PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hiromichi Sato

Publications and source records attributed to Hiromichi Sato.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Metacontrast masking suggests interaction between visual pathways with different spatial and temporal properties.

We examined the spatiotemporal characteristics of metacontrast using sinusoidal grating stimuli as the target and mask for quantitative comparison with the functional properties of the visual cortex. The magnitude of metacontrast effects depended on the stimulus features such as the orientation and spatial frequency of the target and mask. The characteristics of metacontrast dynamically changed depending on the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). At short SOAs (0 to approximately 40 ms), metacontrast exhibited a high stimulus feature specificity and a low contrast sensitivity, whereas at long SOAs ( approximately 40 to 80 ms), metacontrast exhibited a low stimulus feature specificity and a high contrast sensitivity. We suggest that metacontrast is explained by the interaction between two parallel visual pathways: one with a low contrast sensitivity and a high feature specificity, and the other with a high contrast sensitivity and a low feature specificity.

Adult↗

Contrast-dependent, contextual response modulation in primary visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat.

In the primary visual cortex (V1), the responses of neurons to stimuli presented in their classical receptive fields (CRFs) are modulated by another stimulus concurrently presented in their surround (receptive field surround, SRF). We studied the nature of the modulatory effects of SRF stimulation with respect to stimulus contrast in cat V1. In 51 V1 neurons studied, large SRF stimuli (40 degreesx30 degrees ) induced only the suppression of responses to CRF stimulation and the suppressive effects became stronger as the contrast for SRF stimulation increased. The contrast sensitivity of SRF suppression did not correlate with that of CRF responses. By independently controlling contrast of CRF and SRF stimuli, we studied whether SRF effects vary with CRF response magnitude. Increasing contrast for CRF stimulation caused an upward shift of the range of effective contrasts for SRF stimulation, indicating that a high contrast for SRF stimulation is required for suppressing strong responses to CRF stimulation at high contrasts. To assess the possible origin of the suppressive SRF effect on V1 neurons, we also investigated the contrast dependency of SRF effects in 28 neurons from the lateral geniculate nucleus. Our results suggest that SRF effects obtained at the subcortical level strongly contribute to those in V1. Taken together, we conclude that along the thalamocortical projections, SRF modulation exhibits a gain-control mechanism that scales the suppressive SRF effect depending on the contrast for CRF stimulation. In addition, SRF effects can be facilitatory at low stimulus contrasts potentially due to the enlargement of the summation field.

Algorithms↗

Similarity of direction tuning among responses to stimulation of different whiskers in neurons of rat barrel cortex.

Cells in the rat barrel cortex exhibit stimulus-specific response properties. To understand the network mechanism of direction selectivity in response to facial whisker deflection, we examined direction selectivity of neuronal responses to single- and multi-whisker stimulations. In the case of regular-spiking units, i.e., putative excitatory cells, direction preferences were quite similar between responses to single-whisker stimulation of the principal and adjacent whiskers. In multi-whisker stimulation at short (< or = 5 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISIs), response facilitation was evoked only when the whiskers were deflected to the preferred direction of the response to the single whisker stimulation. These results suggest that there are neuronal networks among cells with different whisker preferences but with a common direction preference that could be the neuronal basis of the direction-selective facilitation of the response to multi-whisker stimulation. In contrast, multi-whisker stimulation at long (> or = 6 ms) ISIs caused non-direction-selective suppression of the response to the second stimulus. In the case of fast-spiking units, i.e., putative inhibitory cells, poor direction selectivity was exhibited. Thus stimulus direction is represented as the direction-selective responses to the single- and multi-whisker stimulations of putative excitatory cells rather than those of putative inhibitory cells.

Action Potentials↗

Relationship between excitation and inhibition underlying size tuning and contextual response modulation in the cat primary visual cortex.

In the primary visual cortex (V1), the single-neuron response to a grating stimulus placed in the classical receptive field (CRF) is suppressed by a similar stimulus presented in the CRF surround. To assess the input mechanism underlying the surround suppression, we tested the effects of iontophoretically administered GABA(A)-receptor antagonist, bicuculline methiodide (BMI), for the 46 V1 neurons in anesthetized cats. First, the stimulus-size tuning curves were studied, with or without BMI administration, for each neuron by changing the size of the grating patch. During the BMI administration, the shape of the normalized size tuning curve did not change considerably. Second, the dependency of surround suppression on the orientation of the surround grating was examined. In the control, the surround suppression showed the clear orientation tuning that peaked at an orientation the same as the optimal orientation of the CRF response. The BMI administration did not change the orientation dependency of surround suppression. We also estimated the relative contribution of excitation and inhibition to the size and orientation tuning of surround suppression. It was concluded that cortical excitation and inhibition were well balanced, having similar tuning profiles for both stimulus size and orientation of the surround grating. Furthermore, surround stimuli used for V1 neurons suppressed the CRF response of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus. These results suggest that surround suppression is not primarily attributable to the intracortical inhibition, but because of a reduction of thalamocortical inputs, which drive the cortical excitation and inhibition, and a subsequent decrease in the cortical excitatory interactions.

Animals↗

Blockade of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase does not prevent the reverse ocular dominance shift in kitten visual cortex.

Monocular deprivation (MD) during the critical period for the development of visual cortex causes a loss of binocular response of neurons and a shift to the open eye, a normal ocular dominance (OD) shift. However, when MD is combined with chronic inactivation of the visual cortex by muscimol, the OD distribution of the neurons shifts to the deprived eye (reverse OD shift). We have previously shown that the normal OD shift is abolished by chronic infusion of the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, 8-chloroadenosine-3', 5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate, Rp-isomer (Rp-8-Cl-cAMPS), into kitten visual cortex. In this study, we investigated the effect of this inhibitor on the reverse OD shift. Combination of MD and muscimol infusion into the visual cortex of 6-wk-old kittens caused a reverse OD shift that was comparable to that seen in previous studies. However, a reverse OD shift was also seen with concurrent infusion of the PKA inhibitor with muscimol. The strongest OD shift was observed in layer IV regardless of the presence or absence of the PKA inhibitor. This suggests that the dissociation of pre- and postsynaptic activities, which occurs mainly at thalamocortical synapses, induces the reverse OD shift and that inhibition of PKA does not prevent it. Presumably, an inhibition of PKA has no effect in silent cortex. We conclude that 1) an activation of PKA is not required for the induction of the reverse OD shift, and 2) the intracellular signaling mechanism underlying MD-induced OD plasticity differs between normal and reverse OD shifts.

Animals↗

Suppressive effects of receptive field surround on neuronal activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Effects of sinusoidal grating stimulus presented outside the classical receptive field (CRF) on neuronal responses were studied in the primary visual cortex of anaesthetized cats. Among 101 cells electrophysiologically recorded, the predominant effect of the stimulus in the receptive field surround (SRF) was the suppression of responses to the CRF stimulation, and the SRF grating suppressed them up to 56% of the responses (44% suppression) to the CRF stimulus alone. The strong suppression was observed more often in layer II/III cells than in other layers and in complex cells more often than in simple cells. The modulatory effects by SRF stimulus might be enhanced by the cortical recurrent excitation particularly in the superficial layers. We also examined whether the modulation by the surround grating exhibits a differential effect according to the presence or absence of figure-ground segregation in the stimulus configuration. For this purpose, effects of stimulus configuration with orientation-, direction-contrast or relative spatial phase difference between CRF and SRF stimuli (figure-ground segregated configuration) were compared with those of uniform configuration of stimulus (non-segregated configuration). There was a population of cells, which exhibited significantly stronger suppression with non-segregated configuration than with figure-ground segregated configuration. Such differential modulation of response by the SRF stimulus in the primary visual cortex is a possible basis of perceptual figure-ground segregation.

Animals↗