Biomedical subjects

H Martijn

Publications and source records attributed to H Martijn.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study.

It is likely that the shift from post- to pre-operative radiotherapy and the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery have contributed to the observed improved survival of rectal cancer in the south of the Netherlands. However, no improvement was seen for patients aged 70 or older. To investigate possible causes of this lack of improvement, we examined the risk of treatment-related complications and overall survival. Therefore, a random sample of 455 patients with rectal cancer aged 60 years or older, diagnosed between 1995 and 2001 was extracted from in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry database. Fifty-one percent of patients aged 60-69 years-old had any complication within one year of diagnosis compared to 65% of patients aged 70 or older (p=0.007). Older patients were at higher risk of developing treatment-related complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.8; p=0.01), as were patients with comorbidity (OR 1.7; p=0.07), and those who received pre-operative radiotherapy (OR 1.8; p=0.02). In a multivariable analysis, age older than 70 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.2; p<0.0001), comorbidity (HR 1.7; p=0.03), and having two or more complications (HR=2.2; p=0.0002) had a negative effect on survival. The lack of improvement in the prognosis of elderly patients with rectal cancer after a shift from post- to preoperative radiotherapy might partially be explained by a higher risk of treatment-related complications. In order to optimise the risk/benefit ratio of elderly patients, individualisation of treatment by means of a comprehensive geriatric assessment will be of critical importance.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study.

PURPOSE: Preoperative short-term radiotherapy improves local control in patients treated with total mesorectal excision (TME). This study was performed to assess the presence and magnitude of long-term side effects of preoperative 5 x 5 Gy radiotherapy and TME. Also, hospital treatment was recorded for diseases possibly related to late side effects of rectal cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Long-term morbidity was assessed in patients from the prospective randomized TME trial, which investigated the efficacy of 5 x 5 Gy before TME surgery for mobile rectal cancer. Dutch patients without recurrent disease were sent a questionnaire. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 597 patients, with a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Stoma function, urinary function, and hospital treatment rates did not differ significantly between the treatment arms. However, irradiated patients, compared with nonirradiated patients, reported increased rates of fecal incontinence (62% v 38%, respectively; P < .001), pad wearing as a result of incontinence (56% v 33%, respectively; P < .001), anal blood loss (11% v 3%, respectively; P = .004), and mucus loss (27% v 15%, respectively; P = .005). Satisfaction with bowel function was significantly lower and the impact of bowel dysfunction on daily activities was greater in irradiated patients compared with patients who underwent TME alone. CONCLUSION: Although preoperative short-term radiotherapy for rectal cancer results in increased local control, there is more long-term bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients than in patients who undergo TME alone. Rectal cancer patients should be informed on late morbidity of both radiotherapy and TME. Future strategies should be aimed at selecting patients for radiotherapy who are at high risk for local failure.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Improved survival of patients with rectal cancer since 1980: a population-based study.

The treatment of rectal cancer has changed over the last two decades as far as surgical techniques and radiotherapy are concerned. We studied the changes in patterns of care for patients with rectal cancer and the effect on prognosis. All patients with cancer of the rectum or rectosigmoid in South-east Netherlands, diagnosed in the period of 1980-2000, were included in our analyses (n=3635). The use of surgery as the only treatment decreased from 62% in the period of 1980-1989 to 42% in the period of 1995-2000, whereas the combination of surgery and radiotherapy increased from 26 to 40%. The use of postoperative radiotherapy decreased from 25 to 4%, while preoperative radiotherapy increased from 1 to 35%. Patients aged 75 years or older were less likely to receive radiotherapy. After adjustment for age, gender, tumour stage and tumour site, significant improvements in the relative risk of death were observed between the periods of 1995-2000 and 1980-1989 for patients under 60 years of age (Relative Risk (RR)=0.45; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.35-0.58) and those 60-74 years old (RR=0.62; 95% CI 0.53-0.72). No improvement in the risk of death was found for patients aged 75 years and over. No improvements in the distribution of tumour stage were observed, making it very likely that the continuing increase in population-based survival among patients aged <75 years results from the shift from postoperative to preoperative radiotherapy, the development of the total mesorectal excision technique and the related tendency to subspecialisation of surgeons in colorectal cancer surgery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

After the diagnosis of a locally recurrent rectal cancer, imaging is the first step to estimate the extent and location of the local tumour growth and the presence or absence of distant metastases. The aim of the treatment is a R0 resection (microscopically tumour free circumferential margin) by multimodality treatment consisting of pre-operative radiation, extended resection and intra-operative radiotherapy by either electron beam irradiation or with high dose rate brachytherapy. Filling the pelvic cavity with vital tissue such as an omentoplasty should considered carefully. With this treatment the overall three-year survival rate of a group of 33 patients was 60% with a local control rate of 73%. The combination of chemotherapy as a radiosensitizer resulted in an increase of R0 resections by 20%. Introduction of TME surgery and pre-operative radiotherapy has created a new situation with limited possibilities due to dose-accumulation toxicity of the radiotherapy and extensive scarring of the tissues making estimation of the extent of the tumour growth more difficult. The prevention of local recurrence by proper selection of primary cases, the training of experienced surgeons and the optimal use of pre-operative radiotherapy is the way forward to improve results.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2002

Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer has been shown to result in a reduction in the number of local recurrences in retrospective studies. Reports on improved local control after preoperative, hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) have led to the introduction of a prospective randomized multicenter trial, in which the effect of TME surgery with or without preoperative RT were evaluated. Any benefit in regard to a reduced local recurrence rate and possible improved survival must be weighed against potential adverse effects in both the short-term and the long-term. The present study was undertaken to assess the acute side effects of short-term, preoperative RT in rectal cancer patients and to study the influence of five doses of 5 Gy on surgical parameters, postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients randomized in the Dutch TME trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1,530 Dutch patients entered onto a prospective randomized trial, comparing preoperative RT with five doses of 5 Gy followed by TME surgery with TME surgery alone, of which 1,414 patients were assessable. Toxicity from RT, surgery characteristics, and postoperative complications and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Toxicity during RT hardly occurred. Irradiated patients had 100 mL more blood loss during the operation (P <.001) and showed more perineal complications (P =.008) in cases of abdominoperineal resection. The total number of complications was slightly increased in the irradiated group (P =.008). No difference was observed in postoperative mortality (4.0% v 3.3%) or in the number of reinterventions. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hypofractionated RT is a safe procedure in patients treated with TME surgery, despite a slight increase in complications when compared with TME surgery only.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Anaesthesia for advanced rectal cancer patients treated with combined major resections and intraoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Multimodality treatment for patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer, including high-dose preoperative external beam radiotherapy, extensive surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy, decreases the local recurrence rates and improves survival. During this aggressive operation, the anaesthesiologist is faced with potential problems such as major transfusion requirements, hypothermia, intraoperative position changes, the need to transport the patient to the intraoperative radiation therapy applicator, and the risks associated with remote monitoring of the patient during the 10 min intraoperative radiation therapy application. The anaesthetic management and perioperative results were evaluated for the anaesthetic results and the complications. METHODS: One-hundred-and-six patients undergoing the multimodality treatment between February 1994 and March 2000 for locally advanced primary (n = 50) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (n = 56) were retrospectively evaluated for their anaesthetic results and complications. RESULTS: All patients were operated upon using a combination of general and epidural anaesthesia. The average duration of anaesthesia was 6 (range 3-10.5) h and the mean blood loss 3.6 (range 0.4-14) L. All patients recovered well from anaesthesia. Two patients (2%) died in the intensive care unit (34 and 48 days postoperatively) because of adult respiratory distress syndrome following postoperative haemorrhage. Severe haemorrhage during or after the operation was significantly related with the development of adult respiratory distress syndrome (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: With adequate preoperative assessment and optimalization of the patient's condition, maintaining peroperative haemodynamic stability with the help of adequate remote monitoring, early and fast transfusion, and multidisciplinary communication, anaesthetic complications can be minimized.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

[Local tumor control and (disease-free) survival after surgery with pre- and intraoperative radiotherapy for primary non-resectable rectal carcinoma and local recurrence].

OBJECTIVE: Survey of the results of multimodality treatment for primary irresectable rectum carcinoma and local recurrence of rectal cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHODS: During the period 1 February 1994 to 31 August 1999, 43 patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer (25 men and 18 women; mean age: 64 years (range: 36-86)) and 53 patients with a local recurrence (33 men and 20 women; mean age: 61 years (39-82)) were treated with a multimodality treatment: i.e. preoperative radiotherapy (doses 50.4 Gy, or 30.0 Gy in the case of reirradiation), extensive surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (doses 10-17.5 Gy). This treatment took place at two hospitals in the Netherlands, the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven and, since 1997, the Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre in Rotterdam. In 2000 data were collected for the local control and (disease-free) survival; these were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients also completed a questionnaire about the quality of life at a median period of 14 months (range: 4-60) after the operation; the response level was 96% (76/79). RESULTS: After 3 years, the local control, disease-free survival and survival rates for the locally advanced primary rectal cancer group were 74%, 60% and 55% respectively, and for the locally recurrent rectal cancer group 64%, 34% and 50% respectively. Tumour resection with microscopically negative margins had a statistically significant positive effect on the local control and disease-free survival in both groups as well as on the survival in the locally advanced primary patient group. Seven of the 96 patients (7%) died as a result of complications. Of the patients with a primary irresectable carcinoma or a local recurrent tumour who completed the questionnaire the results were as follows: 56% and 63% respectively had been able to resume employment, 53% and 59% respectively had been able to resume their previous lifestyle, 15% and 27% respectively indicated radicular pain as a new symptom, 26% and 46% respectively stated problems with walking, 42% and 44% respectively stated problems with urinating and 59% and 52% respectively a reduction in sexual activity.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Comparison of intraoperative radiation therapy-containing multimodality treatment with historical treatment modalities for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment protocols for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer have changed in the last two decades. Subsequently, treatment goals shifted from palliation to possible cure. In this retrospective study, we explored the treatment variables that may have contributed to the improvement in outcome by comparing three treatment modalities from two collaborating institutions in patients with similar tumor characteristics. METHODS: Ninety-four patients were treated with electron-beam radiation therapy only (1975-1990), 19 with combined preoperative electron-beam radiation therapy and surgery (1989-1996), and 33 with intraoperative radiation therapy-multimodality treatment (1994-1999). Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered either as intraoperative electron-beam radiotherapy (10-17.5 Gy) in 20 patients or as intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (10 Gy) in 13 patients. No patient had received prior electron-beam radiation therapy. RESULTS: The three-year survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 14, 8, and 10 percent, respectively, in the electron-beam radiation therapy-only group and 11, 0, and 14 percent, respectively, in the combined electron-beam radiation therapy-surgery group. The overall intraoperative radiation therapy-multimodality treatment group showed significantly better three-year survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates of 60, 43, and 73 percent, respectively, compared with the historical control groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer was improved after the introduction of intraoperative radiation therapy-multimodality treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Abdominosacral resection for primary irresectable and locally recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present a technique of abdominosacral resection and its results in patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer with dorsolateral fixation. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1999, 13 patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer and 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer underwent abdominosacral resection as part of a multimodality treatment, i.e., preoperative irradiation, surgery, and intraoperative irradiation. After the abdominal phase, the patient was turned from supine to prone position to perform the transsacral phase of the resection. RESULTS: Margins were microscopically negative in 26 patients (52 percent), microscopically positive in 18 (36 percent), and positive with gross residual disease in 6 patients. Operation time ranged from 210 to 590 (median, 390) minutes, and blood loss ranged from 400 to 10,000 (median, 3,500) ml. No operative or hospital deaths occurred. Postoperative complications occurred in 41 patients (82 percent); most notable were perineal wound infections or dehiscence (n = 24, 48 percent). Other complications were postoperative urinary retention or incontinence (n = 9, 18 percent), peritonitis (n = 4), grade II neuropathy (n = 1), and fistula formation (n = 3). Kaplan-Meier 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were, respectively, 41 percent, 31 percent, and 61 percent. Completeness of the resection (negative vs. positive margins) was a significant factor influencing survival (P = 0.04), disease-free survival (P = 0.0006), and local control (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The abdominosacral resection provides wide access and may be the therapeutic solution for the accomplishment of a radical resection for distally situated, dorsally or dorsolaterally fixed primary or locally recurrent rectal cancers.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2001

Urologic and sexual morbidity following multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer.

AIMS: In the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer much attention is given to the oncological aspects. In long-term survivors, urogenital morbidity can have a large effect on the quality of life. This study evaluates the functional outcome after multimodality treatment in these patient groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and August 1999, 55 patients with locally advanced primary and 66 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with multimodality treatment: i.e. high-dose preoperative external beam radiation therapy, followed by extended surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy. The medical records of the 121 patients were reviewed. To assess long-term urogenital morbidity, all patients still alive, with a minimum follow-up of 4 months, were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their voiding and sexual function. Seventy-six of the 79 currently living patients (96%) returned the questionnaire (median FU 14 months, range 4-60). RESULTS: The questionnaire revealed identifiable voiding dysfunction as a new problem in 31% of the male and 58% of the female patients. In 42% of patients after locally advanced primary and 48% after locally recurrent rectal cancer treatment bladder dysfunction occurred. The preoperative ability to have an orgasm had disappeared in 50% of the male and 50% of the female patients, and in 45% of patients after locally advanced primary and in 57% after locally recurrent rectal cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer results in acceptable urogenital dysfunction if weighed by the risk of uncontrolled tumour progression. Long-term voiding and sexual function is decreased in half of the patients. Preoperative counselling of these patients on treatment-related urogenital morbidity is important.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Feasibility and first results of multimodality treatment, combining EBRT, extensive surgery, and IOERT in locally advanced primary rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of aggressive multimodality treatment with preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), extended circumferential margin excision (ECME) and intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with primary locally advanced rectal cancer, but without distant metastases, received multimodality treatment. CT-scan showed extension to other structures in 15 patients (39%) and definite infiltration into the surrounding structures in 23 patients (61%). All patients received preoperative EBRT (dose range 25-61 Gy) and 82% received 50.4 Gy. The resection types were: 12 low anterior resections (31%), 14 abdomino-perineal resections (37%), 6 abdomino-transsacral resections (16%), and 6 pelvic exenterations (16%). The IOERT dose ranged from 10 to 17.5 Gy depending on the completeness of the resection. RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality. The resection margins were microscopically negative in 31 patients (82%), microscopically positive in 4 (10%), and positive with gross residual disease in 3 patients (8%). Pelvic recurrences were observed in 5 patients (13%) including 3 IOERT infield failures. The overall 3-year local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and survival rates were 82%, 65%, and 72%, respectively. Negative resection margins were the most significant prognostic factor with regard to DFS (p = 0.0003) and distant control (p = 0.002) compared with cancer involved surgical margins. CONCLUSION: A high percentage of curative resections can be achieved in this group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancers. Adding IOERT to preoperative EBRT and ECME achieves high local control rates and possibly improves survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Intraoperative radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

We present our experience with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) multimodality treatment for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, but without distant metastases. Between 1994 and early 2000, 62 patients were treated according to a set protocol. Three-year survival rate was 49%. The local control rate was 63%. Total dose of irradiation and completeness of resection were significantly correlated to a better prognosis.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Treatment results for locally recurrent rectal cancers are poor. This is a result of the fact that surgery is hampered due to the severance of the anatomical planes during the primary procedure and that radiotherapy is limited by normal tissue tolerance, especially after previous irradiation. This paper describes the results of a combined treatment modality in this patient group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1994 to 1998, 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, but without distant metastatic disease, received a combined treatment consisting of 50.4 Gy preoperative irradiation or, in case of previous radiotherapy, 30 Gy reirradiation or no irradiation, followed by radical surgery and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy boost. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received a radical resection (R0), eight a microscopic irradical resection (R1), and 14 a macroscopic irradical resection (R2). The overall 3-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates were 60%, 32%, and 58% respectively. Radicality of resection (R0/R1 vs. R2) turned out to be the significant factor for improved survival (p < 0.05), DFS (p = 0.0008), and LC (p = 0.01). Preoperative (re-)irradiation is the other significant factor in survival (p = 0.005) and DFS (p = 0.001) and was almost significant for LC (p = 0.08). After external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) a significantly higher resection rate was obtained (R0/R1 vs. R2 p = 0.001). Symptomatic peripheral local recurrences have a significantly worse prognosis and higher rate of R2-resection (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: Centralization of locally recurrent rectal cancer patients enabled the development of an aggressive multimodality treatment, which in turn led to promising results. Distant failure is still a drawback.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.

PURPOSE: To answer the question whether a single fraction of radiotherapy that is considered more convenient to the patient is as effective as a dose of multiple fractions for palliation of painful bone metastases. PATIENTS: 1171 patients were randomised to receive either 8 Gy x 1 (n = 585) or 4 Gy x 6 (n = 586). The primary tumour was in the breast in 39% of the patients, in the prostate in 23%, in the lung in 25% and in other locations in 13%. Bone metastases were located in the spine (30%), pelvis (36%), femur (10%), ribs (8%), humerus (6%) and other sites (10%). METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to collect information on pain, analgesics consumption, quality of life and side effects during treatment. The main endpoint was pain measured on a pain scale from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Costs per treatment schedule were estimated. RESULTS: On average, patients participated in the study for 4 months. Median survival was 7 months. Response was defined as a decrease of at least two points as compared to the initial pain score. The difference in response between the two treatment groups proved not significant and stayed well within the margin of 10%. Overall, 71% experienced a response at some time during the first year. An analysis of repeated measures confirmed that the two treatment schedules were equivalent in terms of palliation. With regard to pain medication, quality of life and side effects no differences between the two treatment groups were found. The total number of retreatments was 188 (16%). This number was 147 (25%) in the 8 Gy x 1 irradiation group and 41 (7%) in the 4 Gy x 6 group. It was shown that the level of pain was an important reason to retreat. There were also indications that doctors were more willing to retreat patients in the single fraction group because time to retreatment was substantially shorter in this group and the preceding pain score was lower. Unexpectedly, more pathological fractures were observed in the single fraction group, but the absolute percentage was low. In a cost-analysis, the costs of the 4 Gy x 6 and the 8 Gy x 1 treatment schedules were calculated at 2305 and 1734 Euro respectively. Including the costs of retreatment reduced this 25% cost difference to only 8%. The saving of radiotherapy capacity, however, was considered the major economic advantage of the single dose schedule. CONCLUSION: The global analysis of the Dutch study indicates the equality of a single fraction as compared to a 6 fraction treatment in patients with painful bone metastases provided that 4 times more retreatments are accepted in the single dose group. This equality is also shown in long term survivors. A more detailed analysis of the study is in progress.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. A retrospective analysis of locoregional control, survival, and prognostic factors on 178 patients.

Results are presented of a retrospective study on 178 patients receiving adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy after curative surgery for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Tumorstages according to Gunderson-Sosin were B2: 67, B3: 5, C1: 9, C2: 94, and C3: 3. Median total dosage was 50 Gy (range: 10-66 Gy), with a median dose per fraction of 2.0 Gy, 5 fractions per week. The censored overall 5-year survival rate was 42%, and 5-year disease-free survival rate was 37%. The respective rates for stage B2 patients (n = 67) were 59% and 53%, and for stage C2 patients (n = 94), 25% and 25%. Recurrences occurred in 89% within 3 years, 8% in the fourth, and 1% in the fifth year of follow-up. Five-year local relapse rates were 27% for the stage B2 tumors and 40% for the stage C2 tumors. For survival, stage (P = .006), grade (P = .02), fixation at surgery (P = .03), and gender (P = .03) were independent prognostic factors. With local relapse-free probability (LRFP) as endpoint, grade (P < .02) was an independent prognostic factor. Dose of radiation was not of prognostic significance, neither for survival (P = .63) nor for LRFP (P = .61). Since improvement should be made in locoregional control, initiatives are taken to start preoperative radiotherapy; furthermore, the key role of surgery is emphasized.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1992

Radiotherapy for locoregional relapses of rectal carcinoma after initial radical surgery: definite but limited influence on relapse-free survival and survival.

A group of 95 patients, treated with irradiation for relapse after radical surgery as only initial treatment modality for a rectal carcinoma was studied. The term locoregional relapse relates to evidence of tumor recurrent in the pelvis or the perineal area. Seventy-six patients presented with locoregional relapse only, and 19 patients presented with locoregional relapse and concomitant distant metastases. All patients were irradiated at the site of locoregional relapse. Total dose of irradiation was resp. 44 Gy median (range 6-66 Gy) and 40 Gy median (range 6-50 Gy). In the group of patients with locoregional relapse only, recurrence-free survival and survival after radiotherapy were, respectively, 23% and 61% at 1 year, and 6% and 13% at 3 years. In the group of patients with concomitant distant metastases, survival after radiotherapy was even worse, 33% at one year, and nihil at 3 years. Recurrences after radiotherapy occurred early during follow-up with 75% of the recurrences being recorded during the first year of follow-up. Recurrent or persistent disease inside the irradiation volume was the most important clinical problem in both groups, being documented in, respectively, 43/76 and 7/19 (7/13 if six patients were excluded with a survival of less than 3 months from onset of therapy). In the group of patients with locoregional relapse only, using recurrence-free survival as the endpoint, dose of irradiation (p = 0.01) was a significant multivariate prognostic factor and using survival as the endpoint, dose of irradiation (p = 0.005) and grade of tumor differentiation (p = 0.002) were significant. Potentials of current radiotherapy regimes are limited. Therefore, maximal initial treatment is warranted. In the event of a relapse after initial radical surgery, one should opt for either more aggressive standard therapy, or either new combined modalities approaches should be studied.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1991

Incompletely resected rectum, recto-sigmoid, or sigmoid carcinoma: results of postoperative radiotherapy and prognostic factors.

Postoperative radiotherapy was given in 40 patients with gross or microscopic pathologically proven residual disease after surgical resection of rectum, recto-sigmoid, or sigmoid carcinoma. The radiotherapy target volume included the pelvis with (9 patients) or without (31 patients) the perineum. Median total dose of radiation was 50 Gy (range 30-60). One patient received 30 Gy, 10 received greater than 30 to 40 Gy, 13 received greater than 40 to 50 Gy, and 16 patients received greater than 50 to 60 Gy. The median follow-up in the survivors (16 patients) was 53 months (range: 16-85). Probability of survival with censoring for death due to intercurrent disease was 36% at 5 years. Survival for patients with microscopic residual disease (21 patients) was 40% at 5 years compared to 12% for those with gross residual disease (19 patients) (p = 0.09). Twenty-five patients relapsed. All but one relapse occurred earlier than 50 months after radiotherapy. Approximately half (12/25) of the relapses were observed within 6 months after radiotherapy. Local relapse inside the radiotherapy portals was observed in 9/40 (22%) patients. Therapy-related urogenital complications occurred in no patient and gastro-intestinal complications in three patients (7%). In one patient they were scored WHO grade 4 and in two patients WHO grade 3. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. For survival differentiation, grade (p less than 0.001), stage (p = 0.04), and perineal irradiation (p = 0.03) were independent prognostic factors. With relapse-free survival as the endpoint, only stage (p = 0.003) was a statistically significant prognostic factor. There was a trend toward a better relapse-free survival when the perineum was included in the radiation portals (p = 0.09).

Carcinoma↗

PubMed1989

Locally advanced breast cancer: radiotherapy alone versus surgery and radiotherapy.

From 1976 through 1984 46 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated by either radiotherapy alone or by combination of surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Eleven of the 21 patients treated by radiotherapy alone had a local or regional recurrence, while no recurrences occurred in the combined treatment group. From this study it was concluded that "locally advanced" breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and that further study concerning the role of surgery is justifiable for a selected subgroup of patients with non-inflammatory resectable tumours (meeting the criteria of "locally advanced" breast cancer).

Adult↗