PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Henri Sunthorn

Publications and source records attributed to Henri Sunthorn.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Percutaneous ablation of atrial fibrillation: for whom and how?

Recent developments in our understanding of atrial fibrillation (AF) have focused on the key role of pulmonary vein initiators of multiple wavelet reentry in the atria. Percutaneous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is commonly performed by electrical disconnection of pulmonary vein myocardium from the left atrium. As a result, pulmonary vein foci can no longer drive the atria into fibrillation. At present, the procedure is offered to patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic agents. For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, supplementary linear lesions in the left atrium may be necessary. Success rates (AF elimination) are 90% without drugs in case of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 80% for persistent atrial fibrillation. Complications including pulmonary vein stenosis are uncommon.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

Acute pyloric spasm and gastric hypomotility: an extracardiac adverse effect of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe a new adverse effect of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Extension of the RF lesion beyond atrial myocardium may affect mediastinal structures other than the esophagus. METHODS: Circular mapping-guided isolation of the pulmonary veins was performed in two different electrophysiology laboratories, either individually and supplemented by ostial and posterior left atrial (LA) ablation or two by two with a series of ostial and posterior LA lesions. The RF energy was delivered point by point through a 5-mm open-tip irrigated catheter (40 W maximum) or an 8-mm-tip catheter (45 W maximum). RESULTS: In four (two in each electrophysiology laboratory) of 367 patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, abdominal pain and distension developed within 48 h after the procedure. Investigation showed acute pyloric spasm and gastric hypomotility, probably the result of LA endocardially delivered RF affecting the periesophageal vagi. Complete spontaneous recovery occurred in two patients, but laparoscopic esophagojejunal anastomosis and endoscopic intra-pyloric Botulinum toxin injection, respectively, were performed to remedy delayed gastric emptying in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal injury during endocardial LA RF energy delivery may extend into the mediastinum and rarely may involve the periesophageal nerves, resulting in a syndrome of acute delayed gastric emptying. Marked anatomic variability of periesophageal vagi renders it difficult to reliably avoid the area overlying this plexus, therefore, we advocate a reduction in maximum RF power and application duration on all of the posterior LA to try to avoid this complication.

Abdominal Pain↗

[Management of end-stage heart failure].

Non-medical approaches to end-stage heart failure (ESHF) include heart transplantation, but also implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy and ventricular assist devices. These techniques might be used as a bridge to transplant, as a bridge to recovery or as destination therapy. Optimal medical therapy of ESHF should include an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a beta-blocker and spironolactone. Risk stratification in ESHF allows to determine the individual prognosis of each patient with parameters such as echocardiographic criteria, peak exercise oxygen consumption, or plasma BNP levels. Heart transplantation is to be considered if the individual prognosis obtained after stratification is worse than the expected survival of transplant recipients.

Heart Failure↗

Optimizing sequential biventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography.

BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacemakers are usually programmed with the default setting of synchronous biventricular pacing, although the ventricles may be paced sequentially. Whether this parameter is important for optimizing resynchronization therapy is not clear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sequential pacing acutely improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and dyssynchrony and to assess the feasibility of nuclear ventriculography for device optimization. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients implanted with a biventricular pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for heart failure were studied. LVEF was measured using planar radionuclide ventriculography during simultaneous biventricular pacing and during sequential pacing at four different interventricular intervals ranging from LV-40 (preexciting the left ventricle by 40 ms) to LV+40 (preexciting the right ventricle). Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony were analyzed by phase analysis at each setting. RESULTS: There was great heterogeneity in individual response to VV interval programming. Twenty-four of 27 patients (89%) had significant changes (both favorable and unfavorable) in LVEF at different interventricular delays, with variations of up to 10% in absolute terms. Simultaneous biventricular pacing yielded maximal LVEF in 9 of 27 patients (33%), with a relative increase in LVEF of 18 +/- 14% by optimized sequential pacing in the remaining patients. Interventricular dyssynchrony varied significantly, with least dyssynchrony at the LV-20 setting (P = .024). There were no significant differences in intraventricular dyssynchrony at the different settings. CONCLUSION: Programming VV intervals has considerable impact on LVEF. However, there is a great degree of variation between patients in response to these settings, requiring individual assessment for device optimization.

Aged↗

Prospective study of axillary vein puncture with or without contrast venography for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation.

Axillary vein puncture may be used to implant pacemaker (PM) or cardioverter defibrillator leads, though usually requires venography. We prospectively compared punctures guided by venography versus a new radiological landmark. In 232 patients, the puncture was guided by injecting diluted contrast material via an ipsilateral peripheral vein (group A, n = 142), or without venography using the intersection of the lateral borders of the second and third rib as a radiological landmark, followed by contrast injection in case of failure (group B, n = 90). We implantated 1-3 leads per patient. In group A, implantation was successful in 135 patients (95%) and in group B in 55 patients (61%, P < 0.001 vs group A). Subsequent contrast injection allowed successful implantations in 34 of 35 patients, with an success rate of 97% for the overall study population of 224 patients. Venous access was achieved after a mean of 10.4 +/- 3.2 minutes of skin incision in group A versus 9.4 +/- 3.0 minutes in group B (ns). Pneumothorax occurred in two patients (1% overall). Thus non-contrast guided puncture using a new radiological landmark was successful in a majority of patients. This technique may be useful in absence of ipsilateral peripheral vein access, or presence of contrast allergy.

Aged↗