PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Harsharan K Singh

Publications and source records attributed to Harsharan K Singh.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Latent and productive polyomavirus infections of renal allografts: morphological, clinical, and pathophysiological aspects.

Polyomavirus allograft nephropathy, also termed BK virus nephropathy (BKN) after the main causative agent, the polyoma-BK-virus strain, is a major complication following kidney transplantation. BKN is the most common viral infection affecting the renal allograft with a reported prevalence of 1% up to 10%. It often leads to chronic allograft dysfunction and graft loss. BKN is most likely caused by the reactivation of latent BK viruses which, under sustained and intensive immunosuppression, enter a replicative/productive cycle. Viral disease, i.e., BKN, is typically limited to the kidney transplant. It is histologically defined by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells and severe tubular injury. Virally induced tubular damage is the morphological correlate for allograft dysfunction. In this chapter, different variants of polyomavirus intranuclear inclusion bodies [types 1 through 4] and adjunct techniques [immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] that are used for proper characterization of disease are described. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical and pathophysiological significance of different histological stages of BKN.

Graft Rejection↗

Urine cytology findings of polyomavirus infections.

Polyomaviruses of the BK- and JC-strains often remain latent within the transitional cell layer of the bladder, ureters and the renal pelvis as well as in tubular epithelial cells of the kidney. Slight changes in the immune status and/or an immunocompromised condition can lead to the (re)activation of latent polyomaviruses, especially along the transitional cell layer, resulting in the shedding of viral particles and infected cells into the urine. A morphologic sign of the (re)activation of polyomaviruses is the detection of typical intranuclear viral inclusion bearing epithelial cells, so-called "decoy cells", in the urine. Decoy cells often contain polyoma-BK-viruses. The inclusion bearing cells are easily identified and quantifiable in routine Papanicolaou stained urine cytology specimens. With some experience, decoy cells can also be detected in the unstained urinary sediment by phase contrast microscopy. Different morphologic variants of decoy cells (types 1 through 4) are described and ancillary techniques (immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy (EM), and fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH)) for proper identification and characterization are discussed. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical significance of the detection of decoy cells as a parameter to assess the risk for disease, i.e., polyoma-BK-virus nephropathy (BKN) in kidney transplant recipients. The sensitivity and specificity of decoy cells for diagnosing BKN is 99% and 95%, respectively, the positive predictive value varies between 27% and more than 90%, and the negative predictive value is 99%. The detection of decoy cells is compared to other techniques applicable to assess the activation of polyomaviruses in the urine (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and EM).

Cytodiagnosis↗

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas: utility and diagnostic challenges.

The role of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) as the primary modality for the initial diagnosis of previously undiagnosed soft tissue sarcomas presents several important challenges. Most practicing pathologists are inexperienced with the wide array of soft tissue neoplasms and their morphologic heterogeneity, making them susceptible to misdiagnosis. However, in the hands of experienced cytopathologists, FNAB in conjunction with ancillary techniques has a diagnostic accuracy approaching 95% for the diagnosis of malignancy. FNAB has been shown to have a diagnostic yield nearly identical with core needle biopsy while avoiding significant clinical complications. Nevertheless, FNAB has certain limitations related to the accurate histologic grading and subtyping of certain subgroups of sarcomas. It may also be difficult to accurately distinguish between low-grade sarcomas and benign or borderline cellular lesions, especially in the spindle cell sarcoma subgroup. The aim of this review is to highlight the utility and limitations of FNAB in the primary diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas, highlight diagnostically challenging lesions, and comment on the limitations of FNAB in providing a "definitive" diagnosis.

Biopsy, Fine-Needle↗

Polyomavirus nephropathy: morphology, pathophysiology, and clinical management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Viral nephropathies, particularly those caused by polyomaviruses of the BK-virus strain, are serious complications following renal transplantation. The review will highlight the morphological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of BK-virus nephropathy. New patient management strategies are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate-mofetil promotes the activation of latent BK-virus in the urinary tract and increases the odds ratio for developing BK-virus nephropathy significantly. A productive infection with BK-viruses shows viral replication in tubular epithelial cells and acute tubular injury. BK-virus nephropathy can be further complicated by concurrent acute rejection episodes contributing to graft demise. Risk assessment after transplantation and patient management during ongoing viral nephropathy have undergone revision by the introduction of real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction techniques measuring BK-virus genome load fluctuations in the serum. Treatment strategies for BK-virus nephropathy include not only low-dose immunosuppression but also drugs with antiviral effects: cidofovir and leflunomide. Transient anti-rejection therapy, including anti-lymphocytic preparations, is a therapeutic option in cases of BK-virus nephropathy and concurrent acute rejection. Recent advances in patient management strategies have resulted in markedly improved graft survival. In cases of graft loss due to BK-virus nephropathy, re-transplantation should be considered. SUMMARY: BK-virus nephropathy is a significant complication following renal transplantation. Recent advances have improved our understanding of the morphological changes, potential risk factors and patient management strategies would be optimized. The availability of quantitative viral load measurements now offers the opportunity for a more accurate and timely clinical intervention.

BK Virus↗

Negative-staining electron microscopy of the urine for the detection of polyomavirus infections.

Negative-staining electron microscopy (EM) has played a pivotal role in diagnostic virology. It is a rapid technique for viral detection in the urine and can provide an easy means for monitoring viral activity and productive infections. EM of urine for the detection of polyomaviruses has hitherto not been systematically evaluated as a screening tool for renal transplant patients at risk for BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKN). Here, the authors discuss technical aspects of negative-staining EM of urine (n = 76 samples) and present a simple and rapid protocol for the semiquantitative evaluation of patient samples. In two patient populations (either with (n = 15 samples) or without (n = 15 samples) an established diagnosis of BKN), EM results were compared with two previously established techniques for monitoring polyomavirus activation: (1) cytology for the quantitation of decoy cells, and (2) quantitative PCR assays for the detection of BK virus DNA load levels. In both patient groups, the dynamics of decoy cell shedding by urine cytology closely paralleled free viral particle shedding by EM, and viral load levels as measured by PCR. A trend toward higher readings was observed in patients with BKN (median values, control versus BKN groups: decoy cells 21 versus 50/slide; free virions by EM: 32 versus 66 viral particles/10 high-power fields; PCR: 3.5 x 10(8) versus 5.4 x 10(8) BK virus copies/ml; all differences not statistically significant). The authors conclude that negative-staining EM and the semiquantitative assessment of free viral particles in the urine can be a useful clinical method to identify patients at increased risk for BKN. EM can be used alone or in combination with urine cytology or PCR assays.

Cytodiagnosis↗

Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.

OBJECTIVE: To examine cells that were retained on sampling devices used to collect ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A) Pap smears in order to evaluate both the number and significance of cells that are routinely discarded with these devices after liquid-based specimens are collected. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred Pap smears from 100 women were prospectively procured after gynecologic Pap smears were collected for the ThinPrep Pap test. The sampling end of the collection devices was cut off and placed in a vial that contained SUREPATH preservative fluid (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A). The residual cell samples were processed using the SurePath PREPSTAIN slide processor (TriPath). A single liquid-based slide was prepared from the sampling devices from each of the 100 specimens collected. The slides produced from the discarded devices were reviewed for the following: squamous cells, endocervical component, epithelial cell abnormalities and miscellaneous findings. The slides prepared from the "throw-away" (TA) material were subsequently compared with the primary ThinPrep Pap smear slide. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the TA samples had an equal or greater number of squamous cells per high-power microscopic field when compared to the primary ThinPrep slide, with 8% of the TA slides demonstrating greater overall cellularity. An endocervical component was present on 27 of 66 cervical samples (40.9%). Three of five cases (60%) interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance had similar cells on the TA slides. Two cases of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance had no abnormal cells on the TA slides. Twelve of 14 cases (85.71%) of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion contained similar cells on the TA slides. Two of four cases (50%) of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion also had similar abnormal cells on the TA slides. Miscellaneous findings included 1 case of benign endometrial cells and 4 Candida infections present on both preparations, along with 1 case of Trichomonas vaginalis organisms present on the ThinPrep slide only. In 1 specimen, several multinucleated histiocytic giant cells were present only on the TA slide. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens prepared from TA collecting devices used for the ThinPrep Pap test are less sensitive than the primary specimen for the detection of cervical lesions. This is in contrast to split-sample studies involving ThinPrep and conventional smears. Our study documented the presence of normal and abnormal cells discarded from ThinPrep sampling devices in a high percentage of cases. Discarded abnormal cells on the TA slides were, however, few when compared to the primary specimen, with only 1 exception involving a high grade lesion.

Aged↗