Endoscopic tumor resection of the inferior vena cava.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to H Vanermen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic atrial septal defect (ASD) closure when percutaneous ASD closure is impossible or has failed. PATIENTS: Between March 1997 and February 2003, 74 patients (63% female, mean (SD) age 44 (16) years) underwent an endoscopic ASD closure. Median preoperative New York Heart Association functional class was I. Clinical and echocardiographic follow up was obtained for all patients (mean (SD) 38 (19) months). Patients were assessed for scar aesthetics, procedure related pain, functional recovery, and overall patient satisfaction. RESULTS: ASD closure was successful in all patients (two primum ASD, 68 secundum ASD, four sinus venosus type). Patch repair was performed in 42%. Mean aortic cross clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 54 (24) minutes and 98 (35) minutes, respectively. There were no in-hospital deaths and no conversions to sternotomy. Complications included one iliac vein stenting, one femoral arterioplasty, two revisions for suspected bleeding, and seven cases of atrial fibrillation. Two patients required late reoperation: one for atrial thrombus and another for tricuspid regurgitation. Echocardiographic control confirmed complete ASD closure in 71 patients and a small residual shunt in three patients. Ninety three per cent of the patients were highly satisfied with very low procedure related pain and 97% felt they had an aesthetically pleasing scar. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ASD closure can be safely done with a high degree of patient satisfaction. It is now the authors' exclusive surgical approach whenever percutaneous treatment is not indicated or has failed.
The curative treatment of choice for myxomas is surgical removal. Most of the patients are young and active and are focused on postoperative comfort, cosmesis and a fast track to complete rehabilitation, all of which is related to the degree of invasiveness of the intervention. We report our first experience with video-assisted Port-Access surgery for atrial myxoma. From February 1997 until April 2000, nine patients (3M/6F)) had an atrial myxoma resection with the Heartport Endo-CPB and Endo-aortic clamp system. Mean age was 54 +/- 21.9 years. Most of the patients were symptomatic and had good LV function. Two patients had a combined procedure: one mitral valve replacement and one vascular shunt for dialysis. Mean aortic cross clamp time was 69 +/- 32.8 min and mean perfusion time was 103 +/- 42.7 min. There were no conversions to sternotomy. Three patients had minor complications. Mean ICU and hospital stay were 1 +/- 1.4 and 6 +/- 3.9 days respectively. No thromboembolic or peripheral ischaemic complications were observed. There were no hospital deaths. No recurrent tumors have been identified. The Port-Access approach for myxoma resection constitutes a invaluable alternative to sternotomy with the same gold standards of results and quality.
INTRODUCTION: Right thoracotomy is a well known alternative for median sternotomy to gain access to the right atrium. The Port-Access technique is a surgical option to reduce the skin incision to 5 cm and have a considerable gain in cosmesis and post-operative rehabilitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1997 to May 2000, 50 patients (19M/31F) had Port-Access atrial septal defect repair (ASD) with the Heartport Endo-CPB and Endo-aortic clamp system. Mean age was 46 years (range 10.5-74 years). Forty-nine patients had a type II ASD. Most of the patients were asymptomatic (48 were NYHA class I-II). Five patients underwent combined procedures: two mitral valve repairs, one mitral valve replacement, one plasty of the superior vena cava and one mini Cox-Maze. Direct closure was obtained in 34 patients (68%). Mean aortic cross clamp time was 56 minutes (range 24-134 min) and mean perfusion time was 102 minutes (range 32-196 min). RESULTS: There were no conversions to sternotomy. The procedure was complicated in six patients: revision for bleeding (n = 1), stenting of the iliac vein (n = 1), enlargement plasty of the femoral artery (n = 1), transient renal failure (n = 1), sick sinus syndrome requiring pacemaker implantation (n = 1) and one lymphocoele. No thromboembolic or peripheral ischaemic complications were noted. Per- and postoperative echocardiography showed no leakage in any patients. There was no hospital mortality. Mean ICU and hospital stay were 1.14 days (range 1-3 days) and 6.41 days (range 4-10 days) respectively. CONCLUSION: The Port-Access approach of ASD closure constitutes a valid alternative to sternotomy with the same standards of results and quality.
BACKGROUND: Right thoracotomy is a well known alternative to median sternotomy to gain access to the left atrium. To avoid the potential drawbacks associated with sternotomy coupled to the desire for a smaller scar and a more rapid rehabilitation in young and active patients, we investigated the purported advantages in patients undergoing video-assisted Port-Access mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Between February 1997 and November 2000, 175 patients (94 men, 81 women) with a mean age of 60 years (range 25 to 84) underwent either Port-Access mitral valve repair (n = 117) or replacement (n = 57) for degenerative disease (n = 112), rheumatic disease (n = 36), chronic endocarditis (n = 15), annular dilatation (n = 8), sclerotic disease (n = 2), and ingrowing myxoma (n = 1). There was one closure of a preexisting paravalvular leak. Standard Carpentier-Edwards repair procedures were used in all patients; in 14 patients polytetrafluoroethylene chordae were inserted for anterior leaflet prolapse. A total of 74 patients (42%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 1.1% (n = 2). Four patients had conversion to sternotomy and conventional extra corporeal circulation for repair of a dissected aorta (n = 2) or the inabilty to proceed to a safe femoral cannulation (n = 2). Sixteen patients (9%) underwent a revision for bleeding. Mean cross-clamp time and perfusion time was 95 minutes (range 24 to 160) and 135 minutes (range 75 to 215) respectively. Mean intensive care unit and total hospital stay was 1.8 days (1 to 30) and 8.7 days (4 to 36), respectively. Three patients experienced late acute endocarditis: 2 had late mitral valve replacements and 1 patient had medical therapy for late prosthetic valve endocarditis. There were no myocardial infarctions, cerebrovascular events or peripheral ischemia due to thromboembolic phenomena. No wound complications were observed. The degree of patient satisfaction was very high. CONCLUSIONS: The video-assisted Port-Access mitral valve approach is a valid alternative to sternotomy, with the same standards of results and quality.
OBJECTIVE: The surgical treatment of poststernotomy acute mediastinitis remains challenging. After disappointing results with a conservative management of post coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) mediastinitis, we shifted towards a more aggressive surgical management. METHODS: From March 1993 until December 1999, 32 patients (6 female/26 male), 0.5% of the total sternotomy population, were operated for mediastinitis, defined as wound and sternal dehiscence with medistinal pus and positive culture. Mean age was 66 years (32-79 years). Twenty-two patients (75%) underwent CABG and 16 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV. RESULTS: We performed an omentoplasty in 11 patients, a pectoralis muscle flap associated with an omentoplasty in 20 patients. One patient had a bilateral pectoralis myoplasty. The reconstruction surgery occurred at an average of 11 days (6-26) after primary surgery. Twelve patients had a previous surgical drainage (1-3 surgical procedures) of the mediastinum. Hospital mortality was nine patients (28%). Seven of these patients (77%) were in NYHA IV with inotropic support. Five patients had to be reoperated on: four patients had a bilateral myoplasty after omentoplasty, one patient had an omentoplasty after a unilateral myoplasty. Late epigastric hernia was seen in three patients, two patients had wound revision and one had a retroperitoneal drainage for pancreatitis. There were no early or late flap failures. CONCLUSION: In our experience, omental and pectoralis flaps for poststernotomy acute mediastinitis provides good outcome of our stable patients. We would be reluctant to use it as standard therapy in our unstable patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Port-Access video-assisted surgery for mitral valve repair has become an alternative for mid-sternotomy. However, mid-term results are not yet available. METHODS: Between February 1997 and December 1999, 121 patients underwent mitral valve surgery through a 4- to 5-cm right anterolateral thoracotomy using the Heartport endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system; among these patients, 77 (57 males, 20 females; mean age 59 years; range 31-84 years) underwent mitral valve repair. Severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) was seen in 63 patients (82%). Mean NYHA class was 2.5+/-0.4. Standard Carpentier mitral valve repair procedures were used in all patients; 11 received PTFE chordae for anterior leaflet prolapse. RESULTS: Pathologies were degenerative (n = 69), chronic endocarditis (n = 4), annular dilatation (n = 3) and rheumatic (n = 1). Hospital mortality was 1.3% (n = 1). Two patients (2.6%) had conversion to sternotomy for aortic dissection caused by the Endo-Aortic Clamp. Nine patients (11%) underwent revision for bleeding. Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 103 min (range: 24-160 min) and 140 min (range: 75-215 min), respectively. Mean hospital stay was eight days (range: 4-36 days). During follow up (mean 31 months; range: 17-51 months) all patients improved their NYHA class; eight (11%) remained in class II. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and LV end-systolic diameters decreased from 61+/-7.3 mm to 53+/-6.9 mm (p <0.01) and from 37+/-6.8 mm to 34+/-6.9 mm (p <0.05), respectively. Sixty-two patients (88%) had no or trivial MR, and nine (12%) had moderate MR (2+). There were two late valve replacements for endocarditis, and no late deaths. CONCLUSION: Port-Access mitral valve repair constitutes a valid alternative to the standard procedure, and has good mid-term results. Video-assisted mitral valve repair appears to be safe and reproducible.
A 44-year-old male patient with an undefined mass in the left ventricular endocardium was scheduled for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Ventricular investigation and tissue biopsies were completed with the help of a voice-controlled robotic arm. Pathologic examination revealed non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis. In addition to videoscopy, robotic assistance allows an easier diagnostic and therapeutic approach of intraventricular pathologies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Although conventional right thoracotomy is a well-known alternative for mid-sternotomy to access the left atrium, a combined video-assisted mitral and left anterior descending (LAD) approach via Port-Access has not yet been described. We report the case of a 68-year-old patient with severe mitral valve regurgitation due to myxoid degeneration associated with a critical LAD coronary artery stenosis. A totally video-assisted 'true' Port-Access (i.e. no costal retraction) mitral valve repair and direct coronary artery bypass were performed in combination, without complications.
A right thoracotomy is a well-known alternative for midsternotomy to have access to the left atrium. The Port-Access (Heartport, Inc, Redwood City, CA) approach is an invaluable option to avoid cracking of ribs and cartilage. EndoCPB (Heartport, Inc) and Endo-Aortic Clamp (Heartport, Inc) allows installation of the extracorporeal circulation and cardiac arrest from the groin. Videoassistance and shafted instruments help the surgeon to perform the surgery through a 5 x 2-cm port and fulfill the main goals of minimally invasive cardiac surgery, comfort, cosmesis, and fast rehabilitation. From February 1997 to November 1998, 75 patients (40 men/35 women) had either Port-Access mitral valve repair (n = 41) or replacement (n = 33) for a variety of reasons: myxoid degeneration (n = 45), rheumatic disease (n = 21), chronic endocarditis (n = 4), annular dilatation (n = 2), and sclerotic disease (n = 2). One valve was replaced because of an ingrowing myxoma. There was one closure of a paravalvular leak. The mean age was 59.3 years of age (range, 32 to 83 years). Most patients had normal ejection fractions but different grades of mitral valve insufficiency and were in NYHA class II. One 71-year-old patient died after reoperation on postoperative day 1 for failed repair. Two patients had conversion to sternotomy and conventional ECC for repair of a dissected aorta. One patient died, one patient suffered a minor cerebrovascular deficit. Three patients had prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays for respiratory insufficiency, 5 patients underwent revision for bleeding. Mean ICU stay was 2.5 days; and mean hospital stay, 9 days (range, 4 to 36). A significant difference between the first 30 and last 38 patients in terms of length of stay in the ICU and the hospital was noticed. Two late mitral valve replacements for chronic endocarditis after repair occurred. One patient had medical therapy for endocarditis after mitral valve replacement. The debut of Port-Access mitral valve surgery may be nerve-racking; the routine is a smooth and sure surgery with maximum comfort, a very discrete scar, and a fast rehabilitation. There were no paravalvular leakages nor myocardial infarctions. Cerebrovascular accidents owing to thromboembolic phenomena, vascular lower limb or wound complications were not seen. Port-Access mitral valve surgery is a very important investment in the future of cardiac surgery. Some learning curve pitfalls were associated with the process of starting this revolutionary technique.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Most patient concerns and demands for less invasive surgery are focused on comfort, cosmesis, and rehabilitation that are all related to the degree of invasiveness. The degree of invasiveness of cardiac surgery depends on two factors: the surgical approach--the length of the skin incision, the degree of retraction and aggression to the tissue, and the loss of blood--and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Regarding the surgical strategy, four categories of less invasive cardiac surgery can be distinguished: (1) direct coronary artery surgery via sternotomy on the beating heart (without extracorporeal circulation); (2) limited or modified approaches using conventional techniques and instruments with either conventional cardiopulmonary bypass or the EndoCPB endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system; (3) minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass on the beating heart via a parasternal or left anterior small thoracotomy; and (4) true Port-Access surgery in which all surgical acts are performed through ports and the heart is arrested with the Endoaortic Clamp catheter. These categories offer different advantages in terms of reducing invasiveness and may have different learning curves. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is undergoing an explosive evolution, and although the indications and best strategies for the different categories are yet to be determined, the trend cannot be stopped. We try to distinguish between "fashionable" strategies and those that are truly revolutionary and investments in the future.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.