Biomedical subjects

H LaRocca

Publications and source records attributed to H LaRocca.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

A taxonomy of chronic pain syndromes.

This article has had as its purpose the delineation of the complexity of the production of pain on an organic basis as opposed to any psychological amplification. The issues addressed apply directly to the problem of spinal pain. Classical nociception arising in the structures of the spine thus would include the application of mechanical and chemical stimuli to muscles, ligaments, apophyseal joint capsules, bone, and other structures with adequate innervation, particularly the anterior dura and its extensions. Disease and injury productive of direct nociception are well understood sources of spinal pain. Less well understood, but of at least equal importance in the spinal pain problem, are the activities within the central nervous system that control the transfer of nociceptive information to the higher centers. These activities account for some of the variability known to occur in the experience of pain. Further, the fact that the nervous system changes its activities in response to chronic pain, particularly that arising from damaged neural elements, is of paramount importance in understanding how chronic pain syndromes differ so greatly from simple nociceptive events. Insidious deafferentation ongoing in spinal nerve roots subject to chronic compression and fibrosis offers a fertile field for research into the origin of permanent pain in patients in whom application of accepted therapies does not result in relief. All of this material must be considered by the clinician who is challenged with analyzing spinal pain problems in patients.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed1991

Reconstruction of failed lumbar surgery with narrow AO DCP plates for spinal arthrodesis.

Forty-five patients underwent surgical reconstruction with transpedicular fixation of the lumbar spine with narrow AO DCP plates. Preoperatively, all patients underwent spinal imaging with either magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or myelogram as well as provocative discography to determine the location and the number of symptomatic segments. The minimum follow-up in this series was 2 years. The determination of solid posterior fusion in the presence of plate instrumentation was difficult. The patients in the series were classified as having 1) solid fusion; 2) radiographic flaws within the posterolateral fusion without implant failure; or 3) frank pseudarthrosis with implant failure. Thirty-six (80%) of the patients had a solid fusion, 9 of whom required an additional anterior interbody fusion to obtain symptom control. Twenty percent of the patients in the series had radiographic evidence of reabsorption without implant failure. Four patients in the series (8.8%) had screw breakage, three of which required anterior interbody fusions. The highest rate of reabsorption and pseudarthrosis implant failure was in the 12 patients who had three-level instrumentation; 33% of these patients required anterior interbody fusion to obtain a solid arthrodesis. The average preoperative pain scale was 8.9, and the average postoperative pain scale was a 3.3. Twenty-two patients in the series were cigarette smokers and had a slightly lower fusion rate than non-smokers. They did, however, have a higher use of narcotics after surgery. Forty percent of the patients in this series continued to have radiculopathy after their reconstruction. This study demonstrates the utility of transpedicular fixation in salvage lumbar surgery in obtaining a solid arthrodesis with a beneficial clinical result. Anterior interbody fusions are highly successful in the management of pseudarthrosis and implant failure after transpedicular instrumentation.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

The failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

The problems presented by unsuccessful posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have not been addressed. The cases of 12 patients who presented with failed PLIF were reviewed. Five patients were male and seven female (age range, 24-50 years; mean age, 40 years). All patients underwent at least one PLIF; many had undergone other procedures. A total of 37 procedures had been performed on the 12 patients. Chronic radiculopathy was present in all patients, as detected with electromyographic or nerve conduction velocity examination. At the time of reconstructive surgery, in the 11 patients in whom the canal was explored, all had extensive epidural fibrosis. Nine of the 12 patients had pseudarthrosis of the previous PLIF. Four patients had evidence of motion segment dysfunction at nearby levels: two had positive discograms adjacent to the PLIFs; one developed a facet syndrome at L5-S1, caudal to an L4-5 PLIF; and one demonstrated frank segmental instability at L2-3, cranial to a previous PLIF at L3-4. Twelve patients underwent a total of 22 procedures after referral. Eleven patients initially underwent decompression and fusion, and one patient underwent a sympathectomy. Seven patients underwent an additional 10 procedures, including repeat decompression, repair of pseudarthrosis, and implantation of an epidural analgesic pump system. After all surgical treatment, five patients rated their pain as improved. Seven patients were thought to have a solid fusion. The presence of a solid fusion did not correlate with satisfactory relief of pain (chi-square). Continued extremity pain was the predominant complaint of all the patients. Two shortcomings of the PLIF were evident.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Postoperative infections in spinal implants. Classification and analysis--a multicenter study.

A multicenter study was undertaken to analyze postoperative wound infections after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. The infection rate of these procedures has been documented in multiple reports. From these results, a classification scheme was developed that can guide therapy and determine the populations at risk. The patients were categorized according to two parameters, the first being the severity or type of infection, and the second being the host response or physiologic classification of the patient. This classification scheme is based on the clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis developed by Cierny. The severity of infection is divided into three groups. Group 1 is a single-organism infection, either superficial or deep. Group 2 is a multiple-organism, deep infection. Group 3 is multiple organisms with myonecrosis. The host response, likewise, is divided into three classes. Class A is a host with normal systemic defenses, metabolic capabilities, and vascularity. Class B patients demonstrate local or multiple systemic diseases, including cigarette smoking. Class C requires an immunocompromised or severely malnourished host. Our data have demonstrated that single organisms, Group 1, generally can be dealt with by single irrigation and debridement, and closure over suction drainage tubes without the use of an inflow-irrigation system. The Group 2 patients, with multiple organisms and deep infection, required an average of three irrigation debridements. They have a higher percentage of successful closures with closed inflow-outflow suction irrigation systems when compared to simple suction drainage systems without constant inflow irrigation. Multiple-organism infections with myonecrosis, Group 3, are exceedingly difficult to manage, and portend a poor outcome. Patients without normal host defenses, Classes B and C, are at high risk for developing postoperative wound infection. Specifically, this study demonstrated that cigarette smoking may be a significant risk factor.

Bacterial Infections↗

PubMed1991

Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients.

Surgical fusion results are presented from a retrospective study of 126 consecutive multilevel discectomy and vertebrectomy cases for spondylosis to evaluate fusion rates using autograft and allograft fibula strut graft for reconstruction. The nonunion rate was high in both groups: 27% of the autograft group and 41% of the allograft group. The nonunion rate increased with increasing numbers of motion segments fused. Age and sex were not significant factors.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Reconstruction of the lumbar spine using AO DCP plate internal fixation.

Augmentation of lumbar spine fusion with internal fixation using pedicle screw systems has gained wide currency because it offers rigid stabilization to foster fusion healing. The AO DCP plate has been employed in Europe as a spinal implant with pedicle fixation using 6.5 mm, full-threaded cancellous bone screws with success. This report details the experience of using this device for lumbar spine fusion in a series of 46 North American patients with a mean follow-up of 1.25 years (range 1-2.5 years). Thirty-one patients had had prior lumbar spine surgery with poor outcomes, and 15 had had no prior surgery. All were treated surgically for lumbar degenerative disease with canal decompression, internal fixation with AO plates, and fusion with autologous bone grafting posterolaterally. Complications included two early and one delayed wound infection; five cases of screw loosening; three cases of screw breakage; and three cases of screw impingement upon a nerve. Results of surgery in 17 patients with failed interbody fusion included good to excellent pain relief in 59%, and solid fusion in 76%. In 14 patients with failed posterior surgery the good to excellent pain relief rate was 79%, and the fusion rate was 86%. In 15 patients undergoing primary surgery there was 89% good to excellent pain relief and a solid fusion rate of 87%. The benefits accruing from augmentation of the fusion with internal fixation using AO DCP plates are positive and justify its continued use. Complications encountered in the early experience have been significantly reduced in subsequent series, indicating the existence of a "learning curve" effect which would mandate specific training of spinal surgeons in the technique.

Bone Plates↗

PubMed1988