PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Mutschler

Publications and source records attributed to H Mutschler.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical pharmacological equivalence of a novel FCH-free GTN spray with low ethanol content vs a FCH-containing GTN spray.

The overall therapeutic equivalence of a fluorochlorohydrocarbon (FCH)-free glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) pump spray with a low ethanol content (TL) was investigated relative to an FCH-containing GTN spray (Nitrolingual; R), in terms of: (1) pharmacokinetic bioavailability, (2) pharmacodynamic responses as assessed by digital plethysmography (DPG), and (3) clinical perception upon application. Pharmacokinetically, the time courses of the plasma concentrations of GTN and its dinitrate metabolites, 1,2- and 1,3-GDN, subsequent to the sublingual administration of 0.8 mg GTN showed somewhat lower bioavailability of GTN and its metabolites than to the reference. Pharmacodynamically, the changes in the DPG signals after the application of 0.8 mg GTN with TL were biostatistically equivalent with R (estimated ratio TL/R for the maximum decrease of the ratio between the systolic a wave and c incisure: 0.98; 90% CI: 0.84-1.14; and for the average decrease of the c: a ratio: 0.97; 90% CI: 0.80-1.16). The time of occurrence of the maximum effect of TL was not significantly different from that of R (estimated difference TL-R: -2.25 min; 95% CI:-9.5 min to 2 min). In contrast, after the administration of an FCH-free GTN spray with a higher ethanol content (TH, active control), the effect had a slightly earlier onset (TH-R: -6 min, 95% CI:-9.5 to -2 min) and there was a higher average response (TH/R: 1.12: 90% CI: 0.95 to 1.34). However, TH was consistently judged to cause an extremely unpleasant burning sensation in the mouth and thus was perceived as distinctly different from R. In contrast, TL was well tolerated and could not be distinguished from R.

Adult↗

[Pharmacodynamic equivalence and clinical trial of a new fluorocarbon-free glycerol trinitrate pump spray with low ethanol content in comparison to a fluorocarbon-containing reference spray and a fluorocarbon-free pump spray with high ethanol content].

The pharmacodynamic equivalence of a fluorohydrocarbons-(FCH)-free glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, CAS 55-63-0)-containing pump spray with low ethanol content (Nitrolingual-Spray N; TL) versus a conventional FCH-containing GTN spray (Nitrolingual-Spray, R) as reference and a FCH-free GTN pump spray with high ethanol content (TH) was investigated by digital plethysmography (DPG) in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled (TL-matched placebo spray), randomized, period-balanced, 4-way cross-over design. Additionally the clinical tolerability (as perceived by the subjects and reported to the treatments-administrating investigator) was determined. The DPG-changes (cla; ratio of c-incisure and systolic a-wave) after the sublingual (s.l.) administration of 0.8 mg GTN of TL were biostatistically equivalent with R: the confidence intervals (CI) of the point estimates of the maximal decrease in cla (TL/R: 0.98, 90%-CI: 0.84 to 1.14) and the area-weighted average decrease in cla (TL/R: 0.97, 90%-CI: 0.80-1.16) were well in a 80-125% tolerance range. The time of occurrence of the maximal DPG-effect of TL was not different from R (distribution-free estimate of the difference TL-R: -2.25 min, 95%-CI: -9.5 min to 2 min). In contrast the maximal DPG-effect of TH after the s.l. administration of 0.8 mg GTN had a statistically significant earlier onset (TH-R: -6 min, 95%-CI: -9.5 min to -2 min) and a higher area-weighted average response (TH/R: 1.12, 90%-CI: 0.95 to 1.34). TH consistently caused an utterly unpleasant burning sensation in the mouth, thus this perceived local discomfort was distinctly different compared to all other treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Sublingual↗

[Speech input for handicapped patients].

Depending on the remaining functions of the limbs, head, or articulation organs, various types of aids are available to motor impaired persons for controlling technical devices. For those with their speech organs and speaking ability unimpaired, an innovative approach has recently become available through voice input which uses speech recognition to automatically identify spoken input. This mode permits the largest possible information input per time unit, may however involve faulty recognition. Practical applications of speech recognition systems for motor impaired persons lie in the private and occupational settings, with purposes ranging from telecommunication, environmental control, to locomotion or computer control. Examples are the speech-controlled use of a television set or a wheelchair. Apart from controlling technical devices, voice input may, in other disabling conditions, also be employed to aid human communication. An overview of commercial speech recognition devices is given.

Computers↗