Biomedical subjects

H P Kok

Publications and source records attributed to H P Kok.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Prospective treatment planning to improve locoregional hyperthermia for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the Academic Medical Center (AMC) Amsterdam, locoregional hyperthermia for oesophageal tumours is applied using the 70 MHz AMC-4 phased array system. Due to the occurrence of treatment-limiting hot spots in normal tissue and systemic stress at high power, the thermal dose achieved in the tumour can be sub-optimal. The large number of degrees of freedom of the heating device, i.e. the amplitudes and phases of the antennae, makes it difficult to avoid treatment-limiting hot spots by intuitive amplitude/phase steering. AIM: Prospective hyperthermia treatment planning combined with high resolution temperature-based optimization was applied to improve hyperthermia treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: All hyperthermia treatments were performed with 'standard' clinical settings. Temperatures were measured systemically, at the location of the tumour and near the spinal cord, which is an organ at risk. For 16 patients numerically optimized settings were obtained from treatment planning with temperature-based optimization. Steady state tumour temperatures were maximized, subject to constraints to normal tissue temperatures. At the start of 48 hyperthermia treatments in these 16 patients temperature rise (DeltaT) measurements were performed by applying a short power pulse with the numerically optimized amplitude/phase settings, with the clinical settings and with mixed settings, i.e. numerically optimized amplitudes combined with clinical phases. The heating efficiency of the three settings was determined by the measured DeltaT values and the DeltaT-ratio between the DeltaT in the tumour (DeltaToes) and near the spinal cord (DeltaTcord). For a single patient the steady state temperature distribution was computed retrospectively for all three settings, since the temperature distributions may be quite different. To illustrate that the choice of the optimization strategy is decisive for the obtained settings, a numerical optimization on DeltaT-ratio was performed for this patient and the steady state temperature distribution for the obtained settings was computed. RESULTS: A higher DeltaToes was measured with the mixed settings compared to the calculated and clinical settings; DeltaTcord was higher with the mixed settings compared to the clinical settings. The DeltaT-ratio was approximately 1.5 for all three settings. These results indicate that the most effective tumour heating can be achieved with the mixed settings. DeltaT is proportional to the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and a higher SAR results in a higher steady state temperature, which implies that mixed settings are likely to provide the most effective heating at steady state as well. The steady state temperature distributions for the clinical and mixed settings, computed for the single patient, showed some locations where temperatures exceeded the normal tissue constraints used in the optimization. This demonstrates that the numerical optimization did not prescribe the mixed settings, because it had to comply with the constraints set to the normal tissue temperatures. However, the predicted hot spots are not necessarily clinically relevant. Numerical optimization on DeltaT-ratio for this patient yielded a very high DeltaT-ratio ( approximately 380), albeit at the cost of excessive heating of normal tissue and lower steady state tumour temperatures compared to the conventional optimization. CONCLUSION: Treatment planning can be valuable to improve hyperthermia treatments. A thorough discussion on clinically relevant objectives and constraints is essential.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Reliability of temperature and SAR measurements at oesophageal tumour locations.

INTRODUCTION: For treatment of oesophageal cancer, neo-adjuvant locoregional hyperthermia (HT) has been applied in combination with chemotherapy (ChT) +/- radiotherapy (RT) at the institute. Until now, 26 patients were treated within a completed phase I study combining HT with ChT and 29 patients within an ongoing phase II study combining HT with ChT + RT. METHODS: HT was given with the 70 MHz AMC-4 waveguide system. Initially, oesophageal temperatures were measured using multi-sensor thermocouple probes (TCs) inside a nasogastric tube (NT), but the question arose whether these measurements were reliable enough to quantify the achieved tumour temperatures accurately. Presently, TCs are mounted on the outside of an inflatable balloon catheter (BC) for better intra-luminal fixation and better contact with the tumour. During 14 treatment sessions in four patients TCs inside a NT and mounted on a BC were used simultaneously. Data from these 14 treatment sessions were used to compare temperature and Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) measurements ('DeltaT-measurements') using NTs or BCs. To determine the predictive value of the local SAR for the tumour temperatures achieved during treatment, the relation between the initial DeltaT and steady state temperature (SST) was evaluated. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the temperature measured in the NT (Ttube) and the temperature measured with a BC (Tballoon): R = 0.88 +/- 0.13. However, Ttube was on average approximately 1 degrees C higher than Tballoon and there was a large variation between the different treatments in the relation between both measurements, rendering Ttube a probably unreliable measure for tumour temperatures. The correlation between the DeltaT measured in the NT (DeltaTtube) and with a BC (DeltaTballoon) was rather weak: R = 0.46 +/- 0.25. The correlation between the initial DeltaT and the SST was much stronger for the BC measurements, R = 0.78 +/- 0.19, than for the NT measurements, R = 0.61 +/- 0.23. Thus, DeltaTballoon has a higher predictive value for the achieved tumour temperatures than DeltaTtube. Both DeltaT and SST were generally higher for the NT measurements than for the BC measurements, suggesting an over-estimation of tumour temperatures. Averaged over all treatments in the phase I trial using a NT (20 treatments) or a BC (45 treatments), T90 was significantly higher when measured with a NT. CONCLUSION: Oesophageal temperature and SAR (DeltaT) measurements inside a NT are less reliable than BC measurements. These artefacts are due to bad thermal contact with the tumour tissue and are, therefore, not specific for thermocouple thermometry. For reliable temperature or SAR measurements inside lumina or cavities good thermal contact must be assured, e.g. by using a balloon catheter.

Brachytherapy↗

PubMed2005

High-resolution temperature-based optimization for hyperthermia treatment planning.

In regional hyperthermia, optimization techniques are valuable in order to obtain amplitude/phase settings for the applicators to achieve maximal tumour heating without toxicity to normal tissue. We implemented a temperature-based optimization technique and maximized tumour temperature with constraints on normal tissue temperature to prevent hot spots. E-field distributions are the primary input for the optimization method. Due to computer limitations we are restricted to a resolution of 1 x 1 x 1 cm3 for E-field calculations, too low for reliable treatment planning. A major problem is the fact that hot spots at low-resolution (LR) do not always correspond to hot spots at high-resolution (HR), and vice versa. Thus, HR temperature-based optimization is necessary for adequate treatment planning and satisfactory results cannot be obtained with LR strategies. To obtain HR power density (PD) distributions from LR E-field calculations, a quasi-static zooming technique has been developed earlier at the UMC Utrecht. However, quasi-static zooming does not preserve phase information and therefore it does not provide the HR E-field information required for direct HR optimization. We combined quasi-static zooming with the optimization method to obtain a millimetre resolution temperature-based optimization strategy. First we performed a LR (1 cm) optimization and used the obtained settings to calculate the HR (2 mm) PD and corresponding HR temperature distribution. Next, we performed a HR optimization using an estimation of the new HR temperature distribution based on previous calculations. This estimation is based on the assumption that the HR and LR temperature distributions, though strongly different, respond in a similar way to amplitude/phase steering. To verify the newly obtained settings, we calculate the corresponding HR temperature distribution. This method was applied to several clinical situations and found to work very well. Deviations of this estimation method for the AMC-4 system were typically smaller than 0.2 degrees C in the volume of interest, which is accurate enough for treatment planning purposes.

Body Burden↗

PubMed2005

On estimation of the temperature maximum in intraluminal or intracavitary hyperthermia.

During intraluminal or intracavitary hyperthermia treatments, limited non-invasive temperature information is available, which may result in sub-optimal treatment control. This article describes a method for estimating temperature maximums and their corresponding locations in tissue heated by a cylindrical applicator with an incorporated cooling system, assuming a hollow cylinder of homogeneous tissue. The main purpose of this study is intraluminal heating of tumours at the oesophagus, but the principle described is generally applicable for cylindrical applicators. When assuming no perfusion and only radial heat flow in the heated tissue, an analytical expression for the temperature profile can be derived such that the complete profile can be reconstructed from the inner wall temperature only. For situations with perfusion, finite difference simulations have been performed and the resulting simulated inner wall temperature was put into the analytical expression to obtain an estimation for the maximum temperature and the corresponding location. This way, an estimation method was developed which does not require a priori knowledge of the perfusion rate or invasive thermometry. For volumetric perfusion rates in the clinically relevant range of 0-10 kg m-3 s-1, the deviations between simulated and estimated temperature maximums were less than 10% and the difference in location was typically a few tenths of a millimetre. These deviations are small enough for treatment control purposes.

Humans↗