Biomedical subjects

Hannah C Evans

Publications and source records attributed to Hannah C Evans.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Intranasal sumatriptan: in adolescents with migraine.

Sumatriptan, a serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist, constricts cranial blood vessels and inhibits neuroinflammatory processes. A single dose of sumatriptan 10 mg (approved European dosage) was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving headache relief at 1 hour post-dose in a well designed study. Headache relief occurred in significantly more adolescents administered a single dose of intranasal sumatriptan 20 mg (at 1 and 2 hours) and 5 mg (at 2 hours) than placebo (pooled data from two studies). Sustained headache relief (1-24 and 2-24 hours) occurred in significantly more recipients of a single dose of intranasal sumatriptan 20mg and 5mg than placebo (pooled data from two studies). Intranasal sumatriptan was generally well tolerated in adolescent migraineurs (in single-episode studies or long term in multiple-episode studies). Taste disturbance occurred more often with intranasal sumatriptan than with placebo [Chart: see text].

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed2004

Ximelagatran/Melagatran: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery.

UNLABELLED: Ximelagatran (Exanta), the first available oral direct thrombin inhibitor, and its active form, melagatran, have been evaluated in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. After oral administration ximelagatran is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran. Melagatran inactivates both circulating and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the thrombin active site, thus, inhibiting platelet activation and/or aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis time. The efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran has been investigated in four European trials and the efficacy of an all oral ximelagatran regimen has been investigated in five US trials. In a dose-ranging European study, preoperatively initiated subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg twice daily followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than subcutaneous dalteparin sodium 5000IU once daily in preventing the occurrence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. In one study, there were no significant differences in VTE prevention between subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg administered after surgery followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily and enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 40 mg once daily. Compared with enoxaparin, significantly lower rates of proximal DVT and/or PE (major VTE) and total VTE were observed when melagatran was initiated preoperatively (2mg) then postoperatively (3mg) and followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. In the US, four studies showed that postoperatively initiated ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was of similar efficacy to enoxaparin or warfarin in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. However, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin (target international normalised ratio of 2.5) at preventing the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing total knee replacement in two studies.Ximelagatran alone or after melagatran was generally well tolerated. Overall, the incidence of bleeding events and transfusion rates were not markedly different from those documented for comparator anticoagulants. In a post-hoc analysis of one study, transfusion rates were lower in ximelagatran than enoxaparin recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ximelagatran alone or in conjunction with subcutaneous melagatran has shown good efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving ximelagatran/melagatran do not require anticoagulant monitoring. The drug has a low potential for drug interactions and can be administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally. Thus, on the basis of available evidence, ximelagatran/melagatran appears poised to play an important role in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed2003

Dutasteride.

Dutasteride, a potent inhibitor of type 1 and 2 5alpha-reductase, reduced dihydrotestosterone levels by >90% in 85% of patients following 1 years' administration of oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/day. A combined analysis of three placebo-controlled clinical studies conducted in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) found sustained improvements in American Urological Association- Symptom Index scores and urinary flow rate and a 57% decrease in the risk of acute urinary retention throughout the 2-year treatment period (all p < 0.001 vs placebo). Total prostate and transition zone volume were also reduced (both p < 0.001), as was the risk of BPH-related surgery (by 48%). A nonblind extension study found that dutasteride maintains efficacy for up to 4 years. Dutasteride monotherapy maintained symptom relief following combination treatment with dutasteride and tamsulosin in all patients but those with severe symptoms. Dutasteride was generally well tolerated. Impotence, reduced libido, gynaecomastia and ejaculation disorder occurred significantly more often in dutasteride than placebo recipients, but incidence was generally low. With the exception of gynaecomastia, incidence consistently decreased over time.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors↗

PubMed2003

Transdermal buprenorphine.

Buprenorphine is a low molecular weight, lipophilic, opioid analgesic. Recently, a transdermal matrix patch formulation of buprenorphine has become available in three dosage strengths designed to release buprenorphine at 35, 52.5 and 70 micro g/h over a 72-hour period. At least satisfactory analgesia with minimal requirement for rescue medication (</=0.2 mg/day sublingual buprenorphine) was achieved by 34-50% of patients with chronic pain treated with transdermal buprenorphine 35, 52.5 or 70 micro g/h and 31% of placebo recipients, in one double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. In one trial involving patients unsuccessfully treated with weak opioids or morphine, 36.6% and 47.5% of buprenorphine 35 micro g/h and 52.5 micro g/h recipients, respectively, experienced at least satisfactory analgesia and received </=0.2 mg/day of sublingual buprenorphine compared with 16.2% of placebo recipients (both p </= 0.032). The requirement for rescue medication was reduced from baseline in >50% of patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine, in two trials. Furthermore, despite the availability of rescue medication to all patients, those receiving transdermal buprenorphine tended to experience greater pain relief, reduced pain intensity and longer pain-free sleep. Transdermal buprenorphine was generally well tolerated. Systemic adverse events were typical of opioid treatment or were attributable to the underlying disease.

Administration, Cutaneous↗