Dermoscopy key points: recommendations from the international dermoscopy society.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to H Rabinovitz.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of nonpigmented, facial actinic keratosis (AK) is often suboptimal, even for experienced clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the dermoscopic features of nonpigmented AK located on the head/neck that may assist the clinical diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-one nonpigmented AKs on facial sites were examined by dermoscopy for any consistent underlying features. Lesions were gathered from skin cancer centres in Australia, Austria, Italy and the U.S.A. All cases were diagnosed histopathologically. RESULTS: Four essential dermoscopic features were observed in facial AK: (i) erythema, revealing a marked pink-to-red 'pseudonetwork' surrounding the hair follicles (95%); (ii) white-to-yellow surface scale (85%); (iii) fine, linear-wavy vessels surrounding the hair follicles (81%); and (vi) hair follicle openings filled with yellowish keratotic plugs (66%) and/or surrounded by a white halo (100%). These features combined, in 95% of cases, to produce a peculiar 'strawberry' appearance. CONCLUSIONS: A dermoscopic model of 'strawberry' pattern is presented, which may prove helpful in the in vivo diagnosis of nonpigmented, facial AK. A limitation of this study is the lack of testing of the specificity of the described dermoscopic criteria in differentiating nonpigmented AKs from other nonpigmented skin lesions at this site.
BACKGROUND: Amelanotic malignant melanoma is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma with little or no pigment on visual inspection. It may mimic benign and malignant variants of both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether dermoscopy is also a useful technique for the diagnosis of amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical study of 151 amelanotic/hypomelanotic skin lesions from 151 patients with a mean age of 47 years (+/- 17.5 SD). Digitized images of amelanotic/hypomelanotic skin lesions were converted to JPEG format and sent by e-mail from the five participating centres. Lesions included 55 amelanotic/hypomelanotic nonmelanocytic lesions (AHNML), 52 amelanotic/hypomelanotic benign melanocytic lesions (AHBML), and 44 AHM, 10 (23%) of which were nonpigmented, truly amelanotic melanomas (AM). The 44 AHM lesions were divided into thin melanomas (TnM) </= 1 mm (29 cases) and thick melanomas (TkM) > 1 mm (15 cases), according to the Breslow index. Five clinical features (elevation, ulceration, shape, borders and colour) as well as 10 dermoscopic criteria (pigment network, pigmentation, streaks, dots/globules, blue-whitish veil, regression structures, hypopigmentation, leaf-like areas, multiple grey-bluish globules, central white patch) and eight vascular patterns (comma, arborizing, hairpin, dotted, linear irregular, dotted and linear irregular vessels, and milky-red areas) were evaluated in order to achieve clinical and dermoscopic diagnoses. Statistical analyses were performed with the chi2-test and Fisher's exact test, when appropriate. RESULTS: The most frequent and significant clinical features for TnM and TkM were asymmetry and ulceration (the latter only for TkM) compared with AHBML. Irregular dots/globules (62% vs. 35%; P </= 0.03), regression structures (48% vs. 27%; P </= 0.03), irregular pigmentation (41% vs. 11%; P </= 0.03) and blue-whitish veil (10% vs. 0%; P </= 0.03) were the most relevant dermoscopic criteria for TnM in comparison with AHBML. TkM differed significantly from AHBML in frequency of occurrence of irregular pigmentation (87% vs. 11%; P </= 0.03), irregular dots/globules (73% vs. 35%; P </= 0.03), regression structures (67% vs. 27%; P </= 0.03), blue-whitish veil (27% vs. 0%; P </= 0.03) and hypopigmentation (13% vs. 55%; P </= 0.03). Linear irregular vessels and the combination of dotted and linear irregular vessels associated with TnM and TkM were not found in our cases of AHBML and were only rarely seen in AHNML (3.6% and 1.8%, respectively). Moreover, TkM differed significantly from AHBML and TnM in frequency of occurrence of milky-red areas (93% vs. 17%; P </= 0.03 and 93% vs. 31%; P </= 0.01, respectively). The dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma had a higher sensitivity and specificity than the clinical diagnosis (89% and 96% vs. 65% and 88%, respectively). With the limitation of the small number of cases, vascular patterns were the only dermoscopic criteria for 'truly' AM. In the 10 cases of 'truly' AM, we found milky-red areas in more than half of the cases (six of 10), dotted vessels in four, hairpin vessels in two, linear irregular vessels in two, dotted and linear irregular vessels in two. CONCLUSIONS: Because dermoscopy uses criteria reflecting pigmentation (irregular pigmentation and irregular dots/globules) and vascular patterns, it is a useful technique not only for pigmented melanoma but also for hypomelanotic melanoma. In 'truly' AM, vascular patterns alone may not be sufficient to diagnose melanoma. A combined approach with the clinical information should help in the detection of 'truly' AM.
Dermoscopy is a simple to use in vivo method for the early diagnosis of malignant melanoma and the differential diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. It has been shown to increase diagnostic accuracy over clinical visual inspection in the hands of an experienced physician. This paper is a review of the principles of Dermoscopy as well as recent technological developments.
Any therapeutic substance is potentially harmful. There are many examples in the literature justifying the need to follow-up the drug throughout it's life cycle (post-marketing surveillance). It is estimated that only 50% of the undesirable reactions can be detected during the pre-marketing clinical trials. The drugs' manufacturers have the obligation to report any unwanted reaction or effect of a drug to the regulatory authorities. Furthermore, the regulatory authorities encourage physicians to report adverse effects immediately. The terminology used in these reports contains many different terms which describe an undesired reaction: adverse drug reaction, adverse event, adverse effect and side effect. The common definition of "Adverse Drug Reaction" (ADR) is: "A response to a drug which is noxious and unintended and which occurs at doses normally used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or the modification of physiological function." The use of many terms for the description of the same kind of event causes disharmony and difficulties in analysis. It is of utmost importance to use compatible terms in order to achieve accord throughout the development process and marketing of a drug. Today, adverse-drug-reaction reporting is of major importance in the regulatory authorities' agenda and the regard for drug safety is rising. The aim of this review is to introduce the various terms used to describe ADR's, to discuss their advantages and shortcomings and the differences between them.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the relevant morphologic features and to create a simple diagnostic method for pigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCC) using in vivo cutaneous surface microscopy (ie, dermoscopy, dermatoscopy, or oil epiluminescence microscopy). DESIGN: Pigmented skin lesions were photographed in vivo using immersion oil (surface microscopy). All pigmented skin lesions were excised and reviewed for histological diagnosis. Photographs of 142 pigmented BCCs, 142 invasive melanomas, and 142 benign pigmented skin lesions were randomly divided into 2 equally sized training and test sets. Images from the training set were scored for 45 surface microscopy features. From this a model was derived and tested on the independent test set. SETTING: All patients were recruited from the primary case and referral centers of the Sydney Melanoma Unit, Sydney, Australia, and the Skin and Cancer Unit, Skin and Cancer Associates, Plantation, Fla. PATIENTS: A random sample (selected from a larger database) of patients whose lesions were excised. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of the model for diagnosis of pigmented BCCs. RESULTS: The following model was created. For a pigmented BCC to be diagnosed it must not have the negative feature of a pigment network and must have 1 or more of the following 6 positive features: large gray-blue ovoid nests, multiple gray-blue globules, maple leaflike areas, spoke wheel areas, ulceration, and arborizing "treelike" telangiectasia. On an independent test set the model had a sensitivity of 97% for the diagnosis of pigmented BCCs and a specificity of 93% for the invasive melanoma set and 92% for the benign pigmented skin lesion set. CONCLUSION: A robust surface microscopy method is described that allows the diagnosis of pigmented BCCs from invasive melanomas and benign pigmented skin lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1012-1016
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Currently the hematoxylin and eosin staining procedure is the most popular among Mohs surgeons for histology. However, safranin O, a cheaper and relatively safer stain which is predominantly used for plant histology, should be considered as it offers similar or improved accuracy in the diagnosis of frozen sections of basal and squamous cell carcinomas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The purpose of this study was to assess the precision of automatic computerized measurement of parameters that may be useful in the differentiation of malignant melanoma from benign pigmented skin lesions, and also to determine the feasibility of quantitative monitoring of skin lesions over time. Ten independent sequences of images were acquired with a MelaFind multispectral digital dermoscope for each of 12 benign or malignant pigmented skin lesions. The sequences of images were processed automatically to provide 10 independent measurements of the various parameters for each lesion. Parameters included lesion area, greatest 'diameter', perimeter, reflectance and asymmetry. The precision of each parameter determination was computed from the mean and standard deviation of the 10 measurements of that parameter. The relative errors in determining the lesion area, 'diameter' and perimeter were found to be 6%, 3% and 4%, respectively. Other lesion parameters that are used in differentiating melanomas from benign skin lesions were also analysed as a function of wavelength. In the blue band (about 430 nm) the relative error was about 7% for the mean lesion reflectance and about 7% for the asymmetry parameter. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using MelaFind for objective quantitative monitoring of changes in pigmented skin lesions over time. As suggested by some studies, such information is useful in the early detection of malignant melanoma. The results show that parameters obtained automatically from MelaFind images are sufficiently precise to allow pertinent parameters to be used to classify pigmented skin lesions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.