Biomedical subjects

Harald E Olafsson

Publications and source records attributed to Harald E Olafsson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Baseline factors predictive of incident penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To identify baseline demographic and clinical factors associated with undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in a prospective cohort of 1,065 keratoconus patients followed for eight years in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: We report the rate of PK over eight years and baseline factors predictive of PK in 1,065 patients who, at the time of study enrollment, had not undergone PK in either eye. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of patients completed the eight-year close-out visit. Twelve percent (126 of 1,065) had PK in one (9.3%) or both eyes (2.5%). Baseline factors associated with increased likelihood of PK included younger age, steeper keratometric values, worse visual acuity, corneal scarring, poorer contact lens comfort, and poorer vision-related quality of life. The percent of eyes undergoing PK was 15% for patients 40 years old and younger, 28% for eyes with a steep keratometric value greater than 52 diopters, 33% for visual acuity less than 20/40, and 24% for eyes with corneal scarring. CONCLUSIONS: The CLEK Study confirmed previous reports of the increased likelihood of PK associated with corneal scarring, steeper keratometry values, poorer visual acuity, and poorer contact lens comfort. The CLEK Study is among the first to report an increased risk of PK associated with younger age, worse vision-related quality of life, and flatter contact lens fits. Knowledge of these factors is beneficial to clinicians in patient education and may be useful in disease management.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Longitudinal changes in corneal curvature in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to identify factors that predict longitudinal increases in corneal curvature as measured by the First Definite Apical Clearance Lens (FDACL) and flatter keratometric reading (Flat K) in keratoconus. METHODS: The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study is a long-te rm evaluation of the natural history of keratoconus involving 1209 patients. This report uses 8 years of follow-up data from 1032 patients who had penetrating keratoplasty in neither eye at baseline and who provided enough data to compute the slope of the change with time in the FDACL or the Flat K. Outcome measures included the aforementioned slopes and whether the FDACL or the Flat K increased by 3.00 or more diopters (D) in at least 1 eye. RESULTS: At CLEK Study entry, patients were aged 38.9 +/- 10.8 years. Overall, 44.3% of them were women, and 69.3% of them were white. The slope of the change in FDACL (0.18 +/- 0.60 D/y) and Flat K (0.20 +/- 0.80 D) during 8 years translates into expected 8-year increases of 1.44 D in FDACL and 1.60 D in Flat K. Increases of > or = 3.00 D in either eye had an 8-year incidence of 24.8% for FDACL and 24.1% for Flat K. Independent predictors of increased FDACL included younger age, poorer baseline high-contrast manifest refraction visual acuity, and non-white race. Younger age and poorer high-contrast manifest refraction visual acuity were independent predictors of a >3.00-D increase for both FDACL and Flat K. CONCLUSION: CLEK patients exhibited a slow but clear increase in corneal curvature. Younger age and poorer high-contrast manifest refraction visual acuity at baseline predicted the rate of change in corneal curvature.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with rigid contact lens comfort in keratoconus. METHODS: Baseline data from the 16 Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study clinical sites were analyzed for all patients wearing a rigid contact lens in their more severely keratoconic eye (as determined by steep keratometry). Corneal transplant patients, patients who did not wear a rigid contact lens in either eye, patients who did not wear a rigid lens in their worse eye, and patients with missing contact lens comfort data were excluded from the sample. A total of 751 eyes were included. Variables assessed included measures of disease severity, visual acuity through the patients' habitual rigid contact lenses, contact lens wearing time, the apical fitting relationship of the contact lens, the degree of peripheral clearance, and the presence of corneal scarring and staining. Comfort was measured by asking the patients "In general, how comfortable are your contact lenses?" (1 = very comfortable through 5 = very irritating). RESULTS: Measures of disease severity (steep keratometry and the first definite apical clearance lens) were not associated with lens comfort. There was no difference in self-reported contact lens comfort between patients fitted with apical touch vs. apical clearance. Patients with a peripheral clearance rating of "minimal unacceptable" (more common among patients with milder keratoconus) were approximately half as likely to report good contact lens comfort compared with patients with "average" peripheral clearance (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.79). There was no association between contact lens comfort and the other peripheral clearance ratings compared with ratings of average. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be an association between decreasing patient-reported rigid lens comfort and increasing disease severity as measured by steep keratometry or first definite apical clearance lens in this sample. The apical fitting relationship (flat vs. steep) does not appear to be associated with patient-reported comfort. Minimal peripheral clearance may contribute to decreased rigid contact lens comfort in keratoconus.

Adult↗