PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Marsiglia

Publications and source records attributed to H Marsiglia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the role of specimen radiography in predicting margin status for non-palpable breast malignancies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological data together with specimen radiographs of 164 women with ductal carcinoma in situ, who were referred to our centre between January 1997 and December 2000. In all cases microcalcifications were discovered on mammography. Lesions were localized preoperatively using a guide-wire. Specimen radiography findings and clinicopathological data were correlated with pathological findings. RESULTS: Findings comprised 122 pure ductal carcinomas in situ (74%) and 42 mixed carcinomas, both infiltrating and in situ (26%). On the specimen radiographs, the lesions were close (<1mm) to one edge of the lumpectomy in 34 (21%) cases. Histologically, there were 103 positive resection margins (<1mm, 63%) and only 61 negative margins (> or =1mm, 37%). On univariate analysis, factors associated with positive resection margins were found to be distance from microcalcifications to edge of lesion on specimen radiographs, and radiological multifocality. On multivariate analysis (logistic regression), a radiological margin <5mm and multifocality were the only risk factors for close histological margins. Radiological margins were not associated with surgical findings. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that there is a correlation between specimen radiographs and histological results. The clinical relevance of this should be evaluated in a prospective study.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Genetic bases of the radiosensitivity of breast cancer].

Local-regional radiation therapy is one of the major therapeutic means in the management of breast cancer. Three questions however arise from the important advances achieved in this domain in the past years. The first question concerns the possibilities to identify and overcome the radioresistance of a subset of tumours. The second question is how to recognize women likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy, and therefore to diminish treatment indications in other groups. Finally, the third question is how to identify subjects at high risk for long term injury following breast irradiation, in order to adapt techniques and indications in such populations. The major advances of breast cancer molecular genetics in the past years should provide clinicians with tools to answer these important questions. In this paper, we review the molecular germline (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, ...) and somatic (p53, tyrosine kinase receptors, as well as actors of cell cycle, signal transduction, apoptosis, DNA repair ...) main bases of breast cancer radiosensitivity. Recent methods of exploration of the genetic background of both the host and the tumours (gene and protein expression profiles) are also reviewed as major tools of breast cancer management in the next few years.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2004

[Brachytherapy boost for breast cancer: what do we know? Where do we go?].

Since many years, Brachytherapy (BT) appears to play an important role in the treatment of many solid tumors. For breast cancer, BT is usually used as boost after postoperative external beam radiation therapy. In certain circumstances, BT can be used as sole radiation technique focalized on the tumor bed or more rarely, as second conservative treatment in case of local recurrence for woman refusing salvage mastectomy. Boost BT is most often applied via an interstitial technique while the dose rate can vary from low to high dose rate through pulse dose rate. All of those boost techniques were published and some of them compared the results obtained with BT and external beam electron therapy. The analysis of the published phase II and III trials was not able to show significant differences between the two boost techniques in term of local control as well as late skin side effects. However, we noted that the patients who received BT boost presented a higher risk of local recurrence compare to those treated with electron therapy, due to age, margin status or presence of extensive intraductal component. Only a phase III trial randomizing BT boost vs electron therapy boost could show a possible improvement of local control rate in the BT arm; however, this trial should enroll patients with a real high risk of local recurrence in order to take benefit from the dosimetric advantages of BT.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2004

Partial breast irradiation: revolution or evolution?

INTRODUCTION: It is well established that there is no significant difference in terms of overall survival between mastectomy and radio-surgical conservative treatment (RSCT). Ten to fifteen years have been needed to change from the "standard" to the "new" breast cancer treatment. At the end of the 1990s, a few authors published preliminary results of phase II trials using partial breast irradiation (PBI) as sole post-operative treatment based on interstitial low or high dose rate brachytherapy techniques. Currently, phase III randomized trials comparing whole breast irradiation versus PBI are ongoing in the USA and in EU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature regarding issues in the irradiation of breast cancer and the potential role of PBI to prevent local recurrence in the ipsilateral breast. Furthermore, potential advantages of PBI were discussed as well as the limits of such a procedure. Finally, we tried to determine the characteristics of a subgroup of patients who would receive benefit from this radiation technique. RESULTS: Phase II and III trials have been analyzed concerning feasibility, efficacy and toxicity. PBI may be delivered through low or high dose rate brachytherapy or intraoperative/external beam radiation therapy. PBI satisfies the control quality criteria. The majority of the teams provide PBI recurrence rates lower than 5% (0-4.4%) with a median follow-up varying between 8 and 72 months, and associated with cosmetic results comparable to those achieved with conventional external beam. CONCLUSION: RSCT does not replace mastectomy; mastectomy and RSCT are used together to treat different subgroups of patients. PBI furnished encouraging preliminary results in terms of local control and cosmetic results. However, caution in interpreting the results is required along with longer follow-up. PBI should not replace CT, but could be considered as a new therapeutic strategy for breast cancer dedicated to a very well defined subgroup of patients with a low risk of local recurrence.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2004

Quality of life after sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer.

AIM: This study assessed the effects of multiple therapeutic factors on quality of life (QOL) in the treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: We surveyed 179 recurrence-free women with early breast cancer who had undergone a sentinel lymph node procedure, between January 1999 and June 2001. Age, tumour size, breast and axillary procedure, nodal status, chemotherapy, supra-clavicular fossa radiotherapy, and hormone therapy were tested as possible factors associated with poor QOL. RESULTS: Information on QOL was obtained for 148 out of 179 patients. Age less than 55 years and chemotherapy were factors associated with impairment of physical well-being. Tumour size was associated with poor socio-familial well-being. Factors associated with altered arm subscale scores were age <55, axillary procedure, nodal status, chemotherapy and supra-clavicular fossa radiotherapy. Unexpectedly, sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure delayed the onset of chemotherapy if the metastatic status of SLN was not diagnosed intra-operatively. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to improve the QOL of young patients. Axillary procedure affects only QOL related to arm morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Partial irradiation of the breast: why, how?].

Radiation therapy represents a very important part of breast conservative treatment. The classic schedule consists in delivering a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions on 5 weeks, sometimes associated with a 10 to 16 Gy boost. For elderly women with difficulties to move or for younger women having professional activity or with young children in charge, a 5 to 6 weeks radiation therapy with long and frequent transportations is sometimes difficult to achieve. The aim of partial breast irradiation (PBI) is to prevent, in a short period (5 to 8 days) and less transportations, the risk of local recurrence into the tumor bed. Different techniques have been described, using either interstitial brachytherapy (low or high dose rate) or intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT photons or electrons) or external beam radiation therapy. Phase II PBI trials using interstitial brachytherapy showed a local control rate of 0 to 4% with a follow-up of 20 to 75 months. The rate of good/excellent cosmetic results is 67 to 100%. Results analysis of trials using very new PBI techniques (MammoSite), IORT) remains more difficult. If phase III randomized trials could confirm that PBI achieved, for selected patients, local controls equivalent to those obtain with whole breast irradiation, PBI could improve quality of life during radiation therapy, and maybe contribute to have a cost effective breast cancer conservative treatment.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Breast cancer in elderly women: is partial breast irradiation a good alternative?

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all breast cancer occurs after age 65. Several aspects for the treatment of early breast cancer may be influenced by patient age, including postoperative radiation therapy (RT), in order to prevent the risk of local recurrence (LR). Postoperative adjuvant RT, improving the chances of local control, is not always completed because of comorbidity-associated factors. Does an alternative exist between a 5-week radiotherapy regime and no irradiation after breast conservative surgery without burdening the overall therapeutic management? METHODS: The authors review the literature regarding age-specific issues in the irradiation of breast cancer and the potential role of a partial breast irradiation (PBI) to prevent LR in the ipsilateral breast. RESULTS: Phase II and III trials have been analyzed for feasibility, efficacy and toxicity. PBI may be delivered with low or high dose rate brachytherapy and intra operative, or external beam radiation therapy. PBI satisfies the control quality criteria. The majority of the teams provide PBI recurrence rates lower than 5% (0-4.4%) with a median follow-up varying between 8 and 72 months, associated with cosmetic results comparable to those achieved with conventional external beam. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer in elderly women represents a medical and economical problem. The recommended conservative treatment includes RT for 50 Gy over 5 weeks. Some subgroups of patients did not receive radiotherapy because of comorbidity-associated factors or more favorable tumor biology. PBI seems to be an acceptable alternative to adjuvant RT over 5 weeks and no irradiation. The evaluation of toxicity and efficacy, especially in terms of local control, is necessary and large multicentric phase III trials comparing the two irradiation approaches are needed, including quality of life, economic considerations and longer follow-up.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Prescribing, recording, and reporting in endovascular brachytherapy. Quality assurance, equipment, personnel and education.

Endovascular brachytherapy is a new, rapidly growing field of interest in radiotherapy for the prevention of neointimal hyperplasia after angioplasty in both coronary and peripheral arteries. Many physics aspects of these treatments have already been addressed in the report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group on 'Intravascular brachytherapy', but up to now there are no generally accepted recommendations for recording and reporting radiation doses and volumes. The terminology to be used by all individuals involved in such treatments (radiation oncologists, physicists, and interventionalists) is not clearly defined. The Endovascular Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie/European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Working Group in this document presents recommendations for a common language for general use in endovascular brachytherapy. This proposal addresses general terms and concepts for target and dose specification as well as detailed recommendations for dose prescription, recording and reporting in endovascular brachytherapy for both peripheral and coronary arteries. Additionally, quality assurance and radiation safety aspects are briefly addressed, as are aspects related to equipment, personnel, and training and education related to endovascular brachytherapy.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2000

High-dose-rate brachytherapy as sole modality for early-stage endobronchial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate exclusive high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized early-stage non-small-cell bronchial carcinoma; to develop new insights in treatment-catheter positioning and tumor-volume assessment by computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1992 and 1996, 34 patients with non-small-cell bronchial carcinoma were treated by brachytherapy alone. All patients were medically inoperable and had contraindications for external beam irradiation. The treatment protocol was six sessions of 5 Gy over 6 weeks. The treatment catheter was placed under fiberoscopy and was positioned with the help of spacer catheters or with a surrounding plastic tube; CT scan was performed in 50% of the cases to measure the spacing between the applicator and the bronchial wall. Dose prescription was individually based on clinical and radiologic evaluation of tumor volume. RESULTS: Local disease failure occurred in 5 patients (15%). With a median follow-up of 2 years, the local control rate was 85% and the survival rate 78%. No acute toxicity was found, except one pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy alone can give an optimal therapeutic ratio in small endobronchial carcinomas without radiation-induced morbidity. Such results are achieved after careful tumor volume evaluation and individualized treatment catheter positioning.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Accelerated fractionation in esophageal cancers: a multivariate analysis on 88 patients.

PURPOSE: Accelerated fractionation was used to shorten overall treatment time to increase locoregional control and cause-specific survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-eight patients with cancer of the esophagus ineligible for surgery were entered in the study between 1986 and 1993. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 64% of patients. Accelerated radiotherapy using the concomitant boost technique delivered a median dose of 65 Gy in a median overall treatment time of 32 days. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial local control rate in patients with T1, T2, and T3 tumors was 71%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. The 3-year cause-specific survival rates were 40%, 22%, and 6%, respectively. Sixteen percent of patients experienced Grade 3 esophagitis. Late toxicity included esophageal stenosis and pulmonary fibrosis in 8% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that T stage and overall treatment time were prognostic factors for cause-specific survival. T stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for locoregional control. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that accelerated fractionation given in an overall treatment time of <35 days might be beneficial for early-stage cancer of the esophagus. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended, as it was a significant adverse prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis for local control. Accelerated fractionation can be carried out with moderate acute and late toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

[Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of meningioma].

Between 1962 and 1986, 32 patients with intracranial meningiomas were referred to the Institut Gustave-Roussy for external radiotherapy either after incomplete surgery, or unfavorable histology (meningiosarcoma/anaplastic meningioma), or after recurrences. In the latter case, the mean time interval between the first surgery and the recurrence was 2 years (range: 1-6 years). Radiotherapy was performed using photons, electrons or mixed photons-electrons. The mean total dose was 48 Gy (range: 9-65 Gy) delivered in a mean time of 35 days with a 19 mean number of fractions. Radiotherapy was interrupted in three cases at 9 Gy-17 Gy-20 Gy because of neurological worsening. The actuarial 5-year survival was 64%. Among the 32 patients, 11 died, eight of tumoral progression or recurrence and three of other causes (one ovarian carcinoma, two unknown). Among the 21 alive patients, eight presented a recurrence; five of them could be reoperated on with two complete resections. None of the following factors were found to be of prognostic value on the survival nor on the recurrence occurrence: age, tumor location, first surgical resection type, and, in the group of patients treated at the time of recurrence, the quality of the surgery at the time of recurrence and the time interval between the first surgery and the recurrence. Only one factor was evidenced as of significant value on the recurrence as well as the 10-year survival: the total dose of irradiation with a 10-year survival rate of 74% for total doses higher than or equal to 47 Gy versus 14% when the total dose was lower than 47 Gy.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Brachytherapy of the bladder].

Brachytherapy has a key role to play in the treatment of bladder carcinoma. It is generally combined with partial bladder resection for limited tumours (T1-2, N0, M0). Results obtained in Holland and France have shown 80% local control with limited morbidity.

Brachytherapy↗