Biomedical subjects

Henrik Agersø

Publications and source records attributed to Henrik Agersø.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis following treatment with GnRH analogues.

AIMS: To develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis describing the changes in luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone concentrations following treatment with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist triptorelin and the GnRH receptor blocker degarelix. METHODS: Fifty-eight healthy subjects received single subcutaneous or intramuscular injections of 3.75 mg of triptorelin and 170 prostate cancer patients received multiple subcutaneous doses of degarelix of between 120 and 320 mg. All subjects were pooled for the population PK/PD data analysis. A systematic population PK/PD model-building framework using stochastic differential equations was applied to the data to identify nonlinear dynamic dependencies and to deconvolve the functional feedback interactions of the HPG axis. RESULTS: In our final PK/PD model of the HPG axis, the half-life of LH was estimated to be 1.3 h and that of testosterone 7.69 h, which corresponds well with literature values. The estimated potency of LH with respect to testosterone secretion was 5.18 IU l(-1), with a maximal stimulation of 77.5 times basal testosterone production. The estimated maximal triptorelin stimulation of the basal LH pool release was 1330 times above basal concentrations, with a potency of 0.047 ng ml(-1). The LH pool release was decreased by a maximum of 94.2% by degarelix with an estimated potency of 1.49 ng ml(-1). CONCLUSIONS: Our model of the HPG axis was able to account for the different dynamic responses observed after administration of both GnRH agonists and GnRH receptor blockers, suggesting that the model adequately characterizes the underlying physiology of the endocrine system.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗

PubMed2006

The elimination rates of intact GIP as well as its primary metabolite, GIP 3-42, are similar in type 2 diabetic patients and healthy subjects.

UNLABELLED: The incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP, previously known as gastric inhibitory polypeptide), is rapidly degraded to the biologically inactive metabolite GIP (3-42) in the circulation, but little is known about the kinetics of the intact hormone and the metabolite and whether differences exist between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy subjects. We examined eight type 2 diabetic patients (six men, two women); mean (range) age: 59 (48-69) years; BMI: 31.6 (26.0-37.7) kg/m2; HbA1C: 9.0 (8.2-13.2) %; fasting plasma glucose (FPG): 10.0 (8.3-13.2) mmol/l and 8 healthy subjects matched for age, gender and BMI. An intravenous bolus injection of GIP (7.5 nmol) was given and venous blood samples were drawn the following 45 minutes. Peak concentrations of total GIP (intact+metabolite, mean+/-SEM) and intact GIP (in brackets) were 920+/-91 (442+/-52) pmol/l in the type 2 diabetic patients and 775+/-68 (424+/-30) pmol/l in the healthy subjects (NS). GIP was eliminated rapidly with the clearance rate for intact GIP being 2.3+/-0.2 l/min in the type 2 diabetic patients and 2.4+/-0.2 l/min in the healthy subjects (NS). The volumes of distributions were similar in the two groups and ranged from 8 to 21 l per subject. The primary metabolite, GIP 3-42, generated through the action of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), was eliminated with a mean half-life of 17.5 and 20.5 min in patients and healthy subjects (NS). CONCLUSION: Elimination of GIP is similar in obese type 2 diabetic patients and matched healthy subjects. Differences in elimination of GIP and its primary metabolite, therefore, do not seem to contribute to the defective insulinotropic effect of GIP in type 2 diabetes.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modeling for degarelix, a novel gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) blocker.

An integrated semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic (PD) model describing the relationship between luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) after short-term administration of degarelix was developed. Data from three clinical studies involving, intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) dosing, in healthy male subjects were available. Degarelix pharmacokinetic (PK) data from all studies were modeled simultaneously. One intravenous study was used to develop the PD model and the two other studies (IV and SC dosing) were used to qualify the model. Degarelix PK follows a two-compartment model and exhibits flip-flop kinetics after subcutaneous dosing. Based on physiological mechanism, the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) time course was described using a pulsatile release model. A precursor-dependent pool model was used to describe the kinetics of LH in the pituitary and plasma compartment. In males, LH regulates T production in leydig cells. Degarelix inhibits the release of LH from the pool compartment to the plasma compartment leading to decreased T production. The plasma half-life of LH (2.6-3.3 hr) and T (2.7 hr) match well with the literature reports. The proposed PD model reasonably described the time course of LH and T including the LH rebound for short-term studies. The model predicted the time course of LH and T for the second IV and SC dosing studies very well. However, the long term simulations from the final model did not match with literature reports. A modification is suggested based on the physiological understanding of the system. The proposed novel modification to precursor models can be of general use for predicting long term responses.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics of desmopressin administrated as an oral lyophilisate dosage form in children with primary nocturnal enuresis and healthy adults.

The population pharmacokinetics of desmopressin in children with nocturnal enuresis and in healthy adults were compared using a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. In addition, the model consisted of a number of transit compartments before absorption to describe a lag-time. The model gave an adequate description of adult as well as children data and provided a statistically significant better fit to data than a standard lag-time model. The main difference in the pharmacokinetics between children and adults was the absorption delay. The pharmacokinetic difference was minor and presumably of no clinical relevance.

Administration, Sublingual↗

PubMed2005

Stochastic differential equations in NONMEM: implementation, application, and comparison with ordinary differential equations.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present analysis was to explore the use of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) in population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling. METHODS: The intra-individual variability in nonlinear mixed-effects models based on SDEs is decomposed into two types of noise: a measurement and a system noise term. The measurement noise represents uncorrelated error due to, for example, assay error while the system noise accounts for structural misspecifications, approximations of the dynamical model, and true random physiological fluctuations. Since the system noise accounts for model misspecifications, the SDEs provide a diagnostic tool for model appropriateness. The focus of the article is on the implementation of the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) in NONMEM for parameter estimation in SDE models. RESULTS: Various applications of SDEs in population PK/PD modeling are illustrated through a systematic model development example using clinical PK data of the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist degarelix. The dynamic noise estimates were used to track variations in model parameters and systematically build an absorption model for subcutaneously administered degarelix. CONCLUSIONS: The EKF-based algorithm was successfully implemented in NONMEM for parameter estimation in population PK/PD models described by systems of SDEs. The example indicated that it was possible to pinpoint structural model deficiencies, and that valuable information may be obtained by tracking unexplained variations in parameters.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of GnRH antagonist degarelix: a comparison of the non-linear mixed-effects programs NONMEM and NLME.

In this paper, the two non-linear mixed-effects programs NONMEM and NLME were compared for their use in population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling. We have described the first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) method as implemented in NONMEM and the alternating algorithm in NLME proposed by Lindstrom and Bates. The two programs were tested using clinical PK/PD data of a new gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist degarelix currently being developed for prostate cancer treatment. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous administered degarelix was analysed using a three compartment model while the pharmacodynamics was analysed using a turnover model with a pool compartment. The results indicated that the two algorithms produce consistent parameter estimates. The bias and precision of the two algorithms were further investigated using a parametric bootstrap procedure which showed that NONMEM produced more accurate results than NLME together with the nlmeODE package for this specific study.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Non-linear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in NLME using differential equations.

The standard software for non-linear mixed-effect analysis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data is NONMEM while the non-linear mixed-effects package NLME is an alternative as long as the models are fairly simple. We present the nlmeODE package which combines the ordinary differential equation (ODE) solver package odesolve and the non-linear mixed effects package NLME thereby enabling the analysis of complicated systems of ODEs by non-linear mixed-effects modelling. The pharmacokinetics of the anti-asthmatic drug theophylline is used to illustrate the applicability of the nlmeODE package for population PK/PD analysis using the available data analysis tools in R for model inspection and validation. The nlmeODE package is numerically stable and provides accurate parameter estimates which are consistent with NONMEM estimates.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of a subcutaneous depot for GnRH antagonist degarelix.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that describes the subcutaneous (SC) depot formation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist degarelix, which is being developed for treatment of prostate cancer, exhibiting dose-volume and dose-concentration dependent absorption. METHODS: The PK analysis is made in NONMEM through joint analysis of data from two phase I clinical studies; an intravenous infusion study and a single SC dose escalation study. The SC absorption is modeled using an approximation to Ficks' second law of diffusion out of a spherical depot. The dose-volume effect on the SC release is estimated using a B-spline basis whereas the bioavailability is modeled as a function of the dose-concentration. RESULTS: The SC depot model is approximated by using two concentric spherical compartments for the SC absorption combined with a two-compartment disposition model. The results indicate that the volume effect is most apparent at low injection volumes whereas the effect is diminishing at higher injection volumes. The dose-concentration effect on the bioavailability is estimated to decrease at increasing dose-concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The presented SC depot model describes the PK profile of GnRH antagonist degarelix. This modeling approach might also be applicable for other depot-formulated drugs exhibiting complex PK profiles.

Delayed-Action Preparations↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetics and renal excretion of desmopressin after intravenous administration to healthy subjects and renally impaired patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of desmopressin. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects were enrolled in the study, 18 with varying degrees of renal impairment and six healthy volunteers. Each subject received a single intravenous dose of 2 microg desmopressin. Blood and urine samples were collected for 24 h and assayed for desmopressin by radioimmunoassay. Plasma concentrations and the amounts of desmopressin excreted in the urine were analysed simultaneously by use of mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: Only mild adverse events were observed. Both the renal and the nonrenal clearance of desmopressin were found to vary with the creatinine clearance (CrCL). A decrease of 1.67% in the CrCL (corresponding to 1 ml min(-1) from 60 ml min(-1)) was found to cause a 1.74% decrease in the renal clearance and a 0.93% decrease in the nonrenal clearance. The fall in renal clearance caused the amount of desmopressin excreted in urine to decrease from 47% in healthy subjects to 21% in the patients with severe renal impairment. The mean systemic clearance of desmopressin was 10 litres h(-1) in healthy subjects and 2.9 litres h(-1) in patients with severe renal impairment (difference -7.5 litres h(-1), 95% CI [-11; -4.3] litres h(-1)). Correspondingly, the mean terminal half-life, was 3.7 h in healthy subjects and 10 h in patients with severe renal impairment (difference 6.7 h, 95% CI [4.0; 9.4] h). CONCLUSION: Although desmopressin appears to be safe and well-tolerated by patients with impaired renal function, great caution should be exercised when titrating towards an efficient dosage regimen if patients with moderately or severely impaired renal function are to be treated with desmopressin at all.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

The dosing solution influence on the pharmacokinetics of degarelix, a new GnRH antagonist, after s.c. administration to beagle dogs.

OBJECTIVE: Degarelix (FE200486) is a new GnRH-receptor antagonist intended for the treatment of prostate cancer. The objective of the present analysis was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of degarelix after subcutaneous (s.c.) and intra-muscular (i.m.) administration to male beagle dogs, and to determine the influence of the different dosing conditions on the absorption profile of degarelix. METHODS: Degarelix was administered to 27 dogs and plasma concentrations were measured. The dosing conditions varied with respect to route (s.c. or i.m.), dose (0.25-1.5 mg/kg), solution strength (1.25-40 mg/ml) and volume administered (0.15-2.9 ml). Data were analysed by use of non-linear mixed effect modelling to characterize the pharmacokinetics, in particular the relationship between dosing conditions and rate, and extent of absorption. RESULTS: After s.c. and i.m. administration of degarelix, the plasma concentration versus time profile was best described by applying a two-compartment model, with two input functions: a fast first-order input function to describe the rapid initial increase in the plasma concentration levels, and a slow first-order input function to describe the prolonged absorption profile of degarelix. Intra-muscular as opposed to s.c. administration led to a more rapid absorption of degarelix, reaching a mean maximum concentration of 64 and 31 ng/ml roughly 2.0 and 3.7 h after administration, respectively. The slow absorption half-life was found to be 268 h ( approximately 11 days). The relative fraction absorbed was found to vary with the concentration of the dosing solution. The present analysis suggested that the absorbed fraction was reduced by approximately 50% when the concentration in dosing solution was increased from 1.25 to 40 mg/ml. The rate of the initial absorption component was also dependent on the concentration in the dosing solution, with slower absorption at higher concentrations. CONCLUSION: Through varying the dosing conditions and by applying a joint analysis of all data, the important factors determining the complex absorption of degarelix could be described.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Pharmacodynamics of NN2211, a novel long acting GLP-1 derivative.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of NN2211, a GLP-1 derivative, on glucose and insulin homeostasis in healthy volunteers by use of a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. DESIGN: NN2211 is a GLP-1 derivative intended for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In the present study, eight dose levels of NN2211 were tested in healthy human volunteers. Since NN2211 is only intended to have an effect when glucose levels are above baseline (thus limiting the risk of hypoglycaemia), no effects would be expected in healthy volunteers. In order to demonstrate effect in a phase 1 study including only healthy subjects, a glucose dose was administered i.v. 9 h after NN2211 dosing; the insulin response would then be expected to be improved (higher) in the subjects dosed with NN2211. METHODS: In the present work, the pharmacodynamic glucose and insulin response was modeled by fitting glucose and insulin data simultaneously with a nonlinear model incorporating known carbohydrate regulation mechanisms. After an initial model-building phase, the first-order approximation to the likelihood available in NONMEM was used to model the data. Placebo-dosed subjects were included in the analysis. RESULTS: It was possible to satisfactorily fit both insulin and glucose data simultaneously. The analysis demonstrated a dose proportional effect of NN2211 on the parameters controlling beta cell insulin secretion.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new formulation of recombinant human growth hormone administered by ZomaJet 2 Vision, a new needle-free device, compared to subcutaneous administration using a conventional syringe.

The objective of the present study was to investigate the applicability of a new human growth hormone (Zomacton) formulation, administered both by a conventional syringe and by a new needle-free device (ZomaJet 2 Vision). The study was performed according to a randomized, controlled, three-period crossover design. On 3 separate days, all subjects received in a random order a single subcutaneous injection of 1.67 mg hGH as follows: Zomacton 4 mg/ml conventional syringe administration (Treatment A), Zomacton 10 mg/ml conventional syringe administration (Treatment B), or Zomacton 10 mg/ml ZomaJet 2 Vision administration (Treatment C). The pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for the individual subjects in each group by noncompartmental methods. Bioequivalence was assessed based on log-transformed AUC and C(max) values. To investigate the effectiveness of two formulations and the different administration methods, the pharmacodynamic parameters (insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1] and free fatty acids [FFA]) were also evaluated. No subjects were withdrawn due to adverse events. The local tolerance assessment (assessed by inspection)revealed no differences between ZomaJet2 Vision application and conventional injections by syringe. Administration of the new hGH formulation by syringe was found to be bioequivalent with the reference treatment, both based on AUC and C(max) values; the new formulation administered by use of ZomaJet 2 Vision was found to be bioequivalent based on AUC values only. When using the ZomaJet 2 Vision, the absorption of hGH was faster, resulting in higher C(max) values. The maximum hGH serum concentration of around 20 ng/ml was observed 3.5 to 4 hours after drug administration. The terminal half-life was found to be around 2.5 hours. Comparison of the pharmacodynamic profiles (both IGF-1 and FFA) demonstrated bioequieffectiveness. These results support the use of jet injectors as a viable alternative to the traditional injection pens.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Bedtime administration of NN2211, a long-acting GLP-1 derivative, substantially reduces fasting and postprandial glycemia in type 2 diabetes.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a potent glucose-lowering agent of potential interest for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. To evaluate actions of NN2211, a long-acting GLP-1 derivative, we examined 11 patients with type 2 diabetes, age 59 +/- 7 years (mean +/- SD), BMI 28.9 +/- 3.0 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) 6.5 +/- 0.6%, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. A single injection (10 microg/kg) of NN2211 was administered at 2300 h, and profiles of circulating insulin, C-peptide, glucose, and glucagon were monitored during the next 16.5 h. A standardized mixed meal was served at 1130 h. Efficacy analyses were performed for the fasting (7-8 h) and mealtime (1130-1530 h) periods. Insulin secretory rates (ISR) were estimated by C-peptide deconvolution analysis. Glucose pulse entrainment (6 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) every 10 min) was evaluated by 1-min sampled measurements of insulin concentrations from 0930 to 1030 h and subsequent time series analysis of the insulin concentration profiles. All results are given as NN2211 versus placebo; statistical analyses were performed by analysis of variance. In the fasting state, plasma glucose was significantly reduced (6.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.0 mmol/l; P = 0.004), ISR was increased (179 +/- 70 vs. 163 +/- 66 pmol/min; P = 0.03), and plasma glucagon was unaltered (19 +/- 4 vs. 20 +/- 4 pg/ml; P = 0.17) by NN2211. Meal-related area under the curve (AUC)(1130-1530 h) for glucose was markedly reduced (30.6 +/- 2.4 vs. 39.9 +/- 7.3 mmol x l(-1) x h(-1); P < 0.001), ISR AUC(1130-1530 h) was unchanged (118 +/- 32 vs. 106 +/- 27 nmol; P = 0.13), but the increment (relative to premeal values) was increased (65 +/- 22 vs. 45 +/- 11 nmol; P = 0.04). Glucagon AUC(1130-1530 h) was suppressed (77 +/- 18 vs. 82 +/- 17 pmol x l(-1) x h(-1); P = 0.04). Gastric emptying was significantly delayed as assessed by AUC(1130-1530 h) of 3-ortho-methylglucose (400 +/- 84 vs. 440 +/- 70 mg x l(-1) x h(-1); P = 0.02). During pulse entrainment, there was a tendency to increased high frequency regularity of insulin release as measured by a greater spectral power and autocorrelation coefficient (0.05 < P < 0.10). The pharmacokinetic profile of NN2211, as assessed by blood samplings for up to 63 h postdosing, was as follows: T(1/2) = 10.0 +/- 3.5 h and T(max) = 12.4 +/- 1.7 h. Two patients experienced gastrointestinal side effects on the day of active treatment. In conclusion, the long-acting GLP-1 derivative NN2211 effectively reduces fasting as well as meal-related (approximately 12 h postadministration) glycemia by modifying insulin secretion, delaying gastric emptying, and suppressing prandial glucagon secretion.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of a single-dose of NN2211, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 derivative, in healthy male subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the present study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of NN2211, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) derivative, in healthy male subjects. The secondary objective was to investigate the pharmacodynamics of NN2211. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized dose, escalation, placebo-controlled study, healthy male subjects were enrolled at eight consecutive dose levels (1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, 17.5, and 20.0 microg/kg) with eight subjects per dose level at a 3:1 active:placebo randomization. After subcutaneous dosing with NN2211, 48-h pharmacokinetic, and 24-h glucose, insulin and glucagon profiles were assessed. In addition, three subjects at each dose level were randomly assigned (one placebo/two active) to an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) 9 h after the dose (corresponding to the time to maximal plasma concentration of NN2211). RESULTS: After subcutaneous administration, the half-life of NN2211 was found to be 11-15 h. Overall, although there were no statistically significant differences compared with placebo in the area under the curve (0-9 h for insulin or glucagon), there was a borderline- significant lowering of glucose levels (P = 0.066). During the IVGTT, there was a statistically significant increase in insulin secretion (P = 0.0002), but there was no significant effect on glucagon levels. Although no significant effect was observed on glucose levels during the IVGTT, there was a dose-dependent increase in the glucose disappearance constant. Whereas no serious adverse events were observed, there was a higher incidence of adverse events after active treatment compared with placebo treatment (notably headache, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that NN2211 has a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with once-daily dosing in humans.

Adolescent↗