PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hermann B Frieboes

Publications and source records attributed to Hermann B Frieboes.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

An integrated computational/experimental model of tumor invasion.

The intracellular and extracellular dynamics that govern tumor growth and invasiveness in vivo remain poorly understood. Cell genotype and phenotype, and nutrient, oxygen, and growth factor concentrations are key variables. In previous work, using a reaction-diffusion mathematical model based on variables that directly describe tumor cell cycle and biology, we formulated the hypothesis that tumor morphology is determined by the competition between heterogeneous cell proliferation caused by spatial diffusion gradients, e.g., of cell nutrients, driving shape instability and invasive tumor morphologies, and stabilizing mechanical forces, e.g., cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix adhesion. To test this hypothesis, we here obtain variable-based statistics for input to the mathematical model from in vitro human and rat glioblastoma cultures. A linear stability analysis of the model predicts that glioma spheroid morphology is marginally stable. In agreement with this prediction, for a range of variable values, unbounded growth of the tumor mass and invasion of the environment are observed in vitro. The mechanism of invasion is recursive subspheroid component development at the tumor viable rim and separation from the parent spheroid. Results of computer simulations of the mathematical model closely resemble the morphologies and spatial arrangement of tumor cells from the in vitro model. We propose that tumor morphogenesis in vivo may be a function of marginally stable environmental conditions caused by spatial variations in cell nutrients, oxygen, and growth factors, and that controlling these conditions by decreasing spatial gradients could benefit treatment outcomes, whereas current treatment, and especially antiangiogenic therapy, may trigger spatial heterogeneity (e.g., local hypoxia), thus causing invasive instability.

Animals↗

Mathematical modeling of cancer progression and response to chemotherapy.

The complex, constantly evolving and multifaceted nature of cancer has made it difficult to identify unique molecular and pathophysiological signatures for each disease variant, consequently hindering development of effective therapies. Mathematical modeling and computer simulation are tools that can provide a robust framework to better understand cancer progression and response to chemotherapy. Successful therapeutic agents must overcome biological barriers occurring at multiple space and time scales and still reach targets at sufficient concentrations. A multiscale computer simulator founded on the integration of experimental data and mathematical models can provide valuable insights into these processes and establish a technology platform for analyzing the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic drugs, with the potential to cost-effectively and efficiently screen drug candidates during the drug-development process.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Morphologic instability and cancer invasion.

PURPOSE: A solid tumor embedded in host tissue is a three-dimensional arrangement of cells and extracellular matrix that acts as a sink of oxygen and cell nutrients, thus establishing diffusional gradients. This and variations in vascular density and blood flow typically produce intratumoral regions of hypoxia and acidosis, and may result in spatially heterogeneous cell proliferation and migration. Here, we formulate the hypothesis that through these mechanisms, microenvironmental substrate gradients may drive morphologic instability with separation of cell clusters from the tumor edge and infiltration into surrounding normal tissue. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used computer simulations and in vitro experiments. RESULTS: We provide evidence that morphologic instability could be suppressed in vivo by spatially homogeneous oxygen and nutrient supply because normoxic conditions act both by decreasing gradients and increasing cell adhesion and, therefore, the mechanical forces that maintain a well-defined tumor boundary. A properly working tumor microvasculature can help maintain compact noninfiltrating tumor morphologies by minimizing oxygen and nutrient gradients. In contrast, antiangiogenic therapy, by increasing microenvironmental heterogeneity, may promote morphologic instability, leading to invasive patterns even under conditions in which the overall tumor mass shrinks. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that therapeutic strategies focused solely on reduction of vascular density may paradoxically increase invasive behavior. This theoretical model accounts for the highly variable outcome of antiangiogenic therapy in multiple clinical trials. We propose that antiangiogenic strategies will be more consistently successful when aimed at "normalizing" the vasculature and when combined with therapies that increase cell adhesion so that morphologic instability is suppressed and compact, noninvasive tumor morphologies are enforced.

Antineoplastic Agents↗