PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hans-Henrik Parving

Publications and source records attributed to Hans-Henrik Parving.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular morbidity is a major burden in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the Steno-2 Study, we compared the effect of a targeted, intensified, multifactorial intervention with that of conventional treatment on modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. METHODS: The primary end point of this open, parallel trial was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and amputation. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional treatment in accordance with national guidelines and 80 to receive intensive treatment, with a stepwise implementation of behavior modification and pharmacologic therapy that targeted hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and microalbuminuria, along with secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease with aspirin. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 55.1 years, and the mean follow-up was 7.8 years. The decline in glycosylated hemoglobin values, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels measured after an overnight fast, and urinary albumin excretion rate were all significantly greater in the intensive-therapy group than in the conventional-therapy group. Patients receiving intensive therapy also had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.73), nephropathy (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.87), retinopathy (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.86), and autonomic neuropathy (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: A target-driven, long-term, intensified intervention aimed at multiple risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria reduces the risk of cardiovascular and microvascular events by about 50 percent.

Amputation, Surgical↗

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system versus maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. We tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibitor in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with 8 weeks treatment with placebo and irbesartan 300 mg (once daily), added on top of enalapril 40 mg (once daily). We included 24 type 1 patients with DN. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-hour blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured. RESULTS: Values on ACE inhibitors + placebo were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 519 (342 to 789) mg/24 hours; blood pressure [mean (SEM)], 131 (3)/74 (1) mm Hg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 65 (5) mL/min/1.73 m2. Dual blockade of the RAS induced a reduction in albuminuria [mean (95% CI)] of 25% (15, 34) (P < 0.001), a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 8 mm Hg (4, 12) (P = 0.002), and a reduction of 4 mm Hg (2, 7) (P = 0.003) in diastolic blood pressure. GFR and plasma potassium remained unchanged during both treatment regimes. Dual blockade was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Dual blockade of the RAS is superior to maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibitors with regard to lowering of albuminuria and blood pressure in type 1 patients with DN. Long-term trials are needed to further establish the role of dual blockade of the RAS in renal and cardiovascular protection.

Adult↗

Time course of the antiproteinuric and antihypertensive effect of losartan in diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is the primary target in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease. Angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists reduce albuminuria and lower blood pressure, but the initial time course of these effects after initiation of treatment is unknown. We evaluated the time course of the antihypertensive and antialbuminuric effect after initiation of AT1 receptor blockade by losartan in diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: Ten hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy were included in the study. After a washout period of 4 weeks, patients received losartan 100 mg once daily for 28 days. Every morning, one urine sample was collected for daily determination of albumin/creatinine ratio. Twenty-four hour blood pressure (Takeda TM2420), plasma renin and plasma creatinine were measured at baseline and days 7, 14 and 28. RESULTS: Baseline levels of urinary albumin/creatinine ratio and 24 h mean arterial blood pressure were 676 (402-1136) mg/g (geometric mean and 95% CI, respectively) and 100+/-3 mmHg (mean +/- SEM). Albumin/creatinine ratio was significantly reduced after 7 days of treatment by 29% (15-41) (95% CI) without significant further reductions during the 28 day study period (P<0.01 vs baseline). Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lowered by 7 mmHg after 7 days of treatment and remained unchanged throughout the study (P<0.01 vs baseline). Plasma renin was significantly increased from baseline after initiation of losartan treatment and stabilized after 7 days (P<0.01). We found no changes in plasma creatinine during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The initial time course of the reduction in arterial blood pressure and albuminuria are concordant, which suggests that systemic and renal haemodynamic mechanisms are of primary importance in the reduction of albuminuria.

Adult↗

Impact of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid on kidney function in type 2 diabetic patients with elevated urinary albumin excretion rate.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose treatment with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is widely recommended to type 2 diabetic patients as primary prevention against cardiovascular disease. High-dose treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors reduces urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) in type 1 diabetic patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria. Whether a similar effect on AER exists during low-dose ASA treatment, which may confound the diagnosis and monitoring of micro- and macroalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients, remains to be elucidated. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 31 type 2 diabetic patients with elevated levels of AER (>30 mg/24 h) were, in random order, given ASA (150 mg/day) for 4 weeks followed by placebo for 4 weeks with a 2 week washout period or vice versa. At the end of each treatment period AER, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), blood pressure (BP), transcapillary escape rate (TER(alb)) of albumin and haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) were measured. RESULTS: The following variables remained unchanged (mean (95% CI) unless otherwise noted) (ASA vs placebo, paired Student's t-test): AER (201 (119-341) vs 205 (124-340) mg/24 h (geometric mean, 95% CI); P=0.78), GFR (103 (94-111) vs 102 (93-110) ml/min; P=0.58), systolic BP (151 (146-158) vs 152 (146-158) mmHg; P=0.68), diastolic BP (87 (83-91) vs 87 (82-91) mmHg; P=0.88), TER(alb) (6.3 (5.7-6.9) vs 5.9 (5.1-6.7); P=0.45) and HbA(1c) (8.6 (8.1-9.0) vs 8.5 (8.1-9.0) %; P=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose treatment with 150 mg ASA daily does not have any impact on AER or GFR in type 2 diabetic patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria. Consequently, the widely recommended prescription of low-dose ASA as a primary and secondary prevention strategy against cardiovascular disease in these patients does not confound the diagnosis or monitoring of micro- or macroalbuminuria.

Adult↗

Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. This study tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-I) and an Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to either drug alone in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). A randomized double-blind crossover trial was performed with 8-wk treatment with placebo, 20 mg of benazepril once daily, 80 mg of valsartan once daily, and the combination of 20 mg of benazepril and 80 mg of valsartan. Twenty type I diabetic patients with DN were included. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-h BP, and GFR were measured. Eighteen patients completed the study. Placebo values were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 701 (490 to 1002) mg/24 h; BP [mean (SEM)], 144 (4)/79 (2) mmHg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 82 (7) ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Treatment with benazepril, valsartan, or dual blockade significantly reduced albuminuria and BP compared with placebo. Benazepril and valsartan were equally effective. Dual blockade induced an additional reduction in albuminuria of 43 % (29 to 54 %) compared with any type of monotherapy, and a reduction in systolic BP of 6 (0 to 13) mmHg and 7 (1 to 14) mmHg (versus benazepril and valsartan, respectively) and a reduction of 7 (4 to 10) mmHg diastolic compared with both monotherapies. GFR was reversibly reduced on dual blockade compared with monotherapy and placebo. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, dual blockade of the RAS may offer additional renal and cardiovascular protection in type I diabetic patients with DN.

Adult↗

Genetic variation in the Renin-Angiotensin system and progression of diabetic nephropathy.

The impact of polymorphisms in the genes coding for angiotensinogen (M235T), ACE (ID), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (A(1166)-->C) on decline in GFR and doubling of s-creatinine or development of ESRD in patients with type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy (DN) was tested. From 1985, all patients (n = 169) who had established diabetic nephropathy and were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACE-I) were identified consecutively at Steno Diabetes Center. Patients were followed for a median of 6 yr (range, 3 to 15 yr), with nine (range, three to 29) measurements of GFR ((51)Cr-EDTA). In a Cox proportional hazards model corrected for other risk factors, the D allele (ACE/ID) was associated with time to doubling of s-creatinine/ESRD (rate ratio, 1.81 per allele; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 3.03; P = 0.02). A new interaction hypothesis was generated demonstrating that the following variables were associated with accelerated decline in GFR: albuminuria (estimate, 2.12 ml/min per yr per 10-fold increase in albuminuria; P < 0.001), mean BP (estimate, 0.88 ml/min per yr per 10 mmHg; P = 0.02), hemoglobin A(1c) (estimate, 0.54 min/min per yr per 1%; P = 0.02), and number of M (M235T)/D (ID)/A (A(1166)-->C) alleles (estimate, 0.45 ml/min per yr per allele; P = 0.049). Number of M/D/A alleles also influenced time to doubling of s-creatinine or ESRD. In this study of patients with type 1 diabetes, the D allele of the ACE/ID polymorphism in addition to nongenetic risk factors independently accelerated progression of DN during ACE-I. Interaction between polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin system also influenced the loss of kidney function. This new genetic interaction model needs to be confirmed in future studies.

Adult↗

Optimal dose of candesartan for renoprotection in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy: a double-blind randomized cross-over study.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the optimal dose of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist candesartan cilexetil for renoprotection as reflected by short-term changes in albuminuria in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 23 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy were enrolled in this double-blind randomized cross-over trial with four treatment periods, each lasting 2 months. Each patient received placebo and candesartan: 8, 16, and 32 mg daily in random order. Antihypertensive medication was discontinued before enrollment, except for long-acting furosemide, which all patients received throughout the study in median (range) doses of 40 (30-160) mg daily. End points were albuminuria (turbidimetry), 24-h blood pressure (BP) (Takeda-TM2420), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (51Cr-labeled EDTA plasma clearance technique). RESULTS: Values obtained during placebo treatment: albuminuria [geometric mean (95% CI)] 700 (486-1,007) mg/24-h, 24-h BP (mean +/- SE) 147 +/- 4/78 +/- 2 mmHg, and GFR 84 +/- 6 ml/min/1.73 m2. All three doses of candesartan significantly reduced albuminuria and 24-h BP compared with placebo. Mean (95% CI) reductions in albuminuria were 33% (21-43), 59% (52-65), and 52% (44-59) with increasing doses of candesartan. Albuminuria was reduced significantly more by the two highest doses than by the lowest dose (P < 0.01); 24-h systolic BP was reduced by 9 (2-16), 9 (2-16), and 13 (6-20) mmHg and 24-h diastolic BP was reduced by 5 (2-8), 4 (1-7), and 6 (3-9) mmHg with increasing doses of candesartan. There were no significant differences in the reductions in BP between the three doses. GFR was decreased by approximately 6 ml/min/1.73 m2 by all three doses of candesartan (P < 0.05 versus placebo). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal dose of candesartan is 16 mg daily for renoprotection, as reflected by short-term reduction in albuminuria, in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy.

Aged↗

Autoregulation of glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes during isradipine therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Calcium-channel blockade impairs renal autoregulation in animals. Impaired renal autoregulation leads to transmission of the systemic blood pressure (BP) into the glomerulus, resulting in capillary hypertension. Information on the impact of calcium antagonist treatment on renal autoregulation in humans is lacking. This study examines the effect of isradipine treatment on the autoregulation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind crossover study with 5 mg o.d. isradipine retard and matching placebo in 16 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Each treatment arm lasted 4 weeks. On the last day of each treatment period, GFR (single-shot 51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance technique for 4 h) was measured twice between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., first without clonidine and then after intravenous injection of 75 micro g clonidine. BP was measured every 10 min (Takeda TM2420; A&D, Tokyo). RESULTS: Clonidine reduced mean arterial BP (MABP) by 15 +/- 1 vs. 11 +/- 1 mmHg (means +/- SE) during placebo and isradipine treatment, respectively (P < 0.05). GFR was reduced from 102 +/- 4 to 99 +/- 4 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) with placebo (P < 0.01) and from 106 +/- 5 to 98 +/- 5 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) during treatment with isradipine (P < 0.01). Mean difference (95% CI) between changes in GFR with placebo and isradipine was -4.6 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) (-10.0 to 0.6) (P = 0.08). Six patients had a reduction in GFR >13% (exceeding the normal limit of autoregulation) combined with a complete pressure-passive vasculature (defined as DeltaMABP% < or = DeltaGFR%) during isradipine treatment versus none during the placebo treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Isradipine impairs GFR autoregulation in a sizeable proportion of hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.

Aged↗

Kidney function during and after withdrawal of long-term irbesartan treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

OBJECTIVE: Irbesartan is renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Whether the observed reduction in microalbuminuria is reversible (hemodynamic) or persistent (glomerular structural/biochemical normalization) after prolonged antihypertensive treatment is unknown. Therefore, the present substudy of the Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria Study (IRMA-2) investigated the reversibility of kidney function changes after withdrawal of 2 years' antihypertensive treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The substudy included 133 hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with persistent microalbuminuria in IRMA-2, randomized to double-masked treatment with either placebo, irbesartan 150 mg, or irbesartan 300 mg o.d. for 2 years. Arterial blood pressure, overnight urinary albumin excretion rate, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined repeatedly. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the placebo, irbesartan 150-mg, and irbesartan 300-mg groups. At the end of the study, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was similarly lowered to 105 +/- 2 (mean +/- SE), 103 +/- 2, and 102 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05 versus baseline), and urinary albumin excretion rate reduced by 8% (-16 to 27) (NS), 34% (95% CI 8-53), and 60% (46-70) (P < 0.05). Rates of decline in GFR were 1.3 +/- 0.7, 1.2 +/- 0.7, and 1.0 +/- 0.8 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) per month, respectively, during the initial 3 months of the study and 0.3 +/- 0.1, 0.3 +/- 0.1, and 0.4 +/- 0.1 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) per month in the remaining study period. One month after withdrawal of all antihypertensive medication, MABP remained unchanged in the placebo group, 105 +/- 2 mmHg, but increased significantly in the irbesartan groups, to 109 +/- 2 and 108 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively. Compared with baseline, urinary albumin excretion rate was increased by 14% (-17 to 54) in the placebo group and by 11% (-26 to 65) in the irbesartan 150-mg group but was persistently reduced by 47% (24-73) in the irbesartan 300-mg group (P < 0.05). GFR levels increased to baseline values in the placebo group and approached initial levels in irbesartan groups. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent reduction of microalbuminuria after withdrawal of all antihypertensive treatment suggests that high-dose irbesartan treatment confers long-term renoprotective effects.

Albuminuria↗

Comparative effects of Irbesartan on ambulatory and office blood pressure: a substudy of ambulatory blood pressure from the Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria study.

OBJECTIVE: Irbesartan was renoprotective independently of its blood pressure-lowering effect in the Irbesartan in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (IRMA2) study. However, blood pressure was evaluated by trough office blood pressure (OBP), which may underestimate reductions in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). In the present study, we evaluated 24-h blood pressure patterns in a subpopulation of the IRMA2 trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Type 2 diabetic patients (n = 43) with persistent microalbuminuria (as determined by repeated overnight measurements of urinary albumin excretion [UAE]) and hypertension who were included in the IRMA2 study at the Steno Diabetes Center were subjected to 24-h ABP (Takeda, TM2420) measurements before and 2 years after randomization to placebo (n = 15), irbesartan 150 mg daily (Irb150; n = 13), or irbesartan 300 mg daily (Irb300; n = 15). RESULTS: At baseline, the placebo, Irb150, and Irb300 groups were comparable: OBP: 157 +/- 15/89 +/- 7, 156 +/-15/91 +/- 11, and 159 +/- 16/90 +/- 9 mmHg (NS); 24-h ABP: 148 +/- 13/83 +/- 11, 148 +/- 16/82 +/- 7 and 147 +/- 16/81 +/- 10 mmHg (NS); and UAE (geometric mean with 95% CI): 43 (32-57), 46 (30-70), and 59 (42-85) micro g/min (NS), respectively. We found that 2 years after randomization, OBP was significantly reduced in all three groups (by 11/7, 13/8, and 13/8 mmHg in the placebo, Irb150, and Irb300 groups, respectively), but that there were no significant differences among groups. Reductions in 24-h ABP were similar in the three groups (11/10, 5/7, and 7/8 mmHg, respectively; NS), as were reductions in day ABP (11/9, 7/7, and 8/9 mmHg, respectively; NS) and night ABP (4/11, 7/7, and 3/3 mmHg, respectively; NS). The reduction in UAE at the end of the study was 0% (-86 to 42), 38% (-14 to 66), and 73% (59 to 82), respectively (overall, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Irbesartan is renoprotective independently of its beneficial effect in lowering 24-h blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent microalbuminuria.

Adult↗

Smoking and progression of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking contributes to development of diabetic nephropathy. However, long-term studies on the effect of smoking on decline in kidney function in diabetic nephropathy are lacking. We assessed the impact of smoking on progression of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study started in 1983. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified all albuminuric type 1 diabetic patients (n = 301) followed for at least 3 years, median (range) 7 years (3-14), who underwent at least yearly measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the (51)Cr-EDTA plasma clearance technique (n = 8, range 3-24). In total, 192 men and 109 women were included (age [mean +/- SD] 36 +/- 11 years, duration of diabetes 22 +/- 8 years); 271 patients were treated with antihypertensive drugs, predominantly ACE inhibitors in 179 patients. Patients were classified as smokers if they smoked more than one cigarette per day during a portion of or the entire observation period. Blood pressure, albuminuria, HbA(1c), and serum cholesterol were measured every 3-4 months during the study. RESULTS: In all 301 patients, the mean (SE) rate of decline in GFR (deltaGFR) was 4.0 (0.2) mlx min(-1) x year(-1) during the investigation period. No difference in Delta GFR was demonstrated between nonsmokers (n = 94), deltaGFR 4.5 (0.4), ex-smokers (n = 31), deltaGFR 3.1 (0.7), and smokers (n = 176), deltaGFR 3.9 (0.3) ml x min(-1) x year(-1), respectively (NS). Adjustment for other risk factors for progression of diabetic nephropathy did not alter the results: smoking was not associated with deltaGFR, whereas blood pressure, albuminuria, HbA(1c), and serum cholesterol were demonstrated to be independent progression promoters. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, smoking was not associated with decline in kidney function in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Adult↗

Decreasing incidence of severe diabetic microangiopathy in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Conflicting evidence of a decline in incidence of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes during the last decades has been reported. To assess recent trends in the cumulative incidence of diabetic microangiopathy in type 1 diabetes, we analyzed data from long-term prospective observational studies lasting >/=20 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 600 Caucasian patients with onset of type 1 diabetes between 1965 and 1984 were followed until death or until the year 2000. Patients were divided into four groups based on the year of diabetes onset: group A, 1965-1969 (n = 113); group B, 1970-1974 (n = 130); group C, 1975-1979 (n = 113); and group D, 1979-1984 (n = 244). Group A, B, and C are prevalence cohorts identified in 1984; group D is an inception cohort. RESULTS: In patients followed for >/=20 years, the cumulative incidence (95% CI) of diabetic nephropathy after 20 years of diabetes (urinary albumin excretion >300 mg/24 h) was reduced in patients with more recent diabetes onset (groups A-D): 31.1% (22.5-39.7) vs. 28.4% (19.8-37.0) vs. 18.9% (10.9-26.9) vs. 13.7% (6.2-21.2) (P = 0.015). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of proliferative retinopathy was as follows: 31.2% (22.2-39.8) vs. 30.3% (22.2-38.4) vs. 19.3% (11.2-27.4) vs. 12.5% (5.2-19.8) (P < 0.01). In the latter groups, antihypertensive treatment was started earlier, blood pressure and HbA(1c) were lower, and fewer patients smoked. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a decrease in the cumulative incidence of diabetic microangiopathy in type 1 diabetes over the past 35 years. Improved glycemic control, lower blood pressure (in part due to early aggressive antihypertensive treatment), and reduced prevalence of smoking rates were associated with the improved prognosis.

Aged↗

Long-term renoprotective effects of losartan in diabetic nephropathy: interaction with ACE insertion/deletion genotype?

OBJECTIVE: Several observational follow-up studies have found that the D allele of the insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the ACE gene (ACE/ID) is associated with an increased risk of renal function loss, even during ACE inhibition. Therefore, we investigated the long-term effect of the angiotensin II subtype-1 (AT1) receptor antagonist losartan (100 mg o.d.) on kidney function in II and DD type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 54 hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy homozygous for the insertion (n = 26) or the deletion (n = 28) allele were included in the study. After a 4-week washout, the patients received losartan (tablet, 100 mg o.d.) and were followed prospectively with a mean follow-up period of 36 months. Patients and investigators were blinded to ACE genotypes. At baseline, after 2 and 4 months and every 6 months thereafter, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), albuminuria, and 24-h blood pressure were determined. RESULTS: At baseline, GFR, albuminuria, and blood pressure were similar in the two genotype groups, II versus DD: mean (SD), 86 (22) vs. 88 (24) ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2); median (interquartile range), 1,134 (598-2,023) vs. 1,451 (893-1,766) mg/24 h; and mean (SD), 156/82 (17/9) vs. 153/80 (17/11) mmHg, respectively. GFR decreased similarly in both genotype groups, versus DD, respectively (P = 0.4): geometric mean (95% CI), 2.9 (2.0-4.2) vs. 3.4 (2.3-5.1) ml. min(-1). year(-1). Albuminuria and arterial blood pressure were significantly reduced during the study; no differences were noted between groups. During follow-up, albuminuria was decreased by 75% (95% CI 59-85) and 73% (56-83) in the II and DD groups, respectively (P < 0.01 vs. baseline). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 139/74 mmHg (14/8) in both genotype groups during the study (P < 0.01 vs. baseline). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous observational studies with ACE inhibitors, long-term treatment with losartan has similar beneficial renoprotective effects on progression of diabetic nephropathy in hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with ACE II and DD genotypes.

Adult↗

Renoprotective effects of adding angiotensin II receptor blocker to maximal recommended doses of ACE inhibitor in diabetic nephropathy: a randomized double-blind crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the renoprotective effects as reflected by short-term changes in albuminuria of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by adding an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to treatment with maximal recommended doses of an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients (17 men and 3 women) with type 2 diabetes along with hypertension and nephropathy were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, two-period, crossover trial of 8 weeks of treatment with the ARB candesartan 16 mg daily and placebo added in random order to existing treatment with lisinopril/enalapril 40 mg daily or captopril 150 mg daily. At the end of each treatment period, we evaluated albuminuria in three 24-h urinary collections by turbidimetry, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) using the Takeda-TM2420, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the (51)Cr-EDTA plasma-clearance technique. RESULTS: During monoblockade of the RAS by ACEI treatment, albuminuria was 706 (349-1,219) mg/24 h [geometric mean (IQR)]; 24-h ABP was 138 +/- 3/72 +/- 2 mmHg (mean +/- SE); and GFR was 77 +/- 6 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2) (mean +/- SE). During dual blockade of the RAS by addition of candesartan 16 mg daily, there was a mean (95% CI) reduction in albuminuria of 28 (17-38) compared with ACEI alone (P < 0.001). There was a modest reduction in systolic/diastolic 24-h ABP of 3/2 mmHg (-2 to 8 systolic, -2 to 5 diastolic; NS). Changes in albuminuria did not correlate to changes in ABP. Addition of candesartan 16 mg daily induced a small, insignificant decrease in GFR of 4 (-1 to 9) ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2). CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the RAS provides superior short-term renoprotection independent of systemic blood pressure changes in comparison with maximally recommended doses of ACEI in patients with type 2 diabetes as well as nephropathy.

Aged↗

Dipyridamole, cold pressor test, and demonstration of endothelial dysfunction: a PET study of myocardial perfusion in diabetes.

UNLABELLED: Much evidence suggests endothelial dysfunction to be present in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and to be important for the development of myocardial ischemia. Endothelial function in the coronary vessels may be studied in various ways. We compared the effect of cold pressor testing (CPT) with that of dipyridamole, a pharmacologic vasodilator, on coronary blood flow (CBF) measured by PET in NIDDM patients and healthy volunteers. In addition, we studied the effect of acute angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition on the flow response. METHODS: Ten NIDDM patients and 10 control subjects participated. Myocardial perfusion was determined at baseline, during CPT, and after dipyridamole infusion by PET using intravenous (13)N-ammonia. RESULTS: Resting CBF was similar in NIDDM patients and in control subjects. CPT increased CBF by 20% in the control group, whereas no increase was observed in the patients. After dipyridamole infusion, CBF increased 2- to 3-fold in patients and 3- to 4-fold in control subjects. The increase and maximal CBF were significantly higher in control subjects than in patients. During ACE-inhibitor infusion, which had no influence on resting CBF in patients or control subjects (n = 5), CPT increased CBF by 14% in the NIDDM group. After dipyridamole, CBF increased 3- to 4-fold in both groups. The increase in CBF and maximal CBF in the 2 groups were not different during ACE-inhibitor infusion. CONCLUSION: In these NIDDM patients without evidence of epicardial coronary disease, endothelial dysfunction is strongly suggested by an impaired increase in CBF both to dipyridamole and to CPT. This dysfunction was reversed by infusion of an ACE inhibitor. Although ACE inhibition during CPT did induce significant increases in CBF in the patients, the changes during ACE inhibition were small compared with the dipyridamole response, and the absence of CBF increase during CPT in 3 of the 10 control subjects further limits the value of CPT for the study of coronary endothelial dysfunction.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗