[4th meeting in psychiatry: schizophrenias today].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Henri Lôo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recent studies of neuroplasticity in stress and depression have given rise to new hypotheses on the neural bases of these disorders. Based on data from imaging studies, cellular and molecular biology, and animal models, this approach could help to understand certain clinical findings, and especially cognitive impairments. Some antidepressants have effects on neuroplasticity, in addition to their symptomatic effects on depression.
Brain anomalies associated with schizophrenic disorders may be of a cognitive, neurophysiological or neurological nature [the latter being relatively minor and nonspecific]. Brain imaging has revealed early anomalies such as cortical-subcortical atrophy and abnormal gyration. These anomalies can also be present in relatives free of schizophrenic symptoms. This raises the question of what determines the transition from vulnerability to clinical onset. There is now evidence that schizophrenic disorders are true brain diseases. This is based on neuropathological studies, brain imaging and clinical findings such as "soft" neurological signs (pyramidal and extrapyramidal symptoms, coordination difficulties, etc.). Cognitive dysfunctions such as attention and memory disorders and abnormal verbal fluency have also been described. Oculomotor pursuit and auditive evoked potentials have identified specific neurophysiological disorders such as N300 and P50 wave modifications. Schizophrenic disorders can also be associated with neuronal abnormalities, notably affecting factors involved in synaptic transmission and plasticity. For example, BDNF protein deficit is linked to certain late-onset forms of schizophrenia. Genetic studies are no longer focusing on a possible disease genotype but rather on phenotypic characteristics determined by simpler genotypes (P50 wave modulation, COMT and BDNF genes). The ultimate objective is to identify high-risk subjects, in order to shorten the treatment delay and thereby improve long-term outcome. The benefit of primary prophylaxis remains to be determined, however.
Clinical signs and symptoms preceding the onset of dementia are sometimes acute, such as mood disorders often associated with hypochondriacal traits and cognitive slowing, sudden and serious suicide attempts, character and conduct disorders contrasting with the previous state, and psychotic disorders presenting as pathological mistrust, or ill-structured prejudice or persecution. Most forerunning symptoms reflect a progressive deterioration of cognitive functions over a long period, that have been masked by various coping strategies used by the patient with the spouse's help. Progressive cognitive deficits may develop over years before dementia can be diagnosed with confidence. Quantitative tools can help to detect dementia incipiens, such as the Folstein Mini Mental Test, the Mattis Dementia Scale, the five-word learning test, the clock drawing test, and the brief cognitive battery. The profile of early cognitive deterioration varies according to the type of dementia (Alzheimer's disease, fronto-temporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia). The symptoms of dementia may be interlinked with symptoms of other disorders. Neuropsychological tests and brain imaging are needed to validate the diagnosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The frequency of minor physical anomalies (MPAs) in patients with schizophrenia suggests an early disturbance in the development of the neuroectoderm. To improve the phenotypic delimitation of this disorder, we used a comprehensive scale of MPAs (41 items) in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives. This scale, adapted from a revised version of the Waldrop Scale (Ismail et al. Minor physical anomalies in schizophrenic patients and their siblings, American Journal of Psychiatry 155, 1998a, 1695-1702), introduced new items assessing facial and limbs asymmetry. The interrater reliability between two examiners was good: intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.68 (0.42-0.92). Patients with schizophrenia (n=40; mean=5.8, S.D.=4) and their non-psychotic parents (n=45; mean=4.7, S.D.=2.8) had significantly more MPAs than healthy comparison subjects (n=42; mean=2.2, S.D.=1.2). A logistical regression model showed the ability of several items to predict group status, including facial asymmetry, cleft palate, hair whorls and abnormal palmar crease. The high prevalence of facial asymmetry in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives provides new insights into the underlying dysembryogenic processes. This revised scale thus appears to be a useful complementary tool in pathophysiological studies aiming at the identification of developmental factors in schizophrenia.
Atypical antipsychotics offer advantages over earlier drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia, although few data exist on the relative merits of different atypical antipsychotics. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial was performed to compare amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute schizophrenia. Adult schizophrenic patients with dominant positive symptomatology received amisulpride (200-800 mg/day) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score, assessed with a non-inferiority analysis. The evolution of positive and negative symptomatology, depression, social functioning and quality of life were assessed. Safety evaluation included adverse event reporting, neurological status and body weight. The improvement of BPRS score was 32.7% in the amisulpride group and 33.0% in the olanzapine group; thus, the efficacy of amisulpride was not inferior to that of olanzapine. All other secondary efficacy outcome variables evolved to a similar extent in both groups. Adverse event frequency was similar in both groups. Amenorrhoea was encountered only in the amisulpride group (6.2% of patients), whereas elevations of liver transaminases were more frequent in the olanzapine group (17% versus 3.7% of patients). The incidence and mean extent of clinically relevant weight gain were higher in the olanzapine group (35.1% and 3.9 kg) than in the amisulpride group (20.6% and 1.6 kg). The efficacy of amisulpride is not inferior to that of olanzapine in the treatment of acute schizophrenia. The side-effect profile of the two drugs differed.
Depression is one of the most common health disorders in elderly people. It is still often considered as a natural consequence of aging, arising in reaction to a medical disease, cognitive or functional decline, or a loss of social fabric. Many studies have highlighted the low rates of diagnosis and treatment of depression, especially in the primary care setting. Major depression in old age is characterized by the same core symptoms as in other periods of life. However, aging may accentuate some symptoms and alleviate others. Somatic concern, marked anxiety, poor subjective memory, psychotic ideation, and recurrent thoughts of death can mask sadness and anhedonia. Organic factors and adverse life events are often intricately linked with the pathogenesis of depressive states in the elderly. The role of cerebrovascular lesions has also been established, particularly in late-onset depressive disorders. The management of depressive disorders in older people, as in younger adults, involves pharmacological and psychological treatments. Electroconvulsive therapy can be beneficial in some cases. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is being evaluated in this setting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% to 70% of neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenic patients are nonresponders to clozapine. Several clozapine augmentation strategies have come into clinical practice although often without evidence-based support. Among these strategies, the combined use of clozapine with another antipsychotic has been reported for up to 35% of patients receiving clozapine. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of the present work were to (1) review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of the clozapine augmentation with another antipsychotic using a MEDLINE search of the literature from 1978 to December 2005 and (2) to propose an operational definition of schizophrenia refractory to clozapine ("ultraresistant schizophrenia") for the implementation and homogenization of future therapeutic trials. CONCLUSION: Case controls and open clinical trials largely dominate the literature, and there are only 4 double-blind studies of clozapine augmentation with antipsychotics. The results of these studies are somewhat discrepant. Moreover, the heterogeneity of definitions of resistance to clozapine, of outcome measures and of dose and duration of pharmacological trials is a major limitation for drawing conclusions.
BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy without evidence-based support is sometimes needed for patients treated with 40% to 70% clozapine who are clozapine nonresponders. Several somatic augmentation strategies are proposed in the scientific literature, with different levels of evidence for safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study is to review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of clozapine augmentation with somatic agents other than antipsychotics. The following classes of agents are considered: (1) mood stabilizers, (2) antidepressants, (3) electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, (4) glutamatergic agents, (5)fatty acids supplements, and (6) benzodiazepines. RESULTS: Case controls and small-size clinical trials largely dominate the literature, limiting the power to draw conclusions concerning safety issues and the meaning of negative studies. Moreover, variable definitions of clozapine resistance, heterogeneous outcome measures, and short duration of treatment trials are additional limitations. CONCLUSION: Generally, adjunctive strategies for clozapine-resistant patients remain based on scarce evidence of efficacy and significant safety concerns. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, fatty acids supplements, and mirtazapine showed good tolerability and some efficacy, but the results need replication.