Biomedical subjects

Herbert Hagendorf

Publications and source records attributed to Herbert Hagendorf.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.

We quantified the interference of distracter stimuli on sustained visuo-spatial attention as a function of the distribution of attended positions in the visual fields (bilateral/unilateral, left/right, upper/lower), distracter positions (peripheral, between attended positions, between fixation and attended positions) and task difficulty. Compared to distinct distracter positions, bilateral field and lower field presentation had much stronger influence on the performance. Additionally, interactive effects between task difficulty and distracter position were found. This result was at variance with the previous models of visuo-spatial attention, which attached much more importance to the role of distracter positions compared to visual field effects. In directly comparing the impact of the abovementioned factors, the converse finding is evident-visual field effects, in particular bilateral presentations have a much stronger importance. Moreover, metaphoric concepts of attention like the "zoom lens" are not compatible with these results. The findings are discussed in the light of alternative models of sustained visuo-spatial attention. The visual system architecture and top-down mechanisms are considered.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.

In a location-based negative priming paradigm, the possibility of a disengagement option of the underlying inhibitory mechanism was tested. Whereas in previous studies disengagement was observed when providing utility information about the probe trial structure, in the present study the allocation of visual attention to the stimuli was manipulated. In the first step an automatic deployment of visual attention was implemented by presenting all stimuli as abrupt onsets (Experiment 1), which demonstrated commonly observed negative priming effects. In further conditions of non-automatic allocation of visual attention in which target and distractor were presented as no-onset stimuli, negative priming effects were eliminated (Experiments 2 and 3). The preferred interpretation is that in conditions of automatic control of attention, target and distractor compete for control of action. A non-automatic control of visual attention, on the other hand, leads to a top-down modulated selection, which results in prioritized target encoding and a loss of distractor impact on the selection process. Alternative accounts and the role of no-onset distractor processing were investigated in Experiment 4.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

fMRI localizer technique: efficient acquisition and functional properties of single retinotopic positions in the human visual cortex.

Current fMRI retinotopic mapping procedures often use checkerboard stimuli consisting of expanding rings and rotating wedges to measure the topography within human visual areas. Efficient procedures are well described in the literature. For many experimental paradigms, e.g., visuo-spatial attention paradigms, the identification of task-relevant positions is the only mandatory prerequisite. To define these specific "regions-of-interest" (ROIs), spatially defined localizers are used. A precise evaluation of localizer techniques in regard to efficient scanning time, optimal BOLD (blood oxygenic level dependent) response, as well as quantification of the resulting ROIs within each visual area (size, overlap, surround effects) has not been studied to date. Here, we suggest a mapping procedure designed to quantify spatial and functional properties of single positions at close proximity in multiple human visual areas. During a passive viewing task, various stimuli (e.g., checkerboards or colored objects) subtending 1.4 degrees of visual angle were presented at one out of four positions in a randomized block design. We measured the degree of overlap between positions at different hierarchical levels of the visual system (V1-V4v) and quantified modulatory effects on a specific position by stimulation at neighboring (1.7 degrees spacing) or distant positions (5.1 degrees or 8.5 degrees spacing). Within each visual area, "mexican-hat" distributions of local signal intensity changes, which describe a particular combination of facilitatory and suppressive effects, were found. Cubic fitting revealed the most localized tuning effect in V1, which gradually decreased throughout the higher visual areas. Colored objects were most efficient in localizing circumscribed retinotopic positions in both early and higher areas.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.

Whether attention can be split between multiple regions in space simultaneously is an ongoing controversy in attention research. We argue that the debate could be resolved if the distribution of target locations over hemifields and task difficulty are both considered. This premise was tested in five experiments in which 48 subjects compared the identity of two out of four stimuli. In an easy task, within each hemifield, performance (reaction times and error rates) was better for adjacent targets than for separated ones, but across hemifields, performance for separated and adjacent stimuli was similar. In difficult tasks, performance was always better when the stimuli were presented across the hemifields indicating a bilateral field advantage. Moreover, the difference between adjacent and separate conditions within one hemifield diminished with increasing task difficulty. We propose a modified model of visuo-spatial attention, which permits the hemispheres to maintain and control simultaneous attentional foci.

Adult↗