PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hani Abdel Nabi

Publications and source records attributed to Hani Abdel Nabi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

18F-FDG imaging: pitfalls and artifacts.

18F-FDG PET is emerging as a useful tool in the staging and restaging of many malignant neoplasms, such as lymphoma, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. To accurately interpret 18F-FDG findings one must be familiar with the normal physiologic distribution of the tracer, frequently encountered physiologic variants, and benign pathologic causes of 18F-FDG uptake that can be confused with a malignant neoplasm. The objectives of this article are to (a) describe the mechanism of 18F-FDG uptake, (b) list the patient preparation and pertinent patient history before 18F-FDG imaging, (c) describe the whole-body physiologic distribution of 18F-FDG, (d) list and discuss normal physiologic variants, and (e) list and discuss benign pathologic causes of 18F-FDG uptake.

Artifacts↗

A Comparative Study of 511 keV SPECT and PET Using Separate 370 MBq F-18-FDG Doses on Different Days.

All previously reported comparative studies of 511 keV single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have used one fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose, followed by PET and SPECT on the same day. This approach is inherently biased against the second imaging study. Therefore, we prospectively compared conventional PET and 511 keV SPECT in 23 patients with proven malignancy using separate 370 MBq FDG doses on different days employing an ECAT 951/31R PET scanner and a Trionix XLT-20 for SPECT. Discrepancies were evident in twelve of 23 patients (52%). In eight of these (66%) findings were seen exclusively on PET and represented the only metabolic evidence of disease. Thirty-seven of the 52 lesions (71%) detected at PET were also defined by SPECT, most above 2 cm. In 4 cases of extrahepatic abdominal disease (3 colorectal, 1 melanoma), both PET and SPECT missed small recurrent omental and perivesical lesions; several lesions up to 1.2 cm were also missed by CT and MRI.

Journal Article↗