to H L Elliott.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

The effects of age on the pharmacokinetics, antihypertensive efficacy and general tolerability of dilevalol.

1. This study investigated the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, general tolerability and concentration-effect relationships in 18 patients with essential hypertension (age range 23-73 years) during treatment with dilevalol, a non selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilator properties. 2. There were no significant age-related changes in pharmacokinetics for either acute or chronic treatment with dilevalol, although there were significant changes in elimination half-life from 7.8 to 11.7 h (P less than 0.05) and in AUC from 261 to 352 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.005) following translation from acute to chronic dosing. 3. In absolute terms, dilevalol treatment (as compared with placebo) produced numerically larger falls in average blood pressure in the six oldest as compared with the six youngest patients: for example, supine blood pressure fell by, respectively, 29/15 and 10/7 mm Hg during chronic treatment. 4. Using an integrated kinetic-dynamic model, blood pressure responsiveness was characterised by relating the fall in blood pressure (mmHg) to the plasma drug concentrations in each individual patient. No independent age-related effect was demonstrated. There was a significant relationship between response and the height of initial blood pressure which tended to be higher in the elderly patients. 5. Patient tolerability was generally satisfactory and there was no differential age-related effect. 6. This study has shown that the antihypertensive efficacy of dilevalol is not attenuated in the elderly and that there are no significant age-related differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Studies with abanoquil (UK-52,046) a novel quinoline alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist: I. Effects on blood pressure, heart rate and pressor responsiveness in normotensive subjects.

1. Abanoquil (UK 52,046) is a novel, quinoline-derivative, alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist which, on the basis of animal studies, possesses antiarrhythmic activity at doses which have little or no effect on blood pressure. 2. In two placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover studies the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist activity (phenylephrine pressor responses) and the effects on blood pressure and heart rate (in the presence and absence of concomitant beta-adrenoceptor blockade) have been investigated in healthy, normotensive subjects following the intravenous administration (i.v.) of abanoquil. 3. In the first study, abanoquil at a dose of 0.4 micrograms kg-1 i.v. (as a bolus or by increments) produced significant alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism (with rightward shifts of more than two-fold in the phenylephrine pressor dose-response curves) but no significant effects on supine or erect blood pressure and heart rate. 4. In the second study, a dose of 0.5 micrograms kg-1 i.v. had no significant effect on supine or erect blood pressure but pre-treatment with atenolol promoted a small fall in erect blood pressure without causing significant orthostatic hypotension. 5. In conclusion, significant alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism without marked reflex tachycardia or profound postural hypotension suggest that abanoquil has a different haemodynamic profile from that of 'classical' peripheral alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1991

Studies with abanoquil (UK-52,046) a novel quinoline alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist: II. Duration of action, pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationships in normotensive subjects.

1. This study further examines the quinoline-derivative abanoquil with particular respect to the duration of its alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist activity and its concentration-effect relationship following a single intravenous bolus dose of 0.5 micrograms kg-1 in young, normotensive males. 2. alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism (as assessed by phenylephrine pressor responses) was detectable for up to 12 h post dosing: at 12 h there was a significant 1.5-fold rightward shift (95% CI: 2.2 to 1.1) of the pressor dose-response curve for diastolic blood pressure. 3. Despite evidence of substantial alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism abanoquil had no significant effect on blood pressure, supine and erect, but there were small and statistically significant increments in heart rate. 4. The degree of alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism was related to whole blood concentrations abanoquil: the PD-ratios of phenylephrine pressor responses performed at 1, 6, and 12 h post dosing were significantly correlated with log drug concentrations (r = 0.57 for systolic (P less than 0.05) and r = 0.78 for diastolic blood pressure (P less than 0.005). 5. In conclusion, abanoquil produced significant alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism which was related to circulating drug concentrations. The absence of other significant cardiovascular effects suggests that abanoquil warrants further clinical study as an antiarrhythmic agent.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1991

The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of bopindolol.

The pharmacokinetics of the non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, bopindolol, have been studied in 18 hypertensive patients with varying degrees of renal impairment following single and multiple oral dosing. Bopindolol, which undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, was found to accumulate in patients with chronic renal failure but the disposition in patients on regular haemodialysis did not differ significantly from patients with normal renal function. The mechanism underlying these changes in pharmacokinetics is not clear but suggests the presence of metabolic inhibitors in uraemic plasma which are removed by regular haemodialysis.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1991

Inhibitory effect of uraemia on the hepatic clearance and metabolism of nicardipine.

1. The principal aim of this study was to investigate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of nicardipine following intravenous and oral dosing. 2. The plasma clearance of nicardipine was significantly lower at 6.5 ml min-1 kg-1 in patients with impaired renal function, compared with a mean value of 10.4 in patients with normal renal function and with 12.5 ml min-1 kg-1 in patients on regular haemodialysis treatment. 3. In comparison to the patients with normal renal function, there were significant increases in AUC and Cmax in the patients with renal impairment. These increases were particularly marked during chronic dosing - AUC was increased by 163%, Cmax by 127% and apparent oral bioavailability by 90%. There were no such increases in the dialysis group whose values were similar to those for normal renal function. 4. There were no significant differences in volume of distribution or protein binding, nor in the measured indices of hepatic function to account for the reduction in drug clearance in the patients with renal impairment. 5. The results of this study indicate that renal impairment may have a significant and potentially important impact on the disposition of a drug which, under normal circumstances, is highly extracted by the liver. Accumulation of a metabolic 'inhibitor' substance is a possible explanation.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

Combined lipid-lowering and antihypertensive treatment as part of a strategy of multiple risk factor intervention.

Thirty-six patients with treated mild to moderate hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia (greater than 6.5 mmol/l) entered a 12 week study to evaluate the efficacy and patient tolerability of combined lipid-lowering and antihypertensive treatment as part of a strategy of multiple risk factor intervention. The principal effects on the plasma lipid profiles were significant reductions of 30-40% in total and LDL cholesterol. These reductions were achieved without loss of blood pressure control. There was no significant impact on HDL cholesterol or on lipoprotein Lp(a). These preliminary results suggest that substantial reductions in total and LDL cholesterol can be achieved without compromising blood pressure control which remained satisfactory at 144/82 supine and 143/80 mmHg standing. Furthermore, these changes were achieved without any problems of patient tolerability or interference with patient compliance with drug treatment. Overall, therefore, substantial reductions in CHD risk can be achieved with an acceptable combination of lipid lowering and antihypertensive treatments.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

The clinical consequences of the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of amlodipine.

By comparison with other calcium antagonist drugs, amlodipine has unique pharmacokinetic properties that are probably attributable to its chemical structure and positive ionic charge at physiological pH. Thus, amlodipine undergoes gradual absorption from the gastro-intestinal tract and is widely distributed throughout body tissues. It is cleared only slowly by metabolism in the liver and so has a long elimination half-life, which makes it suitable for single daily dosing. During steady-state administration there are only small peak-to-trough variations in plasma drug levels and in clinical use these pharmacokinetic properties appear to be associated with a smoother pharmacodynamic effect and a reduced incidence of (early) vasodilator side effects.

Amlodipine↗
PubMed1990

Factors influencing the responses to calcium antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.

The results of a variety of studies that have investigated the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcium antagonist drugs have produced the following conclusions. Primarily, as a result of an age-dependent decline in plasma drug clearance, there is a tendency for elderly patients to have higher plasma drug concentrations than young patients. In terms of pharmacological response, there is good evidence of therapeutic efficacy in both hypertension and ischaemic heart disease, but there is no convincing evidence of any preferential age-related effect, particularly in relation to blood pressure reduction. Similarly and conversely, there is no convincing evidence that the elderly are at greater risk from the adverse effects of calcium antagonist drugs, particularly those which reflect the negative effects on cardiac conduction. An integrated mathematical method for describing antihypertensive response, which incorporates both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information, has been used to investigate the variability in antihypertensive effect with nifedipine and verapamil. There was no relationship between responsiveness (in mmHg/ng/mL) and patient age and plasma renin activity; however, responsiveness during chronic treatment was directly correlated with the height of the starting blood pressure and the response to the first dose.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1990

Prediction of the antihypertensive response to enalapril.

This study investigates the potential utility of a drug concentration-effect modelling approach to predict the long-term response to antihypertensive treatment with enalapril. Concentration-effect relationships were characterized in 13 subjects following a single dose of enalapril (20 mg) and for each individual the derived parameters were used to predict the steady-state blood pressure profile. The predicted responses (before dosing and 4 h after dosing) were in close agreement with the responses observed after 6 weeks. In individual patients, the observed and predicted blood pressure profiles over a 12 h period were compared. In six of the 13 subjects, there were statistically significant (P less than 0.05) prediction errors. However, in all but one of these patients the error was less than 10%, and for the group as a whole the mean prediction error was small and not statistically significant (-0.6 +/- 2.1 mmHg). The kinetic-dynamic parameters derived from observations of the first dose were used to simulate steady-state responses to several alternative doses and dose frequencies. A regimen of 10 mg twice daily increased the ratio of blood pressure at trough-to-peak response to 75 +/- 5% compared to 33 +/- 16% when 20 mg was given once daily. In addition, a twice-daily regimen reduced the coefficient of variation of the hourly average blood pressure. Thus, concentration-effect parameters derived from the first dose response to enalapril have potential not only for predicting long-term antihypertensive response, but also for optimizing dosage regimens for individual patients.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1990

Vascular pressor responses in treated and untreated essential hypertension.

Thirty-seven essential hypertensives received placebo for 3 weeks followed by nifedipine retard (n = 14) or enalapril (n = 13) or doxazosin (n = 10) as monotherapy for 6 weeks and attended study days to evaluate the effects of placebo, first dose, and chronic (1-6 weeks) treatment. On each study day, pressor responses to i.v. infusions of phenylephrine (PE) and angiotensin II (AII) were measured 1.5-3 h after drug administration and the derived PD20 values (dose required to increase mean blood pressure by 20 mm Hg) compared. Each treatment produced comparable reductions in BP. Nifedipine significantly attenuated the pressor responses to AII and PE: for AII, the mean PD20 (ng/kg/min) increased from 8.2 (placebo) to 9.9 (first dose), 13.9 (1 week), and 17.4 (6 weeks). Pressor responsiveness to both AII and PE was unchanged following enalapril: for PE, the mean PD20 (micrograms/kg/min) was 2.1 (placebo), 1.5 (first dose), and 1.5 (6 weeks). Doxazosin produced rightward shifts of the PE pressor dose-response curves but had no effect on responses to AII. The relationship between the simultaneous BP and HR changes during the infusion of PE was used as an index of cardiac baroreflex activity. In contrast to enalapril and doxazosin, which had no effect, nifedipine reduced the slope of the HR/BP relationship from -0.62 (placebo) to -0.38 (first dose) and -0.31 beats/min/mm Hg (6 weeks). For comparable reductions in BP, doxazosin only affects adrenergic mechanisms whereas nifedipine affects both adrenergic and non-adrenergically mediated vasoconstriction. The ACE inhibitor enalapril had no effect on pressor responses to AII and PE.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Clinical studies with the potassium channel activator cromakalim in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.

Eight normotensive subjects received single and multiple doses of cromakalim (1 mg) and placebo in a randomised double-blind cross-over study to examine general tolerance to cromakalim and its effects on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and pressor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and angiotensin II (AII). In a second study, 10 hypertensive patients whose BP control was unsatisfactory with atenolol 50-100 mg received additional treatment with placebo followed by cromakalim 1 mg daily for 4 weeks. Assessments were made of BP, HR, apparent hepatic blood flow and renal blood flow (RBF), pulmonary function, and the pharmacokinetics of atenolol. Cromakalim was generally well tolerated in both normotensive and hypertensive subjects. In the normotensive group, cromakalim produced a reflex increase in HR without any detectable decrease in BP: average (placebo-subtracted) increases in HR at 4 h were 16 beats/min with subjects in an erect position after the single dose and 14 beats/min after 7 days. Cromakalim had no effect on pressor responses to NE and AII. Addition of cromakalim to atenolol was associated with modest further reductions in BP between 0.5 and 3 h after drug administration, with maximal reductions of 21/14 mm Hg (subjects in supine position) 2 h after the first dose. Cromakalim had no effect on apparent liver blood flow and RBF, pulmonary function, and the steady-state pharmacokinetics of atenolol. Single and multiple 1-mg doses of cromakalim are well tolerated but are associated with only modest vasodilator activity.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

An evaluation of the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonism produced by SK&F 86466 in healthy normotensive males.

SK&F 86466 is a novel, potent alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist which, in animal experiments, is reported to show a high selectivity for alpha 2-adrenoceptors at both pre- and post-junctional sites. The effects of two intravenous doses of 80 and 200 micrograms kg-1 of SK&F 86466 were assessed in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised study in eight young, healthy, normotensive males. Two indices of alpha-adrenoceptor activity were investigated: i) Pressor responsiveness to the relatively selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine and to the preferential alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist alpha-methylnoradrenaline. ii) Circulating levels of noradrenaline. SK&F 86466 at a dose of 200 micrograms kg-1 produced rightward shifts of the pressor dose-response curves to both agonists: a 1.4 fold shift for phenylephrine (P = 0.023) and a 1.6 fold shift for alpha-methylnoradrenaline (P = 0.051). Erect plasma noradrenaline sampled at 105 min into the infusion was significantly increased from 2.9 to 5.0 nmol l-1 by SK&F 86466 200 micrograms kg-1 (P = 0.002). The change in the phenylephrine responses indicates post-junctional alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade and the rise in noradrenaline is consistent with pre-junctional alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist activity. Overall the results of this study suggest that SK&F 86466, at a dose of 200 micrograms kg-1, causes both alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonism in human subjects.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1990

Kinetic-dynamic relations and individual responses to enalapril.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability largely account for interindividual differences in the response to antihypertensive drugs including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The factors determining the response to enalapril have been investigated in a placebo-controlled study in essential hypertension. The effects of placebo, the initial dose of enalapril, and long-term (1 and 6 weeks) treatment with enalapril were studied in 13 subjects. By using an integrated kinetic-dynamic model that incorporates a parameter for saturable protein binding, individual responses for blood pressure reduction and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition were characterized in terms of the maximum effect (Emax) and the drug concentration required to produce 50% of Emax (Ce50). In individual subjects, plasma enalaprilat concentrations could be correlated with falls in blood pressure and changes in plasma angiotensin converting enzyme activity. For the group, Emax was -46.1 +/- 16.5 and -19.7 +/- 3.8 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, and the corresponding Ce50 values were 66.1 +/- 20.2 and 61.6 +/- 22.5 ng/ml. For angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, Emax (%) and Ce50 (ng/ml) were, respectively, 102.4 +/- 5 and 19.8 +/- 13 after the first dose, 103 +/- 5 and 33.4 +/- 20.3 after 1 week, and 101.3 +/- 2.2 and 31.3 +/- 18.9 after 6 weeks. There was no relation between the responsiveness to enalapril (Emax or Ce50) and patient age or plasma renin activity, but there was a significant positive correlation between Emax and the pretreatment blood pressure. In individual subjects, Emax (first dose) was directly correlated with Emax after 1 and 6 weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Factors determining the response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension.

Converting enzyme inhibitors, alone or in combination, are a safe and effective treatment for many hypertensives. However, the range of responses varies between individual patients and it has been claimed that there are two or three phases to the response. Pretreatment plasma renin (as an indication of activation of the renin angiotensin system) and the patient's age have been claimed to predict blood pressure fall. We have investigated whether these factors are useful indications of clinical response in mild-moderate essential hypertension. We have also investigated how well the response to the first dose correlates with the response to long-term (6 weeks) treatment. In a placebo-controlled trial of enalapril (20 mg daily), the blood pressure fall was analysed using an integrated pharmacokinetic/dynamic model of the concentration-effect relationship. The relation between the active drug concentration and blood pressure fall was best described by a non-linear Langmuir (Emax) model: E = (Emax C/C50 + C), where E is the effect, C the drug concentration, Emax is the maximum blood pressure fall and C50 is the drug concentration which causes a fall in blood pressure of 50% of the maximum. For a group of 13 essential hypertensives Emax was 46/20 mm Hg and C50 77 +/- 17 ng/ml. Emax was not related to age or pretreatment renin, but was positively correlated with pretreatment blood pressure (r = 0.69; p less than 0.01). Emax after 6 weeks of treatment (48 +/- 22 and 50 +/- 20 mm Hg, respectively, r = 0.89; p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors↗
PubMed1990

Concentration-effect relationships and antihypertensive mechanisms: ketanserin in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Concentration-effect relationships were characterized in individual hypertensive patients treated with single and multiple doses of ketanserin. There were significant changes in the concentration-effect parameters during continued treatment, and overall there was a reduction in antihypertensive responsiveness, from -0.47 to -0.25 mmHg/ng per ml. The nature of the changes, however, raises the possibility that there were associated changes in the site and mechanism of the underlying antihypertensive action. It is possible that a peripheral mechanism, perhaps alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism, is relatively more pronounced after the first dose whereas a central mechanism, perhaps related to serotonergic antagonism, is relatively more important during chronic treatment. We conclude that this technique of concentration-effect analysis may be useful in exploring mechanisms of action and identifying issues which require further clarification.

Blood Pressure↗