PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Reicher-Reiss

Publications and source records attributed to H Reicher-Reiss.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Nifedipine and cancer mortality: ten-year follow-up of 2607 patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Recent publications contended that the use of short-acting calcium antagonists may double the risk of cancer incidence and possibly increase mortality in hypertensive patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk ratio for cancer mortality associated with nifedipine in a large population of patients post-myocardial infarction. Cancer mortality data, over a 10-year period, were obtained on 2607 hospital survivors of acute myocardial infarction who were screened, but not included, in the Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT I) study. In this group of patients, 526 (20%) were on nifedipine, according to their treating physicians' decision. In the cohort of screened patients not included in SPRINT I, there were 22 (4.2%) cancer-related deaths in the patients on nifedipine compared with 114 (5.5%) in the group not treated with nifedipine (P = 0.23). In multivariate analysis, the 10-year cancer mortality risk ratio associated with nifedipine therapy was 1.06 (95% CI 0.52-2.18). The current analysis shows no evidence of an increased risk of cancer mortality in a large number of patients treated at baseline with nifedipine.

Aged↗

Long-term mortality follow-up of hospital survivors of a myocardial infarction randomized to nifedipine in the SPRINT study. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial.

This study was intended to determine the 5-year mortality of 2138 post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients who took part in the Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT). In the framework of the SPRINT study, 1065 patients were randomly assigned 30 mg/d nifedipine therapy, for a mean 10-month follow-up period, and 1073 received placebo. No information is available concerning treatment after the first year. One-year postdischarge mortality was 5.0% in the placebo group and 5.9% among patients receiving nifedipine (P = 0.37). Mortality rates after 5 years of follow-up in patients previously randomized to 1 year of nifedipine therapy and placebo were 18.4% and 18.3%, respectively. The 5-year mortality risk ratio associated with randomization to nifedipine over 1 year, adjusted for age, gender, past MI, angina, diabetes, hypertension, MI location, and therapy, was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.81-1.22). Our results do not support an association between nifedipine therapy and a late harmful effect on long-term mortality.

Adult↗

Prognosis of patients with a first non-Q-wave myocardial infarction before and in the reperfusion era. SPRINT and the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Groups. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial.

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has increased in the thrombolytic era. Data comparing prognosis among these patients before and after the advent of the thrombolytic era are scarce. METHODS: We compared the early and late prognosis among 2 cohorts of consecutive patients with a first non-Q-wave AMI hospitalized in the coronary care units operating in Israel: 610 patients from 1981 to 1983 and 225 patients in 1994. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with non-Q-wave AMI increased from 14% in 1981 to 1983 to 32% in 1994. Baseline characteristics in both periods were comparable. In-hospital management of patients differed during the last decade. Patients in 1994 received aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and nitrates more frequently than in the period 1981 to 1983. Thrombolytic therapy, coronary angiography, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting were not used during the index hospitalization in the early 1980s, whereas in 1994 these procedures were used in 28%, 38%, 19%, and 6% of patients, respectively. In-hospital complications, including arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, and heart failure, were less frequent in 1994 compared with the period 1981 to 1983. The 7- and 30-day crude mortality rates were significantly lower in 1994 compared with the early 1980s (5% vs 9% and 5% vs 13%, respectively, P < .05 for both), whereas the 1-year crude mortality rate decreased slightly (15% vs 19%, P = .13). Multivariate analyses adjusting for pertinent variables revealed a decreased risk for death in 1994 versus 1981 to 1983; for 7-day (odds ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.94), 30-day (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.69) and for 1-year (odds ratio = 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.96). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with a first non-Q-wave AMI has improved considerably during the last decade. The introduction of new therapeutic modalities, including invasive cardiac procedures and new medications, probably played a major role in the favorable outcome of these patients.

Adult↗

Baseline characteristics of patients participating in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study.

Low high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, or a combination of both, carries an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). The benefit of therapy that increases serum HDL cholesterol concentrations and lowers triglyceride concentrations on the reduced incidence of myocardial infarctions and mortality has not been unequivocally demonstrated in healthy persons or patients with CHD. The Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study randomized men and women, with CHD and with total serum cholesterol 180 - 250 mg. dl-1, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol < or = 180 mg. dl-1 (< or = 160 mg. dl-1 below age 50 years), HDL cholesterol < or = 45mg. dl-1 and triglycerides < or = 300 mg. dl-1, to bezafibrate retard (400 mg once daily) or placebo. In addition to its effect on the lipids, this drug significantly lower plasma fibrinogen. The demographic, clinical and biochemical characteristics and existing cardiovascular therapy at baseline of 3122 patients randomized onto the study are presented here. A comparison is made with other on-going or recently published secondary prevention studies of lipid modification in CHD patients.

Adult↗

Incidence and mortality from early stroke associated with acute myocardial infarction in the prethrombolytic and thrombolytic eras. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT) and Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Groups.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the incidence of early cerebrovascular events and subsequent mortality in two cohorts of consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), admitted to coronary care units (CCUs) in Israel, in the prethrombolytic and thrombolytic eras. BACKGROUND: During the past decade, substantial changes have occurred in the medical treatment of AMI, and important new therapies have been introduced that could all affect stroke risk and type by diverse mechanisms. Yet the overall impact of these new therapeutic modalities on the incidence of stroke complicating AMI is not clear. METHODS: We compared the incidence and mortality rates of cerebrovascular events complicating AMI within CCUs among 5,839 consecutive patients admitted in the period 1981 to 1983 versus 2,012 patients from two prospective nationwide surveys conducted in all CCUs operating in Israel in 1992 and 1994. RESULTS: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with AMI in both periods were comparable. Patients admitted in the period 1981 to 1983 did not receive thrombolysis and reperfusion therapy; those admitted in 1992 and 1994 received thrombolysis (45%) and coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (14%), and antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments were more frequently used. The incidence of early cerebrovascular events was 0.74% (43 of 5,839) in 1981 to 1983 versus 0.75% (15 of 2,012) in the 1992 to 1994 cohort. Patients with an AMI who experienced a cerebrovascular event were somewhat older in both groups and had a high rate of previous cerebrovascular events, congestive heart failure and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias during the hospital period. Mortality declined by one-third between the two periods. However, the mortality rate of patients with AMI who sustained a cerebrovascular event remained high (> or =40% for 30 days, 60% for 1 year). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of early cerebrovascular events complicating AMI remained similar (0.75%) in the prethrombolytic and thrombolytic eras. Mortality rates of patients with an AMI but no cerebrovascular events decreased substantially over the past decade but not in patients with AMI with a cerebrovascular event.

Aged↗

Long-term prognosis of women after myocardial infarction. SPRINT Study Group. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial.

Women sustaining myocardial infarction fare worse than men during hospitalization. Reports on long-term survival in women surviving an acute myocardial infarction are controversial. The Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT) registry includes 5,839 consecutive myocardial infarction patients who were hospitalized in 13 coronary care units in Israel between 1981 and 1983. The authors examined sex differences in the long-term survival of 4,808 hospital survivors (1,120 women and 3,688 men). Women exhibited a significantly poorer long-term survival than men. After age adjustment, differences between men and women decreased, leaving a survival probability difference of 11% at the end of 12 years of follow-up. In a subgroup analysis, women exhibited poorer survival than men in a comparison of patients with and without periinfarction congestive heart failure or a history of myocardial infarction preceding the index infarction. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios associated with female sex in diabetic and nondiabetic patients were 1.46 and 1.13, respectively. In conclusion, a cumulative survival disadvantage for women in comparison with men is still evident after 12 years of follow-up. The mortality difference is diminished but not erased after age adjustment or multivariate adjustment for confounders. The authors' results are compatible with a hypothesis that the main factor underlying the increased long-term mortality in women after myocardial infarction, besides older age, is diabetes mellitus.

Age Distribution↗

Comparison of short- and long-term prognosis in patients with anterior wall versus inferior or lateral wall non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT) Study Group.

We evaluated the early and long-term prognosis of patients with a first non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in relation to infarct site. Among 4,314 patients with a first AMI, 610 (14%) had a non-Q-wave AMI. Of them, 248 patients with anterior wall AMI were compared with 327 patients with inferior/lateral AMI. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups except for higher mean age in the anterior wall group. In-hospital complications were more common among patients with anterior wall AMI than in the inferior/lateral group. Patients with anterior wall AMI also had higher rates of in-hospital (15%), 1-year (12%), and 5-year (36%) postdischarge mortality compared with the inferior/lateral infarction group (10%, 6%, and 22%, respectively). The 1-year cardiac event rate (recurrent AMI and cardiac death) was significantly higher among the anterior wall AMI group than the inferior/lateral AMI group (14.2% and 4.8% respectively, p = 0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior angina, and treatment with various medications, an increased risk for 1-year (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 2.78) and 5-year mortality (relative risk 1.29, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.85) was observed, but it did not reach statistical significance. Anterior wall AMI location emerged as a predictor for higher 1-year cardiac event rate (odds ratio 3.15, 95% CI 1.59 to 6.78). These findings suggest that AMI location is an important prognostic variable for risk stratification of patients with a first non-Q-wave AMI.

Aged↗

Frequency and prognostic significance of high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with a first non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. The SPRINT Study Group. Second Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial.

Patients with a first non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction with high-degree atrioventricular block were compared with patients without atrioventricular block. In-hospital complications and mortality were significantly higher among patients with atrioventricular block; atrioventricular block emerged as an important prognostic predictor of early mortality in these patients.

Age Factors↗

Improved outcome of elderly patients (> or = 75 years of age) with acute myocardial infarction from 1981-1983 to 1992-1994 in Israel. The SPRINT and Thrombolytic Survey Groups. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israel Nifedipine Trial.

BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is growing rapidly, and their hospital mortality rate remains high, although mortality after AMI declined in the 1990s with the introduction of new therapeutic modalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the management, in-hospital complications, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates in two cohorts of elderly (> or = 75 years of age) AMI patients in the coronary care units in Israel before and after the reperfusion era. The first cohort of 789 consecutive patients was from the Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israel Nifedipine Trial registry in 1981-1983; the second 366 patients came from two prospective nationwide surveys in 1992 and 1994. Reperfusion therapies were not used in 1981-1983 but were used in 1992-1994. The 30-day mortality rate declined from 38% in 1981-1983 to 27% in 1992-1994 (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.71), and the cumulative 1-year mortality rate declined from 52% to 38% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76). In the 1992-1994 cohort, the decline in mortality was most marked in patients reperfused by thrombolysis and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery but was also evident in nonreperfused patients: cumulative 1-year mortality rate was 29% in the former (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.67) and 42% in the latter (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: During the last decade, elderly (> or = 75 years) AMI patients experienced fewer in-hospital complications and lower 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, which declined approximately 30%, most markedly in reperfused patients. The favorable outcome in 1992-1994 was related to changes in patient management. Reperfusion therapy is therefore also advocated in elderly AMI patients, unless specific contraindications are present.

Aged↗

Ten-year survival after acute myocardial infarction: comparison of patients with and without diabetes. SPRINT Study Group. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial.

In a prospective study among 5839 consecutive patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the prognosis of men and women with diabetes was compared with that of patients without diabetes after AMI. The prevalence of insulin-treated diabetes or diabetes treated with oral hypoglycemic drugs was 2% and 8% among men and 6% and 12% among women respectively. After multiple regression analysis, the odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.92) for non-insulin-treated men with diabetes and 2.24 (95% CI 1.14 to 4.38) for those treated with insulin. Among women, these odds ratios were 1.46 (95% CI 0.90 to 2.36) and 1.80 (0.93 to 3.51), respectively. The 10-year relative risk for death was 1.32 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.58) for men with non-insulin-treated diabetes and 1.75 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.45) for men treated with insulin. For women, the respective relative risks for 10-year mortality were 1.41 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.82) for those treated with oral hypoglycemic drugs and 2.59 (95% CI 1.89 to 3.56) for diabetic women treated with insulin. We conclude that (1) diabetes requiring treatment emerged as an independent predictor of short- and longterm mortality after AMI; (2) diabetic women had a worse long-term prognosis than diabetic men after AMI; and (3) diabetic patients treated with insulin had the worst short- and long-term prognosis after AMI in both genders.

Aged↗

Low total cholesterol is associated with high total mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. The Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Group.

The present non-intervention screening study was undertaken to explore the relationships between pre-existing low total cholesterol and all-cause mortality. Eleven thousand, five hundred and sixty-three patients with coronary heart disease who attended a screening visit but were not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study were followed-up for a mean of 3.3 years after determination of baseline total cholesterol. Five hundred and ninety-five (5%) of this largely unselected population who had total cholesterol levels < or = 160 mg.dl-1 formed the study population. The remaining 10968 patients acted as controls. The relative risk of all-cause mortality among patients with low cholesterol compared to others was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.16-1.91). The relative risk of non-cardiac death was 2.27 times higher in the low cholesterol group than in the controls (95% CI: 1.49-3.45), whereas the risk of cardiac death was the same in both groups (relative risk 1.09; 95% CI: 0.76-1.56). The most frequent cause of non-cardiac death associated with low total cholesterol was cancer. These results in patients with coronary heart disease add weight to previous studies associating low total cholesterol with an increased risk of non-cardiac death. However, a longer follow-up of this cohort of patients is necessary in order to clarify this association.

Adult↗

Usefulness of beta-blocker therapy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Group.

The benefit of beta-blocker therapy in patients after myocardial infarction is well established. The use of beta blockers in the high-risk subgroup of patients with combined diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. From a database of 14,417 patients with chronic CAD who had been screened for participation in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study, 2,723 (19%) had non-insulin-dependent DM. Baseline characteristics and 3-year mortality were analyzed in patients with DM receiving (n = 911; 33%) and not receiving (n = 1,812; 67%) beta blockers. Total mortality during a 3-year follow-up was 7.8% in those receiving beta blockers compared with 14.0% in those who were not (a 44% reduction). A reduction in cardiac mortality of 42% between the 2 groups was also noted. Three-year survival curves showed significant differences in mortality with increasing divergence (p = 0.0001). After multiple adjustment, multivariate analysis identified beta-blocker therapy as a significant independent contributor to improved survival (relative risk = 0.58; 90% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.74). Within the diabetic population, the main benefit associated with beta-blocker therapy was observed in older patients, in those with a history of myocardial infarction, those with limited functional capacity, and those at lower risk. Thus, therapy with beta blockers appears to be associated with improved long-term survival in the high-risk subpopulation of patients with DM and CAD.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Calcium antagonists and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: a cohort study of 11,575 patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish the risk ratio for mortality associated with calcium antagonists in a large population of patients with chronic coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested that the use of short-acting nifedipine may cause an increase in overall mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and that a similar effect may be produced by other calcium antagonists, in particular those of the dihydropyridine type. METHODS: Mortality data were obtained for 11,575 patients screened for the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study (5,843 with and 5,732 without calcium antagonists) after a mean follow-up period of 3.2 years. RESULTS: There were 495 deaths (8.5%) in the calcium antagonist group compared with 410 in the control group (7.2%). The age-adjusted risk ratio for mortality was 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.24). After adjustment for the differences between the groups in age and gender and the prevalence of previous myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, hypertension, New York Heart Association functional class, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and current smoking, the adjusted risk ratio declined to 0.97 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.11). After further adjustment for concomitant medication, the risk ratio was estimated at 0.94 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.08). CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis does not support the claim that calcium antagonist therapy in patients with chronic coronary artery disease, whether myocardial infarction survivors or others harbors an increased risk of mortality.

Calcium Channel Blockers↗

Long-term prognosis of patients after a Q wave compared with a non-Q wave first acute myocardial infarction. Data from the SPRINT Registry.

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE, DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Between August 1981 and July 1983, 5839 consecutive myocardial infarction patients were hospitalized in 13 coronary care units in Israel. The present study examines 10 year survival among 4037 consecutive patients with a first myocardial infarction with either Q or non-Q waves. Demographic and medical data were collected from hospital records, and 1 year clinical follow-up was complete for 99% of hospital survivors. Mortality follow-up was extended to June 1992 (mean 10 years of follow-up). RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty patients (14%) had first myocardial infarctions of the non-Q wave type and 3457 of the Q wave type. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with a Q wave (10%) than those with a non-Q wave myocardial infarction (7%) (P < 0.05). One year post-discharge, non-fatal reinfarction and mortality rates were comparable in patients with Q wave (4% and 7%) and non-Q wave myocardial infarctions (4% and 7% respectively). Similarly, 5 to 10 year post-discharge mortality rates were equally high in patients with a non-Q wave (26% and 44%) as in those with a first episode of a Q wave myocardial infarction (22% and 40% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a first non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction exhibited relatively better in-hospital survival than counterparts with a first Q wave infarction, but the advantage did not persist after discharge. Patients with a non-Q wave infarction deserve particular attention as their post-discharge mortality risk is similar to counterparts with a first Q wave myocardial infarction.

Aged↗

Fibrinogen is a predictor of mortality in coronary heart disease patients. The Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Group.

Results of epidemiological studies have indicated that fibrinogen is an important primary cardiovascular risk factor. The role of fibrinogen as a predictor of mortality in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients is unclear. We investigated the association between fibrinogen and mortality in a large cohort of CHD patients screened for participation in a secondary prevention clinical trial. Of the total investigated, 3092 men who were not included in the trial and for whom vital status was known were followed up for a mean period of 3.2 years. In 54.4% of the 111 men who died, mortality was attributed to CHD. Mean baseline plasma fibrinogen levels were 29.4 mg/dL higher in patients who died than in the survivors. All-cause and CHD mortality rates increased with increasing fibrinogen levels. This relationship was also demonstrated within categories of the primary variables predicting mortality in these patients. The contribution of fibrinogen to CHD and all-cause mortality was assessed by multivariate analysis adjusting for age, CHD severity, and comorbidity. Risk of CHD and all-cause mortality for patients in the highest fibrinogen tertile were 1.67 and 1.75, respectively, relative to patients in the lowest tertile, and an increase of about 1 SD of plasma fibrinogen level (75 mg/dL) was found to increase risk of CHD and all-cause mortality 29% and 31%, respectively. These results indicate clearly that fibrinogen level is associated with significantly increased mortality in CHD patients. Implementation of a standardized measuring method is required to allow assessment of risk in CHD patients on the basis of fibrinogen levels.

Aged↗

Early risk stratification of patients with a first inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. SPRINT Study Group.

A prognostic index based on admission characteristics of patients with inferior acute myocardial infarction was developed to predict mortality and other major complications during hospitalization. The study sample included 1841 consecutive patients with a first inferior wall acute myocardial infarction, hospitalized in 13 out of 21 operating coronary care units in Israel. Age, angina in the past, congestive heart failure and blood glucose level > 180 mg/dl were independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality and morbidity. The prognostic weights of these risk factors were determined in a study group which comprised two thirds of the patients (n = 1210) who were randomly selected from the 1841 participants. A prognostic score (range, 0-15) was calculated as the sum of the prognostic weights of the above four risk factors for each patient. These scores were determined in both the study group and in a validation group (the remaining one third of the patients, n = 592). In-hospital mortality in the study group ranged from no death for 102 patients with a prognostic score of 0, to a 37% mortality rate in 106 patients whose prognostic score was > 8. Accordingly, the study group was divided into groups of low-risk (score 0-5), intermediate-risk (score 6-8) and high-risk (score > 8), with in-hospital mortality of 3, 13 and 37%, respectively. In-hospital mortality among patients in the validation group determined to be at low-, intermediate- and high-risk was 3, 13 and 44%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

Digoxin and mortality in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: observations in patients at low and intermediate risk. The SPRINT Study Group. Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial.

Controversy surrounds the safety of digoxin use in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction. Previous observations yielded contradictory conclusions. To determine whether digoxin therapy is associated with increased mortality in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction, we analyzed data from 1731 survivors of acute myocardial infarction enrolled in the Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT), from which patients with severe heart failure were excluded. At the time of hospital discharge, 175 patients (10%) were taking digoxin. Mortality over 1 year after infarction was significantly higher in patients treated with digoxin than in patients who were not receiving digoxin [27 of 175 (15%) vs. 60 of 1556 (4%); p < 0.0001]. Digoxin administration was associated with increased mortality in several subsets of patients. Since patients treated with digoxin had baseline characteristics predictive of mortality more frequently than their counterparts, we adjusted for these differences. Multivariate analysis performed by the Cox proportional hazards model identified treatment with digoxin as an independent determinant associated with increased death during the first year after myocardial infarction [relative risk (RR) 2.8; 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-4.2]. Subgroup multivariate analysis indicated digoxin as an independent predictor of first year death in 464 patients who developed heart failure during their hospital stay (RR 2.3; 90% CI 1.3-4.0), as well as among 1267 patients who did not (RR 3.4; 90% CI 1.7-6.9). The present study suggests a significant excess mortality associated with digoxin therapy after myocardial infarction. The increased mortality risk may be related to unidentified variables associated with the severity of disease in patients treated with digoxin. However, our findings raise concern that the administration of digoxin may contribute to increased mortality in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Acute Disease↗