PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Harry L Messmore

Publications and source records attributed to Harry L Messmore.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Thromboembolism in cancer patients: pathogenesis and treatment.

In this review we summarize the causes of cancer related thrombosis as well as modern treatment approaches. Malignancy as a risk factor for thromboembolism is becoming increasingly recognized by clinicians caring for these patients. The probability of thrombosis occurring in an individual patient is dependent on several factors, including accompanying medical problems, the type of cancer, the clinical stage, performance status, and the treatment modalities employed. Thrombophilia with a history of thromboembolism is important as well. The overall risk of thrombosis is sevenfold that of noncancer patients. Though much has been learned about the pathogenesis of cancer-related thrombosis, we are in fact just beginning to understand the cross-talk between cancer cells and their related microenvironment, and such investigations are likely to increase our knowledge of cancer-related thrombosis mechanisms. Research in these areas may also suggest new strategies for cancer prevention, metastasis suppression, and new treatments. Drugs used in cancer therapy are increasingly recognized to directly contribute to the thrombotic tendency. Few studies provide data on the optimal management of cancer patients with thrombosis. It has been learned that retreating with the same drug can be very hazardous. In general the approach to prevention of thrombosis is the same as for noncancer patients, recognizing that specific cancer types and stage can place a patient in a high-risk category. Initial coumadin therapy fails in a significant number of patients with cancer. Recognition of the cancer patients at highest risk for coumadin failure is challenging. Low-molecular-weight heparins appear to be more effective in such situations where coumadin is likely to fail or has failed, but these drugs are thought to be costlier. Newer agents such as Factor Xa inhibitors and TF inhibitors are currently under investigation and may be found useful in the management of cancer-related thrombosis.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2005

Antiplatelet agents: current drugs and future trends.

Antiplatelet drugs in clinical use are discussed in terms of their mechanisms of action and the relevancy of that to the physiology of platelets and the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis. Current clinical usage is outlined in detail for each drug. Experimental antiplatelet drugs also are discussed.

Blood Platelets↗
PubMed2004

Differential prevalence of anti-heparin-PF4 immunoglobulin subtypes in patients treated with clivarin and heparin: implications in the HIT pathogenesis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is a catastrophic complication of heparin therapy that may result in arterial/venous thromboembolic events. The pathophysiology of HIT is mediated by the generation of a functionally and molecularly heterogeneous group of anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies that cause platelet/endothelial cell activation/destruction. These AHPF4 antibodies may be of various subtypes and cause differential pathogenic responses during HIT. This study evaluated the differential prevalence and functionality of AHPF4 Ig subtypes (IgA, IgG, and IgM) in plasma samples obtained from clinically suspected HIT patients (n = 111) and two clinical trials. In these trials, a low-molecular-weight heparin, clivarin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were used to treat deep-vein thrombosis (CORTES) and for prophylaxis of the orthopedic surgery (ECHOS). In the CORTES study, three randomized groups of patients (n = 312-328) received prophylactic treatment with either UFH or clivarin (o.d. or b.i.d.). In the ECHOS study, there were approximately 600 patients per group. Citrated plasma samples were analyzed for cumulative IgA/IgG/IgM and individual Ig subtypes of AHPF4 utilizing ELISA. Functionality of the ELISA-positive samples was ascertained by 14C-serotonin release assay. In clinically confirmed HIT patients (and UFH-treated CORTES and ECHOS samples), the Ig subtyping revealed a predominance of IgG AHPF4 antibodies in contrast to the asymptomatic high AHPF4 antibody titers, which were found to be mostly IgM and/or IgA subtypes. In the clivarin-treated patients in both trials, the prevalence of AHPF4 antibodies was found to be lower (2-3 fold, p < 0.01) in comparison to UFH group. In addition, the clivarin-treated patients with positive AHPF4 antibodies were found to be predominantly of the non-functional type and were found in the order of IgM > IgA > IgG Together, these observations demonstrate that ELISA-detectable IgG subtype in UFH-treated patients may be more likely to cause functional/pathologic responses during HIT syndrome. Thus, determination of IgG subtype of AHPF4 antibodies during HIT syndrome may be crucial in the diagnosis; however, the relevance of the pathologically non-functional (IgA and/or IgM) antibodies and the overall mechanism(s) of these HIT-associatied antibodies need further investigation.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2004

Heparin to pentasaccharide and beyond: the end is not in sight.

The 87-year history of heparin began in 1916 when a 26-year-old medical student named Jay McLean startled his mentor William Howell, Professor of Physiology at Johns Hopkins University, by proclaiming that he had discovered "antithrombin." This discovery was so surprising to Howell because he had expected McLean to isolate thromboplastin, a clot-promoting substance from animal tissue. In 1928, Charles Best, M.D., in Toronto, Canada, organized a team of chemists, physiologists, and surgeons to focus on the development of heparin. This group determined which animal tissues were the best source, had performed purification and identification, and had determined pharmacologic properties in vitro. By 1935, they were ready for human trials. By 1941, the group reported a series of 700 patients treated with the glycosaminoglycan called heparin. Meanwhile a critical cofactor, antithrombin, had been discovered at the University of Iowa (Brinkhous, et al). Introduction of newer tests for laboratory monitoring enabled refinement of dosages during the 1960s and 1970s. Its use permitted the development of hemodialysis and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, and the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients. The concept of low-molecular-weight heparin occurred to Dr. Choay and others in France in the late 1970s. During the 1980s and 1990s, the development of low-molecular-weight heparins evolved for both prophylaxis and therapy. The first synthetic product was called the pentasaccharide, named for the five critical sugar units in heparin that bind to antithrombin (1983). Since then, this drug has been studied extensively to prove its clinical efficacy and safety.

Heparin↗
PubMed2004

Anti-Xa and anti-IIa drugs alter international normalized ratio measurements: potential problems in the monitoring of oral anticoagulants.

Several of the newly developed anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents have been shown to influence the International Normalized Ratio (INR) values. During phase I trials with normal healthy volunteers and phase II study patients who were given warfarin and concomitant anti-IIa or anti-Xa agents, it has been reported that INR values were falsely elevated. It is of critical importance to know of the effects of these agents on INR to avoid dosage errors. To study the influence of these agents on INR, we used several anti-IIa agents (argatroban, recombinant hirudin, efegatran, and PEG-hirudin) and anti-Xa drugs (pentasaccharides such as fondaparinux and idraparinux, DX-9065a and JTV-803). The anti-IIa drugs were supplemented in citrated plasma at a concentration of 0 to 1 microg/mL level and anti-Xa drugs in the range of 0 to 25 microg/mL. The IC(50) values for each of these agents were calculated. Four different commercially available prothrombin time (PT) reagents were used to perform the PT assays and to calculate the relative INR values. Direct synthetic factor IIa and Xa inhibitors exhibited a concentration-dependent increase in the INR values. Hirudin, efegatran, and PEG-hirudin showed a weaker effect, whereas argatroban showed a much higher elevation of the INR values. Synthetic indirect anti-Xa agents such as the pentasaccharide did not show any effect on the INR values. Furthermore, prothrombin time reagents with high ISI values exhibited disproportionally higher INR values for both the direct anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents. Elevation of INR values has therapeutic implications when non-oral anticoagulant drugs are used in combination with drugs such as warfarin. Because of the false elevation of INR values with some of the non-oral anticoagulant drugs, patients who are on concomitant warfarin therapy should be carefully evaluated for their corresponding INR values for proper dosing. To avoid dosing errors it is best not to use the INR values in the therapeutic monitoring of anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents either in the monotherapeutic or polytherapeutic modalities. These data also warrant the development clinically relevant methods for the monitoring of the concomitant use of newly developed anti-Xa and anti-IIa drugs with oral anticoagulants.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Differential effects of DX-9065a, argatroban, and synthetic pentasaccharide on tissue thromboplastin inhibition test and dilute Russell's viper venom test.

New synthetic direct and indirect factor Xa or factor IIa inhibitors are increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disorders, including patients suffering from antiphospholipid syndrome. In this study, the effects of the synthetic direct factor Xa inhibitor DX-9065a, the indirect synthetic heparinomimetic pentasaccharide, and the direct factor IIa inhibitor Argatroban were studied. These two widely used assays for the detection of lupus anticoagulant, namely the tissue thromboplastin inhibition (TTIT) and the dilute Russell viper venom tests (DRWT) proved useful. The drugs were added to a normal human plasma pool ranging in concentration from 0.04 to 10 microg/mL. Using the two tests named above, DX-9065a and Argatroban showed a dose-related prolongation of TTIT and DRWT in the concentration range from 0.04 to 5 micromol/mL, but the pentasaccharide only slightly prolonged the clotting times of these assays even at high concentrations. Argatroban had the more pronounced effect on both tests when compared with DX-9065a (p < 0.001). The most responsive assay for DX-9065a up to a concentration of 2.5 micromol/mL was the DRWT. For Argatroban both TTIT and DRWT were equally responsive. Patients whose plasma was tested for suspected lupus anticoagulant and who have been given DX-9065a or Argatroban may have false-positive results with the TTIT tests and DRWT. This effect should be considered during patient management. These results indicate that these assays could be used for the effective quantitation of the direct factor Xa or factor IIa inhibitors when suitable controls are used.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2002

Differential effects of clivarin and heparin in patients undergoing hip and knee surgery for the generation of anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies.

The pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is mediated via a heterogeneous group of heparin(s)-platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complexes bound to their antibodies. These anti-H-PF4 (AHPF4) antibodies that are capable of binding to the FcgammaRIIA receptor [cluster of differentiation (CD) 32] on platelets, resulting in platelet activation, widely vary in their specific activities as platelet activation (functionality). Predisposing factors related to specific pathologic conditions may also contribute to the generation of these antibodies and their relative functionality during HIT syndrome. To understand this phenomenon, a sub-study was carried out in patients undergoing elective total hip and knee replacement surgery (ECHOS Study) and who were treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Clivarin). Approximately 600 patients per arm [UFH=7,500 anti-Xa U twice a day (b.i.d.) subcutaneous (s.c.) and clivarin=4200 U once daily (o.d.) s.c.], age >40 years, received prophylactic treatment for a minimum of 11-14 days. Plasma samples were collected at pre-dose, days 2-4, days 11-14 and at follow-up 6-8 weeks after discharge and were analyzed for AHPF4 antibody titers. Functionality of the enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)-positive AHPF4 antibodies to cause platelet activation was tested by 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA). Both UFH and clivarin treatments in orthopedic surgical patients resulted in a progressive generation of AHPF4 antibodies. The relative prevalence/functionality of AHPF4 antibodies in clivarin arm was markedly lower (two- to threefold, p<0.001) as compared to UFH at each time point. Most of the samples in clivarin group were found to be SRA negative, suggesting the presence of AHPF4 antibodies that did not activate platelets (nonfunctional). Within the UFH arm, the relative prevalence/functionality of AHPF4 antibodies was much higher (p<0.002) in knee group compared to the corresponding hip group. This study, for the first time, reports on the elevated levels of AHPF4 antibodies generated by heparin associated with the pathogenesis of knee surgery. Clinical significance of the differential generation of HIT-associated antibodies remains unexplored at this time.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Development of a non-human primate sub-clinical model of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: platelet responses to human anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the responses of human and non-human primate (Macaca mulatta) platelets to anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies. Due to the variations observed in the functionality and immunoglobulin isotypes in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), we used highly characterized human AHPF4 antibodies to study platelet activation responses. Using ELISA and 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) systems, three patients' plasmapheresis fluid with similar responses to these assays were pooled. This pool was then used to study the platelet activation responses of human and primate platelets in the HIT platelet aggregation assay, a flow cytometry assay, and a variation of the aggregation assay in which glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were supplemented. In the plasmapheresis fluid from three patients, the most significant AHPF4 immunoglobulin isotype present (based on optical density readings) was IgG, with less IgM (p < 0.001) and IgA (p < 0.001). The SRA yielded equivalent platelet activation results in all three patients. Using this pool in the platelet aggregation assay, without any heparin present, there was less percent aggregation (p < 0.001) with human platelets (11.8 +/- 2.35, n = 5) compared to the primate platelets (54.3 +/- 10.2, n = 9). In presence of 0.4 U/ml heparin, both platelet types had similar percent aggregations (p > 0.05). Three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors were used to evaluate the similarities in platelet activation. Eptifibatide was found to be a strong inhibitor of both species' platelet types at concentrations greater than 0.01 microg/ml. This was not the case with tirofiban which inhibited both human and monkey platelets at concentrations greater than 0.025 microg/ml. Abciximab inhibited aggregation at concentrations greater than 6.25 microg/ml. These data indicate that phylogenetic similarities in platelets of humans and primates may be used to further characterize the pathophysiology of HIT syndrome.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2002

Prevalence, isotype, and functionality of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in patients treated with heparin and clinically suspected for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The pathogenic role of IgG.

Antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes have been observed in patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome. These antibodies may be of various isotypes and differ with respect to their ability to activate platelets/endothelial cells. This study determined the isotypes and functionality of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies in 111 patients treated with heparin and clinically suspected for HIT. In this patient population, 50% had detectable AHPF4 cumulative IgA, IgG, and IgM (determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA), but only 35% was positive when tested with the (14)C-serotonin release assay (SRA). Using antihuman Ig specific for different isotypes, we found that 50% of the 111 samples was positive for IgG, 45% for IgM, and 37% for IgA. In 50 normal human serum (NHS) samples, only two were positive for IgG, but 33 were positive for IgM, indicating a potential humoral response to the heparin-PF4 complex prior to heparin administration. Patients that were ELISA(+) for AHPF4 antibody titer were subdivided into SRA-positive (+) and SRA-negative (-) groups. The SRA(+) group had a mean ELISA optical density (OD) for AHPF4 IgA/IgG/IgM of 2.1, while the SRA(-) group had a mean OD of 0.8 (P<.001). The SRA(+) group had greater mean OD values for all three individual isotypes. Using flow cytometry, we determined the ability of different patient samples to activate platelets. Samples that contained IgG and were SRA(+) activated platelets (as measured by microparticle generation and P-selectin expression) in the presence of therapeutic concentrations of heparin. NHS and samples containing IgA and/or IgM that were SRA(-) were not able to produce microparticles nor were they able to increase expression of P-selectin. Together, these data indicate that IgG is the principal mediator of platelet activation in patients with HIT, with IgA and IgM playing a less significant role in the pathophysiology of this syndrome.

Antigen-Antibody Reactions↗
PubMed2002

Reference ranges of the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition and dilute Russell's viper venom tests revisited.

Reference ranges for two well-recognized tests for the lupus anticoagulant were determined utilizing 98 healthy subjects. The purpose of the study was to compare the reference ranges for the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition test on this group of healthy subjects calculated by parametric and nonparametric statistical methods, and to compare these results with results obtained on subsets of 20 and 40 randomly selected individuals from the group of 98. The same procedures were followed for the dilute Russell's viper venom test. Results were recorded in seconds of clotting times and in ratios (subject/mean of that set or subset). Statistical analysis revealed Gaussian distribution of the results in the large group as well as in each subset for both tests. The results showed more variation between sets of the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition test than of the dilute Russell's viper venom test. Nonparametrically calculated reference ranges were wider than those determined by a parametric method, especially if confidence intervals are provided for both reference ranges in the group of 94 controls or in a subset of 40 subjects. The nonparametric technique utilizes all data for the calculation of reference ranges of such sample sizes no matter how wide the results are spread. There was no significant difference between the reference ranges of subsets and the whole group (p > 0.05) calculated by both statistical techniques.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Reference intervals of the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition and dilute Russell's viper venom tests revisited.

Reference intervals for two well-recognized tests for the lupus anticoagulant were determined using 98 healthy subjects. The purpose of the study was to compare the reference intervals for the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition test on this group of healthy subjects calculated by parametric and nonparametric statistical methods, and to compare these results with results obtained on subsets of 20 and 40 randomly selected individuals from the group of 98. The same procedures were followed for the dilute Russell's viper venom test. Results were recorded in seconds of clotting times and in ratios (subject/mean of that set or subset). Statistical analysis revealed Gaussian distribution of the results in the large group as well as in each subset for both tests. The results showed more variation between sets of the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition test than of the dilute Russell's viper venom test. Nonparametrically calculated reference intervals were wider than those determined by the parametric method, especially if confidence intervals are provided for both reference limits in a group of 94 controls or in a subset of 40 subjects. The nonparametric technique uses all data for the calculation of reference interval of such sample sizes no matter how widely spread the results are. There was no significant difference between the reference intervals of subsets and the whole group (p > 0.05) calculated by both statistical techniques. Very few outliers were observed among these subjects in both tests.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗