PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H V Barron

Publications and source records attributed to H V Barron.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Effects of the repeated administration of adenosine and heparin on myocardial perfusion in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

The mechanism by which ischemia stimulates angiogenesis is unknown. Adenosine is released during myocardial ischemia and may be a mediator of this process. Experimental data suggest that heparin may enhance this effect. The purpose of this open-labeled, placebo-controlled trial was to determine whether repeated intravenous administration of adenosine and heparin could mimic physiologic angiogenesis and reduce the amount of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Subjects with chronic stable angina refractory to conventional medical therapy and not suitable for revascularization received either adenosine (140 microg/kg/min for 6 minutes) and heparin (10,000 U bolus), (n = 14), or placebo, (n = 7) daily for 10 days. All patients underwent baseline and follow-up exercise testing with thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. A semiquantitative assessment of the extent and severity of the perfusion abnormalities was calculated by 2 blinded investigators. There was no significant change in exercise duration or in the peak heart rate systolic blood pressure product associated with adenosine and heparin compared with placebo treatment. There was, however, a 9% reduction in the extent (60.6 +/- 4.0 vs 54.9 +/- 4.1, p = 0.03) and a 14% improvement in severity (41.5 +/- 3.2 vs 35.7 +/- 2.9, p = 0.01) of the myocardial perfusion abnormalities seen in patients who received adenosine and heparin compared with placebo. Thus, in this pilot study, repeated administration of adenosine and heparin reduced the amount of exercise-induced ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina refractory to conventional treatment.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2000

Treatment and outcomes of left bundle-branch block patients with myocardial infarction who present without chest pain. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the importance of chest pain on presentation as a predictor of in-hospital treatment and mortality in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB). BACKGROUND: Left bundle-branch block patients have a high mortality after MI but are unlikely to receive reperfusion therapy despite evidence from clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy. Nearly half of MI patients with LBBB present without chest pain. METHODS: We studied the clinical features, treatment and in-hospital survival of 29,585 patients with LBBB enrolled in the National Registry of MI 2 June 1994 through March 1998). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independent effect of chest pain on reperfusion decisions and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Left bundle-branch block patients with chest pain were greater than five-fold more likely to receive reperfusion therapy (13.6% vs. 2.6%) than LBBB patients without chest pain; they were also more likely to receive aspirin, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, heparin and nitrates (all p < 0.0001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 18% in patients with chest pain and 27% in patients without chest pain. Adjusting for patient characteristics reduced the odds ratio associated with the absence of chest pain from 1.47 (95% confidence interval: 1.41 to 1.54) to 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.30). The remainder of the mortality difference was caused by the undertreatment of patients without chest pain, particularly the low utilization of aspirin and beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Left bundle-branch block patients with MI who present without chest pain are less likely to receive optimal therapy and are at increased risk of death. Prompt recognition and treatment of this high-risk subgroup should improve survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Treatment and outcome of myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without invasive capability. Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the extent to which the capability of a hospital to perform invasive cardiovascular procedures influences treatment and outcome of patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Patients with AMI are usually transported to the closest hospital. However, relatively few hospitals have the capability for immediate coronary arteriography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), should these interventions be needed. METHODS: The 1,506 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 were classified according to their highest level of invasive capability: 1) none (noninvasive, 28.1%); 2) coronary arteriography (cath-capable, 25.2%); 3) coronary angioplasty (PTCA-capable, 7.4%); and 4) bypass surgery (CABG-capable, 39.2%). Treatment and in-hospital outcomes were assessed for 305,812 patients admitted from June 1994 through October 1996. Follow-up through 90 days was ascertained in a subset of 30,402 patients enrolled simultaneously in both the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 2 and the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP). RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving initial reperfusion intervention was only slightly higher at the more invasive hospitals (noninvasive 32.5%, cath-capable 31.2%, PTCA-capable 32.9% and CABG-capable 35.9%, p < 0.001 by chi-square statistic). Among thrombolytic recipients, median door-to-drug time interval differed little among hospital types and ranged from 42 to 45 minutes. At cath-capable, PTCA-capable and CABG-capable hospitals, coronary arteriography was performed in 32.9%, 37.4% and 64.9%, respectively, and PTCA in 0.0%, 5.1% and 31.4%, both p < 0.001 by chi-square statistic. The proportion of patients transferred out to other facilities was 51.0%, 42.2%, 39.9% and 4.4% (p < 0.0001) among noninvasive, cath-capable, PTCA-capable and CABG-capable hospitals, respectively. Among patients in the combined NRMI and CCP data set, mortality at 90 days postinfarction was similar among patients initially admitted to each of the four hospital types. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with AMI admitted to hospitals without invasive cardiac facilities have a high likelihood of subsequent transfer to other facilities, their likelihood of receiving a reperfusion intervention at the first hospital, their door to thrombolytic drug intervals and their 90-day survival rates are similar to those of patients initially admitted to more invasively equipped hospitals. These data suggest that a policy of initial treatment of myocardial infarction at the closest medical facility is appropriate medical practice.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Arrhythmias in the congenital long QT syndrome: how often is torsade de pointes pause dependent?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and predictors of pause dependent torsade de pointes among patients with the congenital long QT syndrome and spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias. DESIGN: The literature on the "congenital long QT" was reviewed. Articles with illustrations demonstrating the onset of spontaneous polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias in the absence of arrhythmogenic drugs were included. RESULTS: Illustrations of 62 spontaneous episodes of torsade de pointes among patients with congenital long QT syndrome were found in the literature. The majority (74%) of documented arrhythmias were "pause dependent"; 82% of these pauses were longer than the basic cycle length by > 100 ms. Age and sex correlated with the mode of arrhythmia initiation. Arrhythmias in infants (</= 3 years old) were not pause dependent, while female sex correlated with pause dependent torsade. Using multivariate analysis, age was the only independent predictor of the mode of onset of torsade de pointes. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest that the majority of spontaneous arrhythmias in the congenital long QT syndrome are pause dependent. Torsade de pointes that is not preceded by pauses appears to be limited to patient subgroups with severe forms of the disease, like symptomatic infants. These findings have important implications regarding the use of cardiac pacing for arrhythmia prevention.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Early use of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the United States: experience from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 participants.

This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors within 24 hours of admission in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor-prescribing patterns. Demographic, procedural, and acute medication use from 202,438 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 US hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 from June 1994 through June 1996. Acute ACE inhibitor use increased from 14.0% in 1994 to 17.3% in 1996. After controlling for all important clinical variables, we found that there was a significant increase in the odds of acute ACE inhibitor treatment over time (odds ratio [OR]1.07 for each 180-day period; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.06 to 1.08; p<0.0001). Univariate data suggested that patients treated acutely with ACE inhibitors tended to be older (70.9 vs. 67.2 years) and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs. 11.0%). Independent predictors of receiving an ACE inhibitor acutely included anterior wall infarction (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40), Killip class 2 or 3 (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.72 to 1.83), prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.37), prior history of congestive heart failure (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.82 to 1.95), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.38). Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors acutely in patients with AMI with increasing frequency. Patients with evidence of congestive heart failure and those with anterior myocardial infarction have the greatest expected benefit from such therapy, and these persons receive such treatment most often. However, most patients hospitalized with AMI do not receive this potentially life-saving therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of outcomes research with clinical trials using preexisting data.

Outcomes research using analysis of preexisting data is a relatively new field with the potential to improve the quality and effectiveness of medical care, and may provide a useful complement to randomized studies. Motivated by the growth of this research in the cardiovascular literature, this review offers a framework to identify the core concepts of outcomes research from database analyses by comparing and contrasting it with the randomized clinical trial.

Bias↗
PubMed1999

Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting information about whether short-term mortality after myocardial infarction is higher among women than among men after adjustment for age and other prognostic factors. We hypothesized that younger, but not older, women have higher mortality rates during hospitalization than their male peers. METHODS: We analyzed data on 384,878 patients (155,565 women and 229,313 men) who were 30 to 89 years of age and who had been enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 between June 1994 and January 1998. Patients who had been transferred from or to other hospitals were excluded. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate during hospitalization was 16.7 percent among the women and 11.5 percent among the men. Sex-based differences in the rates varied according to age. Among patients less than 50 years of age, the mortality rate for the women was more than twice that for the men. The difference in the rates decreased with increasing age and was no longer significant after the age of 74 (P< 0.001 for the interaction between sex and age). Logistic-regression analysis showed that the odds of death were 11.1 percent greater for women than for men with every five-year decrease in age (95 percent confidence interval, 10.1 to 12.1 percent). Differences in medical history, the clinical severity of the infarction, and early management accounted for only about one third of the difference in the risk. After adjustment for these factors, women still had a higher risk of death for every five years of decreasing age (increase in the odds of death, 7.0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 5.9 to 8.1 percent). CONCLUSIONS: After myocardial infarction, younger women, but not older women, have higher rates of death during hospitalization than men of the same age. The younger the age of the patients, the higher the risk of death among women relative to men. Younger women with myocardial infarction represent a high-risk group deserving of special study.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of the national registry of myocardial infarction 2 with the cooperative cardiovascular project.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to evaluate whether or not the simpler case identification and data abstraction processes used in National Registry of Myocardial Infarction two (NRMI 2) are comparable with the more rigorous processes utilized in the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP). BACKGROUND: The increased demand for quality of care and outcomes data in hospitalized patients has resulted in a proliferation of databases of varying quality. For patients admitted with myocardial infarction, there are two national databases that attempt to capture critical process and outcome data using different case identification and abstraction processes. METHODS: We compared case ascertainment and data elements collected in Medicare-eligible patients included in the industry-sponsored NRMI 2 with Medicare enrollees included in the Health Care Financing Administration-sponsored CCP who were admitted during identical enrollment periods. Internal and external validity of NRMI 2 was defined using the CCP as the "gold standard." RESULTS: Demographic and procedure use data obtained independently in each database were nearly identical. There was a tendency for NRMI 2 to identify past medical histories such as prior infarct (29% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) or heart failure (21% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) less frequently than the CCP. Hospital mortality was calculated to be higher in NRMI 2 (19.7% vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001) due mostly to the inclusion of noninsured patients 65 years and older in NRMI 2. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the simpler case ascertainment and data collection strategies employed by NRMI 2 result in process and outcome measures that are comparable to the more rigorous methods utilized by the CCP. Outcomes that are more difficult to measure from retrospective chart review such as stroke and recurrent myocardial infarction must be interpreted cautiously.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Autonomic nervous system tone measured by baroreflex sensitivity is depressed in patients with end-stage liver disease.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic liver disease is often associated with impairment of autonomic nervous system (ANS) reflexes. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) testing is an inexpensive, relatively noninvasive test that can be used to assess ANS tone. The aims of the present study were to determine the prevalence of ANS dysfunction in cirrhotics who are being considered for liver transplantation and to explore the potential use of BRS as a prognostic tool in identifying patients awaiting transplantation who are at increased risk for death. METHODS: We studied nine cirrhotics who were awaiting liver transplantation and seven controls without liver disease. BRS (ms/mm Hg) was measured using the phenylephrine method. RESULTS: BRS (mean +/- SEM) (ms/mm Hg) was significantly lower in cirrhotics compared with controls (4.2 +/- 0.9 vs 21.1 +/- 3.8 ms/mm Hg; p < 0.05). Furthermore, BRS was lower in cirrhotics with hepatic encephalopathy compared with those without (2.6 +/- 0.9 vs 6.1 +/- 1.0 ms/mm Hg; p < 0.05) and there was a trend toward lower BRS values in Child-Pugh class C patients as compared with class B (3.8 +/- 1.3 vs 5.3 +/- 1.2 ms/mm Hg; p = 0.3). At follow-up (9 months), one patient had died and one underwent liver transplantation. These two patients also had the most severely impaired vagal tone (BRS = 0 and 1.2 ms/mm Hg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vagal tone, as assessed by BRS, is markedly depressed in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Presenting characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of non-black minorities in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

Data from a national registry (cohort) of myocardial infarction, which has enrolled 275,046 patients from June 1994 to April 1996, were analyzed to compare the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among Hispanics, Asian-Pacific islanders, and native Americans with those of white Americans presenting to the hospital with acute myocardial infarction. Non-black minorities were younger, had a higher proportion of men, used the emergency medical services less frequently, and presented later to the hospital after the onset of symptoms (135 vs 122 minutes, p <0.001) than whites. Also, non-black minorities were less likely to receive beta-blocker therapy at discharge (crude odds ratio 0.86, confidence interval 0.82 to 0.90) than whites, but they were generally as likely to receive intravenous thrombolytic therapy (with the exception of Asian-Pacific islanders) and undergo both coronary arteriography and revascularization procedures as their white counterparts. There were no significant differences in hospital mortality for non-black minorities compared with whites.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle-branch block (BBB) is considered an important predictor of poor outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but the consequences of right BBB are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To 1) estimate the prevalence of left and right BBB in patients with myocardial infarction; 2) compare the clinical characteristics of and treatments received by patients with left, right, or no BBB; and 3) determine the independent association of left BBB and right BBB with in-hospital death. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter registry of 1571 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: 297,832 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had left, right, or no BBB on initial electrocardiography. MEASUREMENTS: Presence and type of BBB, clinical characteristics of patients, therapies given, and in-hospital death. RESULTS: Patients with left BBB (n = 19,967; 6.7%) or right BBB (n = 18,354; 6.2%) were older and had more comorbid illness and congestive heart failure than patients with no BBB. Among patients for whom thrombolytic therapy was clearly indicated, fewer patients with left or right BBB (16.6% and 32.0%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (66.5%) received this therapy (P < 0.001). Fewer patients with left or right BBB (60.6% and 67.3%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (75.6%) received aspirin within the first 24 hours (P < 0.001), and fewer patients with left or right BBB (23.9% and 31.8%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (40.4%) received beta-blockers within the first 24 hours (P < 0.001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were almost twice as high for patients with left or right BBB (22.6% and 23.0%, respectively) as for patients with no BBB (13.1%) (P < 0.001). Compared with no BBB and no ST-segment elevation, left BBB was associated with a 34% increase (odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.28 to 1.39]) and right BBB was associated with a 64% increase (odds ratio, 1.64 [CI, 1.57 to 1.71]) in the risk for in-hospital death, after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, prevalences of right and left BBB are similar. Patients with BBB have more comorbid conditions, are less likely to receive therapy, and have an increased risk for in-hospital death compared with patients with no BBB. Compared with left BBB, right BBB seems to be a stronger independent predictor of in-hospital death.

Bundle-Branch Block↗
PubMed1998

Risk for intracranial hemorrhage after tissue plasminogen activator treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Participants in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in reducing mortality from acute myocardial infarction has been unequivocally shown. However, thrombolysis is related to bleeding complications, including intracranial hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of and risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) given for acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving usual care. DESIGN: Large national registry of patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. SETTING: 1484 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: 71073 patients who had had acute myocardial infarction from 1 June 1994 to 30 September 1996, received tPA as the initial reperfusion strategy, and did not receive a second dose of any thrombolytic agent. MEASUREMENT: Intracranial hemorrhage confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: 673 patients (0.95%) were reported to have had intracranial hemorrhage during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction; 625 patients (0.88%) had the event confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Of the 625 patients with confirmed intracranial hemorrhage, 331 (53%) died during hospitalization. An additional 158 patients (25.3%) who survived to hospital discharge had residual neurologic deficit. In multivariable models for the main effects of candidate risk factors, older age, female sex, black ethnicity, systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or more, diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more, history of stroke, tPA dose more than 1.5 mg/kg, and lower body weight were significantly associated with intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial hemorrhage is a rare but serious complication of tPA in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Appropriate drug dosing may reduce the risk for this complication. Other therapies, such as primary coronary angioplasty, may be preferable in patients with acute myocardial infarction who have a history of stroke.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

Impact of time to treatment with tissue plasminogen activator on morbidity and mortality following acute myocardial infarction (The second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction).

This study examines the association between time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy and hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) enrolled in a national registry. A total of 71,253 patients hospitalized with AMI from June 1994 to July 1996 who received tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) therapy in 1,474 United States hospitals were studied. In this study sample, approximately 39% of patients presented to participating hospitals within 2 hours of acute symptom onset and received t-PA; 36% were treated within 2.1 to 4 hours, 12% between 4.1 to 6 hours, and the remaining 13% thereafter. After controlling for potentially confounding factors, in-hospital death rates increased progressively with increasing delays in time of administration of t-PA. The lowest risk for dying during acute hospitalization was seen for those treated with t-PA within 2 hours of acute symptoms. No significant association was seen between time of administration of t-PA and in-hospital risk of recurrent AMI, myocardial ischemia, cardiogenic shock, major bleeding episodes, or stroke and/or intracranial bleeding. The incidence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias declined with progressively longer time to administration of t-PA. The results of this multihospital observational study suggest that patients with AMI treated earlier with t-PA are significantly more likely to survive the acute hospitalization than patients treated later. These data reinforce the benefits to be gained by treatment with t-PA as soon as possible following the onset of acute ischemic symptoms, and for community-wide efforts to reduce the duration of prehospital delay in patients with acute coronary disease.

Cross-Over Studies↗
PubMed1998

Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that reperfusion therapy improves survival in selected patients with an acute myocardial infarction. However, several studies have suggested that many patients with an acute myocardial infarction do not receive this therapy. Whether this underutilization occurs in patients appropriate for such therapy remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the use of reperfusion therapy in patients with an acute myocardial infarction hospitalized at 1470 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. We identified 84 663 patients who were eligible for reperfusion therapy as defined by diagnostic changes on the initial 12-lead ECG, presentation to the hospital within 6 hours from symptom onset, and no contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. Twenty-four percent of these eligible patients did not receive any form of reperfusion therapy (7.5% of all patients). When multivariate analyses were used, left bundle-branch block (odds ratio [OR]=0.22; 95% CI=0.20 to 0.24), lack of chest pain at presentation (OR=0.22; 95% CI=0.21 to 0.24), age >75 years (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.36 to 0.43), female sex (OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.83 to 0.92), and various preexisting cardiovascular conditions were independent predictors that the patient would not receive reperfusion therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Reperfusion therapy may be underutilized in the United States. Increased use of reperfusion therapy could potentially reduce the unnecessarily high mortality rates observed in women, the elderly, and other patient groups with the highest risk of death from an acute myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Beta-blocker dosages and mortality after myocardial infarction: data from a large health maintenance organization.

BACKGROUND: Although long-term beta-blocker therapy has been found beneficial in patients after an acute myocardial infarction, these drugs are greatly underused by clinicians. Moreover, the dosages of beta-blockers used in randomized controlled trials appear to be much larger than those routinely prescribed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an association exists between the dosage of beta-blockers prescribed after a myocardial infarction and cardiac mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1165 patients who survived an acute myocardial infarction from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1992. These patients represent a subgroup of the 6851 patients hospitalized at northern California Kaiser Permanente hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 37.7% of patients prescribed beta-blocker therapy, 48.1% were treated with dosages less than 50% of the dosage found to be effective in preventing cardiac death in large randomized clinical trials (lower-dosage therapy). Compared with patients not receiving beta-blockers, those treated with lower-dosage therapy appeared to have a greater reduction in cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.33; P=.009) than patients treated with a higher dosage (hazard ratio, 0.82; P=0.51), after adjustment for age, sex, race, disease severity, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The dosages of beta-blockers shown to be effective in randomized trials are not commonly used in clinical practice, and treatment with lower dosages of beta-blockers was associated with at least as great a reduction in mortality as treatment with higher dosages. This suggests that physicians who are reluctant to prescribe beta-blockers because of the relatively large dosages used in the large prospective clinical trials should be encouraged to prescribe smaller dosages.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor prescribing patterns. BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated a significant mortality benefit in patients treated with ACE inhibitors after AMI. Numerous studies have demonstrated underuse of other beneficial treatments for patients with AMI, such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents, aspirin and immediate reperfusion therapy. METHODS: Demographic, procedural and discharge medication data from 190,015 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 U.S. hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. RESULTS: Prescriptions for ACE inhibitor therapy at hospital discharge increased from 25.0% in 1994 to 30.7% in 1996. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40% or evidence of congestive heart failure while in the hospital were discharged with ACE inhibitor treatment 42.6% of the time. Of patients experiencing an anterior wall myocardial infarction and no evidence of heart failure, 26.1% of patients were discharged with this treatment. Of the remaining patients, 15.6% received ACE inhibitors at discharge. ACE inhibitors were prescribed more often to elderly and diabetic patients as well as those requiring intraaortic balloon pump placement. This therapy was given less often to patients who underwent revascularization with coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery or were treated with calcium channel blocking agents. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction with increasing frequency. Those patients with the greatest expected benefit receive ACE inhibitor treatment most often. However, the majority of even these high risk patients were not discharged with this life-saving therapy.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗