PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Henryk Faas

Publications and source records attributed to Henryk Faas.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Dynamic imaging with MRI contrast agents: quantitative considerations.

Time-resolved MRI has had enormous impact in cognitive science and may become a significant tool in basic biological research with the application of new molecular imaging agents. In this paper, we examine the temporal characteristics of MRI contrast agents that could be used in dynamic studies. We consider "smart" T1 contrast agents, T2 agents based on reversible aggregation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles and sensors that produce changes in saturation transfer effects (chemical exchange saturation transfer, CEST). We discuss response properties of several agents with reference to available experimental data, and we develop a new theoretical model that predicts the response rates and relaxivity changes of aggregation-based sensors. We also perform calculations to define the extent to which constraints on temporal resolution are imposed by the imaging methods themselves. Our analysis confirms that some small T1 agents may be compatible with MRI temporal resolution on the order of 100 ms. Nanoparticle aggregation T2 sensors are applicable at much lower concentrations, but are likely to respond on a single second or slower timescale. CEST agents work at high concentrations and temporal resolutions of 1-10 s, limited by a requirement for long presaturation periods in the MRI pulse sequence.

Brain Mapping↗

Effect of ingestion order of the fat component of a solid meal on intragastric fat distribution and gastric emptying assessed by MRI.

PURPOSE: To develop an MRI technique to investigate how varying the ingestion order of nonfat and fat components of a solid meal influences three-dimensional intragastric distribution and gastric emptying (GE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were studied twice in randomized order. On one occasion (condition F-NF), the fat component (40 g mayonnaise on toast) was served before the nonfat component (270 g pasta, 200 g tomato sauce, 100 mL water); on the other (condition NF-F), the ingestion order was reversed. GE and intragastric distribution of both components were assessed by MRI for 180 minutes. RESULTS: During condition F-NF, GE of fat was significantly faster than during condition NF-F (T(25) [min]: F-NF: 20 +/- 9; NF-F: 40 +/- 7; P < 0.05), a larger amount of fat was observed in the antrum during condition F-NF, and more fat layering occurred. No differences were observed in total GE between the two conditions. CONCLUSION: Meal ingestion order influences GE and intragastric distribution of fat, which can be assessed by MRI techniques, providing new insights into the physiology of gastric processing and intragastric distribution of different meal phases.

Adult↗