Biomedical subjects

Hiroshi Taneichi

Publications and source records attributed to Hiroshi Taneichi.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study of the postoperative subsidence of two interbody devices following posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE: To assess certain radiograph characteristics of PLIF/TLIF using two interbody fusion devices at L4-L5. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PLIF can achieve spinal stabilization with vertebral body support and direct neural decompression. Although various interbody devices have been used in PLIF procedures, no radiographic studies have compared the load-bearing capabilities of open box and fenestrated tube interbody cages. METHODS: Seventy-five patients who underwent one-level PLIF in the L4-L5 [corrected] segment for degenerative spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Fenestrated tube (Group FT: n = 30 [corrected]) or open box (Group OB: n = 45 [corrected]) cages were used for the PLIF procedure. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated to compare the load-bearing capabilities: disc space height (DH); percent increase and decrease of disc height (% IDH and % DDH, respectively); and percent coverage of the cage on the endplate (% CC). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the baseline data, including age, segmental instability and osteoporotic status, between the two groups. Anterior %IDH and % CC were significantly higher in Group OB than in Group FT (% IDH: 69.4% vs. 57.3%; % OC: 24.5% vs. 12.9%), and anterior and posterior % DDH were significantly higher in Group FT than in Group OB (anterior: -2.9% vs. -.1%; posterior: -6.6% vs. -.3%). Although the restored DH gradually reduced over time in both groups, significant reduction to the preoperative level only occurred in Group FT. CONCLUSIONS: The load-bearing capabilities of the open box cage are superior to those of the fenestrated tube cage. Since there were no significant differences between the baseline status of the two groups, the larger cross-sectional area and stable framework design of the open box cage appears to bring about a greater load-bearing capability. Therefore, the open box cage seems to be biomechanically more advantageous as an interbody device for PLIF than the fenestrated tube cage.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Radiological risk factors of pseudoarthrosis and/or instrument breakage after PLF with the pedicle screw system in isthmic spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have reported favorable results of posterolateral fusion (PLF) with pedicle screw systems (PSs) for isthmic spondylolisthesis. However, the best indication and limitations of this method still remain unclear. The present study aimed to analyze the radiological risk factors of pseudoarthrosis and/or instrumentation failure after PLF with PSs in isthmic spondylolisthesis, and to determine the limitations of this method. METHODS: The study group comprised of 101 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent PLF with PSs. Follow-up was performed for more than 5 years. Statistical analyses with multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors of pseudoarthrosis and/or instrument failures associated with PLF with PSs. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 8 years. Fusion rate was 95%. There were instrument breakage in 6 patients, and pseudoarthrosis in 5. Statistical analysis with a logistic regression model revealed that preoperative % disc height (odds ratio: 3.60 per 10%, P<0.01) and slip angle (odds ratio: 4.48 per 10 degrees kyphosis, P<0.05) were the most crucial risk factors of pseudoarthrosis and/or instrument breakage when performing PLF for isthmic spondylolisthesis. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PLF with PSs provided satisfactory results with high fusion rate. However, there were complications including pseudoarthrosis or instrument breakage in specific conditions. Preserved disc height and presence of segmental kyphosis were risk factors of these complications. Statistically, % disc height within 20% without segmental kyphosis was the best indication for PLF with PSs.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral anterior-column fixation with two Brantigan I/F cages per level: clinical outcomes during a minimum 2-year follow-up period.

OBJECT: There are no published reports of unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in which two Brantigan I/F cages were placed per level through a single portal to achieve bilateral anterior-column support. The authors describe such a surgical technique and evaluate the clinical outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: Data obtained in 86 (93.5%) of the first 92 consecutive patients who underwent the procedure were retrospectively reviewed; the minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Disc height, disc angle, cage positioning in the axial plane, and fusion status were radiographically evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 33.8 months. The mean improvement in the JOA score was 77.2%. Fusion was successful in 93% of the cases. According to the Farfan method, the mean anterior and posterior disc heights increased from 20.2 and 16.9% preoperatively to 35.9 and 22.7% at follow up, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean disc angle increased from 4.8degrees preoperatively to 7.5degrees at last follow-up examination (p < 0.01). Two cages were correctly placed to achieve bilateral anterior-column support in greater than 85% of the cases. The following complications occurred: hardware migration in two patients and deep infection cured by intravenous antibiotic therapy in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral TLIF involving the placement of two Brantigan cages per level led to good clinical results. Two Brantigan cages were adequately placed via a single portal, and reliable bilateral anterior-column support was achieved. Although the less invasive unilateral approach was used, the outcomes were as good as those in many reported series of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in which the Brantigan cages were placed via the bilateral approach.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Traumatically induced vertebral artery occlusion associated with cervical spine injuries: prospective study using magnetic resonance angiography.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) on a consecutive cohort of patients with cervical spine injuries. OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical and radiographic features of vertebral artery injury/occlusion associated with nonpenetrating cervical spine trauma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the popularization of MRA, vertebral artery injury has been a common complication of cervical spine trauma. However, detailed clinical features such as restoration of blood flow in occluded vessels and collateral circulation have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: During a 2-year period, 64 consecutive patients with cervical spine fractures and/or dislocations were prospectively evaluated for patency of the vertebral artery and collateral circulation. Extracranial and intracranial MRAs were conducted at initial injury and follow-up. RESULTS: Vertebral artery occlusion occurred in 11 patients, including 10 with unilateral and 1 with bilateral. Only the patient with bilateral occlusion was symptomatic but had no permanent neurologic deficit as a result of brain ischemia. He had complete circle of Willis, which provides sufficient collateral blood supply from anterior circulation. Follow-up MRAs revealed restoration of blood flow in occluded vessel(s) in 3 patients. All of them had compressive injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of traumatically induced vertebral artery occlusion was 17.2%. The potential for blood flow restoration was higher in compressive injuries than in distractive injuries. The mechanism of occlusion in compressive injuries is likely to be vasospasm or minor artery dissection, which may cause reversible occlusion because vessels are subjected to relatively minor stretching in compressive injuries. Vertebral artery occlusion was rarely symptomatic because of sufficient collateral blood supply through not only contralateral vertebral artery but also the circle of Willis.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A biomechanical analysis of metastatic vertebral collapse of the thoracic spine: a sheep model study.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a biomechanical study using sheep thoracic spine to investigate the probability of mechanical failure of the thoracic spine with various sizes or locations of tumor metastasis. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to investigate biomechanical effects of not only tumor sizes within the thoracic vertebral body but also its involvement of other spinal components on the probability of mechanical failures of the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been no experimental studies concerning mechanical influences of destruction of costovertebral joint or posterior elements as well as vertebral body on the load-bearing capacity of the thoracic spine. METHODS: Ninety-nine fresh sheep thoracic spine specimens with ribs were used (T7-T9, T10-T12). Within vertebral bodies of 39 specimens, only trabecular defects were created in different sizes. In other 48 specimens, not only vertebral body defects that were 40% to the cross-sectional area of the vertebral body but also additional destruction of costovertebral joint, pedicle, and facet joint were created. All specimens were subjected to destructive biomechanical testing. RESULTS: The failure load decreased as the defect size in the vertebral body increased. A negative linear correlation was observed between the failure load and the size of vertebral body defect (r = 0.782). With 40% cross-sectional defect in the vertebral body, additional costovertebral joint destruction brought 25% reduction of the failure load, which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The load-bearing capacity of metastasized vertebrae in the thoracic spine was proportionally decreased when the defect size in the vertebral body increased. Destruction of costovertebral joint significantly increased the probability of vertebral collapse.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Nationwide survey on complications of spine surgery in Japan.

The Japan Spine Research Society carried out a nationwide survey on complications of the spine, enrolling a total of 16 157 patients who had undergone spine surgery in 196 institutes in the 1-year period from January to December 2001. Diseases, surgical procedures, and complications were surveyed in detail. Forty-nine percent of patients were aged 60 years or older, which was remarkably increased in comparison with the percentage reported by the 1994 survey (37.3%). The number of cases with degenerative spinal diseases comprised 78.2% of the total number of spine surgery cases. The percentage of patients with stenosis was the greatest (38.5%), reflecting the increase in the elderly population undergoing spine surgery. Spinal instrumentation was used with 5497 patients (34.0%). The frequency of its use was much greater than that reported in 1994 (27.0%). The pedicle screw was the most frequently used instrument (54.6%). The use of spinal instrumentation greatly increased for spinal deformity, trauma, and tumors. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion has been increasingly used in cases of lumbar degenerative disease. Complications of spinal surgery were reported in 1383 patients (8.6%). The incidence of complications associated with instrumentation surgery was 12.1%, being twice as much as that associated with noninstrumentation surgery (6.8%).

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures.

OBJECT: The posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) in the thoracic and lumbar spine is one of the region's important stabilizers. The precise diagnosis of PLC injury is required to evaluate the instability of the injured spine; however, the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnosing PLC injury has remained unclear. In this study, the authors compared preoperative MR imaging findings with direct intraoperative observation of PLC injury, clarifying the former's diagnostic accuracy regarding detection of PLC injury associated with the thoracic and lumbar fractures. METHODS: Data obtained in 35 patients who sustained thoracic or lumbar injuries were reviewed. There were 17 burst fractures, six flexion-distraction injuries, and 12 fracture dislocations. Each patient underwent MR imaging examination within 3 weeks of injury. Three radiologists independently evaluated sagittal MR images in a blinded fashion. The PLC-related information was retrospectively collected from each operative record. The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging was analyzed by comparing imaging-documented intraoperative findings. The PLC injuries were detected in 23 patients (65.7%) by direct observation during posterior spinal procedures. The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in detecting injury of the supraspinous ligament (SSL) and interspinous ligament (ISL) was 90.5 and 94.3%, respectively. The specificity of T1-weighted MR imaging alone for depicting the SSL was significantly greater than T2-weighted imaging alone (p < 0.05). The overall mean kappa coefficient for MR imaging findings of PLC injury was 0.803, which indicated excellent interobserver reliability; that for ISL (0.915) was significantly greater than that for SSL (0.69) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified a high diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of MR imaging for PLC injury. The precise diagnosis of PLC injury is essential to determine the mechanical instability of the injured thoracic and lumbar spine, especially in differentiating unstable (three-column) burst fractures from the relatively stable (two-column) type. The authors conclude that MR imaging is a powerful diagnostic tool to evaluate PLC injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures.

Humans↗