Biomedical subjects

Hidehito Horinouchi

Publications and source records attributed to Hidehito Horinouchi.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes and genomic features of uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes in osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion subtypes may be associated with differential survival outcomes following EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, evidence remains scarce, particularly regarding osimertinib, and the underlying biological mechanisms are poorly understood. We aimed to compare survival outcomes among EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with osimertinib. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with NSCLC were stratified according to exon 19 deletion subtypes. Whole-exome sequencing data from the American Association for Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange registry and Memorial Sloan Kettering Clinicogenomic Harmonized Oncologic Real-World Dataset were analyzed to investigate co-occurring genomic alterations. RESULTS: Overall, 111 patients with advanced EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive NSCLC were analyzed and 86.5% received osimertinib as first-line therapy. Patients with non-E746_A750del (n = 25) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with E746_A750del (n = 86) (median: 14.3 vs. 20.6 months; p < 0.05). Among non-E746_A750del subtypes, L747_A750delinsP (n = 4) had a particularly poor prognosis, with significantly worse survival than those with E746_A750del (median PFS: 3.5 vs. 20.6 months; p < 0.001, and median overall survival: 11.8 vs. 48.5 months; p < 0.001). In public database analyses, non-E746_A750del had a higher rate of RBM10 co-mutations, whereas L747_A750delinsP was characterized by frequent CDKN2A/B homozygous deletions and MYC amplifications. CONCLUSIONS: Non-E746_A750del was associated with poorer outcomes, with L747_A750delinsP potentially being a high-risk subtype. Differences in co-occurring genomic alterations may contribute to the prognostic heterogeneity among exon 19 deletion subtypes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adjuvant alectinib versus chemotherapy in resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALINA): health-related quality-of-life and safety outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with resected, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the global, phase 3, open-label, randomised ALINA trial. We report safety and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes from the ALINA trial. METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with resected, ALK-positive, stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) via a block-stratified randomisation method to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy for four 3-week cycles. Randomisation was stratified according to disease stage and race. The primary endpoint, previously reported, was disease-free survival. Safety was a secondary endpoint and HRQoL was an exploratory endpoint. Safety was assessed by the investigator as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5·0 until 28 days after the last alectinib dose or chemotherapy cycle. HRQoL was assessed via the Short-Form 36-item health survey version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire at baseline, every 3 weeks to week 12, then every 12 weeks until disease recurrence, consent withdrawal, death, or week 96. Norm-based scoring was applied; clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36v2 manual. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population and HRQoL in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03456076) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2018, and Dec 8, 2021, 257 patients were assigned to receive alectinib (n=130) or chemotherapy (n=127). 123 (48%) patients were male and 134 (52%) were female; 143 (56%) were Asian. The safety-evaluable population comprised 128 patients who received alectinib and 120 patients who received chemotherapy; median duration of safety follow-up was 24·8 months (IQR 22·0-24·9) in the alectinib group and 3·7 months (IQR 3·7-3·8) in the chemotherapy group. The safety of adjuvant alectinib was generally consistent with its known profile. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (eight [6%] of 128), alanine aminotransferase increased (two [2%] of 128), and blood bilirubin increased (two [2%] of 128) in the alectinib group, and neutrophil count decreased (12 [10%] of 120), neutropenia (ten [8%] of 120), and nausea (five [4%] of 120) in the chemotherapy group. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (2%; one each with appendicitis and pneumonitis) of 128 patients in the alectinib group and eight (7%) of 120 patients in the chemotherapy group ( most common were gastrointestinal disorders in three [3%] patients). No deaths due to adverse events were reported in either group. There were fewer discontinuations due to adverse events with alectinib (seven [5%]) versus chemotherapy (15 [13%]). A clinically meaningful difference in improvement from baseline was seen at week 12 for bodily pain, role physical, mental health, social functioning, and vitality SF-36v2 domains with alectinib; improvements in physical and mental HRQoL were maintained over 2 years of active treatment (at week 96, mean Mental Component Summary score: 49·9 [SD 10·4]; mean Physical Component Summary score: 48·8 [SD 7·2]) and reached levels similar to the general population (population norm: 50). INTERPRETATION: For patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC, adjuvant alectinib had a manageable safety profile; HRQoL improved and was maintained over 2 years of active treatment. Together with the disease-free survival benefit seen in ALINA, these data support adjuvant alectinib as an important new standard-of-care for patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Adult↗

PubMed2025

Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in never-smokers is a major public health burden, especially among East Asian women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but are primarily developed in European-ancestry populations. We aimed to develop and validate single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for East Asian never-smokers to improve LUAD risk prediction. METHODS: PRSs were developed using genome-wide association study summary statistics from East Asian (8,002 cases; 20,782 controls) and European (2,058 cases; 5,575 controls) populations. Single-ancestry models included PRS-25, PRS-CT, and LDpred2; multi-ancestry models included LDpred2+PRS-EUR128, PRS-CSx, and CT-SLEB. Performance was evaluated in independent East Asian data from the Female Lung Cancer Consortium (FLCCA) and externally validated in the Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort (NJLCC). We assessed predictive accuracy via AUC, with 10-year and (age 30-80) absolute risks estimates. RESULTS: The best multi-ancestry PRS, using East Asian and European data via CT-SLEB (clumping and thresholding, super learning, empirical Bayes), outperformed the best East Asian-only PRS (LDpred2; AUC=0.629, 95% CI:0.618,0.641), achieving an AUC of 0.640 (95% CI:0.629,0.653) and odds ratio of 1.71 (95% CI:1.61,1.82) per SD increase. NJLCC Validation confirmed robust performance (AUC =0.649, 95% CI: 0.623, 0.676). The top 20% PRS group had a 3.92-fold higher LUAD risk than the bottom 20%. Further, the top 5% PRS group reached a 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year LUAD risk at age 50 (0.42%) by age 41, nine years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-ancestry PRS approaches enhance LUAD risk stratification in East Asian never-smokers, with consistent external validation, suggesting future clinical utility.

East Asian never smokers↗

PubMed2025

Implications of EGFR expression on EGFR signaling dependency and adaptive immunity against EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (EGFRm LUAD), EGFR mutations do not necessarily result in increased EGFR expression (EGFR-exp), which differs among patients. However, the factors influencing EGFR-exp and the impact of EGFR-exp on tumor characteristics in patients with EGFRm LUAD remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole-exome and RNA sequencing were performed for patients with early- and advanced-stage EGFRm LUAD. The patients were classified into low or high EGFR-exp groups based on the median transcripts per million. We retrospectively examined the association between EGFR-exp, genomic characteristics, downstream EGFR signaling activity, tumor microenvironment (TME) status, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 450 and 45 patients in the early- and advanced-stage cohorts, respectively. In both cohorts, the EGFR-exp low group exhibited a lower incidence of TP53 co-mutations and EGFR amplification and a higher incidence of EGFR subclonal mutations than the EGFR-exp high group. Furthermore, downstream EGFR signaling pathways, such as the MAPK signaling, were less activated in the EGFR-exp low group. However, this group showed significantly enriched adaptive immune response pathways (Q < 0.0001) and an immune-inflamed TME. Additionally, a low EGFR-exp was a significantly favorable factor for postoperative relapse (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P = 0.04). However, in the advanced-stage cohort, a low EGFR-exp was a significant risk factor for non-responders to osimertinib (OR, 17.5; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In EGFRm LUAD, significant associations were observed between EGFR-exp levels and both EGFR signaling pathways and adaptive immune status, which in turn influence clinical outcomes. This large-scale multi-omics analysis highlights the heterogeneity among patients with EGFRm LUAD and emphasizes the need to assess EGFR-exp levels alongside mutation status for optimal treatment strategies in EGFRm LUAD.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Evolving treatments and prognosis in Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: 20 years of progress of novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in pharmacotherapy, including molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the treatment for Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past two decades. However, differences in drug approval timelines across countries raise important questions about their impact on survival rates. This study investigates trends in overall survival (OS), patient characteristics, and the association between OS improvements and the introduction of new drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included patients with Stage IV NSCLC treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2001 to 2021. Using data from the Department of Thoracic Oncology registries, 2,555 patients were identified and categorized into four time periods: 2001-2005 (Group A), 2006-2010 (Group B), 2011-2015 (Group C), and 2016-2021 (Group D). RESULTS: While baseline characteristics remained relatively consistent, Group D had an increased proportion of elderly patients (≥ 75 years) and those with brain metastases. Additionally, the gender ratio became more balanced over time. Notably, Group D patients with EGFR mutations or ALK fusion positivity and older age demonstrated significantly longer OS. Analysis revealed steady and substantial improvements in OS across time periods (median OS: Group A, 10.68 months; Group B, 14.12 months; Group C, 16.49 months; and Group D, 25.46 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates marked improvements in survival for patients with Stage IV NSCLC, particularly in the last six years, despite the increase in brain metastases and elderly patients. This finding suggests the crucial role of novel therapies in enhancing survival outcomes.

Humans↗