PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Oberman

Publications and source records attributed to H Oberman.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Prophylactic versus therapeutic platelet transfusion practices in hematology and/or oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Platelet utilization has steadily increased throughout the past three decades. At the same time, there has been very little study of the current transfusion practices. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was conducted of institutional members of the American Association of Blood Banks (hospitals) that were actively involved in the care of pediatric and/or adult hematology and/or oncology patients. Inquiries were made relating to the extent of prophylactic versus therapeutic use of platelets, criteria used for prophylactic transfusion of platelets and type, and dose of platelets used. Data were analyzed according to patient age and type of hospital. RESULTS: Of 786 responding hospitals, 630 (80.2%) provided sufficient data for analysis; 126 of that 630 provided care for pediatric patients. The majority (60.9%) of responding hospitals had a minimum of four hematologists and/or oncologists. Eighty-four percent of hospitals reported transfusing some apheresis platelets. The dose of platelet concentrates most frequently used for adults ranged from 6 to 10, with pools of 10 more commonly used in community hospitals. More than 70 percent of hospitals reported transfusing platelets primarily for prophylaxis: 60 percent of hospitals set the threshold platelet count for prophylactic platelet transfusion at 20,000 per microL, with approximately 20 percent each transfusing at higher and lower levels. A platelet count of 50,000 per microL was most frequently required for performance of a minor invasive procedure. CONCLUSION: The data from this study show that the majority of institutions use prophylactic platelet transfusion in both pediatric and adult hematology and/or oncology patients. However, there is considerable variation in platelet transfusion practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to breast care.

The University of Michigan Breast Care Center (BCC) was established in 1985 to provide comprehensive, multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant breast disease. This work presents an overview of our experience in the BCC and assesses the clinical, academic, financial, and educational effectiveness of the program. A database was used to generate a list of all patients seen in the BCC between February 1, 1985 and December 31, 1991. Participating departments provided information regarding outpatient, inpatient, clinical and consultative activities, and referral patterns attributable to BCC endeavors. BCC educational and academic activities were reviewed and profiled. Clinical information was culled from the BCC database, hospital records, and the hospital tumor registry. The BCC has resulted in a fivefold increase in breast care related activity at the University of Michigan Medical Center. Over half of the patients treated in the BCC with primary operable breast cancer receive breast-conserving therapy. The BCC performs a unique educational function, providing the primary breast care experience for house staff as well as one third of the third year medical school class. The BCC supports over 20 clinical research protocols, and patient enrollment in clinical trials has increased dramatically since 1985. The BCC also provides support to basic science researchers receiving over 2.5 million dollars in peer reviewed direct cost support. These data suggest that a multidisciplinary approach to patient care as embodied by the BCC can be clinically, financially, and academically superior and productive. This model warrants further investigation not only in the field of breast care, but also in other clinical situations that require multidisciplinary input and therapy.

Breast Diseases↗