PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Van de Waterbeemd

Publications and source records attributed to H Van de Waterbeemd.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1988

Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.

The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) of 32 beta-adrenoceptor ligands, mainly antagonists, was calculated by the STO-3G ab initio quantum mechanical method. The MEP of phenylethanolamines (PEAs) features a negative minimum in the meta region (designated M1) which is topographically equivalent to a minimum (designated M2) found in the vicinity of the aromatic ring in all (aryloxy)propanolamines (AOPAs). In these compounds, a second negative zone located beyond the meta position and designated M3 is found in all beta 1-selective antagonists and in some nonselective and beta 2-selective antagonists. The beta 1-selective antagonists feature in the para position an additional zone which is positive (P4) in the full antagonists and negative (M4) in the antagonists displaying intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). The MEP-based pharmacophoric models of PEAs, AOPAs, and oxime ethers show common elements and lead to a proposed general model for beta-adrenoceptor ligands.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1987

Quantitative structure-activity relationships and eudismic analyses of the presynaptic dopaminergic activity and dopamine D2 and sigma receptor affinities of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidines and octahydrobenzo[f]quinolines.

Data from the preceding paper were examined by QSAR and eudismic analyses. A fair parabolic relationship was found between the lipophilicity (measured by a RP-HPLC method) and the sigma-receptor affinity of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidines (3HPP derivatives) and octahydrobenzo[f]quinolines (OHBQ derivatives). As far as the dopamine D2 receptor is concerned, the trans-7-hydroxy-OHBQ derivatives show a 10-fold higher affinity than the eutomeric S enantiomers of 3HPP derivatives, once lipophilicity has been accounted for. This difference in affinity is suggested to correspond to the energy necessary for the 3HPP derivatives to adopt the receptor-bound conformation. The R enantiomers of 3HPP derivatives display no apparent increase in D2 affinity with increasing lipophilicity, and indeed the eudismic index in this series increases with affinity (eudismic affinity quotient = 0.70), in agreement with a recent model of the binding of N-propyl-3HPP (3PPP) enantiomers to the D2 receptor. The selectivity in sigma/D2 affinities was found to depend on both lipophilicity and configuration of the ligands; thus, the selectivity is maximal for log kw values of ca. 1.7-2.1 and is much larger for the R than for the S enantiomers of 3HPP derivatives.

Phenanthrenes↗
PubMed1987

Multivariate statistical analysis of L-dopa esters as potential anti-parkinsonian prodrugs.

This paper reports a QSAR study of thirteen L-DOPA esters previously synthesised and examined for their physicochemical, biochemical and behavioural properties. Multivariate statistical analysis (principal component analysis, cluster analysis, simple and multiple linear regression) reveals favourable and unfavourable structural features of L-DOPA prodrugs. Some of the many biochemical and behavioural activities investigated are shown to be redundant. These indications may contribute to the design of novel L-DOPA prodrugs.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1986

The binding of agonists and antagonists to rat lung beta-adrenergic receptors as investigated by thermodynamics and structure-activity relationships.

Interaction of several agonists and antagonists with the relevant beta receptor were studied in vitro using rat lung membranes as beta-adrenergic receptor source. The influence of temperature, between 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C, on the ability of beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists to displace (-)-[125I]iodocyanopindolol from beta-adrenergic receptors was checked. Thermodynamic parameters were calculated from the Kj values thus obtained. Lipophilicity of the twenty molecules was also measured using a RP-HPLC method. The results obtained show: the density of receptors was not affected by the temperature but their affinity for the twenty agonists and antagonists increased with decreasing temperature; the binding of agonists is enthalpy driven while that of antagonists is entropy driven, with the exception of the lipophilic agonist dobutamine; a single relationship between entropy and lipophilicity exists for all twenty compounds and would suggest that molecular structure and physicochemical properties account for the thermodynamics of binding.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1986

The thermodynamics of agonist and antagonist binding to dopamine D-2 receptors.

The ability of dopamine agonists and antagonists to compete with [3H]spiperone binding to rat striatal membrane preparations at 4, 15, 26, and 37 degrees varied markedly with temperature. Dopamine and the dopamine agonist 2-amino-6,7-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide (ADTN) were more potent at lower temperatures. The ability of the dopamine antagonists, haloperidol, cis-flupenthixol, cis-N-(1-benzyl-1-methypyrrolidin-3-yl)-5-chloro-2-methoxy-9- methylaminobenzamide (YM 09151-2), raclopride, and clozapine, and of the agonists apomorphine and pergolide, to compete with [3H]spiperone binding was little altered by temperature. (+)-Butaclamol was more potent at higher temperatures. In contrast, the antagonists sulpiride, metoclopramide, clebopride, sultopride, tiapride, piquindone, and zetidoline were more potent at lower temperatures. The interaction of the agonists dopamine and ADTN was driven by a decrease in enthalpy, allowing an energetically unfavorable decrease in entropy. The binding of the antagonists, haloperidol, cis-flupenthixol, YM 09151-2, raclopride, (+)-butaclamol, and clozapine, and also of the agonists, apomorphine and pergolide, was entropy driven. The interaction of the antagonists sulpiride, metoclopramide, clebopride, alizapride, sultopride, tiapride, piquindone, and zetidoline differed from that of other antagonists in being enthalpy driven. The observed entropy changes correlated with the lipophilicity of the displacing drugs and not with their intrinsic activity.

Animals↗