PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H V Duggal

Publications and source records attributed to H V Duggal.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

What women want: convenient appointment times for cervical screening tests.

Little is known about women's preferred appointment times for cervical screening tests. Data from a postal questionnaire survey were used to compare preferred appointment times with those given. Although 33.4%[95% confidence intervals (CI) 31.8%-35.0%] of respondents received appointments between 10h00 and 11h55, only 17.0% (95% CI 15.3%-18.7%) wanted an appointment at that time. Nineteen per cent (95% CI 17.4%-21.0%) of respondents wanted appointments between 18h00 and 20h00, but only 4.4% (95% CI 3.7%-5.1%) received them. Saturday appointments for cervical screening are not given; however, overall approximately 13% of those surveyed would have preferred a Saturday appointment. Preferred times also varied significantly with age and deprivation category. Further research is required to determine whether appointment times for cervical screening can be tailored to meet these expressed needs, and the impact this has on service provision and uptake.

Adult↗

An enquiry into the respiratory health effects on a rural community of a soil mound erected close to residential property.

The health concerns of a rural community were investigated following the erection of a soil mound in close proximity to residential property. Retrospective comparisons were made of respiratory and non-respiratory consultations with general practitioners between the exposed population and a sociodemographically similar comparison population. A 2-year period was examined, 1 year before and 1 year after the mound was erected. In the 1-year period prior to erection of the mound, similar consultation rates for both respiratory and non-respiratory conditions were observed in both populations. In the 1-year period following erection of the mound, the exposed population was more likely to consult for respiratory conditions than the comparison population (OR=4.10, 95% CI 2.26-7.44). No differences were observed for non-respiratory conditions. We identified a significant increase in respiratory consultations in the exposed population following erection of the soil mound. Limitations associated with this type of study should be considered when interpreting the results.

Adult↗

Response patterns to a postal survey using a cervical screening register as the sampling frame.

This study compared different types of respondent to a postal survey. A random sample of women aged 20-64 years (n = 4057) was selected from a population-based cervical screening register to examine their information experience during the screening programme. The initial response rate was 57%, and this increased to 81% after one reminder. Respondents were older (P < 0.0001) than non-respondents, but both groups were comparable with regard to attendance history for cervical screening (respondents 89.3%; non-respondents 89.1%) and normal smear test results (respondents 84.0%; non-respondents 81.4%). Early and late respondents were similar in age. Compared with late respondents, early respondents were more likely to live in highly affluent (P < 0.0001) and rural areas (P = 0.026). They were also more likely to be non-attenders (P < 0.0001), but they were less likely to have had inadequate smear results (P = 0.030) than late respondents. These results suggest that consideration should be given to factors other than sociodemographic differences when examining response patterns to postal surveys.

Adult↗

The knowledge of healthcare professionals with regard to the treatment and prevention of head lice.

This study examined the knowledge and practice of healthcare professionals regarding the prevention and treatment of head lice 18 months after dissemination of local guidelines. A self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to all primary healthcare professionals (general practitioners and practice nurses), community healthcare professionals (community paediatricians, health visitors and school nurses) and pharmacists in South Staffordshire health district, UK. The overall response rate was 48% (range 24-63%). Compared to other groups: community healthcare professionals were more likely to refer to the guidelines and have adequate knowledge of treatment and prevention; pharmacists were least likely to refer to the guidelines; and primary healthcare professionals were most likely to have poor knowledge about prevention and treatment. Overall, healthcare professionals' knowledge regarding prevention methods was significantly better than their knowledge of treatment methods (63% vs. 5%, P <0.00001). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that healthcare professionals' knowledge of control methods for head lice varies widely and is sub-optimal and may contribute to ineffective head lice control.

Adult↗

The Stafford outbreak of Legionnaires' disease.

A large outbreak of Legionnaires' disease was associated with Stafford District General Hospital. A total of 68 confirmed cases was treated in hospital and 22 of these patients died. A further 35 patients, 14 of whom were treated at home, were suspected cases of Legionnaires' disease. All these patients had visited the hospital during April 1985. Epidemiological investigations demonstrated that there had been a high risk of acquiring the disease in the out patient department (OPD), but no risk in other parts of the hospital. The epidemic strain of Legionella pneumophila, serogroup 1, subgroup Pontiac 1a was isolated from the cooling water system of one of the air conditioning plants. This plant served several departments of the hospital including the OPD. The water in the cooling tower and a chiller unit which cooled the air entering the OPD were contaminated with legionellae. Bacteriological and engineering investigations showed how the chiller unit could have been contaminated and how an aerosol containing legionellae could have been generated in the U-trap below the chiller unit. These results, together with the epidemiological evidence, suggest that the chiller unit was most likely to have been the major source of the outbreak. Nearly one third of hospital staff had legionella antibodies. These staff were likely to have worked in areas of the hospital ventilated by the contaminated air conditioning plant, but not necessarily the OPD. There was evidence that a small proportion of these staff had a mild legionellosis and that these 'influenza-like' illnesses had been spread over a 5-month period. A possible explanation of this finding is that small amounts of aerosol from cooling tower sources could have entered the air-intake and been distributed throughout the areas of the hospital served by this ventilation system. Legionellae, subsequently found to be of the epidemic strain, had been found in the cooling tower pond in November 1984 and thus it is possible that staff were exposed to low doses of contaminated aerosol over several months. Control measures are described, but it was later apparent that the outbreak had ended before these interventions were introduced. The investigations revealed faults in the design of the ventilation system.

Adult↗

Information given to women invited for cervical screening: results of two postal surveys seven years apart.

In South Staffordshire, England, we compared women's views on information provided to them at different stages of the cervical screening program in 1994 with that provided in 2001. An age-stratified random sample of women aged 20-64 years who had a cervical smear taken between January and March 1994 (3856) or between January and March 2001 (4057) were sent postal questionnaires in June 1994 and July 2001, respectively. Response rates in 1994 (3124/3856, 81%) and 2001 (3288/4057, 81%) were similar. Compared to 1994, the proportion of women who thought the invitation letter was clear to read in 2001 increased (70% vs 98%, P < 0.0001); however, letters were thought to be less reassuring in 2001 compared to 1994 (P < 0.0001). In both study periods, 66% of women reported that the procedure was explained to them before the smear was taken. A greater proportion of women received their results by letter in 2001 compared to 1994 (57% vs 41%, P < 0.0001); however, 49% of women waited >4 weeks to receive their results in 2001 compared to 26% in 1994 (P < 0.0001). Bivariate analysis suggests that responses were age related, with older women (> or =45 years) experiencing poorer information provision. The issues highlighted by this study deserve further investigation in other areas.

Adult↗