Biomedical subjects

Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki

Publications and source records attributed to Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Reconstruction of the ancestral ferungulate karyotype by electronic chromosome painting (E-painting).

By comparing high-coverage and high-quality whole genome sequence assemblies it is now possible to reconstruct putative ancestral progenitor karyotypes, here called protokaryotypes. For this study we used the recently described electronic chromosome painting technique (E-painting) to reconstruct the karyotype of the 85 million-year-old (MYA) ferungulate ancestor. This model is primarily based on dog (Canis familiaris) and cattle (Bos taurus) genome data and is highly consistent with comparative gene mapping and chromosome painting data. The protokaryotype bears 23 autosomal chromosome pairs and the sex chromosomes and preserves most of the chromosomal associations described previously for the boreo-eutherian protokaryotype. The model indicates that five interchromosomal rearrangements occurred during the transition from the boreo-eutherian to the ferungulate ancestor. From there on 66 further interchromosomal rearrangements took place in the lineage leading to cattle and 61 further interchromosomal rearrangements in the lineage to dog.

Animals↗

PubMed2007

Understanding the recent evolution of the human genome: insights from human-chimpanzee genome comparisons.

The sequencing of the chimpanzee genome and the comparison with its human counterpart have begun to reveal the spectrum of genetic changes that has accompanied human evolution. In addition to gross karyotypic rearrangements such as the fusion that formed human chromosome 2 and the human-specific pericentric inversions of chromosomes 1 and 18, there is considerable submicroscopic structural variation involving deletions, duplications, and inversions. Lineage-specific segmental duplications, detected by array comparative genomic hybridization and direct sequence comparison, have made a very significant contribution to this structural divergence, which is at least three-fold greater than that due to nucleotide substitutions. Since structural genomic changes may have given rise to irreversible functional differences between the diverging species, their detailed analysis could help to identify the biological processes that have accompanied speciation. To this end, interspecies comparisons have revealed numerous human-specific gains and losses of genes as well as changes in gene expression. The very considerable structural diversity (polymorphism) evident within both lineages has, however, hampered the analysis of the structural divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes. The concomitant evaluation of genetic divergence and diversity at the nucleotide level has nevertheless served to identify many genes that have evolved under positive selection and may thus have been involved in the development of human lineage-specific traits. Genes that display signs of weak negative selection have also been identified and could represent candidate loci for complex genomic disorders. Here, we review recent progress in comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes and discuss how the differences detected have improved our understanding of the evolution of the human genome.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Conservation of hotspots for recombination in low-copy repeats associated with the NF1 microdeletion.

Several large-scale studies of human genetic variation have provided insights into processes such as recombination that have shaped human diversity. However, regions such as low-copy repeats (LCRs) have proven difficult to characterize, hindering efforts to understand the processes operating in these regions. We present a detailed study of genetic variation and underlying recombination processes in two copies of an LCR (NF1REPa and NF1REPc) on chromosome 17 involved in the generation of NF1 microdeletions and in a third copy (REP19) on chromosome 19 from which the others originated over 6.7 million years ago. We find evidence for shared hotspots of recombination among the LCRs. REP19 seems to contain hotspots in the same place as the nonallelic recombination hotspots in NF1REPa and NF1REPc. This apparent conservation of patterns of recombination hotspots in moderately diverged paralogous regions contrasts with recent evidence that these patterns are not conserved in less-diverged orthologous regions of chimpanzees.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Structural divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes.

The structural microheterogeneity evident between the human and chimpanzee genomes is quite considerable and includes inversions and duplications as well as deletions, ranging in size from a few base-pairs up to several megabases (Mb). Insertions and deletions have together given rise to at least 150 Mb of genomic DNA sequence that is either present or absent in humans as compared to chimpanzees. Such regions often contain paralogous sequences and members of multigene families thereby ensuring that the human and chimpanzee genomes differ by a significant fraction of their gene content. There is as yet no evidence to suggest that the large chromosomal rearrangements which serve to distinguish the human and chimpanzee karyotypes have influenced either speciation or the evolution of lineage-specific traits. However, the myriad submicroscopic rearrangements in both genomes, particularly those involving copy number variation, are unlikely to represent exclusively neutral changes and hence promise to facilitate the identification of genes that have been important for human-specific evolution.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Complex patterns of copy number variation at sites of segmental duplications: an important category of structural variation in the human genome.

The structural diversity of the human genome is much higher than previously assumed although its full extent remains unknown. To investigate the association between segmental duplications that display constitutive copy number differences (CNDs) between humans and the great apes and those which exhibit polymorphic copy number variations (CNVs) between humans, we analysed a BAC array enriched with segmental duplications displaying such CNDs. This study documents for the first time that in addition to human-specific gains common to all humans, these duplication clusters (DCs) also exhibit polymorphic CNVs > 40 kb. Segmental duplication is known to have been a frequent event during human genome evolution. Importantly, among the CNV-associated genes identified here, those involved in transcriptional regulation were found to be significantly overrepresented. Complex patterns of variation were evident at sites of DCs, manifesting as inter-individual differentially sized copy number alterations at the same genomic loci. Thus, CNVs associated with segmental duplications do not simply represent insertion/deletion polymorphisms, but rather constitute a wide variety of rearrangements involving differential amplification and partial gains and losses with high inter-individual variability. Although the number of CNVs was not found to differ between Africans and Caucasians/Asians, the average number of variant patterns per locus was significantly lower in Africans. Thus, complex variation patterns characterizing segmental duplications result from relatively recent genomic rearrangements. The high number of these rearrangements, some of which are potentially recurrent, together with differences in population size and expansion dynamics, may account for the greater diversity of CNV in Caucasians/Asians as compared with Africans.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Characterization of the human lineage-specific pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 1 from the homologous chromosomes of the great apes.

The human and chimpanzee genomes are distinguishable in terms of ten gross karyotypic differences including nine pericentric inversions and a chromosomal fusion. Seven of these large pericentric inversions are chimpanzee-specific whereas two of them, involving human chromosomes 1 and 18, were fixed in the human lineage after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees. We have performed detailed molecular and computational characterization of the breakpoint regions of the human-specific inversion of chromosome 1. FISH analysis and sequence comparisons together revealed that the pericentromeric region of HSA 1 contains numerous segmental duplications that display a high degree of sequence similarity between both chromosomal arms. Detailed analysis of these regions has allowed us to refine the p-arm breakpoint region to a 154.2 kb interval at 1p11.2 and the q-arm breakpoint region to a 562.6 kb interval at 1q21.1. Both breakpoint regions contain human-specific segmental duplications arranged in inverted orientation. We therefore propose that the pericentric inversion of HSA 1 was mediated by intra-chromosomal non-homologous recombination between these highly homologous segmental duplications that had themselves arisen only recently in the human lineage by duplicative transposition.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a familial interstitial deletion Xp22.2-22.3 with a highly variable phenotype in female carriers.

We describe a familial interstitial deletion of 7.7-Mb involving Xp22.2-22.3. The deletion was transmitted from an asymptomatic mother to her two children with severe developmental delay, no speech development and autistic behavior. Assessment of the deletion boundaries by FISH and PCR analyses indicated that the deletions encompasses 27 genes. Several of these genes are associated with known disorders, like KAL1 (Kallmann syndrome), steroid sulfatase (STS) (X-linked ichtyosis), and arylsulfatase E (ARSE) (chondrodysplasia punctata). The deletion also includes all four VCX genes (VCX-A, VCX-B1, VCX-B, and VCX-C) and the neuroligin 4 (NLGN4) gene. VCX-A deficiency has been shown previously to be associated with mental retardation and NLGN4 mutations lead to mental retardation in conjunction with autism. Functional deficiency of both MRX genes, VCX-A and NLGN4, are most likely associated with the impaired cognitive development of the patients described here. The phenotype associated with the Xp deletion was highly variable in female carriers and might be attributed to unfavorable X inactivation. However, all the 27 genes included in the deleted interval escape X inactivation and are expressed at variable levels from the normal X chromosome. Thus, the overall X inactivation pattern and inter-individual expression variability of the genes in distal Xp might be determinants of the phenotype associated with the deletion.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

PubMed2006

Reconstruction of a 450-My-old ancestral vertebrate protokaryotype.

From recent work the putative eutherian karyotype from 100 Mya has been derived. Here, we have applied a new in silico technique, electronic chromosome painting (E-painting), on a large data set of genes whose positions are known in human, chicken, zebrafish and pufferfish. E-painting identifies conserved syntenies in the data set, and it enables a stepwise reconstruction of the ancestral vertebrate protokaryotype comprising 11 protochromosomes. During karyotype evolution in land vertebrates interchromosomal rearrangements by translocation are relatively frequent, whereas the karyotypes of birds and fish are much more conserved. Although the human karyotype is one of the most conserved in eutherians, it can no longer be considered highly conserved from a vertebrate-wide perspective.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Identification of large-scale human-specific copy number differences by inter-species array comparative genomic hybridization.

Copy number differences (CNDs), and the concomitant differences in gene number, have contributed significantly to the genomic divergence between humans and other primates. To assess its relative importance, the genomes of human, common chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, orangutan and macaque were compared by comparative genomic hybridization using a high-resolution human BAC array (aCGH). In an attempt to avoid potential interference from frequent intra-species polymorphism, pooled DNA samples were used from each species. A total of 322 sites of large-scale inter-species CND were identified. Most CNDs were lineage-specific but frequencies differed considerably between the lineages; the highest CND frequency among hominoids was observed in gorilla. The conserved nature of the orangutan genome has already been noted by karyotypic studies and our findings suggest that this degree of conservation may extend to the sub-microscopic level. Of the 322 CND sites identified, 14 human lineage-specific gains were observed. Most of these human-specific copy number gains span regions previously identified as segmental duplications (SDs) and our study demonstrates that SDs are major sites of CND between the genomes of humans and other primates. Four of the human-specific CNDs detected by aCGH map close to the breakpoints of human-specific karyotypic changes [e.g., the human-specific inversion of chromosome 1 and the polymorphic inversion inv(2)(p11.2q13)], suggesting that human-specific duplications may have predisposed to chromosomal rearrangement. The association of human-specific copy number gains with chromosomal breakpoints emphasizes their potential importance in mediating karyotypic evolution as well as in promoting human genomic diversity.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

The chimpanzee-specific pericentric inversions that distinguish humans and chimpanzees have identical breakpoints in Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus.

Seven of nine pericentric inversions that distinguish human (HSA) and chimpanzee karyotypes are chimpanzee-specific. In this study we investigated whether the two extant chimpanzee species, Pan troglodytes (common chimpanzee) and Pan paniscus (bonobo), share exactly the same pericentric inversions. The methods applied were FISH with breakpoint-spanning BAC/PAC clones and PCR analyses of the breakpoint junction sequences. Our findings for the homologues to HSA 4, 5, 9, 12, 16, and 17 confirm for the first time at the sequence level that these pericentric inversions have identical breakpoints in the common chimpanzee and the bonobo. Therefore, these inversions predate the separation of the two chimpanzee species 0.86-2 Mya. Further, the inversions distinguishing human and chimpanzee karyotypes may be regarded as early acquisitions, such that they are likely to have been present at the time of human/chimpanzee divergence. According to the chromosomal speciation theory the inversions themselves could have promoted human speciation.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Polymorphic micro-inversions contribute to the genomic variability of humans and chimpanzees.

A combination of inter- and intra-species genome comparisons is required to identify and classify the full spectrum of genetic changes, both subtle and gross, that have accompanied the evolutionary divergence of humans and other primates. In this study, gene order comparisons of 11,518 human and chimpanzee orthologous gene pairs were performed to detect regions of inverted gene order that are potentially indicative of small-scale rearrangements such as inversions. By these means, a total of 71 potential micro-rearrangements were detected, nine of which were considered to represent micro-inversions encompassing more than three genes. These putative inversions were then investigated by FISH and/or PCR analyses and the authenticity of five of the nine inversions, ranging in size from approximately 800 kb to approximately 4.4 Mb, was confirmed. These inversions mapped to 1p13.2-13.3, 7p22.1, 7p13-14.1, 18p11.21-11.22 and 19q13.12 and encompass 50, 14, 16, 7 and 16 known genes, respectively. Intriguingly, four of the confirmed inversions turned out to be polymorphic: three were polymorphic in the chimpanzee and one in humans. It is concluded that micro-inversions make a significant contribution to genomic variability in both humans and chimpanzees and inversion polymorphisms may be more frequent than previously realized.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Molecular characterisation of the pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 5 from the homologous chimpanzee chromosome.

Human and chimpanzee karyotypes differ by virtue of nine pericentric inversions that serve to distinguish human chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, and 18 from their chimpanzee orthologues. In this study, we have analysed the breakpoints of the pericentric inversion characteristic of chimpanzee chromosome 4, the homologue of human chromosome 5. Breakpoint-spanning BAC clones were identified from both the human and chimpanzee genomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and the precise locations of the breakpoints were determined by sequence comparisons. In stark contrast to some other characterised evolutionary rearrangements in primates, this chimpanzee-specific inversion appears not to have been mediated by either gross segmental duplications or low-copy repeats, although micro-duplications were found adjacent to the breakpoints. However, alternating purine-pyrimidine (RY) tracts were detected at the breakpoints, and such sequences are known to adopt non-B DNA conformations that are capable of triggering DNA breakage and genomic rearrangements. Comparison of the breakpoint region of human chromosome 5q15 with the orthologous regions of the chicken, mouse, and rat genomes, revealed similar but non-identical syntenic disruptions in all three species. The clustering of evolutionary breakpoints within this chromosomal region, together with the presence of multiple pathological breakpoints in the vicinity of both 5p15 and 5q15, is consistent with the non-random model of chromosomal evolution and suggests that these regions may well possess intrinsic features that have served to mediate a variety of genomic rearrangements, including the pericentric inversion in chimpanzee chromosome 4.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Extensively high load of internal tumors determined by whole body MRI scanning in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and a non-LCR-mediated 2-Mb deletion in 17q11.2.

Deletions in 17q11.2 affecting the NF1 gene and surrounding regions occur in 5% of patients with NF1. The two major types of NF1 deletions encompass 1.4-Mb and 1.2-Mb, respectively, and have breakpoints in the NF1 low-copy repeats or in the JJAZ gene and its pseudogene. Deletions larger than 1.4-Mb are rare, and only seven cases have been reported so far. Here, we describe a 26-year-old NF1 patient with an "atypical" NF1 deletion of 2-Mb. In contrast to the 1.4-Mb deletions, which preferentially occur by interchromosomal recombination during maternal meiosis, the deletion described here occurred intrachromosomally on the paternal chromosome. The centromeric deletion breakpoint lies in an L1-element located 1.3-Mb proximal to the NF1 gene. The telomeric deletion boundary is located in a single copy segment between an AT-rich segment and an AluSx-element in intron 15 of the JJAZ1 gene. Structural analysis implies that non-B DNA conformations at the breakpoints destabilized the duplex DNA and caused double-strand breaks. Although the breakpoints of this 2-Mb deletion are not recurrent, it is conspicuous that one breakpoint is located in the JJAZ1 gene. Paralogous recombination between the JJAZ1 gene and its pseudogene causes the recurrent 1.2 Mb deletions. The genomic architecture of the NF1 gene region, influenced by paralogous sequences such as the JJAZ1 gene and its pseudogene, seems also to stimulate the occurrence of non-recurrent deletions mediated by non-homologous end joining. Patient 442 described here suffers from a very high burden of subdermal neurofibromas. Magnetic resonance imaging of the whole body revealed numerous internal tumors, mainly plexiform neurofibromas and spinal tumors. This demonstrates the value of whole-body MRI scanning in determining the total tumor load, which is an important aspect in genotype/phenotype correlations with regard to large NF1 deletions.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Breakpoint analysis of the pericentric inversion distinguishing human chromosome 4 from the homologous chromosome in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

The study of breakpoints that occurred during primate evolution promises to yield valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying chromosome rearrangements in both evolution and pathology. Karyotypic differences between humans and chimpanzees include nine pericentric inversions, which may have potentiated the parapatric speciation of hominids and chimpanzees 5-6 million years ago. Detailed analysis of the respective chromosomal breakpoints is a prerequisite for any assessment of the genetic consequences of these inversions. The breakpoints of the inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 4 (HSA4) from its chimpanzee counterpart were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative sequence analysis. These breakpoints, at HSA4p14 and 4q21.3, do not disrupt the protein coding region of a gene, although they occur in regions with an abundance of LINE and LTR-elements. At 30 kb proximal to the breakpoint in 4q21.3, we identified an as yet unannotated gene, C4orf12, that lacks an homologous counterpart in rodents and is expressed at a 33-fold higher level in human fibroblasts as compared to chimpanzee. Seven out of 11 genes that mapped to the breakpoint regions have been previously analyzed using oligonucleotide-microarrays. One of these genes, WDFY3, exhibits a three-fold difference in expression between human and chimpanzee. To investigate whether the genomic architecture might have facilitated the inversion, comparative sequence analysis was used to identify an approximately 5-kb inverted repeat in the breakpoint regions. This inverted repeat is inexact and comprises six subrepeats with 78 to 98% complementarity. (TA)-rich repeats were also noted at the breakpoints. These findings imply that genomic architecture, and specifically high-copy repetitive elements, may have made a significant contribution to hominoid karyotype evolution, predisposing specific genomic regions to rearrangements.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Interstitial deletion del(10)(q25.2q25.3 approximately 26.11)--case report and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To present the clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular cytogenetic findings of prenatally diagnosed interstitial deletion 10q25.2-q26.1. The majority of distal 10q deletions are pure terminal deletions with breakpoints in 10q25 and 10q26. Only four patients have been described so far with interstitial deletions involving bands 10q25.2-q26.1. METHODS: Postmortem physical examination and autopsy of the foetus after medically terminated pregnancy. GTG-banding, reverse painting, and FISH analysis with BAC clones on amniocyte metaphases were performed to determine the extent of the deletion. RESULTS: At 20 weeks the eutrophic female foetus showed pronounced microretrogeny and hypertelorism, clubfeet as well as minor internal anomalies like pancreas anulare, atypically lobed liver, and missing choleocystis. Cardiac anomalies were not observed and the genitalia were of a normal female. The deletion encompasses 6-Mb and is associated with hemizygosity for 30 genes, including the genes for beta-tectorin, the beta-1 adrenergic receptor, and the alpha-2A adrenergic receptor. CONCLUSION: An interstitial deletion del(10)(q25.2q25.3 approximately 26.11) was confirmed by FISH with mapped BAC clones. Clinical and molecular cytogenetic analyses of further interstitial 10q deletions are necessary to assess whether the phenotypic manifestations differ between deletions that are interstitial compared to those that include also the terminal region of chromosome 10.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Molecular characterization of the pericentric inversion of chimpanzee chromosome 11 homologous to human chromosome 9.

In addition to the fusion of human chromosome 2, nine pericentric inversions are the most conspicuous karyotype differences between humans and chimpanzees. In this study we identified the breakpoint regions of the pericentric inversion of chimpanzee chromosome 11 (PTR 11) homologous to human chromosome 9 (HSA 9). The break in homology between PTR 11p and HSA 9p12 maps to pericentromeric segmental duplications, whereas the breakpoint region orthologous to 9q21.33 is located in intergenic single-copy sequences. Close to the inversion breakpoint in PTR 11q, large blocks of alpha satellites are located, which indicate the presence of the centromere. Since G-banding analysis and the comparative BAC analyses performed in this study imply that the inversion breaks occurred in the region homologous to HSA 9q21.33 and 9p12, but not within the centromere, the structure of PTR 11 cannot be explained by a single pericentric inversion. In addition to this pericentric inversion of PTR 11, further events like centromere repositioning or a second smaller inversion must be assumed to explain the structure of PTR 11 compared with HSA 9.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Childhood overgrowth in patients with common NF1 microdeletions.

While growth retardation and short stature are well-known features of patients with classical neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), we found advanced height growth and accelerated carpal bone age in patients with an NF1 microdeletion. Our analysis is based on growth data of 21 patients with common 1.4/1.2 Mb microdeletions, including three patients with a Weaver-like appearance. Overgrowth was most evident in preschool children (2-6 years, n=10, P=0.02). We conclude that childhood overgrowth is part of the phenotypic spectrum in patients with the common 1.4/1.2 Mb NF1 microdeletions and assume that the chromosomal region comprised by the microdeletions contains a gene whose haploinsufficiency causes overgrowth.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Independent intrachromosomal recombination events underlie the pericentric inversions of chimpanzee and gorilla chromosomes homologous to human chromosome 16.

Analyses of chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred during the evolution of the hominoids can reveal much about the mutational mechanisms underlying primate chromosome evolution. We characterized the breakpoints of the pericentric inversion of chimpanzee chromosome 18 (PTR XVI), which is homologous to human chromosome 16 (HSA 16). A conserved 23-kb inverted repeat composed of satellites, LINE and Alu elements was identified near the breakpoints and could have mediated the inversion by bringing the chromosomal arms into close proximity with each other, thereby facilitating intrachromosomal recombination. The exact positions of the breakpoints may then have been determined by local DNA sequence homologies between the inversion breakpoints, including a 22-base pair direct repeat. The similarly located pericentric inversion of gorilla (GGO) chromosome XVI, was studied by FISH and PCR analysis. The p- and q-arm breakpoints of the inversions in PTR XVI and GGO XVI were found to occur at slightly different locations, consistent with their independent origin. Further, FISH studies of the homologous chromosomal regions in macaque and orangutan revealed that the region represented by HSA BAC RP11-696P19, which spans the inversion breakpoint on HSA 16q11-12, was derived from the ancestral primate chromosome homologous to HSA 1. After the divergence of orangutan from the other great apes approximately 12 million years ago (Mya), a duplication of the corresponding region occurred followed by its interchromosomal transposition to the ancestral chromosome 16q. Thus, the most parsimonious interpretation is that the gorilla and chimpanzee homologs exhibit similar but nonidentical derived pericentric inversions, whereas HSA 16 represents the ancestral form among hominoids.

Animals↗