A new modeling for each population.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cardiac Output↗
Biomedical subjects
Habib Benallal
Publications and source records attributed to Habib Benallal.
Evaluation of cardiac output from a tidally ventilated homogeneous lung model.
We used the direct Fick measurements to validate a method for estimating cardiac output by iteratively fitting VCO(2) at the mouth to lung model values. This model was run using a series of 50, 30 and 10 breaths to test sensitivity to number of breaths used for fitting. The lung was treated as a catenary two-compartment lung model consisting of a dead space compartment connected with a single alveolar space compartment, perfused with constant pulmonary blood flow. The implemented mathematical modeling described variations in O(2) and CO(2) compartmental fractions and alveolar volume. This model also included pulmonary capillary gas exchange. Experimental data were collected from measurements performed on six healthy subjects at rest and during 20, 40, 60 and 85-90% of peak V(O)(2). The correlation between the two methods was highest and the average agreement between the methods was best using 50 breaths R = 095; P < 0.0001; Q(model) = 1.1Q(Fick) - 2.3). The mean difference and lower to upper limits of agreement between measured and estimated data were 0.7 l/min (-2.7 to 4.1 l/min) for cardiac output; -0.9 ml/100 ml (-1.3 to -0.5 ml/100 ml) for arterial O(2) content; -0.8 ml/100 ml (-3.8 to 2.2 ml/100 ml) for mixed venous O(2) content and -0.1 ml/100 ml (-2.9 to 2.7 ml/100 ml) for arteriovenous difference O(2) content. The cardiac output estimated by the lung model was in good agreement with the direct Fick measurements in young healthy subjects.
Adult↗
Modeling of end-tidal and arterial PCO2 gradient: comparison with experimental data.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test whether a tidally ventilated homogeneous lung model can correctly describe arterial and end-tidal gas partial pressures and thus the difference in end-tidal and arterial gas partial pressures at rest and during exercise. METHODS: The implemented mathematical modeling described variations during the breathing cycle in CO2 and O2 fractions, alveolar volume, and pulmonary capillary gas exchange. Experimental data were obtained from measurements performed by 17 healthy subjects at rest and during 40, 50, 65, and 75% exercise .VO(2max) on a cycle ergometer. VO2, VCO2, and PET,CO2 were continuously measured using the MedGraphics CPX/D gas exchange system. Arterial gases were measured in brachial artery blood samples drawn simultaneously with gas exchange. Cardiac output was measured using the CO2 rebreathing method corrected by the blood sample data. The model was driven using experimental data for ventilation, VO2, VCO2, and cardiac output. RESULTS: The mean difference and the upper and lower limits of agreement between measured and simulated data were -0.004, +0.84, and -0.84 Torr for Pa,CO2; -0.06, +0.64, and -0.76 Torr for Pa,O2; -1.96, +2.84, and -6.76 Torr for PET,CO2; and +7.20, +25.80, and -11.40 Torr for PET,O2. Actual PET,CO2-Pa,CO2 difference increased significantly with workload (P < 0.0001) from 0.3 +/- 3 Torr at rest to 4.7 +/- 2.5 Torr at 75% .VO(2max). Model-simulated PET,CO2-Pa,CO2 difference also increased significantly with exercise (P < 0.0001) from 0.7 +/- 1.7 Torr at rest to 9.1 +/- 3.4 Torr at 75% .VO(2max). CONCLUSION: The lung model described actual arterial CO2 partial pressures better than variations in end-tidal CO2 partial pressures and thus better than the gradient in end-tidal arterial CO2 partial pressures.
Adult↗
Assessment of arterial gas pressures and cardiac output using a breathing lung model.
PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate a breathing lung model to estimate arterial gas partial pressures and cardiac output at rest and during exercise. METHODS: A mathematical model was used to describe variations in gas fractions, alveolar volume, and gas exchange in the pulmonary capillaries during the breathing cycle. Experimental data were obtained from 17 healthy subjects at rest and during exercise at 40, 50, 65, and 75% VO(2max) on a cycle ergometer. VO(2), VCO(2), and P(ET,CO2) were monitored continuously with a MedGraphics CPX/D gas exchange system. Arterial gases were measured in brachial artery blood samples drawn simultaneously with gas exchange. Cardiac output was measured using the CO(2) rebreathing method corrected by the arterial blood sample data. The model parameters including cardiac output, end-expiratory alveolar volume, and mixed-venous gas contents were estimated by fitting modelVCO(2) to experimental values over 50 breaths. RESULTS: The fit of model parameters gave arterial gas partial pressures not significantly different from measured data. Measured P(a,C02) and P(a,O2) were significantly correlated with model outputs (R(2) = 0.991 for P(a,CO2) and R(2) = 0.999 for P(a, CO2); P < 0.0001). The cardiac output values estimated using the breathing lung model were significantly correlated with the values obtained with the corrected CO rebreathing method (R(2) = 0.71; P < 0.0001). There was, however, a significant 2.3 L x min(-1) difference between these two methods. CONCLUSION: Results obtained with the proposed method were in good agreement with measured arterial gas partial pressures. Despite a certain degree of bias, the promising results for cardiac output demonstrate the reliability of this method that should be now evaluated using a gold standard method.
Adult↗