PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H M Prupas

Publications and source records attributed to H M Prupas.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Tenidap in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A 4-week, placebo-controlled study.

The present double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of tenidap in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with flare of active RA following NSAID withdrawal were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 67) or tenidap (n = 131; 40-200 mg/day). The mean changes from baseline in efficacy and biochemical variables were compared between treatment groups at endpoint (4 weeks). The improvements in four of the five primary efficacy variables were significantly greater in the tenidap group compared with the placebo group (p < 0.01). Tenidap was also associated with an 18% reduction in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and a marked, 51%, reduction in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, both of which were significantly greater than the changes in the placebo group (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients who discontinued because of side effects was the same in both groups (3%). In conclusion, tenidap 40-200 mg/day was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with RA for 4 weeks.

Administration, Oral↗

Tenidap in rheumatoid arthritis. A 24-week double-blind comparison with hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam, and piroxicam alone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy, effect on serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, and safety of tenidap with a combination of hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam, and piroxicam alone, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study in which patients with active RA were treated with tenidap 120 mg/day, hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day and piroxicam 20 mg/day, or piroxicam alone 20 mg/day, for 24 weeks. RESULTS: At weeks 12 and 24, tenidap produced greater improvements than piroxicam based on 5 primary efficacy parameters; this improvement showed statistical significance in 4 of the 5 measures at week 12, and in 3 of the 5 measures at week 24. Clinical improvements in the hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam-treated with tenidap. Compared with piroxicam, tenidap was associated with significantly greater reductions in serum CRP concentrations at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and significantly greater reductions in SAA concentrations at weeks 12 and 24. The decrease in SAA concentrations was also significantly greater at weeks 4 and 24 in the tenidap-treated group than in the hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam-treated group. Significant reductions in plasma IL-6 levels were observed at weeks 4, 12, and 24 within the tenidap group, and at week 24 within the hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam-treated group. The overall occurrence of side effects, including gastrointestinal side effects, was similar in all 3 treatment groups. A small proportion of tenidap-treated patients (6.4%) manifested mild, nonprogressive, reversible proteinuria of presumed renal proximal tubular origin, and 3-4% of patients had elevated transaminase levels. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of patients with RA, tenidap is as effective as the combination of hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam, and is more effective than piroxicam alone; moreover, tenidap's safety profile is comparable to that observed with piroxicam alone, and with hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam. The clinical response observed in this study, as well as the prompt decreases in acute-phase protein levels of CRP and SAA, and in plasma IL-6 levels, suggest that tenidap represents a new type of antiarthritic medication, with properties similar to, but not identical to, a therapeutic combination of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Adult↗

Total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the femur in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Six patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and avascular necrosis of the femoral head were treated by total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary indication for surgery was persistent hip pain despite conservative therapy. Postoperatively, pain was relieved with corresponding improvement in range of motion in all six patients. There were no serious complications. At follow-up ranging from 23 to 76 months after surgery there was no recurrence of hip pain. These results suggest that THA is indicated in selected SLE patients.

Adult↗