PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hatem Khalaf

Publications and source records attributed to Hatem Khalaf.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Living donor hepatectomy (LDH)--comparative study between two different anesthetic techniques.

BACKGROUND: Living donor hepatectomy (LDH) is now widely used to meet the need for liver grafts due to the shortage of cadaveric livers. Donor safety and perioperative anesthetic management are our major concern. The aim of our study was to compare two anesthetic techniques for management of living donor hepatectomy. PATIENTS & METHODS: After ethical committee approval and informed written consent, 20 donors ASA I physical status undergoing hepatectomy for living-relative liver transplant were allocated randomly to one of two groups. Group A where anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 microg/kg and propofol 2-3 mg/kg(-1), and maintained with isoflurane 0.8-1.2% and fentanyl infusion 1-2mcg/kg(-1)/h(-1). In group B anesthesia was induced with sufentanyl 0.2mcg/kg(-1), and propofol 2-3mg/kg(-1), and maintained with propofol infusion 6-12 mg/kg(-1)/h(-1), and sufentanyl infusion 0.2-0.4mcg/kg(-1)/h(-1). Atracurium was the muscle relaxant for intubation and maintenance in both groups. RESULTS: There were no perioperative mortality in both groups, no significant statistical differences between both groups as regard demographic data, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, hospital stay, intraoperative hemodynamics, blood loss, liver function tests (PT, AST, & ALT) measured in the first, third, and seventh days postoperative. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study demonstrated that both anesthetic techniques were well tolerated for living donor hepatectomy, with no blood transfusion required, with short and safe discharge from PACU and short hospital stay, but with significant laboratory changes reflecting transient impairment in metabolic liver function. These procedures have proven useful as an important alternative to the cadaveric liver transplantation. Both techniques can be used as fast tract technique for living donor hepatectomy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Evolution of living donor liver transplantation in Egypt.

OBJECTIVE: To date, cadaveric organ donation is illegal in Egypt. Therefore, Egypt recently introduced living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), aiming to save those who are suffering from end stage liver disease. Herein, we study the evolution of LDLT in Egypt. METHODS: In Egypt, between August 2001 and February 2004, we approached all centers performing LDLT through personal communication and sent a questionnaire to each center asking for limited information regarding their LDLT experience. RESULTS: We identified and approached 7 LDLT centers, which collectively performed a total of 130 LDLT procedures, however, 3 major centers performed most of the cases (91%). Overseas surgical teams, mainly from Japan, France, Korea, and Germany, either performed or supervised almost all procedures. Out of those 7 LDLT centers, 5 centers agreed to provide complete data on their patients including a total of 73 LDLT procedures. Out of those 73 recipients, 50 (68.5%) survived after a median follow-up period of 305 days (range 15-826 days). They reported single donor mortality. Hepatitis C virus cirrhosis, whether alone or mixed with schistosomiasis, was the main indication for LDLT. CONCLUSION: Egypt recently introduced LDLT with reasonable outcomes; yet, it carries considerable risks to healthy donors, it lacks cadaveric back up, and is not feasible for all patients. We hope that the initial success in LDLT will not deter the efforts to legalize cadaveric organ donation in Egypt.

Cultural Characteristics↗
PubMed2004

Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation in Egyptians transplanted abroad.

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term outcome after liver transplantation (LT) in Egyptian patients who underwent LT outside Egypt. METHODS: Between May 1993 and February 2004, over 150 Egyptians underwent LT outside Egypt. Data of 67 recipients were collected in Egypt through personal communications with the Overseas Liver Transplant Centers and through the records of the Egyptian Liver Transplant Association. RESULTS: Most patients underwent LT in Europe (73.1%), few in the United State of America (17.9%) and in Japan (9%). Sixty-one patients underwent cadaveric LT and the remaining 6 patients underwent living related liver transplantation (LDLT). The male to female ratio was 58:9. Median age was 45 (3-63 years). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis whether alone or mixed with schistosomiasis was the main indication for LT. Out of those 67 recipients, 52 (77.6%) survived after a median follow-up period of 4.6 years (rang 1-10.5 years). Deaths were due to primary non-function in 3 patients, postoperative bleeding in one patient, recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 10 patients, and chronic rejection in one patient. CONCLUSION: Egyptians underwent LT abroad showed a good long-term outcome. Due to the high prevalence of HCV, we expect a growing need for LT in Egypt. Although LDLT has been introduced recently in Egypt, cadaveric liver donation is still not legalized by the government. Efforts should be directed to expanding LDLT, legalizing cadaveric LT and also to the prevention and control of HCV infection in Egypt in order to avoid its devastating effect on the society as well as its enormous negative impact on Egypt's economy and future development.

Adolescent↗