PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Heather L Eisthen

Publications and source records attributed to Heather L Eisthen.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Terminal nerve-derived neuropeptide y modulates physiological responses in the olfactory epithelium of hungry axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum).

The vertebrate brain actively regulates incoming sensory information, effectively filtering input and focusing attention toward environmental stimuli that are most relevant to the animal's behavioral context or physiological state. Such centrifugal modulation has been shown to play an important role in processing in the retina and cochlea, but has received relatively little attention in olfaction. The terminal nerve, a cranial nerve that extends underneath the lamina propria surrounding the olfactory epithelium, displays anatomical and neurochemical characteristics that suggest that it modulates activity in the olfactory epithelium. Using immunocytochemical techniques, we demonstrate that neuropeptide Y (NPY) is abundantly present in the terminal nerve in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), an aquatic salamander. Because NPY plays an important role in regulating appetite and hunger in many vertebrates, we investigated the possibility that NPY modulates activity in the olfactory epithelium in relation to the animal's hunger level. We therefore characterized the full-length NPY gene from axolotls to enable synthesis of authentic axolotl NPY for use in electrophysiological experiments. We find that axolotl NPY modulates olfactory epithelial responses evoked by l-glutamic acid, a food-related odorant, but only in hungry animals. Similarly, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings demonstrate that bath application of axolotl NPY enhances the magnitude of a tetrodotoxin-sensitive inward current, but only in hungry animals. These results suggest that expression or activity of NPY receptors in the olfactory epithelium may change with hunger level, and that terminal nerve-derived peptides modulate activity in the olfactory epithelium in response to an animal's changing behavioral and physiological circumstances.

Ambystoma↗

Is the vomeronasal system really specialized for detecting pheromones?

Many academics, clinicians and lay readers of science incorrectly assume that vomeronasal processing is equivalent to pheromone processing. We review the abundant data concerning the roles of both the olfactory and the vomeronasal systems in the processing of both pheromones and other odorants, demonstrating that this "equivalency hypothesis" is untenable. This conclusion has important implications for the design and interpretation of experiments examining vomeronasal and olfactory system function. We describe some of the problems that arise from assuming that this equivalency holds. Two alternative hypotheses have been offered, but the available data do not enable us to accept or reject either one. Perhaps no single functional description can adequately characterize the role of the vomeronasal system.

Animals↗

Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) modulates odorant responses in the peripheral olfactory system of axolotls.

Peripheral signal modulation plays an important role in sensory processing. Activity in the vertebrate olfactory epithelium may be modulated by peptides released from the terminal nerve, such as gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). Here, we demonstrate that GnRH modulates odorant responses in aquatic salamanders (axolotls, Ambystoma mexicanum). We recorded electrical field potentials (electro-olfactograms, or EOGs) in response to stimulation with four different amino acid odorants, L-lysine, L-methionine, L-cysteine, and L-glutamic acid. EOG responses were recorded from the main olfactory epithelium before, during, and after application of 10 microM GnRH. This protocol was repeated for a total of three trials with 60-80 min between trials. The effect of GnRH on EOG responses was broadly similar across odorants and across trials. In general, EOG responses were reduced to 79% of the initial magnitude during application of GnRH; in some trials in which glutamic acid served as the odorant, EOG responses were enhanced during the wash period. Although the 4-min inter-stimulus interval did not lead to adaptation of EOG responses during the first trial, we frequently observed evidence of adaptation during the second and third trials. In addition, we found that lower concentrations of GnRH produced a smaller effect. These results demonstrate that GnRH can modulate odorant responses in the peripheral olfactory system.

Ambystoma mexicanum↗

Olfactory signal modulation by molluscan cardioexcitatory tetrapeptide (FMRFamide) in axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum).

The terminal nerve, which innervates the nasal epithelia of most jawed vertebrates, is believed to release neuropeptides that modulate activity of sensory receptor neurons. The terminal nerve usually contains gonadotropin-releasing hormone as well as at least one other peptide that has not been characterized, but which bears some structural similarity to molluscan cardioexcitatory tetrapeptide (FMRFamide) and neuropeptide tyrosine (NPY). We investigated the effects of FMRFamide on both voltage-gated currents and odorant responses in the olfactory epithelium of axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum), using whole-cell patch clamp and electro-olfactogram (EOG) recording techniques. In the presence of FMRFamide, the magnitude of a voltage-gated inward current was dramatically increased, reaching an average of 136% of the initial (pre-exposure) magnitude in neurons that showed a response to the peptide. This increase is detectable within approximately 1-2 min of exposure to FMRFamide and is sustained for at least 10 min. In EOG experiments, odorant responses are not affected during FMRFamide application, but are sometimes increased or decreased during the subsequent wash period. On average, the largest single EOG response in each trial was detected approximately 25 min after initial FMRFamide application, and ranged from 110 to 147% of baseline. These results suggest that a compound similar to FMRFamide, if released from the terminal nerve, may function in peripheral olfactory signal modulation.

Ambystoma↗

Why are olfactory systems of different animals so similar?

As we learn more about the neurobiology of olfaction, it is becoming increasingly clear that olfactory systems of animals in disparate phyla possess many striking features in common. Why? Do these features provide clues about the ways the nervous system processes olfactory information? This might be the case if these commonalities are convergent adaptations that serve similar functions, but similar features can be present in disparate animals for other reasons. For example, similar features may be present because of inheritance from a common ancestor (homology), may represent responses to similar constraints, or may be superficial or reflect strategies used by researchers studying the system. In this paper, I examine four examples of features of olfactory systems in members of different phyla: the presence of odorant binding proteins in the fluid overlying olfactory receptor neurons; the use of G protein-coupled receptors as odorant receptors; the use of a two-step pathway in the transduction of odorant signals; and the presence of glomerular neuropils in the first central target of the axons of olfactory receptor cells. I analyze data from nematodes, arthropods, molluscs, and vertebrates to investigate the phylogenetic distribution of these features, and to try to explain the presence of these features in disparate animals. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that these features are not homologous across phyla. Although these features are often interpreted as convergent adaptations, I find that alternative explanations are difficult to dismiss. In many cases, it seems that olfactory system features that are similar across phyla may reflect both responses to similar constraints and adaptations for similar tasks.

Adaptation, Physiological↗