PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H T Brüggenwirth

Publications and source records attributed to H T Brüggenwirth.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Survival and prognostic factors in BRCA1-associated breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing survival in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancer (BC) report inconsistent results and frequently concern small sample sizes. Further, the prognostic impact of the classical tumour and treatment factors is unclear in BRCA1-associated BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected 223 BC patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2001 within families with a deleterious germline BRCA1-mutation ascertained at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. To correct for ascertainment bias, the group of index patients undergoing DNA testing more than 2 years after BC diagnosis (n = 53) was separated from the other BRCA1-patients (n = 170). All BRCA1-associated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age and year of diagnosis to sporadic BC patients. We compared the occurrence of ipsi- and contralateral BC (CBC) as well as distant disease-free (DDFS), BC-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). By multivariate modelling, the prognostic impact of tumour and treatment factors was investigated separately in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancers. RESULTS: For the total group of 669 cases, the median follow-up was 5.1 years, the median age at diagnosis 39 years. We confirmed the existence of the typical BRCA1-associated tumour type and the high CBC incidence. No significant differences between BRCA1-associated and sporadic tumours were found with respect to ipsilateral BC recurrence (HR(mult) 0.7; P = 0.24), DDFS (HR(mult) 1.2; P = 0.37) or BC-specific survival (HR(mult) 1.3; P = 0.23). A trend towards a worse survival was found for BRCA1-associated ductal BC (HR(mult) 1.5, P = 0.07). Prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated BC were age at diagnosis, tumour size and morphology, and nodal status. Further, survival was non-significantly improved by systemic treatment and a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. No effect on survival of a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy was seen. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1-associated BC is characterised by specific tumour characteristics, a high incidence of CBC and a trend towards a worse survival for the ductal tumour type. Our observation that tumour size and nodal status are also prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated BC implies that the strategy to use these factors as a proxy for ultimate mortality, for instance in BC screening programmes or the consideration of (contralateral) preventive mastectomy, appears to be valid in this specific group of patients.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Clinical and molecular spectrum of somatic mosaicism in androgen insensitivity syndrome.

We recently found that postzygotic de novo mutations occur at the expected high rate of an X-linked recessive mutation in androgen insensitivity syndrome. The resulting somatic mosaicism can be an important molecular determinant of in vivo androgen action caused by expression of the wild-type androgen receptor (AR). However, the clinical relevance of this previously underestimated genetic condition in androgen insensitivity syndrome has not been investigated in detail as yet. Here, we present the clinical and molecular spectrum of somatic mosaicism considering all five patients with mosaic androgen insensitivity syndrome, whom we have identified since 1993: Patient 1 (predominantly female, clitoromegaly), 172 TTA(Leu)/TGA(Stop); patient 2 (ambiguous), 596 GCC(Ala)/ACC(Thr); patient 3 (ambiguous), 733 CAG(Gln)/ CAT(His); patient 4 (completely female), 774 CGC(Arg)/TGC (Cys); and patient 5 (ambiguous), 866 GTG(Val)/ATG(Met). Serum sex hormone binding globulin response to stanozolol, usually correlating well with in vivo AR function, was inconclusive for assessment of the phenotypes in all tested mosaic individuals. An unexpectedly strong virilization occurred in patients 1, 3, and 5 compared with phenotypes as published with corresponding inherited mutations and compared with the markedly impaired transactivation caused by the mutant ARs in cotransfection experiments. Only the prepubertal virilization of patients 2 and 4 matched appropriately with transactivation studies (patient 4) or the literature (patients 2 and 4). However, partial pubertal virilization in patient 4 caused by increasing serum androgens and subsequent activation of the wild-type AR could not be excluded. We conclude that somatic mosaicism is of particular clinical relevance in androgen insensitivity syndrome. The possibility of functionally relevant expression of the wild-type AR needs to be considered in all mosaic individuals, and treatment should be adjusted accordingly.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Substitution of Ala564 in the first zinc cluster of the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-binding domain of the androgen receptor by Asp, Asn, or Leu exerts differential effects on DNA binding.

In the androgen receptor of a patient with androgen insensitivity, the alanine residue at position 564 in the first zinc cluster of the DNA-binding domain was substituted by aspartic acid. In other members of the steroid receptor family, either valine or alanine is present at the corresponding position, suggesting the importance of a neutral amino acid residue at this site. The mutant receptor was transcriptionally inactive, which corresponded to the absence of specific DNA binding in gel retardation assays, and its inactivity in a promoter interference assay. Two other receptor mutants with a mutation at this same position were created to study the role of position 564 in the human androgen receptor on DNA binding in more detail. Introduction of asparagine at position 564 resulted in transcription activation of a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter, although at a lower level compared with the wild-type receptor. Transcription activation of an (ARE)2-TATA promoter was low, and binding to different hormone response elements could not be visualized. The receptor with a leucine residue at position 564 was as active as the wild-type receptor on a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter and an (ARE)2-TATA promoter, but interacted differentially with several hormone response elements in a gel retardation assay. The results of the transcription activation and DNA binding studies could partially be predicted from three-dimensional modeling data. The phenotype of the patient was explained by the negative charge, introduced at position 564.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Molecular analysis of the androgen-receptor gene in a family with receptor-positive partial androgen insensitivity: an unusual type of intronic mutation.

In the coding part and the intron-exon boundaries of the androgen-receptor gene of a patient with partial androgen insensitivity, no mutation was found. The androgen receptor of this patient displayed normal ligand-binding parameters and migrated as a 110-112-kD doublet on SDS-PAGE in the absence of hormone. However, after culturing of the patient's genital skin fibroblasts in the presence of hormone, the slower-migrating 114-kD protein, which reflects hormone-dependent phosphorylation, was hardly detectable. Furthermore, receptor protein was undetectable in the nuclear fraction of the fibroblasts, after treatment with hormone, which is indicative of defective DNA binding. By sequencing part of intron 2, a T-->A mutation was found 11 bp upstream of exon 3. In our screening of 102 chromosomes from unrelated individuals, this base-pair substitution was not found, indicating that it was not a polymorphism. mRNA analysis revealed that splicing involved a cryptic splice site, located 71/70 bp upstream of exon 3, resulting in generation of mRNA with an insert of 69 nucleotides. In addition, a small amount of a transcript with a deleted exon 3 and a very low level of wild-type transcript were detected. Translation of the extended transcript resulted in an androgen-receptor protein with 23 amino acid residues inserted between the two zinc clusters, displaying defective DNA binding and defective transcription activation.

Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome↗
PubMed1997

Mosaicism due to a somatic mutation of the androgen receptor gene determines phenotype in androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Premature stop codons of the human androgen receptor (AR) gene are usually associated with a complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. We, however, identified an adult patient with a 46,XY karyotype carrying a premature stop codon in exon 1 of the AR gene presenting with signs of partial virilization: pubic hair Tanner stage 4 and clitoral enlargement. No other family members were affected. A point mutation at codon position 172 of the AR gene was detected that replaced the original TTA (Leu) with a premature stop codon TGA (opal). Careful examination of the sequencing gel, however, also identified a wild-type allele, indicating a mosaicism. In addition, elimination of the unique AflII recognition site induced by the mutation was incomplete, thus confirming the coexistence of mutant and wild-type AR alleles in the patient. Normal R1881 binding and a normal 110/112-kDa AR doublet in Western immunoblots consolidated the molecular genetic data by demonstrating the expression of the wild-type AR in the patient's genital skin fibroblasts. Transfection analysis revealed that only relatively high plasmid concentrations carrying the mutated AR complementary DNA lead to expression of a shortened AR due to downstream reinitiation at methionine 189. Thus, reinitiation does not play a role in the presentation of the phenotype; rather, the partial virilization is caused by the expression of the wild-type AR due to a somatic mosaic. We conclude that somatic mosaicism of the AR gene can represent a substantial factor for the individual phenotype by shifting it to a higher degree of virilization than expected from the genotype of the mutant allele alone.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity.

Mutations in the androgen receptor gene in 46,XY individuals can be associated with the androgen insensitivity syndrome, of which the phenotype can vary from a female phenotype to an undervirilized or infertile male phenotype. We have studied the androgen receptor gene of androgen insensitivity patients to get information about amino acid residues or regions involved in DNA binding and transcription activation. Genomic DNA was analysed by PCR-SSCP under two different conditions. Three new mutations were found in exon 1 of three patients with a female phenotype. A cytosine insertion at codon 42 resulted in a frameshift and consequently in the introduction of a premature stop at codon 171. Deletion of an adenine at codon 263 gave rise to a premature stop at codon 292. In both these cases, receptor protein was not detectable and hormone binding was not measurable. In a third patient, a guanine-to-adenine transition at codon 493 converted a tryptophan codon into a stop codon. Genital skin fibroblasts from this patient were not available. In exon 2 of the androgen receptor gene of a patient with receptor-positive androgen insensitivity, a cytosine-to-adenine transition, converting alanine 564 into an aspartic acid residue, resulted in defective DNA binding and transactivation. In three other receptor-positive androgen insensitivity patients no mutations were found with PCR-SSCP.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Androgen receptor mutations.

Male sexual differentiation and development proceed under direct control of androgens. Androgen action is mediated by the intracellular androgen receptor, which belongs to the superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. At least three pathological situations are associated with abnormal androgen receptor structure and function: androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) and prostate cancer. In the X-linked androgen insensitivity syndrome, defects in the androgen receptor gene have prevented the normal development of both internal and external male structures in 46,XY individuals. Complete or gross deletions of the androgen receptor gene have not been found frequently in persons with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Point mutations at several different sites in exons 2-8 encoding the DNA- and androgen-binding domain, have been reported for partial and complete forms of androgen insensitivity. A relatively high number of mutations were reported in two different clusters in exon 5 and in exon 7. The number of mutations in exon 1 is extremely low and no mutations have been reported in the hinge region, located between the DNA-binding domain and the ligand-binding domain and which is encoded by the first half of exon 4. Androgen receptor gene mutations in prostate cancer are very rare and are reported only in exons 4-8. The X-linked spinal and bulbar muscle atrophy (SBMA; Kennedy's disease) is associated with an expanded length (> 40 residues) of one of the polyglutamine stretches in the N-terminal domain of the androgen receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Influence of sex of the transmitting parent as well as of parental allele size on the CTG expansion in myotonic dystrophy (DM).

In patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM), the severity of clinical signs is correlated with the length of a (CTG)n trinucleotide repeat sequence. This sequence tends to expand in subsequent generations. In order to examine the kinetics of this process and, in particular, the influence of the mutant-allele size and the sex of the transmitting parent, we have studied (CTG)n repeat lengths in the offspring of 38 healthy carriers with small mutations (less than 100 CTG trinucleotides, mean length [CTG]67). In these studies, we found a weakly positive correlation between the size of the mutation in the carrier parents and that in their offspring. Furthermore, we observed that, in the offspring of male transmitters, repeat lengths exceeding 100 CTG trinucleotides were much more frequent than in the offspring of carrier females (48 [92%] of 52 vs. 7 [44%] of 16, P = .0002). Similarly, in genealogical studies performed in 38 Dutch DM kindreds, an excess of nonmanifesting male transmitters was noted, which was most conspicuous in the generation immediately preceding that with phenotypic expression of DM. Thus, two separate lines of evidence suggest that the sex of the transmitting parent is an important factor that determines DM allele size in the offspring. On the basis of our data, we estimate that when both parents are asymptomatic, the odds are approximately 2:1 that the father carries the DM mutation. Because expansion of the CTG repeat is more rapid with male transmission, negative selection during spermatogenesis may be required to explain the exclusive maternal inheritance of severe congenital onset DM.

Adult↗