Biomedical subjects

H M van der Bruggen

Publications and source records attributed to H M van der Bruggen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Screening for bronchiectasis. A comparative study between chest radiography and high-resolution CT.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate whether in the search for bronchiectasis a correlation exists between abnormalities on the chest radiograph and high-resolution CT (HRCT), and if HRCT has an additional value when the chest radiography is normal. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, chest radiographs were compared with HRCT in 84 patients. Analysis of presence and extent of bronchiectasis were made for each bronchopulmonary lobe. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had a normal radiograph, from whom 32 had a normal HRCT. The other 5 had a low HRCT severity score with a mild cylindrical bronchiectasis. From the 47 patients with an abnormal radiograph, 36 had signs of bronchiectasis at HRCT; 11 patients, however, had a normal HRCT. The sensitivity for chest radiography to detect bronchiectasis appeared to be 87.8% with a specificity of 74.4%. We found a significant linear relationship between the severity of bronchiectasis at HRCT and abnormalities as seen on the chest radiograph (r=0.62, p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: A normal chest radiograph almost always excludes relevant bronchiectasis and no further investigation seems necessary. There is a significant linear relationship between the severity of bronchiectasis at HRCT and abnormalities as seen on the chest radiograph.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of bronchiectasis: comparison of HRCT and spiral volumetric CT.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to ascertain the sensitivity of spiral CT for the detection of bronchiectasis in comparison with high resolution CT (HRCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with a suspected clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis were evaluated with spiral CT (slice thickness 5 mm, pitch 1, reconstruction index 2 mm, 1 s rotation) and HRCT (1.5 mm, interval 10 mm). Analysis of the presence, type, and severity of bronchiectasis was performed for each bronchopulmonary lobe. RESULTS: In 30 patients, 177 lobes were evaluated. At HRCT 14 patients showed signs of bronchiectasis in 32 lobes. Spiral CT confirmed the presence in 29 lobes. In one lobe spiral CT was false positive. The severity score was the same in 23 lobes, in 4 lobes higher at HRCT, and in 2 lobes higher at spiral CT. Spiral CT has a high sensitivity of 91% to detect bronchiectasis with a specificity of 99.3%. Spiral CT demonstrates adequately lack of tapering of the bronchus. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected bronchiectasis, HRCT is the method of first choice based on greater sensitivity and lower radiation dose. However, spiral CT done for other indications is a reliable method for assessment of bronchiectasis. Inability of patients to hold their breath did not prove to interfere with diagnostic reliability.

Adult↗