PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Henry Cohen

Publications and source records attributed to Henry Cohen.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering--morning versus evening statin administration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best time to administer statins for optimal lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by reviewing the clinical evidence evaluating the chronobiologic effects of morning versus evening statin administration. DATA SOURCES: Using the MeSH terms HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, statins, morning and evening dosing, and clinical trials, a literature review was conducted to identify articles in MEDLINE (1966-December 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 2006), and IOWA Drug Information Systems (1985-December 2006). DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven English-language studies evaluating morning and evening statin administration were identified and evaluated. Based on the available data, simvastatin demonstrated a pronounced LDL-C percentage reduction with evening dosing. Although not statistically significant, a trend in the LDL-C percentage reduction favoring evening statin administration was noted with lovastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin. Atorvastatin demonstrated similar LDL-C reduction regardless of administration time. With the exception of simvastatin, the trials comparing morning versus evening effects of statins on LDL-C have several significant methodologic shortcomings, including small sample size, lack of statistical power, and inappropriate exclusion criteria that did not include or did not mention drug-induced effects on lipids. CONCLUSIONS: There are sufficient data to support evening administration of simvastatin to achieve optimal lowering of LDL-C levels. Rigorous and robust trials are necessary to determine the best administration time to achieve optimal LDL-C lowering for lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and fluvastatin.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2006

How to write a patient case report.

PURPOSE: Guidelines for writing patient case reports, with a focus on medication-related reports, are provided. SUMMARY: The format of a patient case report encompasses the following five sections: an abstract, an introduction and objective that contain a literature review, a description of the case report, a discussion that includes a detailed explanation of the literature review, a summary of the case, and a conclusion. The abstract of a patient case report should succinctly include the four sections of the main text of the report. The introduction section should provide the subject, purpose, and merit of the case report. It must explain why the case report is novel or merits review, and it should include a comprehensive literature review that corroborates the author's claims. The case presentation section should describe the case in chronological order and in enough detail for the reader to establish his or her own conclusions about the case's validity. The discussion section is the most important section of the case report. It ought to evaluate the patient case for accuracy, validity, and uniqueness; compare and contrast the case report with the published literature; derive new knowledge; summarize the essential features of the report; and draw recommendations. The conclusion section should be brief and provide a conclusion with evidence-based recommendations and applicability to practice. CONCLUSION: Patient case reports are valuable resources of new and unusual information that may lead to vital research.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

An evidence-based, Latin-American consensus on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

In recognition of the high prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and its importance in Latin America, the InterAmerican Association of Gastroenterology and the InterAmerican Society of Digestive Endoscopy organized a Latin-American Consensus on GORD in Cancun, Mexico in September 2004. The main objectives of the consensus meeting were to provide evidence-based guidance with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of GORD, relevant to all countries in the region. The methodology, results and recommendations of the consensus are described in detail.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effects of morning versus evening administration of atorvastatin in patients with hyperlipidemia.

PURPOSE: The effects of morning versus evening administration of atorvastatin in hyperlipidemic patients were studied. METHODS: Patients whose care was managed by a teaching hospital run by the Department of Veterans Affairs who were prescribed atorvastatin calcium 40 mg p.o. daily by their primary care physician were interviewed by a clinical pharmacist in the ambulatory care clinic for study enrollment. Patients were excluded if they had diseases or conditions or took medication known to affect serum lipoprotein levels, as were patients who consumed more than three alcoholic drinks per day and those who could not verify the time of atorvastatin administration. Blood samples were collected after a 12-hour fasting period and serum lipoprotein levels were measured at baseline and after four weeks. RESULTS: Of the 204 hyperlipidemic patients receiving atorvastatin, 64 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study, 32 of whom took the drug in the morning (before noon) and an equal number who took the drug at night (after 6 p.m. but before midnight). All patients were male outpatients with a mean +/- S.D. age of 57.8 +/- 7.8 years and 58.5 +/- 7.8 years for the morning and evening administration groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences in lipid values measured were found between the morning and evening administration group after four weeks. CONCLUSION: Changes in the levels of total cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol were similar among hyperlipidemic patients receiving atorvastatin calcium 40 mg, regardless of the time of day the drug was administered.

Atorvastatin↗
PubMed2004

Bosentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

PURPOSE: The etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and manifestations of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are described, and the role of bosentan in the management of PAH is reviewed. SUMMARY: The incidence of primary pulmonary hypertension, a subcategory of PAH, is estimated to be one to two new cases per million people annually in the general population. PAH has definitively been linked with several appetite suppressants. Disease-induced causes of PAH include connective tissue diseases, portal hypertension or liver disease, and human immunodeficiency virus infection. The clinical diagnosis of early PAH is difficult because its symptoms are nonspecific. Exertional dyspnea, the most common symptom of PAH, occurs in 60% of patients and indicates a severely compromised cardiac output. Three dependent elements are integral to the development of elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure and PAH: vascular wall remodeling, thrombosis in situ, and vasoconstriction. Bosentan undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism. Bosentan-induced hepatotoxicity is common and must be monitored carefully throughout therapy. Since PAH is common in women of childbearing age, the use of bosentan in these patients requires careful review. Limited data exist on the use of bosentan in children, but one small study found that treatment with the drug resulted in hemodynamic improvement for pediatric patients with PAH. CONCLUSION: Prostacyclin analogues are the most effective agents for managing PAH, but their use is hampered by the need for parenteral therapy. Oral bosentan is a novel treatment alternative for patients with PAH. Further trials are necessary to determine bosentan's onset of action, consistency, durability, and magnitude of effect in different populations with PAH and its impact on survival.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2003

Leptomeningeal dissemination at diagnosis of pediatric low-grade neuroepithelial tumors.

The goal of this study was to describe the demographic, histologic, and prognostic features of children with low-grade neuroepithelial tumors (LGN) of the CNS presenting with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) at diagnosis. We identified 528 newly diagnosed LGN children, 13 (3%) of whom had LM at diagnosis. LM was defined by neuroimaging, clinical evidence, and/or biopsy. The charts were reviewed and patients contacted to validate the demographic data, treatment, and clinical status. The distribution of LM patients by primary tumor site was diencephalon, 5; cerebrum, 2; spinal cord, 3; brainstem, 2; and cerebellum, 1. Six of 8 patients with LM had durable objective responses to chemotherapy. The 5-year progression-free survival of patients with LM at diagnosis was 17%, compared to 85% (95% CI, 80%-91%) for those with localized LGN who had a gross total resection and 51% (95% CI, 44%-52%) for those with localized LGN who had less aggressive surgery ( P < 0.0001). Only 1 of these 13 LM patients died. The 5-year overall survival of the localized LGN group with a gross total resection was 97% (95% CI, 92%-99.9%), and that of the localized LGN group with less aggressive surgery was 88% (95% CI, 84%-95%) ( P = 0.004). The 3% frequency of LM at diagnosis is likely an underestimate since patients with newly diagnosed LGN were not routinely staged. We suggest that staging be considered in the following circumstances: diencephalic primary site, unexplained hydrocephalus, clinical features suggestive of LM, and before adjuvant therapy is initiated. The prognosis for children with LM at diagnosis is favorable, and its identification alters therapeutic strategies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Tenascin-C promotes microvascular cell migration and phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase.

Enhanced expression of tenascin-C (TN-C) at the invasive edges of glioblastoma multiforme in close association with vascular sprouts, suggests a role for TN-C in microvascular cell migration. To test this hypothesis, we studied the migration of endothelial cells in vitro. In an aggregate migration assay, bovine retinal endothelial cells (BRECs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells spread and migrated similarly on TN-C or fibronectin (FN). In contrast, U251 MG glioma cells migrated less on TN-C than on FN. Morphological features of U251 MG glioma cells on TN-C included poor cell spreading and short processes. In contrast, on FN, U251 MG glioma cells spread and exhibited long radial processes. Using a transmembrane migration assay, we observed that BREC adhesion was similar on TN-C or FN, whereas U251 MG glioma cells adhered better to FN than to TN-C. In addition, BRECs migrated more across the membrane toward regions coated with TN-C than FN, and conversely, U251 MG glioma cells migrated more toward FN than TN-C. Migration of endothelial and glioma cells toward TN-C or FN occurred in a dose-dependent manner and was strongly dependent on cell adhesion. In this assay, ultrastructural study revealed the migrating phenotype of the endothelial cells through the micropores of the membrane and their spread morphology on TN-C. Moreover, in situ hybridization revealed specific expression of TN-C in migrating microvascular cells in a cerebral microvascular ring assay. Finally in a phosphorylation assay, TN-C enhanced focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation of BRECs, but not of U251 MG glioma cells, and FN enhanced focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation of both BRECs and U251 MG cells. The expression of TN-C by migrating endothelial cells and the promotion of endothelial cell adhesion and migration by TN-C suggest a potential role for TN-C in pathological angiogenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

A randomized clinical trial of nebulized magnesium sulfate in addition to albuterol in the treatment of acute mild-to-moderate asthma exacerbations in adults.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) plus albuterol with that of albuterol alone in adult patients with mild-to-moderate acute asthma exacerbations. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive nebulized MgSO(4) (384 mg in 6 mL of sterile water) or an equal volume of placebo (normal saline solution) in a double-blind fashion after each dose of nebulized albuterol administered (2.5 mg/3 mL) every 20 minutes for the first hour of the study. Spirometry was performed at baseline and every 20 minutes for 2 hours. Monitoring for safety included vital signs, pulse oximetry, and serum magnesium levels. Improvement in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was chosen as a primary efficacy end point. RESULTS: Among 74 patients enrolled, 37 were randomized to each of 2 study groups. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the 2 study groups in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second at any point during the trial or overall. There were no significant differences in vital signs, pulse oximetry, or serum magnesium levels at any point during the study. CONCLUSION: The combination of nebulized MgSO(4) and albuterol provides no benefit in addition to that provided by therapy with albuterol in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma exacerbations. The efficacy of nebulized MgSO(4) in patients with severe asthma exacerbations remains unknown.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Strategies to optimize drotrecogin alfa (activated) use: guidelines and therapeutic controversies.

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) is a new agent that may substantially affect the treatment of patients with severe sepsis. Despite its therapeutic promise, treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated) represents a new challenge for many clinicians and health care centers. Specifically, optimizing the appropriate role for drotrecogin alfa (activated) requires balancing numerous issues, including its efficacy in high-risk patients with its potential for indiscriminate administration. One common approach to minimizing indiscriminate administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) and maximizing its efficacy while minimizing its toxicity is for hospitals to develop therapeutic guidelines that define how the agent should be used. We outline factors that should be considered when developing drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy guidelines and address realistic questions that routinely arise in clinical practice regarding the implementation of such guidelines and the administration of this product. In general, the guidelines must facilitate optimization of drug therapy and not be viewed as hurdles to drug therapy Developing clear guidelines that are based on evidence, outlining a specific process to facilitate optimal therapy, and educating all parties involved are paramount to ensuring that the benefits of therapy are maximized.

APACHE↗