10th Summit Meeting consensus: recommendations for regulatory approval for hormonal male contraception.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Hermann M Behre.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the present study, we employed 2-DE to characterize the effect of the acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)-specific PML-RARalpha fusion protein on the proteome. Differentially expressed proteins, a number of which are related to the cell cycle function, including oncoprotein18 (OP18), heat shock protein70, glucose-regulated protein75, and peptidyl-prolyl isomerase, were identified by MS. Subsequent bioinformatic pathway discovery revealed an integrated network constituting SMARCB1, MYC, and TP53-regulated pathways. The data from the DNA microarray and proteomic experiments demonstrated the correlation between the translocation and higher expression of OP18 at mRNA and protein levels. Transient cotransfection assay revealed that PML-RARalpha is a potent activator of OP18 promoter and this transcriptional activation is retinoic acid sensitive. PML-RARalpha induction also leads to decreased phosphorylation on Ser63 residue of OP18, which is okadaic acid sensitive suggesting the involvement of a phosphatase pathway. Overexpression of a constitutively phosphorylated Ser63 mutant of OP18 in PML-RARalpha expressing APL patient, PR9, and NB4 cells led to a G2/M-phase arrest in contrast to a phosphorylation-deficient Ser63 mutant and untransfected control. Taken together, our results demonstrate the significance of decreased Ser63 phosphorylation of OP18 in PML-RARalpha-mediated effects on cell cycle.
PURPOSE: To study effects of endogenous LH levels on ovarian response and outcome in ART cycles a controlled study was performed with two patient groups differing in the intensity of pituitary downregulation. METHODS: Group I (n = 27) received 3.75 mg of the GnRH agonist triptorelin acetate depot, group II (n = 54) was given 0.1 mg triptorelin acetate daily, followed by ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH. RESULTS: After downregulation serum LH and FSH levels were significantly lower in group I. Patients of group I needed significantly higher FSH doses to achieve comparable levels of serum estradiol and preovulatory follicles. The number of retrieved oocytes and transferable embryos was lower in group I. CONCLUSION: Patients with profound endogenous LH suppression by depot GnRH agonists show higher FSH stimulation dose requirements and lower oocyte number and fertilization rate, indicating a need for minimal LH activity in folliculogenesis and oocyte development.
Tailoring ovarian stimulation to the individual patient can be challenging because the ovarian response varies substantially between patients. Pharmacogenetics has emerged as a new area of research to improve the balance between desired and undesired actions of drugs, based upon the genetic predisposition of the individual patient. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the p.N680S polymorphism of the FSH-receptor gene determines the ovarian response to FSH stimulation in patients undergoing IVF. In homozygous Ser(680)/Ser(680) type women, the FSH receptor appears to be more resistant to FSH action even in normal menstrual cycles. Therefore, genotyping of patients scheduled for ovarian stimulation could be an attractive tool to individualize FSH dosing according to genetic differences in ovarian sensitivity. More clinical studies are warranted to investigate the usefulness of genotyping for the p.N680S polymorphism as a routine diagnostic test before ovarian stimulation.
The p.N680S sequence variation of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor gene was previously shown to influence the ovarian response to FSH in normo-ovulatory women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, we tested whether the same daily dose of FSH results in lower levels of oestradiol in women homozygous for the p.N680S sequence variation, and whether the difference can be overcome by higher FSH doses. Women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and homozygous for the wild-type or for the p.N680S FSH receptor were randomly assigned to group I (Ser/Ser, n=24), receiving an FSH dose of 150 U/day, or group II (Ser/Ser, n=25), receiving an FSH dose of 225 U/day. In group III (Asn/Asn, n=44), the FSH dose was 150 U/day. Age and basal FSH levels were not different between groups. At ovulation induction, total FSH doses were comparable in group I (1631+/-96 U) and group III (1640+/-57 U) but significantly higher in group II (2421+/-112 U) (P<0.001). Peak oestradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration were significantly lower in group I (5680+/-675 pmol/l) compared to group III (8679+/-804 pmol/l) (P=0.028). Increasing the FSH dose from 150 to 225 U/day overcame the lower oestradiol response in women with Ser/Ser (group II, 7804+/-983 pmol/l). In women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, the p.N680S sequence variation results in lower oestradiol levels following FSH stimulation. This lower FSH receptor sensitivity can be overcome by higher FSH doses.
PURPOSE: To study the association of inhibin B with ovarian response to FSH stimulation, applying either GnRH agonist or antagonist. METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 46 patients undergoing COH received either triptorelin (group I, n = 15) or ganirelix (group II, n = 31). Parameters of follicular response and inhibin B serum levels were assessed. RESULTS: Inhibin B before FSH stimulation was significantly lower in group I than group II. The FSH stimulation phase was significantly longer in group I than group II, and the total FSH dose was significantly higher with a comparable number of retrieved oocytes. Day 1 inhibin B in group I, but not group II, was significantly correlated with the number of large ovarian follicles and retrieved oocytes. In group II, but not group I, inhibin B on day 1 was inversely correlated with the daily and total FSH dose as well as FSH stimulation duration. CONCLUSIONS: The association of inhibin B serum levels with parameters of follicular response in COH is different in patients assigned to GnRH agonist vs. antagonist treatment protocols.
OBJECTIVE: Smoking by one or both partners can adversely affect IVF outcome. We investigated whether smoking may also play a role in the success rate of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in which initial steps of fertilization are bypassed. DESIGN: Three hundred one couples (ICSI: 153, IVF: 148) participated in 415 treatment cycles (ICSI: 202, IVF: 213). One hundred thirty-nine men were habitual smokers (ICSI: 71, IVF: 68). Seventy-seven women were smokers (ICSI: 41, IVF: 36). Multiple nominal regression analyses of various steps of assisted reproduction included smoking status, age, semen parameters, and number of embryos transferred. SETTINGS: Reproductive and andrology unit of the university. PATIENT(S): Three hundred one couples seeking fertility treatment. INTERVENTION(S): Assisted reproduction by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): Intracytoplasmic sperm injection success (clinical pregnancy) in women with smoking male partners was 22% and was 38% with nonsmoking partners. Similar results were seen for IVF, with 18% vs. 32%. Multinominal logistic regression analysis revealed smoking in men to be a significant predictor of ICSI outcome, along with female age and the number of embryos transferred, whereas clinical pregnancies after IVF were dependent on smoking in men, number of embryos transferred, sperm motility, and female age. Female smoking influenced the number of oocytes retrieved and the fertilization rate of oocytes in IVF but not in ICSI. The odds ratio for failure of ICSI for male smokers in comparison to male nonsmokers was 2.95 (IVF: 2.65). CONCLUSION(S): Smoking by males decreases the success rates of assisted reproduction procedures, not only in IVF, but also in ICSI. Apart from putative adverse effects during fertilization, altered DNA in spermatozoa might hamper development of the embryo.