PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Hidetoshi Hayashi

Publications and source records attributed to Hidetoshi Hayashi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for ERBB2-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With or Without Brain Metastases: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IMPORTANCE: Brain metastases reduce overall survival rates of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); patients with epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2])-mutant NSCLC are more likely to have baseline brain metastases. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an approved ERBB2-directed treatment for previously treated unresectable or metastatic ERBB2-mutant NSCLC. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg doses in patients with previously treated ERBB2-mutant metastatic NSCLC with or without untreated or previously treated stable brain metastases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc secondary analysis pooled patients from the DESTINY-Lung01 (data cutoff date: December 3, 2021) and DESTINY-Lung02 (data cutoff date: December 23, 2022) clinical trials by T-DXd dose (5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg). DESTINY-Lung01 was a multicenter, open-label, 2-cohort, nonrandomized phase 2 study, while DESTINY-Lung02 was a dose-blinded, multicenter, 2-cohort, randomized phase 2 study. Participants had a previously treated ERBB2-mutant metastatic NSCLC with or without untreated or previously treated stable brain metastases at baseline. All statistical analyses were performed from April 2023 to October 2024. INTERVENTION: Patients received a T-DXd dose of either 5.4 mg/kg or 6.4 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Systemic and intracranial effectiveness by blinded independent central review using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) version 1.1, sites of progression, and safety. RESULTS: This analysis included 102 patients in the T-DXd 5.4-mg/kg dose group (65 females [64%]; median [range] age, 57.5 [37.0-83.0] years and 59.5 [30.0-79.0] years in patients with and without brain metastases, respectively) and 141 patients in the T-DXd 6.4-mg/kg dose group (94 females [67%]; median [range] age, 62.5 [29.0-88.0] years and 59.0 [27.0-83.0] years in patients with and without brain metastases, respectively). In each group, 31% (32 of 102) and 38% (54 of 141) of patients, respectively, had baseline brain metastases and 53% (17 of 32) and 44% (24 of 54), respectively, received prior brain metastasis treatment. In patients with and without brain metastases, systemic confirmed objective response rates (ORRs) were 47% (15 of 32; 95% CI, 29%-65%) and 50% (35 of 70; 95% CI, 38%-62%), respectively, with the T-DXd 5.4-mg/kg dose, and 50% (27 of 54; 95% CI, 36%-64%) and 59% (51 of 87; 95% CI, 48%-69%) with the T-DXd 6.4-mg/kg dose. Median progression-free survival was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.5-9.7) months in the T-DXd 5.4-mg/kg dose group and 7.1 (95% CI, 4.5-9.6) months in the T-DXd 6.4-mg/kg dose group of patients with baseline brain metastases. Among patients with measurable baseline brain metastases, intracranial confirmed ORRs were 50% (7 of 14; 95% CI, 23%-77%) with the T-DXd 5.4-mg/kg dose and 30% (9 of 30; 95% CI, 15%-49%) with the T-DXd 6.4-mg/kg dose. At both doses, the safety profile of T-DXd was generally manageable, regardless of baseline brain metastases, favoring the T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg dose. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this secondary analysis, T-DXd at the approved dose of 5.4 mg/kg showed antitumor activity in patients with previously treated ERBB2-mutant metastatic NSCLC with or without brain metastases. This finding supports T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg use in this population.

Adult

Clinical and molecular landscape of metastatic extramammary Paget's disease.

BACKGROUND: Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare malignancy without established systemic therapy. EMPD shares molecular features with breast cancer, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and hormone receptor (HR) expression, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumors from 20 metastatic invasive EMPD cases were analyzed for molecular and biological features. Genomic features, transcriptomic profiles, and HER2 and HR expression status were investigated using immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted-genome next-generation sequencing and nCounter BC360 panels. Metastatic breast cancer samples were used as a comparison to clarify metastatic EMPD's clinical relevance. RESULTS: Estrogen receptor expression was observed in 45% of EMPD tumors, while only 10% expressed progesterone receptor. HER2 was overexpressed in 30% of cases, and HER2-directed therapies were durably effective. Among 8 patients with NGS data, 63% (5/8) harbored oncogenic ERBB2 alterations independent of HER2 expression. BC360 profiling revealed biological differences between EMPD and breast cancer, particularly poor biological compatibility for HR-positive tumors. Immune profiling showed that a subset of EMPD tumors exhibited CD8+ T-cell signatures and PD-1/PD-L1 gene expression comparable to triple-negative breast cancer. The median overall survival was 22.1 months (95% CI, 12.0-42.2), with 16 patients (80%) treated with systemic therapy, including anti-HER2 therapy, hormonal therapy, or cytotoxic therapies based on their molecular features. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the unique molecular and biological features of metastatic EMPD, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment approaches. This information should be used to guide future clinical strategies for metastatic EMPD.

Humans

Soluble immune checkpoint factors reflect exhaustion of antitumor immunity and response to PD-1 blockade.

BACKGROUNDPrecise stratification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is needed for appropriate application of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.METHODSWe measured soluble forms of the immune-checkpoint molecules PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC before PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. A prospective biomarker-finding trial (cohort A) included 50 previously treated patients who received nivolumab. A retrospective observational study was performed for patients treated with any PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy (cohorts B and C), cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort D), or targeted therapy (cohort E). Plasma samples from all patients were assayed for soluble immune-checkpoint molecules with a highly sensitive chemiluminescence-based assay.RESULTSNonresponsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy was associated with higher concentrations of these soluble immune factors among patients with immune-reactive (hot) tumors. Such an association was not apparent for patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Integrative analysis of tumor size, PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue (tPD-L1), and gene expression in tumor tissue and peripheral CD8+ T cells revealed that high concentrations of the 3 soluble immune factors were associated with hyper or terminal exhaustion of antitumor immunity. The combination of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) and sCTLA-4 efficiently discriminated responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade among patients with immune-reactive tumors.CONCLUSIONCombinations of soluble immune factors might be able to identify patients unlikely to respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a result of terminal exhaustion of antitumor immunity. Our data suggest that such a combination better predicts, along with tPD-L1, for the response of patients with NSCLC.TRIAL REGISTRATIONUMIN000019674.FUNDINGThis study was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Sysmex Corporation.

Humans