PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Lôo

Publications and source records attributed to H Lôo.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[French validation of a Minor Morphologic Anomalies Scale in schizophrenic patients and their parents].

UNLABELLED: Minor Physical Anomalies represent valuable indices of disturbance in early neurodevelopment. They are frequently observed in individuals with various brain disorders, including mental retardation, autism, epilepsy, hyperactivity, foetal alcohol syndrome and schizophrenia. The high prevalence of Minor Physical Anomalies in schizophrenia provides considerable support for a neurodevelopmental model in this disorder. However, studies in large sample using standardised scale are lacking. Such studies are needed in order to confirm their actual frequency and study the clinical correlates or morphological anomalies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to revise and validate a French version of a scale designed for the evaluation of Minor Physical Anomalies in adult psychiatric patients and notably in patients with schizophrenia. METHODOLOGY: The scale was revised from the Waldrop scale. The choice of items was done on the basis of frequency, reliability in the adult, reliability of rating. Some new items, related to know syndroms with comportmental symptoms were added. Both raters had previously had a short initiation to the rating of the scale. Interrater reliability between two examiners, blind with regards to the diagnosis was evaluated. RESULTS: The interrater reliability was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient at 0.97. Patients had significantly more minor physical anomalies than comparison subjects, and also more Minor Physical Anomalies than their parents. Fathers and mothers of these schizophrenic patients had significantly more Minor Physical Anomalies than normal comparison subjects. CONCLUSION: Although the evaluation of physical anomalies relies on subjective appreciation of normal vs abnormal, the revised version of minor physical anomalies scale (French version) was found to be a reliable tool, provided that a short initiation to the rating is performed. The scale differentiated schizophrenic patients from their parents, and the latter from the normal controls. A lot of questions remains unanswered concerning the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. This scale appeared as a useful complementary tool to help in the determination of the developmental phenotypic status of the patients enrolled in pathophysiological studies aiming the identification of developmental factors in schizophrenia.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Pilot study comparing in blind the therapeutic effect of two doses of agomelatine, melatoninergic agonist and selective 5HT2C receptors antagonist, in the treatment of major depressive disorders].

Rational and method - Two doses of agomelatine (S-20098), a novel potential antidepressant drug with a new pharmacological profile (melatonin agonist and selective 5HT2C antagonist -MASSA), were compared in a double-blind, randomised, pilot study in order to estimate the antidepressant activity shown in preclinical data. Inpatients suffering from major depressive disorder (DSM III-R criteria) and presenting a minimal score of 25 for MADRS were selected at D -7. After one week of run-in placebo treatment, included patients received one evening dose of agomelatine (either 5 or 100 mg) for 4 to 8 weeks. Hospitalization was required at least for the first 3 weeks. Patients presenting a satisfying response to treatment (MADRS total score<15 or decrease 40% from inclusion score) could be treated as outpatients. A follow up of 2 weeks was performed after stopping the treatment. The total duration of the treatment period could vary, according to investigator's decision, between 7 and 11 weeks. Evaluation criteria included MADRS, HAMD-17, HAM-A, CGI and AMDP 5 at D0, D7, D14 and D28, and, when applicable, at D35, D42, D49 and D56. Safety evaluations included recording of adverse events, ECG monitoring and biology. Results - Thirty inpatients were selected and 28 included (14 per group). There was no major difference between groups at inclusion, neither for demographic nor evaluation criteria. One patient of each group was excluded of the ITT analysis; 19 patients completed the mandatory period up to D28: 10 in the 5 mg group and 9 in the 100 mg group; 10 patients (5 in each group) carried on the study during the optional period, up to D56 for 7 out of them (4 in the 5 mg group, 3 in the 100 mg group). Efficacy criteria showed a significant improvement in both groups, with highly significant within group evolutions (p<0.001 whatever the criteria) and without significant difference between groups. However, better results were observed in the 5 mg group compared to the 100 mg group. Total MADRS scores then decreased from 30.7 3.5 to 14.8 6.4 in the 5 mg group vs a decrease from 31.6 4.7 to 18.6 14.8 in the 100 mg group. Furthermore, significant improvement between D14 and D28 visits were only seen in the 5 mg group. Analysis of somatic complaints (AMDP 5) showed with both treatment a strong decrease of symptoms during the study, especially for items related to sleep disorders (difficulties for falling asleep, interrupted sleep, shortened sleep, early wakening and drowsiness). Acceptability was good for both doses of agomelatine. However, there were slightly more emergent adverse events and severe treatment-related adverse event in the 100 mg group. No modifications of cardio-vascular parameters nor biological abnormalities were observed in both groups. Conclusion - Preliminary clinical data with agomelatine confirm the potential antidepressant effect in accordance with positive preclinical results. There was no significant difference between 5 and 100 mg, both for efficacy and for safety. However, the data suggest that 5 mg could be a at least as effective and slightly better tolerated dose than 100 mg. Further double-blind controlled studies versus active comparators and placebo are required in order to confirm these results.

Acetamides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Cannabis and schizophrenia: demographic and clinical correlates].

UNLABELLED: The high prevalence of psychoactive substance abuse or dependence among schizophrenic patients has now been well established. Mueser et al. stressed the need to assess the abuse of specific classes of substances and analyse the data accordingly. The objective of this study was to compare the socio-demographic correlates and the clinical features in a group of schizophrenic patients with a lifetime cannabis abuse or dependence according to the DSM III-R with a group of schizophrenic patients who had never presented any abuse or dependence. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 124 subjects with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders according to the DSM III-R. Inclusion criteria for participation in the study were age 18 years or older and willingness to provide consent to participate in the study. The inpatients were evaluated when their condition was stabilised. Assessment tools were the psychoactive substance use disorder section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). Subjects with cannabis abuse or dependence during their lifetime were compared with subjects without abuse or dependence, using chi(2) test for categorical variables and analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) for quantitative variables. RESULTS: Forty-nine subjects (42,6%) presented lifetime abuse or dependence on one or more substances. Since 19 patients with alcohol, stimulant, sedative or opiate abuse or dependence were excluded, the study finally included 96 subjects including a first group of schizophrenic patients with cannabis abuse (n=6) or dependence (n=24) and a second group without any psychoactive substance abuse (n=66). Thirteen (11.3%) patients presented cannabis abuse or dependence within the 6 months prior to the assessment. The mean SD age of onset of cannabis abuse or dependence was 19.6 +/- 3.0 years. Cannabis abuse/dependence preceded the first psychiatric treatment in 70% of the subjects (n=21). 83.3% of the schizophrenic patients with cannabis abuse or dependence were male (n=25) compared to 62.1% in the group without substance abuse (n=41) (chi(2)=4.32, df=1, p=0.04). Schizophrenic patients with cannabis abuse were significantly younger (mean age: 28.9 +/- 6.3 vs 37.0 +/- 12.7, ANCOVA, F=7.2, df=1,96 p=0.009). There was no significant difference between the two groups for marital status, (chi(2)=5.34, df=2, p=0.07), level of education, (chi(2)=0.93, df=2, p=0.62) professional status, (chi(2)=8.7, df=5, p=0.11), on PANSS total score (ANCOVA, F=0.42, df=1,93, p=0.52), GAF score (ANCOVA, F=0.06, df=1,92, p=0.80), mean number of hospitalizations (ANCOVA, F=3.25, df=1,85, p=0.08), mean age of first psychiatric contact (ANCOVA, F=0.74, df=1,93, p=0.39), and neuroleptic dosages (ANCOVA, F=0.03, df=1,90, p=0.87). In contrast, the total duration of hospitalization was significantly longer for the group with cannabis abuse. Patients with cannabis abuse were more likely to have an history of suicide attempts than subjects without substance abuse (chi(2)=11.52, df=1, p=0.0007). DISCUSSION: The prevalence rates for substance abuse and the socio-demographic characteristics of the population of our study are consistent with findings of previous studies. Male gender and age were significantly related to history of cannabis abuse or dependence. Cannabis abuse frequently preceded the onset of psychiatric treatment. However, both schizophrenia and substance abuse tend to develop gradually, with no clear demarcation for the onset of schizophrenia. The absence of any link between the scores for the subscales of the PANSS and cannabis abuse, both in our study and in some retrospective previous studies, is not suggestive of cannabis abuse as a self-medication of positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Self-medication could concern other symptoms, such as cognitive deficits. In addition, the hypothesis of self-medication has especially been suggested in cocaine abuse or dependence. Some limitations to this study can be discussed. First, although the recruitment was systematic and done in a public mental health service, the patients of our study are not necessarily representative of all schizophrenic patients. Secondly, as in any retrospective study, the prevalence of lifetime substance abuse may have been under-estimated. Urinary toxicology tests may have been able to improve the sensitivity of the diagnosis of recent substance abuse, but structured interviews are more appropriate for the diagnosis of lifetime substance abuse in schizophrenic patients than urinary toxicology tests. CONCLUSION: The socio-demographic characteristics of cannabis abuse or dependence in schizophrenia are similar to those found in general population. Cannabis using schizophrenic patients were more likely to be younger and male than non users. The duration of hospitalization was significantly longer for the group with cannabis abuse. Prevalence of suicide attempts in schizophrenia is closely correlated to cannabis abuse.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Nonspecific factors and variations in biological parameters studied in biological psychiatry].

Some studies found no connection at all between biological parameters and mental illness. There are many reasons for the discrepancies: populations and parameters investigated as well as the method used, widely differed. The discrepancies observed, could also be partly due to several non-specific factors such as age, sex, hormonal status, circadian or circannual variations, and washout period. The authors report here some data gathered in the course of a psychobiological research program on healthy volunteers. Their results indicate that human plateler MAO activity shows an apparent menstrual cycle related variation [3H] IMI binding in human platelets shows circadian variations in summer and some antidepressant drugs have a residual effect on serotoninergic parameters during one month. These studies oblige investigators to be cautious when interpreting biological data in psychiatry. Ideally longitudinal studies should be implemented at the various stages of mental illness.

Blood Platelets↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Stress and depression].

Can modern life foster more depression life? Neuroendocrine, epidemiological and even immunological approaches allow us to suppose a passage between stress and depression, far beyond the archetype of exhaustion depression (break down syndrome).

Antibody Formation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Schizophrenia and immunity].

In schizophrenia, various modifications of the immune system have been reported. A decrease of interleukin-2 production by T lymphocytes and an increase of IL-2 receptors were observed by several authors. Not only cellular but humoral immunity seems to be modified: apart from the viral hypothesis, an auto-immune hypothesis holds that auto-antibodies may play a role in the biology of schizophrenia. Natural auto-antibodies, preexisting any antigenic stimulation, may also be involved, particularly in the response to neuroleptic drugs.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Pilot study comparing in blind the therapeutic effect of two doses of agomelatine, melatonin- agonist and selective 5HT2c receptors antagonist, in the treatment of major depressive disorders].

RATIONALE AND METHOD: Two doses of agomelatine (S-20098), a novel potential antidepressant drug with a new pharmacological profile (melatonin agonist and selective 5HT2C antagonist), were compared in a double-blind, randomised, pilot study in order to estimate the antidepressant activity shown in preclinical data. Inpatients suffering from major depressive disorder (DSM III-R criteria) and presenting a minimal score of 25 for MADRS were selected at D-7. After one week of run-in placebo treatment, included patients received one evening dose of agomelatine (either 5 or 100 mg) for 4 to 8 weeks. Hospitalization was required at least for the first 3 weeks. Patients presenting a satisfying response to treatment (MADRS total score < 15 or decrease > or = 40% from inclusion score) could be treated as outpatients. A follow up of 2 weeks was performed after stopping the treatment. The total duration of the treatment period could vary, according to investigator's decision, between 7 and 11 weeks. Evaluation criteria included MADRS, HAMD-17, HAM-A, CGI and AMDP 5 at D0, D7, D14 and D28, and, when applicable, at D35, D42, D49 and D56. Safety evaluations included recording of adverse events, ECG monitoring and biology. RESULTS: Thirty inpatients were selected and 28 included (14 per group). There was no major difference between groups at inclusion, neither for demographic nor evaluation criteria. One patient of each group was excluded of the ITT analysis; 19 patients completed the mandatory period up to D28: 10 in the 5 mg group and 9 in the 100 mg group; 10 patients (5 in each group) carried on the study during the optional period, up to D56 for 7 out of them (4 in the 5 mg group, 3 in the 100 mg group). Efficacy criteria showed a significant improvement in both groups, with highly significant within group evolutions (p < 0.001 whatever the criteria) and without significant difference between groups. However, better results were observed in the 5 mg group compared to the 100 mg group. Total MADRS scores then decreased from 30.7 +/- 3.5 to 14.8 +/- 6.4 in the 5 mg group vs a decrease from 31.6 +/- 4.7 to 18.6 +/- 14.8 in the 100 mg group. Furthermore, significant improvement between D14 and D28 visits were only seen in the 5 mg group. Analysis of somatic complaints (AMDP 5) showed with both treatments a strong decrease of symptoms during the study, especially for items related to sleep disorders (difficulties in falling asleep, interrupted sleep, shortened sleep, early wakening and drowsiness). Acceptability was good for both doses of agomelatine. However, there were slightly more emergent adverse events and severe treatment-related adverse events in the 100 mg group. No modifications of cardio-vascular parameters nor biological abnormalities were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: Preliminary clinical data with agomelatine confirm the potential antidepressant effect in accordance with positive preclinical results. There was no significant difference between 5 and 100 mg, both for efficacy and for safety. However, the data suggest that 5 mg could be a dose at least as effective and slightly better tolerated than 100 mg. Further double-blind controlled studies versus active comparators and placebo are required in order to confirm these results.

Acetamides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Electroconvulsive therapy and schizophrenia. Update from the data of the literature].

The place of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of affective disorders is presently important and even inequaled in some depressive illness forms. But ECT is still controversial and its indications in the treatment of schizophrenia remain debated. In order to evaluate the place of this "vielle thérapeutique du futur" (39) in the treatment of schizophrenia, we reviewed the literature of the two last decades and tried to answer these questions. 1) Is ECT effectiveness in treatment of schizophrenic symptoms proved? 2) What is the effectiveness of ECT compared with other efficacious treatment? 3) Does the ECT + neuroleptic combination provide some advantage? and in which cases? The literature provides many studies in the topic. However, a considerable proportion of these studies make no use of modern methodological criteria. We only consider papers which: --give a clear diagnostic definition in patients groups and control groups, --use a standardized method of treatment, --use quantitative tools to evaluate results, --randomize treatment and use, when possible, double blind design. 1) Curative effects of ECT in schizophrenic symptoms: Brandon et al. (14) compare two groups of schizophrenic patients diagnosed according to PSE for schizophrenia and receiving equivalent doses of neuroleptics. The first group receives ECT when the other one receives simulate ECT. The former improved significantly better than the later. The difference persists but is no longer significant from the forth week of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Heroin addiction treated with methadone. Experience in 50 patients].

The authors have reviewed the records of 50 heroin addicts treated with methadone, a drug which, in France, is delivered under strict and daily supervision to only few patients. This retrospective study yielded the following data: (1) the success rate of maintenance treatment with methadone exceeded 50 percent and remained the same in HIV positive patients; (2) social and environmental factors predictive of poor response to methadone were the absence of professional activity at the beginning of treatment and a painfully disturbed family context. A history of trouble with the law was not a factor of poor prognosis. These data raise the problem of importance of an early treatment which might have a strong influence on subsequent developments.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[A controlled double-blind study of tetrabamate versus lorazepam and placebo in generalized anxiety].

The anxiolytic efficacy of tetrabamate was evaluated in a multicentric double-blind study versus lorazepam and placebo, in 269 patients with a generalized anxiety disorder according to DSM III-R criteria. The anxiolytic activity of tetrabamate (at 900 mg/day) was significantly superior than that of placebo from day 7 of treatment and equivalent to lorazepam efficacy (at 4.5 mg/day). In the tetrabamate group, 55.3% were considered as "good responders" (as defined by a HARS score reduction equal or superior to 50%), versus 51.3 and 32.9% respectively in the lorazepam and the placebo groups (chi-square = 9.63, p = 0.008). Sheehan's scales (parts 1 and 2), Norris visual analogue scales, CHESS 84, CHESS complement 82 for withdrawal evaluation, physician's overall evaluation of efficacy and tolerance, were also used to assess the clinical effects of tetrabamate. The data on these measures confirmed the anxiolytic efficacy of tetrabamate and showed some advantages in the tetrabamate group in comparison with the lorazepam group: a better global tolerance at the study end point (day 35), a greater efficacy on some anxiety somatic items and lesser frequency and severity of withdrawal symptoms during treatment tapering off.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Tolerability of tianeptine in 170 patients with depression treated during one year].

Tianeptine, a new antidepressant, has a tricyclic molecular structure. Its main biochemical activity consists of an increase in the reuptake of 5 HT both in men and animals, after acute and chronic administration. Tianeptine demonstrated its antidepressive clinical efficacy in several double-blind versus reference drug trials. A multicentre open trial, including depressed patients enabled us to evaluate the safety of tianeptine and to control the maintenance of the therapeutic efficacy in the course of its long-term prescription. Depressed patients included showed a major depressive episode, single (296.22) or recurrent (296.32) without melancholia or psychotic features, or a dysthymic disorder (300.40), according to DSM III criteria. A minimum MADRS score of a least 25, and the informed consent of the patients were required. The dose of tianeptine was 3 tablets per day (12.5 mg/tablet) with the possibility of increasing to 4 or decreasing to 2 tablets per day, depending on the symptomatology. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by item 1 and 2 of the Global Clinical Impression (CGI), the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) and the Hopkins Symptom Check-List (HSCL). Clinical and paraclinical safety were evaluated by CGI item 3, standardized ratings of patients' complaints (CHESS 84), interruption for side effects, evaluation of blood pressure, weight, biological parameters, EKGs. This intermediate evaluation concerns the first 170 depressed patients treated over a one-year period as well as the total group of patients included (n = 447).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Long-term treatment using antidepressants. Tianeptine: methodology of a long-term study and preliminary results].

Numerous authors insist on the need for prolonged prescription of antidepressant drugs. Legislation develops and now requires long-term controls for psychotropic drugs. In order to assess long-term efficacy and safety of tianeptine, a clinical trial was undertaken with the objective of 100 patients completing one year of treatment. This multicentered study involves 157 psychiatrists all over France, under the responsibility of a national coordinator and 19 regional coordinators. The methodology is explained, as well as the various means that have been planned to set up the protocol, to follow the case reports and to analyse the results. The use of a central computer assisted monitoring and the organization of national and regional meetings with the investigators seem to take an important part in the management of the study. Preliminary results after 6 months of treatment for 478 patients are discussed. They confirm the prolonged efficacy and the safety of tianeptine. The effective contribution made by the logistic support should allow the study to reach its objectives. When completed, it should be a pilot study for further long-term studies with antidepressants.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Epileptogenic action of fluvoxamine. Apropos of a case].

A case of status epilepticus with transient motor deficit is reported in a 66 year old male treated with fluvoxamine. Fluvoxamine is supposed to induce few epileptic seizures. The patient had no previous history of epilepsy. Two factors seem to have favoured the occurrence of epilepsy: presence of an incipient arteriopathic impairment, cortical and subcortical brain atrophy and perhaps drug overdosage causing a tremor in the days before the epileptic fit.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Treatment with tianeptine of depressive disorders in drug addicts under withdrawal. Assessment of efficacy and study of dependence].

The study concerns the use of a new antidepressant, tianeptine, as a treatment of depressive and/or amotival syndrome, in 30 drug addicts, detoxified from opiates. From a thymoanaleptic point of view, 85% of the patients exhibit a positive result after 28 days of treatment with 37.5 mg/day. These good results are confirmed by the evolution of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale global score, which significantly decreases from D0 to D14 and from D14 to D28. The acceptability of the antidepressant is good. Anticholinergic side-effects are very uncommon. Tianeptine appears devoid of any obvious psychostimulant or sedative effect. The drug compliance, estimated by counting the tablets, is very satisfying: there is no tendency to a spontaneous increase of dosing. The follow-up of the patients after drug cessation has not shown any symptoms suggesting psychological or physical dependence towards the drug. During this study in subjects particularly predisposed to the abuse of psychoactive drugs, tianeptine has not induced anything suggesting the possibility of drug abuse or tolerance.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Anxiolytic efficacy and tolerance of tetrabamate in anxious patients abusing alcohol. Multicenter double-blind versus placebo study].

The anxiolytic efficacy of tetrabamate was evaluated in 68 out-patients presenting an anxiety state with alcohol abuse according to DSM III criteria. The study followed a double-blind placebo-controlled design with parallel groups and lasted for 21 days. Anxiety was evaluated by the Hamilton anxiety scale, Norris visual analog scales, and the Hopkins Symptom Check List, along with the investigator's assessment. Safety was evaluated in terms of somatic symptoms (CHESS 84) and the physician's overall evaluation. The anxiolytic activity of tetrabamate (three 300 mg tablets/day) was significantly greater than that of placebo from seventh day on. There were no statistically significant differences in safety profile between tetrabamate and placebo. Moreover, in the tetrabamate group the significantly greater improvement in the scores of somatic symptoms indicates that the compound caused no notable adverse effects and its activity on somatic complaints (psychopathologic and/or toxic).

Alcoholism↗