[Allergen-specific immunotherapy--vaccination against allergy].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to H Mosbech.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
House dust mites are the most important indoor allergens in our region. During recent years more dwellings have become infested, most likely as a result of increased indoor humidity due to reduced ventilation. Among Danish adults, 14% have developed IgE against mites. The allergens are stable and can remain for years. Keeping the humidity low (< 45%) during winter months is the most important limiting factor for mite growth. It can be accomplished by ventilation and heating. If bedding, pillow, eiderdown and covering mattress are washedat temperatures > 55 degrees C mites are killed and allergens removed. In addition mattress covers seem to be useful, although guidelines for quality assessment are lacking. Reduction in mite exposure will reduce development of allergy in all age groups especially in the newborn period. Immunotherapy can be offered in rhinitis and moderate asthma when sufficient allergen reduction cannot be accomplished.
The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of various environmental factors on occurrence of house dust mite allergens and the influence of allergen exposure on mite allergy. Ninety-two persons from a population study filled in a questionnaire, were skin prick and lung function tested and dust samples were collected from their mattresses for analyses. Two out of five patients with asthma had a positive skin reaction to house dust mite allergen in contrast to five out of 87 non-asthmatics. Fifty-nine per cent of the dust samples contained (group 1) mite allergen > 2 micrograms/g dust. Such mattresses were older (median 7 years, range 1-22) than mattresses with less allergen (median 4 years, range 1-20). In the six bedrooms reported to be humid or mouldy, mattresses contained high concentration of mite allergens. No other parameter investigated could predict the allergen contents. In almost all cases dust analyses are crucial to be able to advise patients with house dust mite allergy.
BACKGROUND: Vacuum cleaners may increase the level of airborne allergens by leakage through the cleaners or by disturbance of floor dust by the exhaust air produced. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of vacuum cleaning with two different types of cleaners on airborne cat allergen analyzed by a biologic and by an immunochemical test. METHODS: Ten homes with cats were cleaned in random order with a 1-week interval by a traditional canister type vacuum cleaner (T) and a semi-stationary vacuum cleaner (S) that conducts the air to the exterior through a valve in the wall. Airborne particles were collected by air sampling for 2 hours and cat allergen, Fel d 1, was quantified biologically by basophil histamine release test (HR test) and immunochemically by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Using the S resulted in smaller amounts of airborne cat allergen than the T (mean 2.1 ng/m3 air (range .8 to 12.5) versus 5.2 ng/m3 (1.3 to 13.3), P < .002 measured by ELISA). Results from ELISA and HR test correlated well (r = .91, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of S with exhaust to the outside of the dwelling gave rise to less airborne low particle size allergen during the cleaning procedure than a T method. The basophil histamine release test could be a valid alternative method to establish allergen content in environmental samples especially in allergen systems with no available monoclonal antibodies.
Detergent enzymes may cause skin irritation and occasionally hypersensitivity reactions. The potential hazards of these enzymes have led some physicians to advise atopic dermatitis patients against the use of enzyme-enriched detergents. A three-phased randomised, double-blind, cross-over experiment was designed to question this recommendation. Each period was of 1 month's duration. In the first phase patients continued using their normal washing detergent. In phase II patients used trial detergent with or without added enzymes, and during phase III patients were given the opposite trial detergent. A total of 25 patients completed the study. The primary efficacy parameters were inter-period changes in corticosteroid usage and changes in SCORAD. Secondary efficacy parameters were altered subjective symptoms scored during the final 2 weeks of each interval. Analyses of all data revealed no statistical differences in any of the primary or secondary parameters comparing treatment and placebo periods. Our data therefore seem to exclude that atopic dermatitis may exacerbate during 1 month's exposure to enzyme-enriched detergents. Since no significant irritant capacity was detected in atopic dermatitis patients, it is unlikely that consumers with "normal skin" will experience any skin discomfort when enzyme-enriched detergents are used.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Exposure chambers have proven to be valuable tools in the study of reactions to aeroallergens, and in monitoring the efficacy of antiallergic therapy. In the present study, 15 house-dust-mite-allergic asthmatics and five nonallergic volunteers were challenged in a recently developed exposure chamber. The trial was performed double-blinded with house-dust-mite allergen or placebo. Patients with allergy to house-dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) (Der p) were included by positive skin prick test, allergen-specific IgE, and conventional bronchial allergen challenge, with nebulizer and mouthpiece. In the exposure chamber, a total allergen dose corresponding to 1200 ng Der p 1 was applied. All participants kept diaries, recording peak expiratory flow rates, symptoms, and medication in periods of at least 2 weeks before and after each challenge. Twelve of the 15 asthmatics reacted with asthmatic symptoms with a median change in FEV1 of -16.4% when exposed to the allergen, but not to placebo, in the exposure chamber. Three patients had only minor symptoms during both chamber exposures and experienced no impairment of pulmonary function. Late-phase reactions were less frequent (one vs three) after the exposure chamber challenges, as compared to the traditional challenges. None of the healthy subjects reacted to the challenges. In conclusion, our exposure chamber was able to elicit symptoms in allergic subjects, and this ability was obtained with only minor amounts of house-dust-mite allergen. The described method could prove to be a more physiologically relevant model to monitor individual responses to aeroallergens.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy treatment in allergic diseases involves a risk of systemic side effects. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 45 patients allergic to pollen to determine whether pretreatment with loratadine could reduce the number and severity of systemic reactions during the dose-increase phase of cluster immunotherapy. METHODS: The patients received cluster immunotherapy with a standardized birch (Betula verrucosa) or grass (Phleum pratense) pollen extract adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide. The immunotherapy schedule involved seven visits and 14 injections to reach a maintenance dose of 100,000 standardized quality units. Loratadine, 10 mg, or placebo tablets were administered 2 hours before the first injection at each visit. RESULTS: A total of 720 injections were given (309 injections in 21 patients receiving loratadine and 411 injections in 24 patients receiving placebo). The median numbers of injections to reach maintenance dose were 15 (range, 14 to 18) in the loratadine group and 16 (range, 14 to 23) in the placebo group (p = 0.037). The numbers of patients with systemic reactions were seven (33%) and 19 (79%) in the loratadine and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.002). Twenty-five reductions caused by systemic reactions were observed in the placebo group in contrast to nine in the loratadine group (p = 0.047). No life-threatening systemic reactions were observed in either group. Systemic reactions were, however, more severe in the placebo group, mainly because of a significantly higher incidence of urticaria (10 vs 1, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with loratadine seems to reduce both the number and severity of systemic reactions in specific cluster immunotherapy.
BACKGROUND: The purposes of the study were to characterize allergen-induced histamine release in intact human skin in vivo by using a novel microdialysis technique and to study covariates influencing histamine releasability. METHODS: Hollow microdialysis fibers were inserted into the upper dermis in 15 timothy-sensitivity subjects. Up to 12 fibers were inserted in each subject. Each fiber was perfused with Krebs-Ringer's solution at a rate of 3.0 microliters/min. Three to four serial dilutions of allergen were applied to the skin by intracutaneous injections or skin prick test above individual fibers. Samples were collected in two 2-minute fractions before skin challenge and in 10 consecutive samples for 20 minutes after skin challenge. Histamine was assayed spectrofluorometrically. RESULTS: A significant dose-response relationship for histamine release was demonstrated with intracutaneous tests and skin prick tests. The time to reach peak histamine release after an intracutaneous test was 4 to 8 minutes, compared with 12 to 14 minutes for a skin prick test. Histamine release correlated significantly with wheal size. Intrasubject coefficient of variation on histamine release was about 20%. A substantial intersubject variation in histamine releasability was observed. Seventy to seventy-five percent of the variation could be accounted for by a combination of gender, total and allergen-specific IgE, and an in vitro basophil histamine release test. CONCLUSIONS: Using a skin microdialysis technique, we have described in detail histamine release in intact human skin by allergen. The microdialysis method proved to be a reproducible technique for monitoring histamine release in allergic skin reactions and for studying histamine releasability of skin mast cells in vivo.
Exposure chambers have proven to be valuable tools in studying allergic diseases. The chamber provides a controlled environment and maintains conditions for measuring the amount of allergen inducing symptoms in allergic subjects. The aim of the present study was to develop and test an exposure chamber. The chamber was constructed as an airtight tent, made of transparent polyethylene, easy to adapt to the shape of an existing room, easy to clean, and providing exact allergen-dosage control. Airflow to the interior of the tent was controlled by a variable inlet ventilator fitted with a micropore filter and balanced by a variable high-volume air-sampler on the outlet side. Trace material and allergen were administered as aerosols with a nebulizer connected to the inlet pipe. Samples were obtained from interior surfaces and filters at the outlet. Two different methods were used to test the concept. One method used a colored, neutral trace substance (phenol red indicator) measured photometrically on extracts from filters. Secondly, house-dust mite allergen (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) was applied, with samples analyzed by an ELISA technique. The results demonstrated the ability of the system to administer and sample allergen with a high degree of reproducibility. A clinical pilot trial proved the capability of the system to initiate symptoms in allergic subjects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Thirty-six Danish bee-keepers were clinically investigated by means of a questionnaire before and after the bee season 1990. Their serum was assayed for IgE and IgG antibody reacting with bee venom, and skin prick tests were performed prior to the season. Thirty-six percent had previously reacted abnormally, either with a systemic reaction (SR) (25%) or a large local reaction (LLR) (11%). Retrospectively, eight of the nine bee-keepers with SR had upon re-exposure developed a normal reaction, in spite of the fact that seven of them had specific IgE and/or a positive prick test at subsequent examination. At follow up 38% of the persons who had previously had a SR reacted with a SR or a LLR on the first sting in the season. Two of eight with previous SR reacted with SR during the observation period in spite of a negative prick test and no specific IgE. Of the bee-keepers who had previously only reacted normally there were no systemic of large localised reactions during the observed period, although six showed signs of IgE-sensitization. The results confirm the problems of identifying patients where immunotherapy is superfluous in the group with previous SR and IgE sensitization.
Cord blood cells were incubated (passively sensitized) with sera from 27 patients with previous systemic reactions to insect stings. Histamine release (HR) from these cells was measured following exposure to venom extracts at increasing concentrations. The aim was to see whether this parameter could predict more efficiently than RAST and skin test the outcome of a subsequent re-sting. Results showed that HR from passively sensitized cells tended to reflect skin sensitivity and specific IgE levels. If patients were not re-stung during the follow-up period, HR from the passively sensitized cells frequently decreased whereas an increase was seen (in 6/13) when using sera collected after re-sting. In conclusion HR from passively sensitized cord blood cells could not satisfactorily predict re-sting reactions in the serum donors.
Forty-one patients stung by wasp and 29 by bee were evaluated by comparing the correlation between skin prick test (SPT), Phadebas radioallergosorbent test (P-RAST) and Magic Lite SQ Specific IgE assay (LIA). All patients had had a systemic reaction to insect sting. In the patients stung by bee we found agreement between SPT and P-RAST, and SPT and LIA. Similarly, there were no significant differences in sensitivity between P-RAST and LIA (p > 0.05). In patients stung by wasp, SPT was found to be more sensitive than P-RAST. There were no differences between SPT and LIA or between P-RAST and LIA.
A comparison was made between the amount of airborne pollen collected by Burkard airsampler and the allergenic activity of particles trapped on glass fibre filters in an Accu-Vol high-volume airsampler. The comparison was made throughout the pollen seasons 1986 to 1989. Both airsamplers were operated 24 h a day. They were placed less than 5 m apart, and estimation of the pollen amount was made on a day-to-day basis during the pollen seasons, and on a weekly basis outside the seasons. The occurrence of the 3 clinically most important allergenic types of pollen, birch, grass, and mugwort, was analysed, and close correlations between the 2 sampling techniques were found (rs 0.5-0.8, p < 0.001). The detected range of counted pollens/m3 was: birch 0-1075, grass 0-156, and mugwort 0-44. By immunochemical analysis we found the corresponding amounts to be 0-80, 0-8, and 0-1 SQ-U/m3, respectively. Pollen counts and immunochemical estimation were compared with the symptom score recordings of allergic persons for birch season 1989 and for grass seasons 1986, 1988, and 1989. A close correlation was found for both sampling techniques for the grass seasons in 1986 and 1989 (rs 0.51-0.61, p < 0.001-0.0001), but a less significant correlation was found for the 1988 grass season, and for birch in 1989 (rs 0.24-0.34, p < 0.001-0.05).