PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H O Adami

Publications and source records attributed to H O Adami.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease.

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in patients hospitalized for asthma.

In the first cohort study of the question we followed 92 986 (42 663 men and 50 323 women) adult patients hospitalized for asthma in Sweden from 1965 to 1994 for an average of 8.5 years to evaluate their risk of oesophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) adjusted for gender, age and calendar year was used to estimate relative risk, using the Swedish nationwide cancer incidence rates as reference. Asthmatic patients overall had a moderately elevated risk for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (SIR = 1.5, 95% confidence interval CI, 0.9-2.5) and gastric cardia cancer (SIR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.0-1.9). However, the excess risks were largely confined to asthmatic patients who also had a discharge record of gastro-oesophageal reflux (SIR = 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6-22.0 and SIR = 7.1, 95% CI, 3.1-14.0, respectively). No significant excess risk for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma or distal stomach cancer was observed. In conclusion, asthma is associated with a moderately elevated risk of developing oesophageal or gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Special clinical vigilance vis-à-vis gastro-esophageal cancers seems unwarranted in asthmatic patients, but may be appropriate in those with clinically manifest gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Risk of cancers of the lung, head and neck in patients hospitalized for alcoholism in Sweden.

Alcoholic patients are at increased risk of cancers of the head and neck but little information is available on the magnitude of the risk for specific sites and for different histological types. We followed 182 667 patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of alcoholism during 1965-1994, for an average of 10.2 years. We compared their incidence of site- and histological type-specific cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx and lung with that of the national population. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx was 5.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.04-5.64, based on 1207 cases). The SIRs of laryngeal and lung cancer were 4.21 (95% Cl 3.78-4.68, 347 cases) and 2.40 (2.29-2.51, 1880 cases), respectively. The SIR was highest for cancers of the hypopharynx, floor of the mouth, mesopharynx and base of the tongue. The relative excess of lung cancer was similar for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Low age at first hospitalization was associated with higher SIRs for all sites under study. 25 years after first hospitalization for alcoholism, the cumulative probability of developing a lung cancer was in the order of 5%, for oral and pharyngeal cancer it was 2.5%, and for oesophageal or laryngeal cancer 1% each. Our study shows that the risk of head and neck cancer among heavy drinkers is highest for sites in direct contact with alcohol. The high risk of head and neck neoplasms may justify specific medical attention.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2001

Alcoholism and risk for endometrial cancer.

Endogenous estrogens increase the risk of endometrial cancer and are also elevated among women with high alcoholic intake. It is incompletely known, however, whether alcohol intake in general and alcohol abuse in particular increases risk for endometrial cancer. We thus analyzed prospectively the risk for endometrial cancer among 36,856 women hospitalized with alcoholism between 1965 and 1994 through linkages between several national Swedish registers. Compared with the general population, women who were alcoholics had an overall 24% lower risk of developing endometrial cancer, a finding challenging our a priori hypothesis. However, among women below the age of 50 years at follow-up, the mean age of menopause among Swedish women, the risk was 70% higher, whereas the risk among women aged 50 years or more at follow-up was 40% lower compared with the general population. Hence, the effect of alcoholism on endometrial cancer appears to be age dependent.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. What do we know? What do we think? Reports from the Lakardagarna in Orebro].

Läkardagarna (physician days) in Orebro is an annual course arranged by the Orebro Society of Medicine in collaboration with The Swedish Society of Medicine. In the year 2000 the title was "Prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. What do we know? What do we believe? What do we do?" With general practitioners as the target audience, the course covered basic biological science, risk factors, screening, ethical questions and the general practitioner's dilemma. This article reviews four selected contributions: 1) What is cancer? 2) Possible importance of the fetal stage for later risk of cancer; 3) Infections as a cause of cancer; and 4) Screening for cancer.

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice↗
PubMed2001

Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies.

Recently, there has been interest in whether intakes of specific types of fat are associated with breast cancer risk independently of other types of fat, but results have been inconsistent. We identified 8 prospective studies that met predefined criteria and analyzed their primary data using a standardized approach. Holding total energy intake constant, we calculated relative risks for increments of 5% of energy for each type of fat compared with an equivalent amount of energy from carbohydrates or from other types of fat. We combined study-specific relative risks using a random effects model. In the pooled database, 7,329 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurred among 351,821 women. The pooled relative risks (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for an increment of 5% of energy were 1.09 (1.00-1.19) for saturated, 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for monounsaturated and 1.05 (0.96-1.16) for polyunsaturated fat compared with equivalent energy intake from carbohydrates. For a 5% of energy increment, the relative risks were 1.18 (95% CI 0.99-1.42) for substituting saturated for monounsaturated fat, 0.98 (95% CI 0.85-1.12) for substituting saturated for polyunsaturated fat and 0.87 (95% CI 0.73-1.02) for substituting monounsaturated for polyunsaturated fat. No associations were observed for animal or vegetable fat intakes. These associations were not modified by menopausal status. These data are suggestive of only a weak positive association with substitution of saturated fat for carbohydrate consumption; none of the other types of fat examined was significantly associated with breast cancer risk relative to an equivalent reduction in carbohydrate consumption.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies.

CONTEXT: Some epidemiologic studies suggest that elevated fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, most have been case-control studies in which recall and selection bias may influence the results. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced the literature on associations for specific fruit and vegetable subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between breast cancer and total and specific fruit and vegetable group intakes using standardized exposure definitions. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SELECTION: Eight prospective studies that had at least 200 incident breast cancer cases, assessed usual dietary intake, and completed a validation study of the diet assessment method or a closely related instrument were included in these analyses. DATA EXTRACTION: Using the primary data from each of the studies, we calculated study-specific relative risks (RRs) that were combined using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: The studies included 7377 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurring among 351 825 women whose diet was analyzed at baseline. For comparisons of the highest vs lowest quartiles of intake, weak, nonsignificant associations were observed for total fruits (pooled multivariate RR, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.00; P for trend =.08), total vegetables (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04; P for trend =.54), and total fruits and vegetables (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00; P for trend =.12). No additional benefit was apparent in comparisons of the highest and lowest deciles of intake. No associations were observed for green leafy vegetables, 8 botanical groups, and 17 specific fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fruit and vegetable consumption during adulthood is not significantly associated with reduced breast cancer risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Overweight as an avoidable cause of cancer in Europe.

There is growing evidence that excess body weight increases the risk of cancer at several sites, including kidney, endometrium, colon, prostate, gallbladder and breast in post-menopausal women. The proportion of all cancers attributable to overweight has, however, never been systematically estimated. We reviewed the epidemiological literature and quantitatively summarised, by meta-analysis, the relationship between excess weight and the risk of developing cancer at the 6 sites listed above. Estimates were then combined with sex-specific estimates of the prevalence of overweight [body mass index (BMI) 25-29 kg/m(2)] and obesity (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)) in each country in the European Union to obtain the proportion of cancers attributable to excess weight. Overall, excess body mass accounts for 5% of all cancers in the European Union, 3% in men and 6% in women, corresponding to 27,000 male and 45,000 female cancer cases yearly. The attributable proportion varied, in men, between 2.1% for Greece and 4.9% for Germany and, in women, between 3.9% for Denmark and 8.8% for Spain. The highest attributable proportions were obtained for cancers of the endometrium (39%), kidney (25% in both sexes) and gallbladder (25% in men and 24% in women). The largest number of attributable cases was for colon cancer (21,500 annual cases), followed by endometrium (14,000 cases) and breast (12,800 cases). Some 36,000 cases could be avoided by halving the prevalence of overweight and obese people in Europe.

Body Weight↗
PubMed2001

Incidence of ovarian cancer among alcoholic women: a cohort study in Sweden.

Linkage of nationwide databases in Sweden allowed us to evaluate the incidence of ovarian cancer among 36,856 women diagnosed with alcoholism between 1965 and 1994. Mean duration of follow-up was 9.6 years, for a total of 317,518 person-years at risk. The expected number of cases of ovarian cancer was calculated by multiplying the number of person-years by 5-year age group and calendar year-specific incidence rates of ovarian cancer in Sweden. The effect measure was the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our results indicate an overall deficit of cases of ovarian cancer of about 14% among women with a diagnosis of alcoholism. This deficit is particularly strong and statistically significant among alcoholic women younger than 60 years (SIR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-1.00). This deficit is compatible with the reported reduction of gonadotrophin levels among alcoholic women younger than 60 years and with the hypothesis invoking these gonadotrophins in the etiology of ovarian cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: With an improved compliance with screening a larger reduction of cervical cancer incidence would be within reach. We aimed at investigating why certain women do not attend Pap smear screening and at validating the reliability of self-reported screening. METHODS: In 1998 in the county of Uppsala, Sweden, information was collected through telephone interviews with 430 nonattendees and 514 attendees to Pap smear screening, who were all sampled from a population-based database. The women's recall of attendance was validated against the database. The main outcome measures used were odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Non-attendance was positively associated with nonuse of oral contraceptives (OR = 3.56, 95% CI 2.18-5.83), seeing different gynecologists (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.34-2.70), and seeing a physician very often (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.45-6.70) or not at all (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.90). Frequent condom use (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.02-3.47), living in rural/semirural areas (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.21), and not knowing the recommended screening interval (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.20-3.89) were all associated with nonattendance, whereas socioeconomic status was not, when tested in a multivariate model. Among the nonattendees, 57% underestimated the time lapse since last smear. CONCLUSIONS: Seeing a gynecologist on a regular basis and information guiding women to have a Pap smear on their own initiative are important factors for recurrent screening. Therefore, information should be given to all women about the purpose and benefits of Pap smear testing. Self-reports on screening should be treated with caution.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Primary and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality.

Overall, cancer is a highly preventable disease. Indeed, modifiable external factors, discovered by epidemiological studies during the last 50 years, account for a majority of all cancer deaths. In this review, we discuss briefly these factors and their contribution to the current burden of cancer with an emphasis on the developed countries. Needless to say, tobacco smoking remains the largest contributor to the cancer landscape, whilst the contribution of poor diet and obesity may be equally important, but much more difficult to quantify. Our main goal was to assess what prevention of cancer has accomplished and might accomplish in the next two decades. Based on (necessarily crude) estimates, age-adjusted mortality rates from cancer in year 2000 had been reduced by approximately 13% due to primary prevention and an additional 6% due to the combined effect of early diagnosis and screening (secondary prevention). According to a realistic goal for the year 2020, a further 29% reduction might be achieved by primary, and 4% by secondary prevention. The main contribution to such accomplishments would be a reduction in tobacco smoking, improvements in diet--including reduced alcohol intake--and arrest of the obesity epidemic, in part through increased physical exercise. Rather than being granted, these goals require great effort and major commitment from all those who share responsibility for public health.

Diet↗
PubMed2001

Breast cancer risk in male alcoholics in Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between alcoholism and risk of male breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study in Sweden of men diagnosed with alcoholism between 1965 and 1995. The cohort was followed up through interlinkages with nationwide registries (the national cancer registry, immigration registry, causes of death registry, and population registry), using the national registration numbers. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), calculated using the Swedish national cancer incidence rate as reference, were used as estimates of relative risks. RESULTS: A total of 145,811 men were enrolled into the cohort, contributing 1,499,504 person-years of follow-up. Sixteen incident breast cancer cases were identified, and the mean age at diagnosis was 68 years. We excluded the first year of follow-up (cases and person-years) from the analysis to avoid detection bias. The overall SIR (excluding the first year of follow-up) was 1.1 (95% CI 0.6-2.0). Although based on small numbers we found no indication of a differential SIR according to duration of follow-up, age at cohort enrolment, or age at follow-up (attained age or age at cancer diagnosis). CONCLUSION: The observed associations are not compatible with an increase in breast cancer risk among male alcoholics.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Attitudes to screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how attitudes and beliefs about Pap smear screening affect women's choice to participate in organized or opportunistic screening. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with 430 (69.0%) non-attenders and 514 (80.7%) attenders to Pap smear screening, sampled from a population-based database. The interviews were conducted during 1998 in Uppsala County, Sweden. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Non-attendance was negatively associated with perceived severity of cervical cancer compared to other malignancies (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4) as well as with satisfactory benefits (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8), but positively associated with time-consuming and economical barriers (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.5 and OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5, respectively). Non-attendance was also negatively associated with anxiety, but was of borderline significance (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.0). The results were strengthened with increasing time since last smear or if self-reported attendance status was used instead of true attendance. Non-attenders kept holding harder to their preferences than did attenders, stating they would not participate if their preferences were not met. CONCLUSIONS: Important differences in attitudes and beliefs exist between non-attenders and attenders in Pap smear screening. Rather than being emotional, the main barriers are either practical or rooted in misunderstandings and lack of relevant information. These insights offer opportunities to increase attendance rates considerably.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The role of gene-environment interaction in the aetiology of human cancer: examples from cancers of the large bowel, lung and breast.

It has become increasingly clear that cancer can be considered neither purely genetic nor purely environmental. A relatively new area of cancer research has focused on the interaction between genes and environment in the same causal mechanism. Primary candidates for gene-environment interaction studies have been genes that encode enzymes involved in the metabolism of established cancer risk factors. There are common variant forms of these genes (polymorphisms), which may alter metabolism and increase or decrease exposure to carcinogens, thus impacting the risk of cancer. We present an overview of enzymes involved in carcinogen metabolism, present epidemiological tools to evaluate gene-environment interactions, and provide examples from cancers of the breast, lung and large bowel.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Pre-operative oestradiol levels - relation to survival in breast cancer.

AIMS: There are clinical observations that operation during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (with high oestradiol levels) may positively influence prognosis in breast cancer. However, few studies have information on plasma levels of hormones pre-operatively. METHODS: We studied 774 women treated for breast cancer where plasma levels of oestradiol had been measured 1-2 days pre-operatively. Date and cause of death were ascertained from the files of the Swedish Cancer Register and 5434 person-years were observed. The endpoint was death with breast cancer as the underlying cause (n=41 and n=158 in the pre- and post-menopausal group, respectively). RESULTS: In life-table analyses, only pre-menopausal patients with oestradiol 500 pmol/l and above had a tendency (not statistically significant) for better survival. Multivariate Cox models with oestradiol modelled in continuous form yielded relative hazards (RH) close to unity in all women and in strata according to menopausal status. CONCLUSIONS: When oestradiol was analysed in categorized form, only women with the highest levels had a tendency for improved prognosis (RH around 0.7; not statistically significant). Moreover, this pattern was not apparent for pre-menopausal women. Our findings contradict the notion that the pre-operative oestradiol level is independently associated with breast cancer prognosis.

Adult↗